logo
Troop numbers won't increase for at least four years, says Defence Secretary

Troop numbers won't increase for at least four years, says Defence Secretary

Telegraph01-06-2025
Troop numbers will not increase for at least four years, the Defence Secretary has admitted.
Ahead of Monday's publication of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR), John Healey said he did not expect the number of people in the Army to rise until the next parliament.
It comes despite speculation that Labour could look to reverse the British Army troop cuts made under the previous Tory government.
Asked on the BBC's Sunday Morning With Laura Kuenssberg when the 'depleted' Army would reach its target of 73,000 people in the force, Mr Healey said there had been '15 years of a recruitment and retention crisis in our forces', of which the 'last government set and missed targets every year in every service for those 14 years'.
'We've narrowed the gap, but we've still got more people leaving than joining,' he said.
'The first job is to reverse that trend and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number of our full-time forces.'
However, pushed on why this target could not be achieved sooner Mr Healey said: 'My first task as Defence Secretary is to reverse that long run decline, that deep set crisis in recruitment, deep set crisis in retention.'
In May last year the number of Army personnel fell below 73,000 for the first time since the Napoleonic era.
Under Ben Wallace, the former defence secretary, it was announced that the Army was to be reduced to 72,500 personnel by 2025, scrapping the 82,000 target which had been set in 2015.
Troop numbers have been cut by around 27,500 since 2010. When Labour was last in office, the Army had more than 100,000 soldiers.
Mr Healey also sidestepped questions about whether he had any guarantee from the Treasury that funding would be committed to boost defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2034.
Asked what he would tell Nato allies at an upcoming summit after calls for members to spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence, he said: 'The heart of this is not just how much the nations spend, but how we spend it.
'And you will see just as much concentration on what are the capabilities that Nato together needs in order to deter adversaries in the future.'
'We have to be prepared'
The Defence Secretary said that Monday's SDR would send a 'message to Moscow'.
He said: 'This is a message to Moscow as well. This is Britain standing behind, making our Armed Forces stronger but making our industrial base stronger, and this is part of our readiness to fight, if required.'
Mr Healey revealed Russia is ' attacking the UK daily ' in cyberspace.
Asked if he expected a form of real-world attack by Russia on the UK in the coming years, he said: 'We have to be prepared. Nato has to be prepared. We see Putin in Ukraine trying to redraw international boundaries by force... it's part of the growing Russian aggression.'
Mr Healey added that is why Nato and the UK are 'stepping up our ability to deter as well as to defend in the future'.
'The world is more uncertain. The tensions are greater but we prepare for war in order to secure the peace. If you're strong enough to defeat an enemy you deter them from attacking in the first place.'
Earlier this week Mr Healey announced the British military is to spend more than £1 billion on artificial intelligence and a hacking-attack team.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump praises Zelensky's attire for White House meeting
Trump praises Zelensky's attire for White House meeting

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump praises Zelensky's attire for White House meeting

