logo
Andrew Bailey lays bare the damage of Reeves's broken promises

Andrew Bailey lays bare the damage of Reeves's broken promises

Yahoo07-02-2025

Rachel Reeves promised businesses time and time again before the election that she was on their side.
As part of her Mais Lecture last year, the then-shadow chancellor promised a partnership between 'dynamic business and strategic government'.
Not only did she vow 'to mobilise all of Britain's resources in pursuit of shared prosperity' but she also offered 'stability too in the tax system'.
However, it didn't take long for her promises to unravel, as the Chancellor used her maiden Budget to hammer companies with a £25bn National Insurance tax raid – using the proceeds to help fund a public sector hiring spree.
While this may have mobilised one part of the economy, it may not be what private sector bosses were expecting when listening to Ms Reeves's speech last year.
In a stinging rebuke to Reeves's entire economic philosophy on Thursday, the Bank of England highlighted how the growing public workforce is draining productivity.
According to Threadneedle Street, the economy is on course for its third year without productivity growth, as output per worker – a critical measure that enables rising wages and living standards – is forecast to fall by a further 0.5pc in 2025.
Brexit, Covid and the energy crisis were major factors for this recent trend, although the Bank has warned that the problem will persist because of the government-backed boom in public sector employment.
At the same, the private sector is struggling.
Since the start of 2023, public sector output has grown by almost 4pc, while the private sector has not expanded at all.
This is worrying given the private sector's typical growth potential, particularly in contrast to that of the public sector.
Worse still, recent policy decisions by the Government mean prospects for the private sector are becoming bleaker.
In particular, the shock of the £25bn increase in employer National Insurance contributions has demolished bosses' confidence.
Businesses had wrongly believed Labour's manifesto pledge of no National Insurance tax hikes applied to them, meaning many were stunned by October's Budget.
Most bosses surveyed by the Bank expect to cover some of that cost by employing fewer staff and raising prices, while a significant chunk plan to offer workers smaller pay rises to offset the tax bill.
The Bank of England's analysis indicates the blow from the NICs tax raid will fall most heavily on low-paid workers, and particularly those in consumer-facing jobs.
It expects unemployment to rise from 4.4pc at the end of last year to 4.8pc in 2027, dealing a blow to the Chancellor's plans to get more people into work.
The simultaneous jump in the minimum wage is also poised to make hiring workers much more expensive.
The recent gloom sparked by the Budget has led to businesses warning the Bank that they will reduce investment, which further harms future growth prospects and stifles a revival in productivity.
Business investment may have been higher in 2024 than the Bank had anticipated, but it has since cut its forecasts for this year and the following two.
This all contributes to lower GDP growth. The Bank believes the economy avoided a recession by the skin of its teeth over winter, while Andrew Bailey, the Governor, also confirmed a drastic reduction in Britain's growth forecasts on Thursday, from 1.5pc to 0.75pc.
However, Bailey himself stressed that this was not just because of the Budget, as he pinned some of the blame on productivity.
He said: 'On the growth forecast, it is not a judgement on the Budget. The judgement really is that growth has been flat, as measured, since the spring of last year.
'It has left us with quite a few puzzles as to what is going on, particularly because of the way the increase in population will come though and what effect that has.
'We have got more population, we have got more labour force and we have got the same output, so you can only conclude then that you have got lower productivity.'
Similarly, the Governor is not entirely opposed to Reeves's plans for the economy.
Bailey went out of his way to praise the long-term agenda set out by the Chancellor last week, including her bid to expand airports and build more homes.
He said: 'I am a very, very strong supporter both of the growth agenda this Government has, and by the way of the growth agenda the previous government had as well.
'The potential growth rate in the UK has been low since the financial crisis. Addressing those questions is critical. I very strongly agree with the Chancellor on this point.'
The danger is that those plans will take years to come off.
'Structural policies take time to come through,' said Mr Bailey. 'When we are looking at a two- to three-year horizon here you would not expect a lot of that to come through quickly.
'But I don't for a moment want to leave you with the thought that therefore it doesn't matter - it does matter.'
It leaves the Chancellor –and, more importantly, the rest of us – facing the prospect of a middling economy for years to come as the cost of higher taxes and a bloated public sector hit home.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dividend King Federal Realty Has a High Yield and Industry-Leading Business
Dividend King Federal Realty Has a High Yield and Industry-Leading Business

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dividend King Federal Realty Has a High Yield and Industry-Leading Business

