At least 33 people killed in suspected RSF attacks in Sudan
At least 33 people have been killed in Sudan in attacks suspected to have been carried out by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) as the brutal two-year war claims its latest victims.
An RSF strike on a prison on Saturday in el-Obeid killed at least 19 people, while on Friday evening, at least 14 members of the same family were killed in an air attack in Darfur, local sources said.
The attacks – part of the RSF's ongoing war with the military-led government's Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) since 2023 – came after six straight days of the paramilitary group's drone attacks on the army-led government's wartime capital of Port Sudan.
These attacks damaged key infrastructure, including a power grid and the country's last operational civilian airport, which was a key gateway for aid into the war-ravaged nation.
The war has left tens of thousands dead, displaced 13 million people and triggered what the United Nations calls the world's worst humanitarian crisis.
The attack on the prison on Saturday also wounded 45 people, a medical source told the AFP news agency. The source said the jail in the army-controlled city in the North Kordofan state capital was hit by an RSF drone.
The night before, 14 people were killed at the Abu Shouk displacement camp near el-Fasher in Darfur, a rescue group said, blaming the paramilitary.
The camp 'was the target of intense bombardment by the Rapid Support Forces on Friday evening', said the group of volunteer aid workers.The camp near el-Fasher, the last state capital in Darfur still out of the RSF's control, is plagued by famine, according to the UN.
It is home to tens of thousands of people who fled the violence of successive conflicts in Darfur and the conflict that has been ripping Africa's third-largest country asunder since 2023.
The RSF has shelled the camp several times in recent weeks.
Abu Shouk is located near the Zamzam camp, which the RSF seized in April after a devastating offensive that virtually emptied it.
Elsewhere on Saturday, SAF warplanes struck RSF positions in the Darfur cities of Nyala and el-Geneina, destroying arms depots and military equipment, a military source told AFP.
The RSF has recently said it had taken the strategic town of al-Nahud in West Kordofan, a key army supply line to Darfur.
The RSF's escalation in Port Sudan earlier this month came after the military struck the Nyala airport in South Darfur, where the RSF receives foreign military assistance, including drones. Local media stated that dozens of RSF officers were killed in the attack.
Sudan's army-aligned authorities accuse the United Arab Emirates of supplying those drones to the RSF, which has no air force of its own.
The war began as a power struggle between SAF chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and his former deputy, RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo. It has effectively divided the country into two, with the army controlling the north, east and centre, while the RSF and its allies dominate nearly all of Darfur in the west and parts of the south.
Both sides have been accused of committing war crimes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Six killed by Israeli gunfire near Gaza aid site, Hamas officials say
Six Palestinians have been killed and several others wounded by Israeli gunfire in the latest deadly incident close to an aid distribution centre in southern Gaza, the Hamas-run Civil Defence agency says. People had gathered to collect food supplies on Saturday morning when the shooting started, a spokesman for the agency said. Reports quoting an eyewitness said the Israelis opened fire when people tried to advance towards the site. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots at suspects who approached them in a threatening manner. Dozens of Palestinians have been killed and hundreds injured trying to get to the distribution centre this week. The US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) which runs the centre says it has paused its operations to deal with overcrowding and improve safety. But people have gathered nearly every day at a roundabout on the edge of an Israeli military zone, through which they have to pass to reach the aid site. In a statement, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said they had told Gazans the area was an active combat zone during nighttime hours. GHF said it had not been able to distribute food on Saturday because of direct threats from Hamas - something the group has denied. Whatever the case, the new incident will almost certainly strengthen international criticism of the new distribution model. The United Nations insists it puts Palestinians in danger and does not provide enough food and medicine to deal with Gaza's humanitarian crisis. Civil Defence spokesman Mahmoud Basal said at least 15 people had also been killed by Israeli air strikes on a residential home in Gaza city, with reports that some of the casualties remained trapped in the rubble. The Israeli army said the strikes had eliminated the head of a Palestinian militant group known as the Mujahideen Brigades. The Israelis have accused the group of killing and kidnapping some of the victims of the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October, including a Thai national named Nattapong Pinta. His body was recovered in the Rafah area of southern Gaza in a special operation on Friday. What we know about killings near US-Israeli backed Gaza aid site Killings near Gaza aid centre will deepen criticism of Israel's new distribution system Israeli army admits to Gaza strike after BBC Verify investigation Israel recently began to allow limited aid into Gaza after a three-month blockade, prioritising distribution through the GHF. But the foundation has been mired in controversy. Medics and local health authorities reported more than 60 Palestinians were killed by gunfire over three days shortly after it started operating. Multiple witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it had fired warning shots on the first two days and shot near Palestinian suspects advancing towards their positions on the third, adding that it is investigating the incidents. The distribution centre is one of four operated in Gaza by the GHF. It is part of a new aid system - widely condemned by humanitarian groups - aimed at circumventing the UN which Israel has accused of failing to prevent Hamas from diverting supplies to its fighters. The UN has denied these allegations, stating that it can account for all the aid it hands out and that the GHF's system is unworkable and unethical. It is almost 20 months since Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led cross-border attack, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. At least 54,677 people have been killed in Gaza during the war, according to the territory's health ministry.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