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky arrived at the White House today for the first time since an explosive row with Donald Trump in February. The US President is hosting European leaders at the White House today to discuss plans for an immediate ceasefire to end the Ukraine-Russia war . Zelensky will be joined by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italy's Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Germany's Friedrich Merz and more. The Ukrainian leader was kicked out of the White House in a previous meeting after a shouting match erupted between the two leaders during a press conference, leaving Zelensky to walk out of the West Wing and into his SUV prematurely . Amongst the fiery exchange, Brian Glenn, Chief White House Correspondent Real America's Voice, asked Zelensky: 'Why don't you wear a suit? You're at the highest level in this country's office and you refuse to wear a suit. Do you own a suit? 'A lot of Americans have problems, with you not respecting the dignity of this office.' Responding to the criticism at the time, the Ukrainian leader said he faced more pressing problems with the war in Europe. He added that he 'will wear a kostium (Ukrainian for 'suit') after this war will finish' and it would be 'maybe something like yours, maybe something better, maybe something cheaper'. In a sign of support towards Zelensky, before the meeting escalated into a tense war of words, Trump quickly came to his aid and defended the president's clothing. 'I do like your clothing by the way,' Trump said. 'I don't know if you two like each other, but I think he (Zelensky) is dressed beautifully.' However, reports suggested that Trump privately was irritated by Zelensky's attire. The Ukrainian leader has rarely been seen wearing anything other than casual combat clothes since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 and has even visited 10 Downing Street and Buckingham Palace without a suit. Supporters of Zelensky have compared him to the UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who notably also refused to wear a suit during a visit to the White House in the midst of World War Two. However, Zelensky was seen today wearing a suit in a potential bid to please the US President ahead of the crucial talks. The European leaders traveling to Washington DC today are being dubbed Mr Zelensky's 'back-up' following the previous acrimonious visit to the White House. Ahead of today's meeting, Trump posted a series of angry social media posts, tearing into the 'fake news' media for calling the meeting a 'big loss '. 'Actually, it is a great honor for America!!!' he insisted. The president also defended his high-stakes meeting with Russian President Putin on Friday in Alaska, which ended without a ceasefire deal or rough framework for peace with Ukraine. He also sent supporters into a tailspin on Sunday after posting a one-word message 'bela' to his Truth Social without additional context. Tempers flared on all sides during February's Oval Office showdown. Trump threatened to abandon Ukraine completely if Zelensky did not agree to his peace terms. He also accused the Ukrainian leader of not being grateful. Zelensky showed Trump photos he brought of the devastation to his country, and argued he had thanked the American people. The yelling match was unlike anything ever seen publicly in the Oval Office. And it played out on TV screens across the world. 'You're gambling with World War III,' Trump bellowed Zelensky at one point. Both men were tense and on the defensive as they repeatedly tried to talk over one another. Oksana Markarova, Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S., seated to the side in the Oval Office , buried her face in her hands. After the heated meeting Trump announced he had asked Zelensky to leave . The row started when Trump was pressed on historic Russian domination of its neighbors and repositioning the U.S. toward Russia. 'If I didn't align myself with both of them, you'd never have a deal,' Trump explained. 'You want me to say really terrible things about Putin and then say: 'Hi, Vladimir. How are we doing on the deal? It doesn't work that way. I'm not aligned with anybody. I'm aligned with the United States of America.' Then Vice President JD Vance jumped in. 'I will respond to this. So look, for four years the United States of America, we had a president who stood up the press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country,' said Vance. 'The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy. Then a fight over history ensued, as Zelensky ran through Ukraine's 2014 illegal annexation of Crimea. After Zelensky mentioned 2015, Trump jumped in: 'I was not here.' 'But during 2014 till 2022 … people have been dying on the contact line. Then he brought up broken ceasefire and other agreements. 'What kind of diplomacy JD was speaking about?,' asked Zelensky. 'I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country, Mr. President, Mr. President, with respect. I think it's disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media,' Vance told Zelensky, whose country has been under siege since 2022, and who came to Washington to ink a deal that will give the U.S. access to its rare earth minerals.' 'Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems, you should be thanking the president,' Vance told him. Vance accused Zelensky of bringing in dignitaries to his country on 'a propaganda tour' 'Do you think that it's respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?' Vance berated him. Zelensky tried to respond, but that only angered Trump more. 'Don't tell us what we're going to feel, because you're in no position to dictate,' he said. 'You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position,' Trump told Zelensky, after last week calling him a 'dictator' and blaming Ukraine for starting the war . Yelling with his face getting red, Trump intoned: 'You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now … You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. 'You're gambling with World War Three. You're gambling with World War Three, and what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country – this country that's backed to you far more than a lot of people say they should have. 'Have you said thank you once, this entire meeting,' Vance said next in the tag team pile-on. 'You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October,' Vance, said, characterizing Zelensky's trip to an ammunition factory. 'Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country,' he demanded. 'You think that, if you will speak very loudly,' Zelensky tried to counter in his accented English. 'He's not speaking loudly,' Trump said. 'Your country is in big trouble.' 'I know,' Zelensky responded. 'You're not winning. You're not winning this,' Trump told him. Zelensky got a moment to try to counter, saying 'in our country, staying strong, from the very beginning of the war, we've been alone, and we are thankful.' Trump contradicted him, telling him he hadn't been alone. 'We gave you, through this stupid president, $350 billion we gave you military equipment,' he said, overstating the amount of military hardware. Trump said Zelensky's men are 'brave,' but then told him, 'If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.' 'It's going to be a very hard thing to do business like this,' Trump said. That brought Vance back to demanding thanks. 'Just say thank you,' Vance told him. 'I said it a lot of times,' Zelensky responded. Then Trump gave remarks indicating the blow-up was serving a purpose for him. 'I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful you don't have the cards. You're buried there. You people are dying. You're running low on soldiers,' Trump said. 'You're running low on soldiers. Listen, you're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing. Then you tell us, 'I don't want a cease fire. I don't want a cease fire,' Trump said, delivering a mocking impression of his counterpart. 'I want to go, and I want this – look, you could get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed.' 'Of course I want to stop the war. What I said to you – with guarantees,' Zelensky said. He has been pushing for security guarantees from the U.S. Shortly after the argument, Trump ended the public part of the meeting. 'This is going to be great television, I will say that,' he said. As press was being ushered out, President Trump reached over and patted Zelensky's shoulder.

UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws
UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws

Daily Mail​

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws

Britain's first transgender judge has lodged an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. Victoria McCloud is seeking a rehearing of the case as she claims the UK's highest court undermined her Article 6 rights to a fair trial when it declined to hear evidence from her. In April the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that 'woman' and 'man' refer to biological women and men in the context of the Equality act and that 'the concept of sex is binary'. Ms McCloud - who left her role as a judge last year - is seeking a review as she claims the Supreme Court refused permission for her to provide evidence on how its clarification of the law would affect trans people. But women's rights campaigners have dismissed the case as a 'fantasy' and say Ms McCloud should exhaust 'all domestic legal remedies' before appealing to the court in Strasbourg. The former judge will be represented by Oscar Davies, the UK's first openly non-binary barrister, and Olivia Campbell-Cavendish, the founder of the Trans Legal Clinic and the UK's first black trans lawyer. 'There is no space for decision-making about us, without us,' Ms McCloud said in a statement yesterday. 'I intend to ensure that there will be no peace for the gender-critical ideological movement, the Labour Government appeasing it, or space in our schools, homes and workplaces for an ideology which causes harm, misery and oppression of a small and law-abiding minority in our formerly tolerant country.' A spokesman for the Trans Legal Clinic said: 'For the trans community, it embodies a simple truth: there must be no more conversations about us, without us. 'At its heart lies the principle in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the right to a fair and impartial hearing by an independent tribunal. 'This cornerstone of democratic societies exists to guarantee that those whose rights are affected can take part in proceedings that determine their future.' However Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said Ms McCloud's appeal is legally 'incomprehensible' and a 'fantasy'. She said: 'What we are being told about this proposed case is incomprehensible. The ECHR only hears cases that have exhausted all domestic legal remedies, and since McCloud wasn't a party to For Women Scotland in the Supreme Court, that's not the case here. 'It's a fantasy that someone can go straight to Strasbourg to complain that the Supreme Court in their own country didn't listen to them.' Ms Forstater added: 'This looks more like a deceptive and expensive PR campaign than a serious legal strategy.' The Supreme Court can consider outside arguments from 'interveners' at its discretion but rarely allows individuals to intervene and often rejects them if it will hear the same arguments from others. In the biological sex case, the UK's highest court did consider arguments on trans issues from the human rights campaign group Amnesty International. Susan Smith - from For Women Scotland, which brought the Supreme Court case - said that it is the Supreme Court's 'prerogative whether to accept interventions or not' and that it 'rarely takes interventions from individuals' 'We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed,' she added. Ms McCloud transitioned in the 1990s and became the first transgender barrister and judge in the UK. She stood down last year, saying she could not continue her work amid the increasingly fraught public debate. In her resignation letter, Ms McCloud likened herself to civil rights activist Rosa Parks. It comes as Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy was criticised for wearing a trans rights T-shirt with the slogan 'protect the dolls' while attending a Pride march in her Wigan constituency. Critics have said a government minister should not be promoting the slogan and described it as a 'middle finger from the Labour Government'. The term 'doll' is a slang term from the 1980s for biological men who 'pass' as women but has seen a revival after celebrities including Pedro Pascal, Madonna and Tilda Swinton were photographed in a £75 T-shirt emblazoned with the slogan. James Esses, a gender critical campaigner and therapist, said it was a 'middle finger from the Labour Government to everyone who believes in biological reality'. Fiona McAnena, from Sex Matters, said: 'No elected representative of the public - let alone a government minister - should be promoting the slogan of campaigners who are calling for men to be able to identify into any space for women'. The Culture Secretary was contacted for comment.

Ofwat – what are they thinking of?
Ofwat – what are they thinking of?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Ofwat – what are they thinking of?

Following major sewage breaches by Thames Water, Ofwat imposed a massive fine on it, the only effect being to make it still further unable to perform its legal responsibilities, instead of obtaining authority to prosecute the responsible executives of the company. Then the powers that be announced the imminence of a drought, yet the public has not been urged to cut water use. Can any of your readers enlighten me as to the thought process of our water regulators?Prof Roy GoodeOxford I have not enjoyed a double-yolk egg for more than 30 years until last week, when all six in a box of free-range eggs had double yolks. Rachel Reeves would have no worries if we could all raise our productivity by the same JohnsonBedford I was delighted by the excellent review of Beaumaris's launderette (Letters, 17 August). However, the Blue Bay Launderette in Llangollen is even more marvellous. Just in case anyone camping in north Wales needs one, the Welsh word for launderette is CollinsCarrog, Denbighshire To an atheist like me, this dispute over Good Friday (Letters, 14 August) is like two bald men fighting over a Joss BuckleyLondon On reflection, I find the planting of a potato tuber or seed into the ground on Good Friday deeply symbolic. I commend Christians and non-Christians to do so next spring, on 3 April Canon John Longuet-HigginsHartpury, Gloucestershire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store