Peter Sullivan has murder conviction quashed after 38 years in jail
A 68-year-old man who has spent 38 years in jail has had his murder conviction quashed at the court of appeal in what is thought to be the longest-running miscarriage of justice in British history.
Peter Sullivan was wrongly convicted in 1987 for the frenzied murder of a florist and part-time pub worker, Diane Sindall, 21, who was killed as she left work in Bebington, Merseyside.
It was alleged that in August 1986, Sullivan had spent the day drinking heavily after losing a darts match and went out armed with a crowbar before a chance encounter with Sindall.
Her florist van had broken down on her way home from a pub shift and she was walking towards a petrol station when she was beaten to death and sexually assaulted. Her body was left partly clothed and mutilated.
Sullivan has always protested his innocence and lawyers have tried twice before to get his conviction overturned.
In a statement read by his lawyer Sarah Myatt outside the court on his behalf, Sullivan said too many horrors had been inflicted on him to detail.
'As God is my witness, it is said the truth shall take you free,' he said. 'It is unfortunate that it does not give a timescale as we advance towards resolving the wrongs done to me, I am not angry, I am not bitter. I am simply anxious to return to my loved ones and family as I've got to make the most of what is left of the existence I am granted in this world.'
New tests ordered by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) revealed that Sullivan's DNA was not present on samples preserved at the time.
Duncan Atkinson KC, for the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court of appeal that analysis of the DNA showed it came from someone known as 'unknown male one', and that it was 'one billion times more likely that the sample originated from unknown male one, rather than someone else, and it did not match the appellant'.
He said: 'Had this DNA evidence been available at the time a decision was taken to prosecute, it is difficult to see how a decision to prosecute could have been made.'
Quashing the conviction, Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Goss and Mr Justice Bryan, said: 'In the light of that evidence, it is impossible to regard the appellant's conviction as safe.'
Sullivan, who attended the hearing via video link from HMP Wakefield, listened to the ruling with his head down and arms folded, and appeared to weep and put his hand to his mouth as his conviction was quashed.
As the judgment was read out, his sister Kim Smith tearfully declared: 'We've done it.'
Outside court, she said: 'We lost Peter for 39 years and at the end of the day it's not just us, Peter hasn't won and neither has the Sindall family. They've lost their daughter, they are not going to get her back.'
Merseyside police said the crucial DNA evidence was not available during the original investigation and officers were now 'committed to doing everything' to find the person whose DNA was left at the scene where Diane Sindall died.
Det Ch Supt Karen Jaundrill said that more than 260 men had been screened and eliminated from the investigation since it was reopened in 2023.
She said: 'Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Diane Sindall who continue to mourn her loss and will have to endure the implications of this new development so many years after her murder. We are committed to doing everything within our power to find whom the DNA, which was left at the scene, belongs to.
'Unfortunately, there is no match for the DNA identified on the national DNA database.'
But she said that, with the help of the National Crime Agency (NCA), officers were 'proactively trying to identify the person the DNA profile belongs to'.
Holroyde said a decision by the CCRC in 2008 that scientific techniques at the time would not yield a DNA profile was 'plainly correct'.
He said: 'The brutal attack which ended Miss Sindall's young life also blighted the lives of her fiance, her family and all those who loved her. We offer our condolences to the bereaved.'
James Burley, who led the investigation by the charity Appeal into the case of Andrew Malkinson, said: 'Peter Sullivan's exoneration today after nearly four decades of wrongful imprisonment provides further evidence that our current appeals system cannot be trusted to swiftly identify and rectify miscarriages of justice.
'Between them, Peter Sullivan, Andrew Malkinson and Victor Nealon spent over 70 years wrongly imprisoned before finally being exonerated by compelling DNA evidence. Each had their cases previously rejected by both the court of appeal and the CCRC – the institutions which are meant to act as our justice system's safety net. The case for an urgent overhaul of the appeals system is now overwhelming.'
His comments were echoed by Prof Rebecca Helm, who runs the miscarriages of justice registry at the University of Exeter law school.
'The case underscores the importance of having a mechanism through which convictions based on evidence that is known to be misleading (including weak or incorrectly described forensic science) can be scrutinised even in the absence of 'new' evidence in order to protect others who have been wrongfully convicted, and to ensure that true perpetrators are brought to justice,' she said.