What we know about the killing of Palestinians at a food point in Gaza
On Sunday, at least 31 Palestinians were killed after Israeli forces opened fire at the site of a food distribution centre in Rafah, Gaza, according to witnesses. On Monday, another three Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire at the same site, according to health officials and a witness. And on Tuesday, 27 people were killed after Israeli forces opened fire again, say Gaza officials. The incidents have intensified criticism of the new system for distributing supplies in Gaza, run by the Israeli- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) rather than by the UN or well-established aid organisations. The UN's human rights chief, Volker Türk, said on Tuesday that Palestinians in Gaza now faced an impossible choice: 'Die from starvation or risk being killed while trying to access the meagre food that is being made available.' The attacks on civilians, he added, constituted a war crime. All three incidents unfolded in the same area, near the al-Alam roundabout, about 1km from the GHF distribution centre in Rafah. The Israeli military is not present on the site itself – where armed American contractors are in charge – but it controls the surrounding areas. On Sunday, rescuers and witnesses said Israeli forces opened fire as people congregated before going to pick up food parcels. Israel denied firing 'near or within' the site, but an Israeli military source later acknowledged that 'warning shots were fired towards several suspects' about 1km away. The GHF denied that there were any 'injuries, fatalities or incidents' during its operations. Gaza's civil defence agency reported that 31 people were killed, with another 176 wounded. On Monday, the Israeli military again acknowledged firing warning shots towards 'suspects who advanced toward the troops and posed a threat to them'. Three people were killed, said the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and dozens more injured. On Tuesday, witnesses said that the shooting started at about 4am local time, as crowds started to gather in the hope of getting food before the centre ran out for the day. Mohammed al-Shaer told AFP that 'the Israeli army fired shots into the air, then began shooting directly at the people', with a helicopter and drones present as the crowd approached a barrier separating them from the Israeli forces. The IDF said 'suspects' failed to retreat after warning fire and 'additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced towards the troops'. A statement claimed that they were not following 'designated access routes' to the GHF site. The GHF says civilians should arrive via a single coastal road, a route that one expert told the BBC was neither 'safe nor effective'. Local health officials put the death toll at 27 so far, including at least three children. Mohammed Saqr, the head of nursing at Nasser hospital, which received the bodies, told the Guardian that they had shrapnel wounds which appeared consistent with being targeted by tanks or artillery. Accounts from the scene suggest that besides the conduct of the Israeli forces, there are other factors exacerbating the situation. Food is reportedly running out very early each day, adding to the chaos as people desperately try to secure supplies for themselves and their families. Even if all of the GHF sites were opened, large numbers of people needing support would be congregating in a very few places; with only one site up and running since Friday and only one access route allowed, that effect is worsened. Then there is the sheer physical difficulty of the journey for those living further away. 'It takes three or four hours to reach the distribution point from here,' said Amjad al-Shawa, director of the Palestinian Non-Governmental Organizations Network in Gaza City. 'There are tens of thousands of people waiting to get a very limited amount of food parcels, and so there is a rush. There is no system; they just open the gate and tell people to go. The mechanism excludes older people, women with children, the sick, people with disabilities.' GHF says it has distributed just over 7m meals so far. It says that it will continue to increase its operations in the days ahead. But on Tuesday night it said that all of its distribution centres would be closed on Wednesday for 'update, organisation, and efficiency improvement work'. The Israeli military said that while the sites were closed, the areas leading to them would be considered 'combat zones'. The fact that food is running out so early each day is testament to how badly supply is outstripped by desperate demand. As of 12 May, almost all of the population of about 2.1 million were facing acute hunger, according to Unicef; one in five were facing starvation, and about 71,000 children and 17,000 mothers needed urgent treatment for acute malnutrition. Coverage of the war in Gaza is constrained by Israeli attacks on Palestinian journalists and a bar on international reporters entering the Gaza Strip to report independently on the war. Israel has not allowed foreign reporters to enter Gaza since 7 October 2023, unless they are under Israeli military escort. Reporters who join these trips have no control over where they go, and other restrictions include a bar on speaking to Palestinians in Gaza. Palestinian journalists and media workers inside Gaza have paid a heavy price for their work reporting on the war, with over 160 killed since the conflict began. The committee to protect journalists has determined that at least 19 of them 'were directly targeted by Israeli forces in killings which CPJ classifies as murders'. Foreign reporters based in Israel filed a legal petition seeking access to Gaza, but it was rejected by the supreme