UK locked in talks over one-in-one-out small boats returns deal with France
The UK is locked in talks over a migrant returns deal with France ahead of Emmanuel Macron's state visit on Tuesday.
Keir Starmer and the French President are trying to hammer out a one-in-one-out deal - but hopes of announcing it this week may have been scuppered by outcry from other European nations. Under the plans, people who arrive in small boats would be returned to France in exchange for Britain accepting people with a legitimate case to join their families.
But Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Malta and Spain have all voiced concerns, arguing that people returned to France could in turn end up being sent back to other EU nations. Mr Macron will become the first European leader to receive a lavish state visit since Brexit as the Government seeks to reset relations with its nearest neighbours.
The two leaders are expected to confirm a new protocol which will see French police intercept small boats in shallow waters. This will see officers permitted to stop vessels within 300 metres of the shore.
On Monday a No 10 spokesman said: "Our joint work with the French is stronger than it has ever been and we very much look forward to welcoming President Macron for a historic state visit this week.
"That relationship is key to a number of issues, and we expect to make good progress on a wide range of priorities, including migration, growth, defence and security, which will deliver on the interests of both the British and the French public."
The spokesman declined to comment on specific deals ahead of the summit, but added: "We expect to make good progress on a wide range of our joint priorities, including on migration. The French are our closest partner on tackling the global threat of organised immigration crime."
So far this year 20,600 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel by small boat, a rise of nearly 50% compared to last year. The Government is desperately seeking an agreement that will allow the UK to return them to mainland Europe.
The UK had legal powers to do so before Brexit, and Mr Starmer has said reaching a new returns agreement is a top priority. But the five southern European states have voiced their alarm over the proposed new deal between the UK and France.
They have written to the European Commission saying it raises "serious concerns". In their letter they demanded clarifications on whether they would be affected - as EU rules mean France could return migrants to countries they previously passed through.
Last week French police were filmed using a knife to puncture an inflatable boat in a sign of new tactics being employed. The No10 spokesman appeared to suggest a new approach had not yet been rolled out.
Speaking in the Commons, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she wants to see French authorities change their rules as soon as possible. The No10 spokesman said there was no "silver bullet" to stop small boats arrivals.
"We've never shied away from the scale of the problem we face," he said. "These gangs are organised, criminal and international. Their tentacles stretch across borders and continents and for almost a decade they have been allowed to embed their global smuggling networks almost unchecked.
"That's what we're intent on changing."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
28 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
'We are not alone in our disappointment' for Glasgow
Here is a practical example of both national governments supporting a local partnership of business, academia and city council to encourage regional economic growth. It would have been even more cheering if we had arrived home to find that Glasgow and its city region were benefitting from a similar approach in the comprehensive spending review. All it would have taken was a single sentence saying that the UK and Scottish governments would be working together to establish long-term flexible funding deals for Scottish cities to match those already sorted out for Greater Manchester and the West Midlands. No such sentence appeared. Read more: Instead, I found myself reading Chief Secretary of the Treasury, Darren Jones, arguing that in Scotland the decision to "empower the city regions rests firmly with the Scottish Government". If he really believes that, we are at risk of stepping back a decade in time. Eleven years ago, it was the UK and Scottish governments that together announced the £1.3 billion Glasgow City Region Deal. That deal was the first of many in Scotland, each designed in collaboration with local stakeholders to demonstrate how joint working between both governments can initiate real empowerment on the ground. The chamber, senior business leaders and leading academics have all invested time and energy to help create the structures and capabilities of the Glasgow City Region. We did so in the belief that there was good faith in their value being demonstrated by both the UK and Scottish governments. We were encouraged by decisions made by the last UK Government to allocate over £300 million in additional resources to help the city region grow. Read more: The most recent was the announcement of £160m for a 10-year investment zone supporting the growth of advanced manufacturing. The chamber was involved in the process for project selection and there were so many more exciting projects - and in many other industry sectors - that could have been funded had the money been available. We can see the region's growth potential and how it can be unlocked. Over time, we have become a vigorous advocate for regional devolution deals. We believe that many of the projects our members want to see - particularly in skills, infrastructure, and innovation - are best delivered at the regional level. Projects like the