The prime minister's spokesperson called it a 'grave miscarriage of justice' and said: 'We must carefully consider this judgment and look at how this could have happened, to get both him [Sullivan] and Diane's family the answers they deserve.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Homes and Shops Burn in Northern Ireland in Riot Over Sexual Assault Case
The police in Northern Ireland have condemned an outbreak of disorder in the town of Ballymena on Monday night in which 15 officers were injured and houses and shops were set on fire. Officers came under 'sustained attack' for several hours, according to the Police Service of Northern Ireland, which said in a statement that rioters, many of whom were masked, had thrown petrol bombs, fireworks, heavy masonry and bricks at the police. The statement added that attacks on several houses and businesses, in which some had windows and doors smashed and others were set on fire, were being investigated as racially motivated hate attacks. Three people were evacuated from four homes that were set alight, and some of the 15 officers who were injured required hospital treatment. The violence followed the appearance in court earlier on Monday of two 14-year-old boys who had been charged with serious sexual assault of a teenage girl on Saturday night. Both boys have been charged with attempted oral rape and deny the charges, the BBC reported, adding that they had confirmed their names and ages through a Romanian interpreter. A planned demonstration in Ballymena over the case began at about 7:30 p.m. on Monday. Crowds of people made their way through the town and toward the scene of the alleged assault, Clonavon Terrace. The police said that the procession was 'initially peaceful' and officers were present because of the large number of people who had gathered. But later a number of masked individuals broke away and began to build barricades, stockpiling missiles and attacking properties, the police added. Far-right groups and influencers on social media had amplified news of the assault case and celebrated the violence. Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson said: 'The shocking scenes of disorder on the streets of Ballymena have to be condemned in the strongest terms.' 'I would strongly urge anyone who was involved in yesterday's rioting and disorder to think long and hard about their actions,' he added. 'Violence and disorder will only place people at greater risk.' A 29-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of riotous and disorderly behavior and other offenses. The police said they were also investigating reports of a petrol bomb attack in the village of Cullybackey, around three miles away, shortly after midnight on Tuesday. A vehicle was set on fire and a nearby property, with a woman and two children inside, was damaged, in what investigators are treating as a racially motivated hate crime.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
How Similar Are Whisky Cask Investment Firms To Scammers Of The Past?
In an article on the blog of whisky retailer Master of Malt, former Diageo executive, archivist and whisky historian Dr. Nick Morgan provides examples of promises made by Scotch whisky cask investment firms to the general public: '15 – 30% capital growth per annum'; 'in four years your matured whisky may double in value'; 'malt whisky investment shows an average profit of 50% at maturity.' They sound awfully similar to ads from Scotch whisky cask investment companies that I've come across too: 'Cask whisky saw 15.86% growth in 2022'; '12% typical annual returns', '36.3% return in 3 years', 'a strong asset with the potential for significant capital appreciation' The difference? Morgan's examples are from the late 1960s and 1970s, when prospective investors not involved with the whisky industry were lured into investing into whisky casks - and fell for schemes where all their money was lost. My examples come from Scotch whisky cask investment ads that have shown up on my social media feed within the last year. All these promises past and present form part a pattern that repeats itself every 25 years and it has a familiar script - a new crop of upstart companies enter the whisky industry and tell prospective whisky investors unfamiliar with the market that putting money into Scotch whisky casks will deliver high profits at low risk. The reality is much different. The majority of investors who put their money into such schemes in the past lost everything or were left with casks not worth nearly the value that they were promised. It happened in the 1970s, in the late 1990s/early 2000s, and it's starting to happen again now. However, thanks to new technology and social media the scale at which the current crop of Scotch whisky cask investment firms operates is truly impressive. Morgan warned me that he believes that the dangers of fraud are larger than ever: 'Compared to the previous two [periods where scams took place] A court case from 1973, SEC v. Haffenden-Rimar International, involved defendants charged with selling unlicensed securities under the guise of whisky investments. Investors were told their money would grow as the whisky aged—but many of the casks either didn't exist or had been misrepresented. The scam resurfaced in the late 1990s and early 2000s with companies like Hamilton Spirit Management and Marshall Wineries. These firms used phone sales and print ads to attract investors, promoting casks at heavily marked-up prices and assuring buyers of strong, reliable returns. These casks were often resold multiple times, and when the companies went under, most investors were left with nothing. The promises made to investors today—steady growth, strong returns, a tangible asset—haven't changed for decades. The pillars of how these scams work - either by overcharging for casks and/or not actually providing proper ownership over a cask - remains the same. Morgan sees clear similarities to today: 'Relentless high-pressure sales techniques, inflated promises in terms of return and security of your investment and vastly inflated prices", he noted, 'this is the same palette of sharp practices that was employed 40 or 50 years ago and 20 or 25 years ago is the same one that's been deployed today, but at a higher technological level.' Indeed, the BBC's groundbreaking investigative show and podcast series about whisky cask investment scams, both titled Hunting the Whisky Bandits, revealed how three different firms, Cask Whisky Ltd, Cask Spirits Global Ltd, and Whisky Scotland, recently collapsed after having done the exact same thing to their clients. It's not about cold calls or a reliance on classified ads in the investment sections of newspapers and magazines anymore (though this is also happening today, through ads and sponsored content placed in mainstream publications). Laurence Cook is a producer who worked and was deeply involved with Hunting The Whisky Bandits. In a webinar interview with a consumer protection website I co-founded, he emphasized how today's scammers use digital tools to broaden their reach and sharpen their approach. 