court on security grounds. Private lobbying by diplomats and public appeals by prominent journalists and media outlets have been ignored by the Israeli government. To ensure accurate reporting from Gaza given these restrictions, the Guardian works with trusted journalists on the ground; our visual teams verify photo and videos from third parties; and we use clearly sourced data from organisations that have a track record of providing accurate information in Gaza during past conflicts, or during other conflicts or humanitarian crises. Emma Graham-Harrison, chief Middle East correspondent While the GHF has sought to emphasise the amount of food it has distributed so far, there are reasons to be sceptical that it will soon be able to start running the sites in a more orderly way. Its founding executive director, Jake Wood, quit last week, saying that it could not operate in a way that followed 'humanitarian principles'; on Tuesday, he was replaced by the Rev Dr Johnnie Moore. Donald Trump appointed Moore as a commissioner for international religious freedom, but Moore has no apparent experience of complex aid operations. Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported that Boston Consulting Group, which helped design the programme, had withdrawn its team working in Tel Aviv. Sources close to the operation told the Post that 'it would be difficult for the foundation to continue to function without the consultants who helped create it'. As the situation worsens, Israel is facing growing diplomatic pressure from the UK, other European countries and Canada. But the Trump administration continues to offer its unflagging support, and is likely to veto a UN security council resolution demanding unfettered access for aid operations on Wednesday. In those circumstances, it is difficult to see how the situation on the ground will improve. 'People have no option but to keep coming,' Shawa said. 'They will be back tomorrow in search of food. But they will pay a price to get it, and the price is in lives.'
Washington Post
17 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump travel ban targets nations mired in civil wars or armed conflicts
When President Donald Trump announced his new and expanded travel ban this week, the list of countries facing restrictions exhibited few obvious through lines. A closer look, though, reveals that many of the countries are united by a harsh recent history of civil war or armed conflict. Of the 12 countries from which travel is fully restricted, three are embroiled in bloody civil wars: Yemen, Myanmar and Sudan. Myanmar is considered among the most extreme conflicts in the world because of the number of armed groups involved in the civil war there, ranking behind only Gaza and the West Bank in an assessment by Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED), a nonprofit analysis and crisis-mapping project. The country's military has faced an intense internal conflict since forcibly seizing power in 2021 and only controls about 21 percent of the country, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. ACLED lists Sudan as the eighth-most extreme conflict zone amid a ruinous civil war between the country's army and a rival paramilitary force. The fighting has led to more than 150,000 fatalities and a mass humanitarian crisis that numbers among the worst in the world. Yemen, considered by ACLED to have high but not extreme levels of conflict, has been threatened by the presence of Houthi militants. The Trump administration re-designated the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization in early March. These conflicts and others around the world have prompted mass migration from the violence and into neighboring countries or places deemed to be more stable — sometimes prompting political backlash aimed at refugees. In some cases, migrants don't have homes to return to or cannot return because of instability or the presence of a hostile regime. Many of the remaining countries on the total-ban list — Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya and Somalia — are also undergoing conflicts of varying degrees of intensity. In Haiti, the government is struggling to regain authority after gangs seized vast control of its capital, Port-au-Prince. Ten percent of the Haitian population has been displaced as a result of gang violence. Neighboring Dominican Republic implemented a plan in 2024 for mass deportations of Haitians back across the border. Haiti's Foreign Affairs Ministry said in a statement Thursday that it was working to find a swift solution to the ban, given the consequences on Haitian families living inside and outside the country. 'This decision comes at a moment when the Haitian government is striving, with the help of its international partners, to fight the insecurity and to strengthen border security,' it said. In Somalia, a fractious government emerging from a multi-decade legacy of civil war, is seeking assistance from international partners to fight against al-Shabab insurgents, who are global affiliates of al-Qaeda. The group, which previously led a fatal assault on a U.S. airfield in Kenya, has retaken crucial areas from Somali forces over the past three months. Farther north in Africa, Libya is at risk of political instability over its oil fields, just five years out from a six-year civil war that broke the country in two. In most cases, the White House cited visa overstays as the justification for putting countries on a full travel ban, including Muslim-majority nations such as Iran, Somalia and Yemen. While the overstay rate was high in some instances, the total number of visas issued was relatively small, The Washington Post reported. It was not immediately clear why some countries with higher overstay rates were left off. A handful of countries impacted by the ban — including Cuba, Venezuela and Iran — were tied together by historically adversarial relationships with the United States. Human rights organizations condemned the move, referencing the confusion and turmoil that was suffered under the first Trump administration's travel ban. 'This brings back all the tragic stories … people who were unable to see a dying relative or the birth of a new child and had to attend weddings on Zoom,' Jamal Abdi, the president of the National Iranian American Council, a U.S.-based advocacy group, previously told The Post.