Clyde Metro transport system, our three university-led innovation districts for emerging industries, our city centre renewal plan and investment help to grow our airport and our conference centre, all demonstrate the kind of ambition that regional empowerment can unlock. We shouldn't really need to argue the importance of regional devolution deals with the UK Government. It sets out all the reasons in several papers, including its English Devolution White Paper: the UK's low productivity trap, the stagnation of living standards and the unusual economic underperformance of all the UK major cities outside London. The chamber had therefore asked for a devolution deal with long-term funding and greater flexibility, but there is no such deal being proposed for Glasgow – or for any other region in Scotland. Read more: Instead, Glasgow is offered confirmation of the investment zone announced by the previous government, a share in a new UK-wide local growth fund, and support from the National Wealth Fund. These are all welcome but the investment zone had already been announced and the local growth fund looks set to be small once funds have been allocated across the country. It is also unclear if those funds are expected to deliver on old commitments such as that for Greenock town centre. The National Wealth Fund's commitment to a strategic partnership with Glasgow City Region could be more promising, but it is unclear whether there will be any new funds under the control of the regional partnership. If it helps the region attract private finance for projects, it could still prove valuable. However, it appears from the outside to be more like working with a body such as the Scottish National Investment Bank than a genuine devolution deal. Read more: We are not alone in our disappointment. The London-based thinktank the Centre for Cities issued its own report describing Glasgow as the "missing piece in the big cities' jigsaw". Especially worrying is their assessment that the lack of a devolution deal "places Glasgow at risk of falling behind its comparators south of the border". And yes, of course the Scottish Government has a poor track record on regional devolution. So much of the momentum building behind Glasgow City Region has come from UK Government funding programmes. One notable exception was the Clyde Mission - a Scottish Government initiative that promised much but ultimately fizzled out and ended up being passed to the city region with approaching £30m in funding. Otherwise the Scottish Government has undoubtedly been slow to devolve. As one example, the announcement in the programme for government of £2m towards a Glasgow City Region response to maritime industry skills shortages was welcome, but there is a much bigger prize. Passing apprenticeship funding from Skills Development Scotland direct to the regions instead of to the Scottish Funding Council would be much a better long-term aim. Regional devolution has not been the Scottish Government's natural default, so all eyes have tended to fall on the UK Government. If Darren Jones is signalling that momentum on regional devolution is to be stalled until the Scottish Parliamentary elections next May, then sadly, so too the growth potential of Scotland's largest city region may be stalled as well. Stuart Patrick is chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Albanese condemns antisemitism after receiving special envoy Jillian Segal's report
The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, appeared alongside the special envoy to combat antisemitism, Jillian Segal, who delivered her report to the government. 'There is no place in Australia for antisemitism. The kind of hatred and violence that we have seen on our streets recently is despicable and it won't be tolerated and I want those responsible to face the full force of the law,' Albanese said
JAMnews
an hour ago
- JAMnews
The European Parliament has adopted a resolution on Georgia based on reports from 2023–2024
The European Parliament has adopted a resolution on Georgia The European Parliament has adopted a resolution on Georgia based on the 2023–2024 reports. The document states that the situation in Georgia has significantly deteriorated since the European Commission's report on Georgia was published on October 30, 2023. The resolution was passed with 490 votes in favor and 147 against. This is the European Parliament's first report on Georgia as an EU candidate country. It evaluates Georgia's progress based on the Commission's 2023 and 2024 reports and sets out the Parliament's official position on EU–Georgia relations. The resolution does not recognize the results of the October 2024 parliamentary elections or the legitimacy of the Georgian Dream government. It therefore declares the new repressive laws adopted by the ruling party to be illegal. The resolution condemns pressure on civil society, the political opposition, and independent media, and calls on EU member states to independently impose personal sanctions on those responsible for democratic backsliding in Georgia and for supporting the Georgian Dream regime. The report also calls for disconnecting Georgia from SWIFT and imposing sectoral sanctions. According to the resolution, the European Parliament: ● Strongly condemns the violent repression, arbitrary and politically motivated detentions without sufficient legal basis, and the systematic torture of peaceful protesters, civil society representatives, political opponents, and media figures; ● Demands that Georgian authorities refrain from the use of force, respect freedom of assembly and expression, and repeal the recently adopted repressive legislation aimed at suppressing public protests, particularly through excessive fines; ● Expresses serious concern over the growing number of political prisoners and reiterates