Six Romanian nationals arrested in jewelry scam on Kauai
Six Romanian nationals have been arrested in connection with a counterfeit jewelry scam targeting customers on Kauai that police discovered when two suspects were caught selling fake gold to people in a Walmart parking lot, according to the Kauai Police Department.
On Feb. 15, at about 6 p.m., KPD officers responded to a report of two male suspects trying to sell counterfeit gold jewelry to customers in the Walmart parking lot, 'claiming they needed cash to repair their vehicle, ' according to the Kauai Police Department.
The pair initially evaded police but officers got a description of their car and on Sunday, Feb. 16, 29-year-old Remus Miclescu, a Romanian national residing in Washington State, was arrested on suspicion of driving without a valid driver's license and theft in the third degree.
Miclescu was released without bail based on his 'written promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings.'
On Feb. 19, officers arrested Constantin Miclescu, a 34-year-old Romanian national residing in New York, and Sarai Gheorghe, a 23-year-old Romanian national residing in Maryland, on suspicion of fraud.
'These arrests were a critical step in halting further criminal activity and uncovering additional information, ' read a statement from KPD.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
On Feb. 20, officers arrested Inilian Constantin, 30, of Romania who lives in Maryland, Sofian Miclescu, a 28-year-old Romanian national living in New York, Constantin Miclescu, 26, of Romania by way of Maryland, and Remus Miclescu, a 29-year-old Romanian national residing in Washington.
Police did not say if or how the Miclescu's from Romania are related. All six suspects are currently being held at the KPD Cellblock pending further investigation.
'Thanks to the persistence and thorough investigation by our officers, along with the public's vigilance, we've made great strides in putting an end to this scam, ' said Deputy Chief Mark Ozaki, in a statement. 'These groups often operate as organized crime, targeting our kupuna. We want every Kaua 'i resident to feel safe, knowing those responsible will be held accountable for their crimes.'
These frauds 'bear striking similarities to ' when the KPD arrested four men from Romania claiming to sell rare or antique pieces of jewelry at significantly reduced prices because they needed the money.
Those jewels were fake.
Please report any suspicious activity to KPD Dispatch at (808 ) 241-1711. To remain anonymous, contact Crime Stoppers Kaua 'i at (808 ) 246-8300, submit a tip at crimestopperskauai.org, or use the Crime Stoppers Kaua 'i P3 Tips Mobile App.
17 Comments By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our.
Having trouble with comments ? .
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ballymena riots: Families flee 'locals' venting their feelings
Here we go again. It was not long after 8pm when a police announcement over a tannoy mounted on their armoured vehicles reverberated around for all to hear. "Force is about to be used against violent individuals," blasted from the speakers as locals, some masked, stood waiting for action. "You better be filming this," one man said as we captured the scenes for Sky News amid a growing sense from locals that the police were being heavy handed in their tactics. And then officers, holding their shields, surged forward as people edged back. The move seemed to further anger the residents who had gathered, almost goading them as tensions ran high. The pace of clashes was slower on this, the third night of conflict. But it was nevertheless just as ugly and messy. Eyewitness: Soon came the baton rounds, the firebombs, the water cannon. Those pelting the police seemed unfazed as they were battered with plastic bullets in return. The watching crowd cheered the rioters on. Police chiefs earlier defended their operation. A senior officer insisted he did have "a grip" on the unravelling situation when questioned by Sky News. The increased presence of officers was felt on the ground and was clear to see. The soundtrack of sirens swirled around this town once again as police lurched from incident to incident as pockets of violence flared up. Officers are on their way from Scotland, England and Wales to help bolster resources. And they won't be short of work. A leisure centre 25 minutes away in Larne came under attack on Wednesday evening after it emerged some of the foreign families fleeing the Ballymena chaos were being temporarily held there. A short drive around Ballymena's one way road system takes you on a journey through housing estates where people have flooded the streets with union jack flags and stuck yellow A4 sheets to their windows with the words, "LOCALS LIVE HERE". These colourful displays are being seen as a public noticeboard of the nationality of the occupants inside each home. A deterrent to make the angry mob to look elsewhere. And those failing to advertise whether they are a 'native' or not seem to be paying a price. I witnessed an upper floor flat with a window smashed, the guttering on fire and the ground outside ablaze. An older neighbour fled her home downstairs in her dressing gown. Earlier in the day two Romanian women were frantically examining their phones down an alleyway as their kids played on the trampoline in the garden. They were terrified and were bundling their belongings in the car and leaving for good. A sizeable chunk of people born in Ballymena are angry. They do not like the talk from police and politicians that taking to the streets following an alleged sex attack on a teenage girl equates to them being "racist thugs". They see this as an act of venting their feelings. And they are hellbent on continuing this campaign of carnage across Northern Ireland to ensure they prove their point.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘I killed two people': Witness reports abrupt confession from woman who crashed into trooper, causing serious injuries
