
Why the Iga Swiatek-Jelena Ostapenko head to head is not like the other tennis pigeons
Welcome back to the Monday Tennis Briefing, where The Athletic will explain the stories behind the stories from the past week on court.
This week, one of the strangest head-to-heads in tennis got stranger still; Amanda Anisimova and Joao Fonseca achieved tennis milestones; Diego Schwartzman retired from the sport and Chile's tennis federation challenged the ITF over the Zizou Bergs vs. Cristian Garin incident at the Davis Cup.
If you'd like to follow our fantastic tennis coverage, click here.
One of the strangest head to heads in tennis got a little bit stranger last week. Jelena Ostapenko extended her record against the five-time Grand Slam champion and current world No. 2 Iga Swiatek to 5-0, with a 6-3, 6-1 win in the Qatar Open semifinals. In four of their five meetings, Ostapenko has been the lower-ranked player by a distance.
Advertisement
It is the heaviest defeat Swiatek has suffered in any match since a 6-2, 6-0 defeat to the same player in 2019, at a grass-court event in Birmingham, England. Swiatek, 18 then, was a qualifier at the tournament and ranked No. 65.
This latest win for Ostapenko, the 2017 French Open champion, was all the more extraordinary given that Swiatek was going for a fourth straight title in Doha. She hadn't lost there since 2020. Ostapenko, ranked no. 37 when the match took place, needed just 71 minutes to thrash her much higher-ranked opponent before somewhat inevitably losing the final in straight sets to the lower-ranked Amanda Anisimova.
This is not like most tennis pigeon matchups — 'pigeon' being tennis-speak for when one player becomes easy prey for the stronger predator. Swiatek should be nobody's pigeon, and she beat Elena Rybakina in the previous round in Doha, Ostapenko — her nightmare opponent — is the only active WTA player with a positive record against her. Swiatek's elite defense and heavy groundstrokes have allowed her to improve against other flat-hitting blasters, but on Friday Ostapenko found the lines time and time again. If there is a weak point, it's the Swiatek serve, which often ends up in Ostapenko's strike zone, but for nearly the entire match there was just nothing to be done.
Tennis is a sport of matchups, and there is no doubt that the uneven record between these two has gotten into both players' heads. Midway through the second set, Swiatek, normally so calm on court, smashed her racket at a change of ends. Ostapenko laughed to herself in response, in what felt like a microcosm of their rivalry: Ostapenko the antagonist gleeful, as Swiatek once again walked into the trap she had laid for her.
'I was pretty confident I would beat her, because we played a lot of matches and I know how to play against her. I just was more focusing on myself and knew what I have to do,' Ostapenko said in her on-court interview, adding later that she was pleased with how she read Swiatek's serve during the match.
Advertisement
When The Athletic asked about her extraordinary record against Swiatek in an interview last year, Ostapenko grinned: 'That's my top secret. I'm not going to say anything.'
For Swiatek, the only positive is that the Latvian is rarely present at the sharp end of Grand Slams these days — only one of their five meetings has taken place at a major. Despite lots of improvements in other areas from this time last year, Swiatek is no closer to solving her Ostapenko conundrum.
GO DEEPER
How to be a tennis pigeon: The worst matchups and how players prepare for them
Charlie Eccleshare
Chile's tennis federation lost its appeal to tennis authorities over its recent Davis Cup tie with Belgium, issuing a statement in which it decried the 'apathy and indifference' of the International Tennis Federation (ITF) and said that Belgian player Zizou Bergs showed 'a lack of respect towards his opponent lacking the most basic sporting values'. A spokesperson for Bergs declined to comment; the ITF told The Athletic the appeal process was confidential.
The tie had ended acrimoniously when Bergs crashed into Cristian Garin at a changeover during their singles rubber, after breaking the Chilean's serve.
Garin went to the ground. Bergs got a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. Chile's team physio assessed Garin. Then, with the area near his right eye swelling and, according to him, his head cloudy, Garin refused to play on. But the Davis Cup's neutral doctor cleared him to return to the court, so when he did not resume, the umpire issued a series of time violation penalties. Because it was 6-5 to Bergs in the deciding set, the game penalty Garin conceded lost him the match.
Chile's tennis federation argued that the umpire erred when he only issued Garin a warning, saying that an aggression like the one their player experienced, even when unintentional, requires an immediate default. The default rules do not ascribe any outcome or impact of an action when considering whether or not a player should be defaulted, nor do they consider intent — that the collision was accidental should not matter in the final decision.
