&w=3840&q=100)
India's football ecosystem is scared with uncertainty: Chhetri on ISL pause
Chhetri, who turns up for Bengaluru FC in the league, said he has been inundated with phone calls and messages expressing apprehensions about the future of the sport in the country.
"It began with worrying about how I am on borrowed time with what I have left in the tank. But speaking with players from across clubs, I've realised that my selfish problem isn't as important," the 40-year-old Chhetri posted on X.
"The current situation that Indian football finds itself in, is very concerning. I've received a flurry of texts from players, staff members, physios, masseurs - not just from my club, but from other clubs as well.
When my phone went off a few weeks ago informing us of a delay in pre-season by a fortnight, I must admit it made me smile. And that's because I was on vacation, hadn't moved as much as I would have liked to, and hadn't been eating as clean as I usually do. I had more time than I… pic.twitter.com/pEGyr8Sp5O
— Sunil Chhetri (@chetrisunil11) July 16, 2025
"Everybody in the Indian football ecosystem is worried, hurt, scared about the uncertainty we are faced with," he added.
The ISL (Indian Super League) put the 2025-26 season "on hold" due to uncertainty surrounding the renewal of Master Rights Agreement (MRA) between the event organisers and the All India Football Federation.
The league normally runs from September to April, and the current MRA between Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL), which organises the event, and the AIFF is scheduled to expire on December 8, 2025, by which time the ISL would be into its third month.
This was after a Supreme Court directive to AIFF in which the body was asked not to negotiate new terms of the MRA with FSDL, the apex governing body's commercial partner running the ISL, until a final judgment is delivered in the AIFF draft constitution case.
FSDL is also the commercial partner of AIFF, and they signed a 15-year MRA in 2010. According to the MRA, FSDL pays the AIFF Rs 50 crore annually, and in turn gets the rights to broadcast, manage and commercialise Indian football, which also includes the national team.
Chhetri said he was on vacation when he first learnt about the league being put on hold.
"...I must admit it made me smile. And that's because I was on vacation, hadn't moved as much as I would have liked to, and hadn't been eating as clean as I usually do. I had more time than I had bargained to get in shape.
"That 'fortnight' has now changed to 'indefinitely' and that smile's been wiped out. I know that the think tank and all those involved in running the sport are working to get the football season up and running, and I'm hopeful that there is a solid fix sooner rather than later," he said.
The star player, who has come out of international retirement to bolster the Indian team that is enduring continuous poor results, urged for patience nonetheless.
"I may not have all the answers, but my message to all those involved with Indian football and more importantly the ones whose livelihood depends on it, the players, staff, kitmen, masseurs, medical teams, production crews, operations staff please stay calm.
"We'll ride this storm together. Stick together and look out for each other. Keep training and getting better. Football has to resume soon. It will," he signed off.
The AIFF has said it is "conscious" of ISL's importance to the football ecosystem but had to respect the law of the land by following the Supreme Court directive.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
Washington Sundar Ignores Harry Brook's Handshake During Jadeja's Century Celebration, Video Goes Viral
ENG vs IND: The 4th Test between India and England at Old Trafford, Manchester, ended in a dramatic draw, thanks to resilient centuries from Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar. On a final day where England eyed a series-clinching win, the Indian duo held firm and denied the hosts a 3-1 lead in the five-match series. Stokes Offers Early Draw, India Decline With India comfortably navigating the final session and both batters closing in on their centuries, England captain Ben Stokes reportedly offered an early handshake to draw the match. However, the Indian camp declined, keen to let Jadeja and Sundar complete their personal milestones. Handshake Snub Goes Viral A moment of light-hearted awkwardness went viral on social media when England's part-time bowler Harry Brook extended a hand to congratulate Jadeja after his century, thinking the match would end there. However, both Jadeja and Sundar continued celebrating their milestones, unintentionally leaving Brook hanging. The incident added an amusing twist to an otherwise tense final day. Moment of the match. Ravindra Jadeja scored 100 and Harry Brook intentionally came forward to call off the match. But Washington Sundar totally ignored him. Brook reaction after that — Selfless (@SelflessCricket) July 27, 2025 Brook, Root Bowl Final Overs as Fast Bowlers Rested England resorted to bowling part-timers Harry Brook and Joe Root during the final stages of the match. With no realistic chance of a win and only pride at stake, Stokes revealed in the post-match presentation that he didn't want to risk injury to any of his key fast bowlers with one Test still to go. 'Yeah, I think all the hard work was done by India. They both (Washi and Jadeja) played incredibly well and it got to that point where there was obviously only one result,' Stokes said. 'There was absolutely no chance I was going to risk any of my big fast bowlers through injuries with one more game to go. Dawsy (Liam Dawson) just bowled so many overs this game his body started to cramp up in the legs, so I wasn't risking any of my frontline bowlers for that last half an hour,' he added. Jadeja's composed ton was a reminder of his growing stature as a dependable Test batter, while Washington Sundar's return to red-ball cricket was marked by grit and poise. His century was particularly important, as it came after a long injury layoff. Together, the pair stitched an unbroken partnership that drained England's hopes on a pitch that had earlier promised plenty of assistance to bowlers. Series Decider Set for The Oval With the series now level at 2-1 in England's favour, the fifth and final Test at The Oval is expected to be a high-stakes encounter. India must win to draw the series, while a draw or win for England will hand them the series trophy.