CHICOPEE — The Springfield woman who allegedly plowed into a trooper conducting a traffic stop Tuesday morning told her employer and the police that she had been attacked at a convenience store by several women and that her car was stolen. This is according to court records associated with the arrest of Naisha L. Rodriguez, 32, of Springfield. She was arraigned in Chicopee District Court Wednesday morning after being charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol causing serious injury, intimidating a witness, leaving the scene of a crash and falsely reporting a stolen vehicle. She pleaded not guilty to the charges and was held on $500,000 cash bail. The parking lot of the courthouse was filled with state police cruisers; troopers packed the courtroom in support of their injured comrade. Investigators say Rodriguez was driving her work-issued Subaru in the westbound lane of the Massachusetts Turnpike around 2:20 a.m. near Chicopee, and veered into the trooper, who had a tractor trailer pulled over in the breakdown lane. A witness called 911, and colleagues of the trooper came to his aid. 'Troopers arrived on scene and located (the injured trooper) severely wounded and bleeding extensively from his arm in front of the tractor trailer,' a police narrative reads. While Rodriguez fled the scene, state police detectives gathered video footage from around the region to track Rodriguez's movements before and after the crash, according to the report. Her cover story about the alleged attack and car theft was quickly debunked, the records say. Video footage showed Rodriguez went to Baystate Wing Hospital in Palmer around 1:15 a.m., leaving 20 minutes later. The Subaru did not appear to have any body damage. Less than an hour later, the footage told a different story. The trooper's dash-cam video shows him walking along the driver's side of the tractor trailer. 'Once out of view, a white Subaru ... is seen moments later driving in the right lane before a witness, who was standing on the passenger side of (the cruiser), is seen running toward the direction of (the trooper),' records say. Footage from the city of Chicopee then showed the Subaru exiting I-90 with 'extensive' passenger side damage, then idling in a nearby Walmart parking lot and heading toward Springfield a few minutes later. The vehicle was registered to LabCorp in Holyoke, investigators found. Troopers spoke with a manager there, who confirmed that the Subaru was assigned to Rodriguez exclusively. He also said Rodriguez called him at 4:30 a.m. to report five women had cut her off at a 'Cumbies,' pulled her from the car and stole it. The manager said Rodriguez had been an employee only for 10 months and had already been involved in two motor vehicle incidents. 'One of which occurred on May 29, 2025, when she also stated she was attacked and had her vehicle stolen. She was given the Subaru Outback after the incident,' the police narrative states. Rodriguez doubled down on the stolen car story by also making a report to the Springfield Police Department, records show. She told a responding officer a woman named 'Dixie' attacked her but she did not know why. 'I observed multiple injuries to Ms. Rodriguez for this incident. She suffered a black eye on her left side, bleeding from her lower lip and scratches on both sides of her arms,' a Springfield police report says. Rodriguez refused an ambulance. A witness told police that Rodriguez called her six times between midnight and 6 a.m. that morning. 'After Witness 1 returned her call, Rodriguez stated she just killed two people and hung up. Rodriguez is known to drink excessively,' a trooper recounted in the police report. Investigators ultimately found the Subaru on Windemere Street in Springfield. The windshield was marked with pieces of a high visibility patrol jacket and had pieces of flesh clinging to the underside of the side quarter panel, which was torn back, according to the report. Briefing reporters on Monday outside Baystate Medical Center on Tuesday, Col. Geoffrey Noble of the Massachusetts State Police said the injured trooper will have a long road to recovery but was in good spirits. Investigators later arrived at Rodriguez's Tulsa Street home and spoke with her, the report says. 'Investigators immediately observed a strong odor of alcohol emanating from Rodriguez's breath as she spoke with a very slurred voice,' the report says. 'Rodriguez incoherently repeated over and over a story about being beat up and having her car stolen.' There was an empty nip bottle on the floor of her living room, which she quickly swatted away, the report adds. Rodriguez refused to go to the state police office at Tower Square in downtown Springfield and asked troopers to leave. They later returned with an arrest warrant. A pretrial hearing in the case is set for July 10. Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Starmer's homelessness reform could see Britain overrun by rough sleepers