Speaking in a news conference after the match, ITF match referee Carlos Ramos said: 'I consider it was a very unfortunate accident between two players — caused unfortunately by a player without any intention.'
Following Chile's appeal, ITF president David Haggerty sent a letter to Sergio Elias Aboid, president of the Chilean tennis federation. In the confidential letter, which The Athletic has reviewed, Haggerty writes: 'There is no 'mandate' in the code as to exactly what should happen in the unfortunate and unique circumstances that arose in this match. The referee applied the code in the manner he considered appropriate and whilst not everyone will agree with every decision reached by a Referee, the ITF does not consider that the referee acted outside of his powers. The Davis Cup regulations are clear that such decisions are reserved to the referee.'
Advertisement
Haggerty also said the ITF code states a referee's decisions are final and cannot be overturned, so Chile had no grounds for appeal. Separately, the Chileans argued that the tournament doctor who examined Garin and decided he was fit to play did not ask the proper questions about his symptoms.
Haggerty responded: 'Although the independent doctor's opinion did not align with that of the Chilean team doctor, that does not mean that the opinion of the independent doctor was incorrect. The ITF has no reason to believe that the independent doctor did anything other than undertake an appropriate assessment of Mr Garin in order to reach an objective and informed view on whether or not he was fit to continue playing.
'Independent doctors are appointed to all Davis Cup ties in order to provide their opinions in circumstances such as these. It was entirely appropriate for the referee to rely upon the determination of the independent doctor in directing that play should resume.'
GO DEEPER
'A shameful international incident': How Cristian Garin and Zizou Bergs created tennis farce
Matt Futterman
It's happened again: A big-hitting American woman touted as the next big thing doesn't conform to the expectations set for them, enters a lull, then storms back to win a big title.
Three weeks after Madison Keys' Australian Open triumph, Amanda Anisimova delivered the latest don't-forget-about-me performance, winning Doha for her first title at the 1,000 level — the one just below the Grand Slams. She beat Jelena Ostapenko 6-4, 6-3 for her first title in three years, when she won the Melbourne Summer Set 2, which replaced the usual Australian Open tuneup tournaments during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Anisimova barely played in 2023, taking an extended break from tennis starting in the May to address some burnout and her mental health. She had described simply being at tournaments as 'unbearable' before beginning her hiatus. Returning to the tour in earnest last spring, she had her best result in Montreal in August, where she made the final before losing to Jessica Pegula.
Advertisement
'Super-proud of myself,' she said in comments after the Doha win that the WTA Tour distributed. 'Just the way I was able to stay mentally tough in a lot of difficult matches against some amazing players.'
In the final against Ostapenko, Anisimova came on court aware she was going to have to find a way to go on the attack, easier said than done against the free-swinging Latvian, who had just dispatched tournament favorite Iga Swiatek in the semifinals. 'I knew I was going to step it up and play the most aggressive tennis of the week,' she said.
The title puts Anisimova into the world top 20 for the first time, meaning that as well as there being four Americans in the top 10, there are six in the top 20.
Matt Futterman
Before the latter stages of the Argentina Open in Buenos Aires, Joao Fonseca's introduction to the tennis world had been all sparkle.
Crushed forehands, delivered with a liquid uncoiling of his relatively modest frame. Winners that scud through the court from all directions. The fervor of Brazilian fans, who took over the U.S. Open as he knocked out No. 9 seed Andrey Rublev before falling to Lorenzo Sonego, on a court harder to get into than the most exclusive nightclub in Rio de Janeiro. Whatever word comes to mind — aura, presence, stature, charisma — Fonseca, 18, exudes it.
In Argentina, he faced a different kind of challenge. In the third of three matches against players from the event's host nation, always a huge sporting rival to Brazil, he went down two match points to Mariano Navone in the quarterfinals. After saving one in a long rally, he rescued the second with a backhand lasered up the line.
Saving match point – Joao Fonseca style 😯@ArgentinaOpen pic.twitter.com/upiImxnR3D
— Tennis TV (@TennisTV) February 14, 2025
He blocked out the noise of the crowd by playing to his usual rhythm.
After being broken twice — once when serving for the match — against Serbia's Laslo Djere in the semifinals, he won a third set he shouldn't have had to play 6-1. In the final, another home hope, Francisco Cerundolo, served for the title twice in the third set. But he was broken each time and it went to a deciding tiebreak.
Advertisement
All match long, the crowd jeered and whistled to distraction between Fonseca's serves. It was the kind of barracking that had rattled world No. 2 Alexander Zverev into losing to Cerundolo from a set up earlier in the tournament. Fonseca however, the first man born in 2006 to reach an ATP Tour final, won the tiebreak 7-1.