its call for their immediate and unconditional release; ● Calls for effective and credible investigations into all acts of violence and for those responsible to be held accountable; ● Voices concern over the lack of judicial independence, noting that senior judges linked to Georgian Dream are overseeing politically motivated trials against peaceful protesters and government critics; ● Deeply regrets that the ruling Georgian Dream party failed to seize the historic opportunity granted to Georgia as an EU candidate to advance along the path of European integration, while noting that the vast majority of the population continues to support EU integration; ● Notes that candidate status was granted to Georgia despite the alarming trajectory of the Georgian Dream government, which has increasingly diverged from European values and democratic principles; ● Warns that the upcoming municipal elections in autumn 2025 will take place against a deteriorating legal environment, worsened by legislative amendments passed in December 2024, ongoing political repression, and intensified persecution of opposition forces; ● Stresses that under Georgian Dream's rule, Georgia has not only failed to make progress but has actually regressed on key elements of the European Commission's nine-step recommendations, despite government claims to the contrary; ● Emphasizes that Georgia's EU integration process has effectively stalled due to continued democratic backsliding and the rigging of the October 2024 parliamentary elections, marking a clear shift toward authoritarian rule, further illegal capture of state institutions, and the adoption of anti-democratic laws that contradict the values and principles of the European Union; ● Agrees with the conclusions of the European Council of June 27, 2024, that the Georgian government's current course threatens the country's EU integration, and urges Georgian Dream to return to the path of democratic reform and Euro-Atlantic integration; ● Condemns the dismissal of around 700 civil servants since December 2024 for supporting EU integration or participating in pro-European protests; ● Stresses the need for an immediate and comprehensive reassessment of EU policy toward Georgia in light of the ongoing democratic decline, increasingly repressive political and legislative environment, erosion of democratic achievements and reforms, weakening of democratic institutions, and consolidation of power by the ruling party. ● Emphasizes the responsibility of Bidzina Ivanishvili and other officials and political leaders – including Irakli Kobakhidze, Shalva Papuashvili, Vakhtang Gomelauri, Tbilisi mayor and Georgian Dream secretary general Kakha Kaladze, and former Georgian Dream chairman Irakli Garibashvili – for the deterioration of the political process in Georgia. They contributed to the democratic backsliding that led to authoritarian consolidation of power and contradicted the Euro-Atlantic goals enshrined in the constitution; ● Calls for the immediate imposition of targeted personal sanctions against Bidzina Ivanishvili, his family members, and his companies, and urges the European Union, in cooperation with the United Kingdom, to freeze his financial assets; ● Reminds the governments of Hungary and Slovakia of the principle of sincere cooperation, which requires member states to refrain from actions that could undermine the EU's objectives; ● Urges the governments of Hungary and Slovakia to align their foreign policies with EU positions and principles and to lift their veto on sanctions against those responsible for democratic backsliding and the suppression of legitimate protests in Georgia; ● Condemns the unilateral actions of the Hungarian government aimed at legitimizing Georgian Dream; ● Calls on the Georgian authorities to hold new parliamentary elections under independent international and domestic observation; ● Urges the European Commission to review the EU's policy toward Georgia, including monitoring the implementation of the EU–Georgia Association Agreement. What else does the resolution say? ● Given the current political and legal conditions, the 2025 municipal elections pose a serious challenge for any potential participant expecting a free and fair electoral process. Such participation is likely to be used by the self-proclaimed government to legitimize the current status quo; ● The upcoming elections cannot offer a genuine opportunity for the Georgian people to express their democratic will unless imprisoned and detained opposition leaders are released and unless the elections are held in an improved electoral environment – under independent and impartial electoral management and credible international observation – to ensure a truly fair, free, and transparent process. Commentary Salome Samadashvili, opposition Lelo – Strong Georgia: 'The resolution discussed and adopted today by the European Parliament is especially important because on July 15, the European Council is set to discuss its policy toward Georgia. Ahead of this historic debate, it is crucial for us that the European Parliament clearly states its political position on key issues such as the illegitimacy of the Ivanishvili regime, the need for sanctions against it, and broader support for the Georgian people. I believe this resolution makes it absolutely clear that unless there are political changes—specifically, new parliamentary elections – not only will Georgia's EU accession process remain frozen, as it already is, but we also risk losing important achievements such as visa-free travel to the EU. This resolution clarifies the situation especially for those who still consider themselves supporters of Georgian Dream. It is an important political document that should be carefully read by anyone who cares about Georgia's future and its European path.' News in Georgia