The 'tent city' on Park Lane, in the central reservation near Hyde Park Corner, comprises 23 tents, tables, office chairs, shopping trolleys and washing lines. A neatly stacked pile of bin bags lies to one side while Lime bikes have been discarded around the settlement. A handful of large white signs are stacked up, reading: 'I'm hungry, God bless.' Those living here suggest there is little difference between their circumstances and those of the thousands of rough sleepers across the country, who will be decriminalised under plans announced by Sir Keir Starmer this week. To tourists, residents and those working in the surrounding Mayfair streets, however, the scene might more aptly be described as illegal camping. 'It's not good at all, but we don't have a permanent place where we can wait for approval from City Hall [for housing],' says Mihai, 54, from Romania, the only inhabitant prepared to speak to The Telegraph, who refuses to give his surname. 'Would you like to live here?' He says he has lived at the site for two years, has indefinite leave to remain in the UK and works as a cleaner. He has also camped at Marble Arch and in Hyde Park. There were more people in the camp previously, he says, but they have gradually been found housing. A mile to the east, at Tottenham Court Road, Mel, 60, who also refuses to give his surname, lives in another encampment with his nephews Danny, 27, and Liam, 22, and their dogs, Cain and Sierra. Mel was born in west London and says he used to have three full-time jobs – in sales and advertising, as an estate agent and as a supervisor at a bowling alley – but has been living on the street for six years since he was kicked out of his council house over a dispute with a neighbour. 'It's not a choice for me living on the street,' he says. 'If it was, I wouldn't have been here for nearly seven years now.' He adds that Romanian migrants are more comfortable living this way. 'People from other places have a tent mentality,' he says. 'What bugs me is we're a first-world country, and these people don't have the understanding that when you come to a better country, you have to make yourself better. You can't just stand on the corner drinking beer and whistling at women. It's easy for them because they grew up in desolate countries.' The situation in central London encapsulates the complexity of legislating around homelessness. On Tuesday, the Government announced plans to decriminalise rough sleeping, continuing a Tory proposal from 2022 to repeal the 1824 Vagrancy Act. The Bill was originally brought in to deal with rising homelessness after the Napoleonic Wars and has long been considered out of date, with references to 'vagabonds' and 'rogues'. 'We are drawing a line under nearly two centuries of injustice towards some of the most vulnerable in society, who deserve dignity and support,' said Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister. 'No one should ever be criminalised simply for sleeping rough and, by scrapping this cruel and outdated law, we are making sure that can never happen again.' To ensure the police still have authority to combat antisocial behaviour, the Government promised to create new offences, including facilitating begging for gain and trespassing with the intention of committing a crime, both of which were previously included under the 1824 Act. Experts warn legislation against begging may yet rub up against the European Convention on Human Rights; in 2021, the court ruled that Switzerland had violated human rights when it fined a woman who had been begging. Homelessness is a global issue, of course, and there is a huge range of government responses to it. While Britain is moving to decriminalise rough sleeping, America has gone in the other direction. Last year, the US Supreme Court ruled that punishing rough sleepers was not a 'cruel and unusual punishment,', as prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Homelessness has become a pressing problem in several American cities, most notoriously San Francisco. An estimated 771,000 Americans were homeless last year, more than any year on record. Since the ruling, at least 163 municipalities have passed rules banning camping. There are signs that policy is working. Last year, the California governor, Gavin Newsom, promised 'no more excuses' for the state with the highest 'unsheltered' rate in the country. Since encampments began to be cleared after the Supreme Court ruling, California's rate has stabilised. While, nationwide, homelessness increased by 18 per cent, in California it rose by just 3 per cent. In Fresno, California, members of the public can now report camps via an app. Rough sleepers could face fines of up to $1,000 or a year in prison, or they can ask to be taken to a shelter to discuss treatment or housing. When asked about whether the new rules were simply moving homeless people out of sight, Jerry Dyer, the city's Republican mayor and its former police chief, recently told The Economist: 'I'm sure there are people that have now chosen places that are less visible publicly, which is not a bad thing.' Some fear that the relaxing of rules in the UK will lead to the proliferation of rough sleeping seen in California prior to last year's Supreme Court ruling, in which Park Lane-style encampments spread across the country. 'San Francisco is the worst example but loads of these Left-wing-run cities in America have taken an approach of non-enforcement of laws around rough sleeping and petty crime,' says Fred de Fossard, the strategy director of the Prosperity Institute and a former Tory special adviser at the Cabinet Office, highlighting the absurdity of the UK taking such an approach when the United States is tacking in the opposite direction. 'Repealing the Vagrancy Act paves the way for [American levels of rough sleeping] here. This, in turn, will lead to a clamp-down in the future that will be 'more authoritarian than people are comfortable with and it will be entirely avoidable because we have taken a misguided, short-termist approach to these laws. This will fortify these encampments and make it harder for police to get rid of genuine criminals.' Certainly, those in charge of clearing encampments such as the one at Park Lane may wish police had similar powers to their US counterparts. The problem has been rumbling on for years. Last month, a court granted Transport for London (TfL), which owns the land, a possession order to remove the camp on Park Lane. A TfL spokesman said: 'We had to take enforcement action to regain possession of the site on two occasions last year; however, a number of people have returned with tents and other belongings.' David Spencer, the head of crime and justice at Policy Exchange, a think tank, and a former Met Police officer, says the situation at Park Lane encapsulates the difficulties facing those trying to disperse groups of rough sleepers, and the risks of removing their powers. 