There were plenty of winners from the teenager all week long, but his path to victory in Buenos Aires was paved with grit.
GO DEEPER
The seven points that prove Joao Fonseca is set for tennis stardom
James Hansen
Last week reminded tennis that nobody does goodbyes like Argentina.
A couple of months after Juan Martin del Potro's emotional farewell in Buenos Aires, one-time world No. 8 Diego Schwartzman said his farewell to the sport at the Argentina Open in the same city.
In his final match, in round two against Pedro Martinez, which came after a heroic opening win over Chile's Nicolas Jarry, Schwartzman wiped tears from his eyes as his opponent went to serve match point. The match paused briefly as the whole stadium chanted his name in appreciation of an extraordinary career.
A fitting finale 🥹
Pure goosebumps as the cathedral of Argentinian tennis hails 'Diegooo'@dieschwartzman | @ArgentinaOpen | #ArgOpen2025 pic.twitter.com/0Zf6QrD4wH
— ATP Tour (@atptour) February 13, 2025
Standing at just 5 feet 7 inches (170cm) in a sport of giants, Schwartzman was a natural underdog. He punched way above his weight, reaching the world's top 10 and making Rafael Nadal as uncomfortable as anyone else could manage at the French Open.
In 2018, Schwartzman briefly looked like he might do the unthinkable and beat Nadal there in Paris, when he led their quarterfinal by a set and 3-2 with a break of serve. Nadal came back to win after rain forced the match to be suspended until the next day, but it was a demonstration of the phenomenal power Schwartzman could generate despite his stature. His affectionate nickname, 'El Peque,' translates to 'Shorty.'
Advertisement
Schwartzman went one better at Roland Garros two years later by reaching the semifinals, where Nadal beat him again. He qualified for the ATP Tour Finals, for the world's eight best players, that year, and also made the U.S. Open quarterfinals twice.
Only 32, Schwartzman started having physical issues in 2022. He recently got engaged and wants to start a family in retirement.
Reflecting on his career, Schwartzman told the ATP last week: 'While it has been a little bit sad watching tennis lately, knowing this moment was coming, it was in a good way. I have a lot of amazing memories to think about and achievements to celebrate. I had the opportunity to check off many dreams and do more than people thought was possible for me.
'I have a small body, but it gave the biggest players in our history bad moments.'
Tennis players seem to be getting taller and taller and more homogenized. An always-popular figure, Schwartzman will be much missed.
Charlie Eccleshare
Yep, Joao Fonseca hit some winners, didn't he?
🎾 ATP:
🏆 Joao Fonseca def. Francisco Cerundolo (5) 6-4, 7-6(1) to win the Argentina Open (250) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It is the Brazilian's first ATP Tour title.
🏆 Ugo Humbert (2) def. Hamad Medjedovic 7-6(4), 6-4 to win the Open 13 Provence (250) in Marseille, France. It is his second consecutive title at the tournament.
🏆 Miomir Kecmanovic (7) def. Alejandro Davidovich Fokina (8) 3-6, 6-1, 7-5 to win the Delray Beach Open (250) in Delray Beach, Florida. It is his second ATP Tour title.
🎾 WTA:
🏆 Amanda Anisimova def. Jelena Ostapenko 6-4, 6-3 to win the Qatar Open (1,000) in Doha, Qatar. It is the American's first WTA 1,000 title.
📈 Amanda Anisimova ascends 23 spots from No. 41 to No. 18 after her win in Doha. It is a new career high for the American.
📈 Joao Fonseca moves up 31 places from No. 99 to No. 68 after his win in Buenos Aires. It is a new career high for the Brazilian.
📈 Jelena Ostapenko gains 11 places after her run to the Doha final, returning to the seeded positions for Grand Slams by moving from No. 37 to No. 26.
📈 Hamad Medjedovic rises 23 places from No. 96 to No. 73 after his run to the Marseille final.
🎾 ATP
📍Doha, Qatar: Qatar Open (500) featuring Carlos Alcaraz, Novak Djokovic, Alex De Minaur, Abdullah Shelbayh.
📍Rio de Janeiro: Rio Open (500) featuring Alexander Zverev, Joao Fonseca, Francisco Cerundolo, Yunchaokete Bu.
📺 UK: Sky Sports; U.S.: Tennis Channel 💻 Tennis TV
🎾 WTA
📍Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Dubai Tennis Championships (1000) featuring Aryna Sabalenka, Iga Swiatek, Coco Gauff, Elena Rybakina.