Federal Realty has the longest dividend increase streak in the REIT sector. The company focuses on quality over quantity and is a skilled developer and redeveloper. Federal Realty's dividend yield is notably higher than the REIT industry average. 10 stocks we like better than Federal Realty Investment Trust › Federal Realty (NYSE: FRT) is not the largest real estate investment trust (REIT) you can buy. It isn't even the largest REIT in its strip mall niche. It actually has a fairly small collection of properties in its portfolio. And yet it stands head and shoulders above every other REIT when it comes to its dividend. Here's why now is a good time to consider adding Federal Realty and its industry-leading business to your portfolio. Federal Realty owns strip malls and mixed-use properties, which generally include apartments and offices in the mix with retail. Some of the REIT's individual properties are quite large developments with multiyear projects on them. Others are simple strip malls where locals go to meet their everyday needs, like buying groceries or getting a haircut. From this perspective, Federal Realty isn't particularly differentiated from its competitors. That changes when you see that it only owns around 100 properties, which is generally a much smaller portfolio than its closest peers. However, those properties are particularly well located, with Federal Realty's assets having a higher average income around them and higher average population density. In other words, its portfolio is focused in wealthy areas with lots of residents nearby, which is exactly where retailers want to be located. The strength of Federal Realty's portfolio today is highlighted by its occupancy rates. After dipping during the coronavirus pandemic, they are now back above that level and closing in on 20-year highs. Occupancy ended the first quarter of 2025 at 93.6% but is expected to close in on 95% as the year progresses. Even during the pandemic, when non-essential businesses were closed by the government in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19, Federal Realty's occupancy didn't fall below 89%. The real story, however, is Federal Realty's dividend, which has been increased annually for 57 consecutive years. That makes the REIT a Dividend King, which alone is an impressive feat. But there's two more nuances here. First, Federal Realty has the longest dividend streak of any REIT. Second, it is the only REIT that is a Dividend King. Having a small, well-positioned portfolio has clearly paid off. Federal Realty didn't just buy 100 or so properties 57 years ago and sit on them for half a century. It is actually a quite active buyer and seller of assets. The key to its long-term success is what it does with the assets it buys. Usually Federal Realty buys well-located properties that need a little love and attention. That could be as simple as a coat of paint and more focus on tenant quality. A refresh of a property's exterior to make it look up to date goes a long way in attracting customers and tenants. But often the capital investments being made are far more extensive. Federal Realty will usually add to the properties it buys in some way. That can include adding apartments and offices above street-level retail space. It can involve tearing down an entire property and rebuilding it from scratch. Or it can be as simple as getting the permitting to make changes, which alone adds value to a property. When Federal Realty believes that it can sell a property for an attractive price, it will do so and then go on the hunt for another property that it can work on to improve its value over time. In other words, Federal Realty's portfolio is in a near-constant state of flux. And the inherent push is for the improvement in the quality of its portfolio. Management knows from experience that well maintained and located properties attract tenants, customers, and buyers, and that is the REIT's guiding star. Given the quality of Federal Realty's business model, highlighted by its Dividend King status, the shares don't go on sale very often. Today the dividend yield is 4.6%, which is notably higher than the S&P 500 index's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) 1.3% and the average REIT's 4.1%. Federal Realty's yield is also near the high side of the range over the past decade. If you are looking for a reliable dividend backed by a high-performing business, Federal Realty should probably be on your short list today. Before you buy stock in Federal Realty Investment Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Federal Realty Investment Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Federal Realty Investment Trust. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Dividend King Federal Realty Has a High Yield and Industry-Leading Business was originally published by The Motley Fool

UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip

LONDON (Reuters) -British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These (security) issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday. Sign in to access your portfolio

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says
No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

No decision will be taken on the winter fuel allowance until the Autumn budget – dispelling speculation that the government would make an announcement on it at next week's spending review. Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour decided to means test the previously universal payment. But weeks later, chaotic government messaging had left millions of pensioners with no idea what the changes will look like or when they will be announced. Asked about the changes, Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, told Sky News: 'These issues are going to be dealt with in the run up to the autumn where these decisions are going to be taken and announced. 'But this is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years.' Pressed on whether that means no details will be unveiled on winter fuel next week, the technology secretary said: 'I think what you're going to see is the overall spending constraints and allowances for each government department, and then each department is then going to start talking about how it's going to allocate those.' Last week, Rachel Reeves confirmed the expected U-turn on the controversial cuts would be in place for this winter, meaning that the government will be faced with a scramble to get the changes rolled out between the October budget and the winter months. While the chancellor had previously confirmed that they would not set out how the changes would be paid for until the autumn, there was a growing suggestion from the government that details on who the changes would affect could be set out at next week's spending review. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts on Wednesday as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. Mr Kyle's comments come days after pensions minister Torsten Bell confirmed there was no prospect of returning to a universal winter fuel payment for all, saying that '95 per cent of people agree that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Winter fuel payments are a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive the benefit. As a result, just 1.5 million pensioners received the payment in winter 2024-25 – a massive drop from the 10.8 million pensioners who received it the year before. The cuts were deeply unpopular because they were seen as being disproportionately damaging to vulnerable people, and were criticised for leaving thousands of poorer pensions who were on the borderline missing out on the payment. In November, it was revealed that the government's own figures indicated it would force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026. The policy was partly blamed for Labour's poor performance at the local elections – which saw them lose two-thirds of the council seats they had in 2021– as well as the previously Labour-held Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK. The cuts – combined with the £5bn welfare cuts and the party's decision to keep the two child benefit cap in place – have sparked growing concern over the direction of the government among Labour MPs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store