Why are maths competitions on the rise in Central Asia?
Maths competitions are booming in Central Asia, with thousands of young people participating in olympiads in countries such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.
The region has a proud history of mathematics. Al-Khwarizmi, a 9th-century scholar known as the "father of algebra", was born in Khiva, a city in modern-day Uzbekistan.
The subject was also important during the USSR's rule over the region, as maths was viewed as a strategic asset during the Cold War's arms and space race.
Although Central Asian countries have long placed special emphasis on STEM subjects including maths, they currently do not excel in international rankings.
In fact, Kazakhstan is the only country in the region which consistently ranks within the first 30 countries at the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO).
That could be about to change with the rise of maths competitions in Central Asia, which now include Turkmenistan's Open Mathematics Olympiad for University Students and Kazakhstan's International Zhautykov Olympiad.
Last year, Nordic International University in Uzbekistan launched the Tashkent International Mathematics Olympiad (TASIMO).
Sherzod Mustafakulov, the university's rector, believes such competitions will be good for the region's economic development.
'Olympiads, especially mathematical ones, stimulate socio-economic development primarily by improving the quality of human capital,' Mustafakulov said.
'They identify and nurture talented young people capable of innovation and solving complex problems, which is critical for progress in science, technology and the economy," he added.
Indeed, studies have shown a strong correlation between participation in STEM competitions and future career success.
A study conducted by St. John's University in New York and the University of Helsinki which tracked 1,093 students over 11 years found that, alongside a conducive home environment and personal motivation, specialised programmes and competitions played a crucial role in fostering long-term engagement in STEM fields.
Mustafakulov said his university had invited mathematics professors from across the world to TASIMO and had introduced challenging problems "which attracted participants from all over Eurasia".
"We are also working with the IMO from Romania to share our experience and further improve the quality level of the competition," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
5 days ago
- France 24
Trump-Musk showdown threatens US space plans
So when President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cancel Elon Musk's federal contracts, space watchers snapped to attention. Musk, the world's richest person, shot back that he would mothball Dragon -- the capsule NASA relies on for crew flights -- before retracting the threat a few hours later. For now, experts say mutual dependence should keep a full-blown rupture at bay, but the episode exposes just how disruptive any break could be. Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. Driven by Musk's ambition to make humanity multiplanetary, it is now NASA's sole means of sending astronauts to the ISS -- a symbol of post–Cold War cooperation and a testbed for deeper space missions. Space monopoly? The company has completed 10 regular crew rotations to the orbiting lab and is contracted for four more, under a deal worth nearly $5 billion. That's just part of a broader portfolio that includes $4 billion from NASA for developing Starship, the next-generation megarocket; nearly $6 billion from the Space Force for launch services; and a reported $1.8 billion for Starshield, a classified spy satellite network. Were Dragon grounded, the United States would again be forced to rely on Russian Soyuz rockets for ISS access -- as it did between 2011 and 2020, following the Space Shuttle's retirement and before Crew Dragon entered service. "Under the current geopolitical climate, that would not be optimal," space analyst Laura Forczyk told AFP. NASA had hoped Boeing's Starliner would provide redundancy, but persistent delays -- and a failed crewed test last year -- have kept it grounded. Even Northrop Grumman's cargo missions now rely on SpaceX's Falcon 9, the workhorse of its rocket fleet. The situation also casts a shadow over NASA's Artemis program. A lunar lander variant of Starship is slated for Artemis III and IV, the next US crewed Moon missions. If Starship were sidelined, rival Blue Origin could benefit -- but the timeline would almost certainly slip, giving China, which aims to land humans by 2030, a chance to get there first, Forczyk warned. "There are very few launch vehicles as capable as Falcon 9 -- it isn't feasible to walk away as easily as President Trump might assume," she said. Still, the feud could sour Trump on space altogether, she added, complicating NASA's long-term plans. SpaceX isn't entirely dependent on the US government. Starlink subscriptions and commercial launches account for a significant share of its revenue, and the company also flies private missions. The next, with partner Axiom Space, will carry astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary, funded by their respective governments. Private power, public risk But losing US government contracts would still be a major blow. "It's such a doomsday scenario for both parties that it's hard to envision how US space efforts would fill the gap," Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP. "Both sides have every reason to bridge the disagreement and get back to business." Signs of a rift emerged last weekend, when the White House abruptly withdrew its nomination of e-payments billionaire Jared Isaacman -- a close Musk ally who has twice flown to space with SpaceX -- as NASA administrator. On a recent podcast, Isaacman said he believed he was dropped because "some people had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target." The broader episode could also reignite debate over Washington's reliance on commercial partners, particularly when one company holds such a dominant position. Swope noted that while the US government has long favored buying services from industry, military leaders tend to prefer owning the systems they depend on. "This is just another data point that might bolster the case for why it can be risky," he said. "I think that seed has been planted in a lot of people's minds -- that it might not be worth the trust."