📺 UK: Sky Sports; U.S.: Tennis Channel
Tell us what you noticed this week in the comments below as the men's and women's tours continue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Players to get ranking protection after freezing eggs
Female tennis players who wish to freeze eggs or embryos, so they can start a family at a later date, will have their ranking protected by the WTA Tour. The offer is open to any player ranked in the world's top 750 who spends more than 10 weeks out of competition. Advertisement The 2017 US Open champion Sloane Stephens says the rule will reduce the pressure on players to return to the court too quickly. The 32-year-old, who has won eight WTA tournaments, told BBC Sport she has twice previously used the off-season to freeze her eggs. "The first time I did it, I rushed back and I was overweight and not happy - and just very stressed out," she said. "The second time I did it I took a totally different approach so I could just be in better shape: I could have the surgery, I could have more time to recover. "So having the protected ranking there, so that players don't feel forced to come back early and risk their health again, is the best thing possible." Advertisement Players who undergo fertility treatment will be able to use their special ranking to enter up to three tournaments within 10 weeks of their return. The special ranking will be an average of a player's ranking over a 12-week period before and during their leave. Players will not, however, be able to use this ranking to enter one of the WTA's premier 1000 events, as the tour wants to encourage players to undertake the procedure at a quieter time of the season. "It's all trial and error, everyone's body is different," Stephens added. "Someone might be out for three months, someone might be out for one week. Advertisement "Some people gain a tonne of weight, some people can go back immediately. I think when you are family planning, it's better if you have that support." Stephens says she was a strong advocate for such a measure when a member of the WTA Players' Council, and the tour's chief executive Portia Archer confirms the move was player-led. "It was very much at the instigation of the players," she said. "We want to really help players address this conundrum where peak athletic performance coincides with the time period of peak fertility, so players are often faced with this tough choice of how to really maximise and optimise those years." Advertisement Grants have also recently been made available towards the cost of any fertility treatment, and earlier this year the WTA introduced paid maternity leave for the first time. More than 320 players are now eligible for up to 12 months paid leave - with everyone receiving the same amount, irrespective of their ranking. Returning to the tour after maternity leave started to become easier when the WTA changed the rules before the 2019 season. New mothers are able to use their previous ranking to enter 12 tournaments over a three-year period from the birth of their child. The WTA also offers access to a health team, which offers physical assessments, mental health support and guidance on a staged return to play for new mothers and pregnant players. Advertisement Tennis is not the first sport to offer support to women wishing to freeze their eggs, with the American basketball league the WNBA offering up to $60,000 (£52,500) reimbursement to players for fertility treatment including egg freezing. High-profile athletes have spoken about their decision to freeze their eggs, including England cricket captain Nat Sciver-Brunt and former England netballer Geva Mentor. 'Such a gift' - players react to ranking protection Australian Open champion Madison Keys welcomed the news, saying it will give players planning to start families additional peace of mind. Advertisement "It is absolutely amazing what the WTA is doing," she told BBC Sport. "We have all become really great at keeping our bodies healthy and being able to stay on tour longer and I know for a lot of us family planning is a big part of that. "Being able to have the security to take care of that, have that peace of mind and know we can come back to the tour without working our way up the rankings is such a gift." German Tatjana Maria, who is ranked 81st in the world, has two children and returned to the tour after both pregnancies. The 37-year-old welcomed the action by the WTA but says there are "still opportunities to help the WTA players and the mums on tour". Advertisement "Even now having two kids on tour there are still issues," she told BBC Radio 5 live. "The WTA could change a little bit, whether it is [related to] hotel rooms or accreditation to make life easier. "It is helpful to help [as they are doing] but also to help the mums on tour."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Players to get ranking protection after freezing eggs
Female tennis players who wish to freeze eggs or embryos, so they can start a family at a later date, will have their ranking protected by the WTA Tour. The offer is open to any player ranked in the world's top 750 who spends more than 10 weeks out of competition. Advertisement The 2017 US Open champion Sloane Stephens says the rule will reduce the pressure on players to return to the court too quickly. The 32-year-old, who has won eight WTA tournaments, told BBC Sport she has twice previously used the off-season to freeze her eggs. "The first time I did it, I rushed back and I was overweight and not happy - and just very stressed out," she said. "The second time I did it I took a totally different approach so I could just be in better shape: I could have the surgery, I could have more time to recover. "So having the protected ranking there, so that players don't feel forced to come back early and risk their health again, is the best thing possible." Advertisement Players who undergo fertility treatment