'Aggressive begging, rough sleeping and associated antisocial behaviour are things residents bring up all the time with the police,' he says. 'The reality is that they are issues which the police and local authorities are not able or willing to get to grips with. The police would never look at arrest and prosecution in the first instance, but what the Government is doing is removing the backstop, taking away almost any power the police has to deal with it. 'What we risk is a constant slide towards the degradation of our public realm, with government, police, authorities seeming to take a more permissive attitude to things like graffiti, begging, rough sleeping, fare dodging, which come up all the time with law-abiding people going about their lives,' he adds. 'People are sympathetic to those who find themselves in these situations, but we risk taking away the backstop that lets authorities do something about it. If we look at Park Lane, things have really got out of control. While some rough sleepers in central London beg, others manage to work, often in marginal gig-economy employment as delivery drivers or kitchen porters. Others choose to leave offered accommodation altogether. In June 2023, dozens of asylum seekers camped outside the accommodation they were offered in Pimlico, having balked at the prospect of sleeping four to a room. Signs by their camp read: 'This is a prison, not a hotel.' The Home Office stated that the accommodation was offered on a 'no-choice basis' and met 'all legal and contractual requirements.' In May 2024, Sadiq Khan pledged to end rough sleeping by 2030, and secured £17 million in central funding to do so. But if dealing with homeless people who want to find accommodation is difficult enough, what to do about those who – like the asylum seekers in Pimlico – prefer to sleep outside? Rough sleeping is only the most visible form of homelessness, which can also include living in temporary accommodation, sofa-surfing – sometimes called 'hidden homelessness' – and statutory homelessness, where a tenant has been served an eviction notice. The nature of rough sleeping can be difficult to quantify. According to the Ministry of Housing, which collates estimates from local authorities, there are around 2,000 rough sleepers in London, a figure that has more than doubled since the pandemic. Its data show that in that period, rough sleeping has risen across the country, in some areas by many multiples, including 1050 per cent in Charnwood, Leicestershire. Other sources put the figures much higher. According to the homelessness charity St Mungo's, there were 4,427 people recorded rough sleeping in London in the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 8 per cent on the same period last year. 'More people are becoming homeless and people are staying homeless for longer,' says Sean Palmer, the executive director of strategy and transformation at St Mungo's. 'It's getting more difficult to move people off of the streets, because there's not a supply of social housing, there's a block at the end of the system.' Rough sleeping has already been in effect decriminalised, with only five people sentenced for 'sleeping out' in England and Wales since 2017. Begging prosecutions have also fallen: the 160 sentences handed down for begging in 2024 was the lowest annual total on record, less than a fifth of the series high in 2018. But Palmer says the law can still have a deterrent effect on people seeking help: 'The Act as it is now isn't good for our clients, people suffering from homelessness and people rough sleeping. Sometimes it encourages them to hide more because they don't want to be criminalised and are less likely to receive the help and support they need to resolve their homelessness.' He says Mungo's clients come from a wide range of situations. 'It could be problems with the housing market, problems with money. A lot of people are bouncing around insecure accommodation and eventually they run out of goodwill and end up on the streets. Often our clients have backgrounds in the care system, sometimes in the military. Often people are leaving a government institution – they might be discharged from hospital, or be being moved on from the asylum system, or they might have left prison. 'I can't see how criminalising someone is helpful. We see the numbers of people coming out of the criminal justice system into homelessness. Feeding them back into the criminal justice system for being homeless, or feeding people who are homeless for other reasons back into the justice system, seems entirely counterproductive.' Proposed new offences target aggressive beggars and gangs, rather than individuals. The cautionary example of the US, however, shows what can happen when authorities have insufficient powers to disperse rough sleepers. The knottier issue at the heart of legislation is that many people don't think camping ought to be illegal and have great sympathy for those who find themselves homeless, even if they object to the sight of tent cities in some of London's most prestigious areas. The legal fudges reflect this Nimbyism. It also means that as a political issue, rough sleeping will not be moving along any time soon. Additional reporting by Ollie Corfe Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