'These are people that can build slick websites, slick social media profiles. They're people that are committed to creating content that is targeted.' This expanded reach is translating into significantly more victims. Cook described the process of finding burned investors when he started investigative work for the series: 'There was an incredible human story in this, which was a lot of people had been exploited by a group of people, a fairly large group of people, working with kind of impunity and that was something worth looking into', he said. "We immediately knew was that the scale of this was massive. And secondly, as soon as the team began reaching out to victims, and we started finding people all over the place and in of infinite variety in terms of backgrounds and amounts that they'd invested, we also just found huge numbers of victims." Though his series and podcast only focuses on three firms, Cook is sure that this is just the tip of the iceberg and there are many others operating in the same way today as well. Over the course of his investigation, Cook and his team discovered that at least a few current operators may have been new to cask whisky investment, but aren't new to scam work. He makes chillingly clear the kinds of people who are often involved in this sector: 'It's fairly obvious, once you start digging on a few of them, that there were links to previous commodity scams, you know, be that wine, gold, art, whatever, and that these were people working in with an MO basically of sell a asset that you you tell the customer is a tangible thing that will go up in value, but it's tangible, but they shouldn't touch it. It's taking storage", he explains. "Fine wine was a kind of common denominator across a lot of the people that we looked at. Or they previously had been involved in property abroad, things that basically you have to take on trust in terms of the scale of customers and the scale of loss.' That model, selling an asset that's technically tangible but somewhat out of reach, works well with whisky. Investors usually don't see the casks they supposedly own. If purchasing through a middleman like a cask investment firm, they don't even necessarily safely own them unless they receive a document called a delivery order, which provides real legal proof of ownership under U.K. law. (Technically, clear contact between warehouse and cask owner fulfills that legal ownership requirement, but a D.O. is the industry standard). So far, these are hardly ever actually provided by most Scotch whisky cask investment firms. For those affected, the damage isn't just financial. As Cook pointed out during our webinar, 'We found people who hadn't told their families the true scale of the loss. We found people who are contemplated taking their own lives. We found people who would talk to us for background conversations, but wouldn't talk on air because of the shame that they felt.' There's a reason similar tactics have been used by Scotch whisky cask investment firms from the past and present - their goal has been the same. It is to develop a kind of product that provides them with a profit - and it's not whisky. That is just the lure. The money-making product are investors unfamiliar with the industry who can be squeezed for their cash, using both legal (but ethically suspect) and sometimes illegal means. These investors can be overcharged for casks, and regularly enticed with new products once they are in the sales database of the firm that brought them in. In today's Scotch whisky cask investment 'ecosystems', they can even sell to each other with the middleman cask investment firm facilitating the sale between its two clients, arbitrarily determining sale price and then taking a slice of the resulting transaction. If whisky was the product these firms were offering, and if they truly believed that a fortune can be made from it, then they should be bottling and selling whisky themselves. However, the truth - as any independent whisky bottler will tell you - is that this is actually incredibly hard work. It requires the nous to run a good business, to understand your consumer and your markets, to understand the true industry price of casks, to have the contacts to find genuinely tasty ones, and plenty more besides. It's easier to set up a whisky cask investment firm marketing overpriced, mediocre casks to the general public. However, to keep this kind of operation going requires aggressive sales tactics, slick marketing, and constantly bringing in new prospective clients. The business models of many of these firms resemble and blend together two different types of venerable scam business models - boiler rooms and pyramid schemes. Little wonder it all feels familiar to Morgan: "What they're doing is absolutely identical. The key difference is social media and technology."
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Reeves Rejects Police Funding Demands Ahead of Spending Review
UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves rejected demands for extra police funding ahead of her spending review on Wednesday, despite warnings from senior officers that it could mean the government misses its flagship pledges on law and order. The Treasury imposed a settlement on Home Secretary Yvette Cooper on Monday after weeks of negotiations went down to the wire, according to a person familiar with the matter, who spoke anonymously about private negotiations. The Times of London first reported how the settlement was reached.