Sustainability Times
5 days ago
- Sustainability Times
'Radioactive Dust From the Desert': Nuclear-Contaminated Saharan Sand Rains Down on France, Shocking Scientists and Alarming the Public
IN A NUTSHELL 🌍 The Sahara regularly transports sand to Europe, sometimes carrying invisible particles that can be hazardous. regularly transports sand to Europe, sometimes carrying that can be hazardous. 🔍 In March 2022, cesium-137 was detected in sand that fell on France, initially linked to French nuclear tests. was detected in sand that fell on France, initially linked to French nuclear tests. 💡 Recent research identified that the radioactivity originated from international nuclear tests during the Cold War. during the Cold War. 🌱 Climate change may increase the transport of radioactive materials, necessitating international cooperation for monitoring. In March 2022, a striking phenomenon captivated both scientists and the public in Western Europe. A Saharan sandstorm swept across the region, painting the sky an ominous orange. While visually arresting, this event unveiled a hidden danger: the presence of radioactive particles in the sand deposits. Initially, authorities attributed this radioactivity to French nuclear tests conducted in the 1960s in Algeria. However, recent research has uncovered far more complex and concerning origins for this contamination. The Supposed Origins of Radioactivity in Saharan Sand The Sahara, often seen as a timeless traveler, regularly transports vast quantities of sand to Europe. This sand, laden with invisible particles, can occasionally prove hazardous. In March 2022, Parisian skies turned ochre, prompting scientists to analyze air quality. The findings revealed the presence of cesium-137, a radioactive particle. Initially, the contamination was linked to French nuclear tests in Algeria, with traces believed to have persisted, still tainting European skies. However, this explanation turned out to be incomplete. Researchers discovered that the source of this radioactivity was far more global. Analyses highlighted that the cesium-137 originated from international nuclear tests conducted during the Cold War. This discovery underscores a far more complex and worldwide history of contamination than previously believed. Avian Apocalypse in the Desert: Saudi Arabia's 105-Mile-Long Megastructure Threatens Mass Bird Deaths Along Key Migration Corridors Scientific Analysis of Radioactive Particles Researchers measured a median concentration of 14 becquerels per kilogram of cesium-137 in the sand, with peaks reaching up to 1,000 Bq/kg. While these figures are significant, they remain below the safety thresholds defined by the European Union. Nonetheless, vigilance is essential, as even low concentrations can have long-term effects on public health. To determine the origin of this radioactivity, scientists employed advanced isotopic analysis techniques. Each nuclear test leaves a unique chemical signature, enabling identification of precise sources of contamination. This expertise revealed that the radioactive particles stemmed from atmospheric residues left by American and Soviet tests, raising questions about international responsibility for radioactive pollution. 'Jurassic Tree Lives Again': 200-Million-Year-Old 'Dinosaur Tree' Successfully Bred in Stunning Scientific Breakthrough Environmental Impact and Climate Change With climate change, Saharan sandstorms may become more frequent, increasing the transport of radioactive materials. Growing erosion and shifting climate conditions exacerbate this phenomenon. Experts estimate that global warming is altering weather patterns, thereby facilitating the dispersion of toxic particles over distant territories. This raises concerns about the already fragile global ecological balance. Deposits of radioactive dust could have worrying ecological and health impacts if these episodes become more frequent. Consequently, international cooperation is crucial to monitor and understand these natural processes, which have become involuntary vectors of health risks. '268 Olympic Pools Below Ground': World's Largest Hidden Reservoir Discovered in Shocking Subterranean Water Breakthrough What Are the Stakes for Tomorrow? In light of these challenges, it is imperative to strengthen interdisciplinary research to anticipate the effects of climate change on the dispersion of radioactivity. This situation calls for close cooperation between countries to ensure continuous monitoring and develop reliable atmospheric predictive methods. Decision-makers and communities must be prepared to implement effective adaptation strategies. The question remains: how can we balance environmental protection and health risk management in a context where climate and nuclear issues are increasingly intertwined? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (21)
France 24
02-06-2025
- France 24
Milky Way may not be destroyed in galactic smash-up after all
But don't worry either way: no galactic smash-up is expected for billions of years, long after our ageing Sun will have burnt away all life on Earth. The Milky Way and the even-larger galaxy Andromeda are speeding towards each other at 100 kilometres (60 miles) a second, and scientists have long predicted they will collide in around 4.5 billion years. That would be bad news for our neighbourhood. Previous research has suggested that the Sun -- and our Earth -- could wind up in the centre of this newly merged "Milkomeda" galaxy and get sucked into its supermassive black hole. Alternatively, the Sun could be shot out into the emptiness of intergalactic space. However "proclamations of the impending demise of our galaxy seem greatly exaggerated", according to a new study in the journal Nature Astronomy. There is only a roughly 50 percent chance the Milky Way and Andromeda will smash into each other in the next 10 billion years, the international team of astrophysicists determined. "It's basically a coin flip," lead study author Till Sawala of the University of Helsinki told AFP. The researchers ran more than 100,000 computer simulations of our universe's future, using new observations from space telescopes. A galaxy merger in the next five billion years is "extremely unlikely", Sawala said. Much more likely is that the galaxies will zoom relatively close to each other -- say, a little under 500,000 light years away. In only half of the simulations did dark matter then eventually drag the two galaxies together into a cataclysmic embrace. But this would likely only occur in around eight billion years -- long after our Sun has died, the researchers found. "So it could be that our galaxy will end up destroyed," Sawala said. "But it's also possible that our galaxy and Andromeda will orbit one another for tens of billions of years -- we just don't know." Galaxy's fate 'open' "The fate of our galaxy is still completely open," the study summarised. The researchers emphasised that their findings did not mean that previous calculations were incorrect, just that they had used newer observations and taken into account the effect of more satellite galaxies. Future data releases from Europe's recently retired Gaia space telescope as well as Hubble could provide a definitive answer to this question within the next decade, Sawala predicted. How much all this all matters to us is a matter of debate. The Sun is expected to make Earth inhospitable to life in around a billion years. "We might have some emotional attachment" to what happens after we're gone, Sawala said. "I might prefer the Milky Way not to collide with Andromeda, even though it has absolutely no relevance to my own life -- or the lives of my children or great-great grandchildren." © 2025 AFP