will be able to use their special ranking to enter up to three tournaments within 10 weeks of their return. The special ranking will be an average of a player's ranking over a 12-week period before and during their leave. Players will not, however, be able to use this ranking to enter one of the WTA's premier 1000 events, as the tour wants to encourage players to undertake the procedure at a quieter time of the season. "It's all trial and error, everyone's body is different," Stephens added. "Someone might be out for three months, someone might be out for one week. Advertisement "Some people gain a tonne of weight, some people can go back immediately. I think when you are family planning, it's better if you have that support." Stephens says she was a strong advocate for such a measure when a member of the WTA Players' Council, and the tour's chief executive Portia Archer confirms the move was player-led. "It was very much at the instigation of the players," she said. "We want to really help players address this conundrum where peak athletic performance coincides with the time period of peak fertility, so players are often faced with this tough choice of how to really maximise and optimise those years." Advertisement Grants have also recently been made available towards the cost of any fertility treatment, and earlier this year the WTA introduced paid maternity leave for the first time. More than 320 players are now eligible for up to 12 months paid leave - with everyone receiving the same amount, irrespective of their ranking. Returning to the tour after maternity leave started to become easier when the WTA changed the rules before the 2019 season. New mothers are able to use their previous ranking to enter 12 tournaments over a three-year period from the birth of their child. The WTA also offers access to a health team, which offers physical assessments, mental health support and guidance on a staged return to play for new mothers and pregnant players. Advertisement German Tatjana Maria, who is ranked 81st in the world, has two children and returned to the tour after both pregnancies. The 37-year-old welcomed the action by the WTA but believes more can be done to assist mothers on tour. "I think there is still opportunities to help the WTA players and the mums on tour," she told BBC Radio 5 live. "Even now having two kids on tour there are still issues. The WTA could change a little bit, whether it is [related to] hotel rooms or accreditation to make life easier. "It is helpful to help [as they are doing] but also to help the mums on tour." Advertisement Tennis is not the first sport to offer support to women wishing to freeze their eggs, with the American basketball league the WNBA offering up to $60,000 (£52,500) reimbursement to players for fertility treatment including egg freezing. High-profile athletes have spoken about their decision to freeze their eggs, including England cricket captain Nat Sciver-Brunt and former England netballer Geva Mentor.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Top 750 WTA players to receive protected ranking for fertility procedures
Tennis players who choose to take time off in order to undergo fertility protection procedures, such as egg or embryo freezing, will be permitted to receive a protected ranking according to new rules announced by the Women's Tennis Association. Players ranked inside the top 750 on the WTA who undergo fertility procedures will be eligible to receive a Special Entry Ranking (SER) allowing them to enter up to three tournaments. The SER will be calculated using their average ranking during a 12-week period before and during their absence and can be used up to WTA 500 events. Advertisement Related: Raducanu and Boulter laugh off Queen's doubles defeat with singles to come A growing number of players are opting to take time away from the sport in order to give birth or actively plan their families during their careers. At the urging of the players, over the past few years the WTA has taken significant steps towards addressing these issues, helping to provide players with options to plan their families while competing at the highest level. Earlier this year, the organisation announced that it would offer players paid maternity leave. Those who take time away from the tour to give birth are also able to use their previous ranking to enter 12 tournaments over three years from the birth of their child. Sloane Stephens, the 2017 US Open champion, has twice used the short tennis off-season to freeze her eggs. 'During my first retrieval cycle, I ended up gaining around 20lbs due to hormones and taking a break from training that, going forward, I would be more aware of and plan differently for my next cycle this off-season,' the American told Essence last year. Advertisement Related: 'Proud' Caroline Wozniacki back on tour and looking to get better 'It is also important to rest and not over-exert yourself, at the risk of developing ovarian torsion or other complications, so I had to really plan out my training blocks and off-season to make it all happen. Because of this, I am really passionate about introducing protected rankings for players undergoing fertility treatments so that they can feel supported in making decisions for themselves and properly caring for their bodies without rushing back out of fear of ranking points or career setbacks. ' In a statement on Wednesday, Stephens hailed the WTA's new ruling: 'I'm incredibly proud of our sport in recognising the importance of fertility treatments for female athletes. For any woman, the conversation of family life versus a career is nuanced and complex. The WTA has now created a safe space for players to explore options and to make the best decisions for themselves. It's truly groundbreaking and will empower this generation, and future generations of players, to continue with the sport they love without having to compromise.'