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
Washington Sundar turns down Harry Brook's handshake offer, joins Jadeja's century celebrations
Tensions between India and England came to a boil once again on Day 5 of the Manchester Test as England skipper Ben Stokes asked Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar to draw the match in the final hour of play, sensing there was only one result possible from that point. However, Jadeja and Sundar—batting on 89 and 80 respectively—refused to budge, prompting a barrage of comments from the English players about how the two should have maintained their tempo or if they were simply chasing personal milestones against the likes of Harry Brook. The Indian batters, though, were in no mood to let go of the momentum and didn't seem to be paying much heed to the chatter. Jadeja even shifted the responsibility, pointing towards the dressing room and clarifying that it was the call of the captain and coach to continue playing. Soon after, Jadeja brought up his fifth Test century with a big shot off Brook's bowling. As he celebrated, Brook appeared to think the match would now be drawn and extended his hand toward Sundar, suggesting an end. But Sundar paid no attention, instead running across to his partner to celebrate the milestone. A couple of overs later, Sundar too reached his hundred—his maiden Test ton at the international level—and India finally agreed to call it a draw. Jadeja and Sundar walked in after the dismissals of a well-set KL Rahul and Shubman Gill in the first session on Day 5. Jadeja offered a chance to Joe Root at slip off the very first ball he faced, but from there on, the duo looked resolute. They weathered everything England threw at them and ensured only one result was possible. The two left-handers added over 200 runs while batting through two full sessions, tiring out England's bowlers ahead of a quick turnaround before the final Test at The Oval. Their partnership has not only helped India avoid defeat but also kept them alive in the series, with the visitors now trailing 2-1. The young Shubman Gill-led side will have a chance to level the series in the fifth and final Test.
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ben Stokes calls injury replacements ‘absolutely ridiculous'; India coach Gambhir backs substitutions, says ‘I'm all for it'
England skipper Ben Stokes feels 'absolutely ridiculous' to have a conversation on whether teams should be allowed replacement players mid-way through a game in case of a major injury. This came after Indian wicket-keeper batter Rishab Pant fractured his toe during the first innings of the Manchester Test. 'I think it's absolutely ridiculous that there's a conversation around an injury replacement,' Stokes said during the post-match press conference of the fourth Test, where India managed to draw the game with gritty knocks from KL Rahul, Shubman Gill, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar at Old Trafford on Sunday. 'I think that there would just be too many loopholes for teams to be able to go through. You pick your 11 for a game; injuries are part of the game. I completely understand the concussion replacement: player welfare, player safety. But I think the conversation should just honestly stop around injury replacements because if you stick me in an MRI scanner, I could get someone else in straightaway,' he added. 'If you stick anyone else with an MRI scanner, a bowler is going to show, 'Oh yeah, you've got a bit of inflammation around your knee. Oh sweet, we can get another fresh bowler in'. I just think that conversation should be shut down and stopped,' said Stokes. As per the existing rules, teams can opt for a replacement player in case of concussion, but if there any other external injuries like in the case of Pant fracturing the toe, replacement is not allowed. India head coach Gautam Gambhir had different thoughts from Stokes and said he is all for the replacement. 'Absolutely, I'm all for it,' Gambhir said after the game. 'If the umpires and the match referee sees and feels that is a major injury, I think it's very important. It's very important to have this rule where you can get a substitute, that is, if it's (the injury) very visible. 'There's nothing wrong in doing that, especially in a series like this where it's been such a closely-fought series in the previous three Test matches. Imagine if we would've had to play with 10 men against 11. How unfortunate would this be for us,' added Gambhir. Earlier, Former England captain Michael Vaughan also called for an adjustment in the substitution rule. 'I don't like the fact that we've got four days left in the game, four days of action in what has been an incredible series where we are going to have 10 versus 11,' Vaughan had said to BBC Sports. 'I prefer that you'd have a sub. You know, once they brought in concussion subs, I was crying out, saying, 'Well, just have substitutions then in the first innings of a game.' That would be my stepping point. If it happens in the second innings, I feel that team might kind of break the rules or indulge in a bit of skullduggery. But if it's clear and obvious when someone breaks a hand or a foot or ruptures a calf it's so evident that someone is in real pain and can't carry on. I think it's very clear to me: you should be allowed a sub,' said Vaughan.
