
Why the Iga Swiatek-Jelena Ostapenko head to head is not like the other tennis pigeons
Welcome back to the Monday Tennis Briefing, where The Athletic will explain the stories behind the stories from the past week on court.
This week, one of the strangest head-to-heads in tennis got stranger still; Amanda Anisimova and Joao Fonseca achieved tennis milestones; Diego Schwartzman retired from the sport and Chile's tennis federation challenged the ITF over the Zizou Bergs vs. Cristian Garin incident at the Davis Cup.
If you'd like to follow our fantastic tennis coverage, click here.
One of the strangest head to heads in tennis got a little bit stranger last week. Jelena Ostapenko extended her record against the five-time Grand Slam champion and current world No. 2 Iga Swiatek to 5-0, with a 6-3, 6-1 win in the Qatar Open semifinals. In four of their five meetings, Ostapenko has been the lower-ranked player by a distance.
Advertisement
It is the heaviest defeat Swiatek has suffered in any match since a 6-2, 6-0 defeat to the same player in 2019, at a grass-court event in Birmingham, England. Swiatek, 18 then, was a qualifier at the tournament and ranked No. 65.
This latest win for Ostapenko, the 2017 French Open champion, was all the more extraordinary given that Swiatek was going for a fourth straight title in Doha. She hadn't lost there since 2020. Ostapenko, ranked no. 37 when the match took place, needed just 71 minutes to thrash her much higher-ranked opponent before somewhat inevitably losing the final in straight sets to the lower-ranked Amanda Anisimova.
This is not like most tennis pigeon matchups — 'pigeon' being tennis-speak for when one player becomes easy prey for the stronger predator. Swiatek should be nobody's pigeon, and she beat Elena Rybakina in the previous round in Doha, Ostapenko — her nightmare opponent — is the only active WTA player with a positive record against her. Swiatek's elite defense and heavy groundstrokes have allowed her to improve against other flat-hitting blasters, but on Friday Ostapenko found the lines time and time again. If there is a weak point, it's the Swiatek serve, which often ends up in Ostapenko's strike zone, but for nearly the entire match there was just nothing to be done.
Tennis is a sport of matchups, and there is no doubt that the uneven record between these two has gotten into both players' heads. Midway through the second set, Swiatek, normally so calm on court, smashed her racket at a change of ends. Ostapenko laughed to herself in response, in what felt like a microcosm of their rivalry: Ostapenko the antagonist gleeful, as Swiatek once again walked into the trap she had laid for her.
'I was pretty confident I would beat her, because we played a lot of matches and I know how to play against her. I just was more focusing on myself and knew what I have to do,' Ostapenko said in her on-court interview, adding later that she was pleased with how she read Swiatek's serve during the match.
Advertisement
When The Athletic asked about her extraordinary record against Swiatek in an interview last year, Ostapenko grinned: 'That's my top secret. I'm not going to say anything.'
For Swiatek, the only positive is that the Latvian is rarely present at the sharp end of Grand Slams these days — only one of their five meetings has taken place at a major. Despite lots of improvements in other areas from this time last year, Swiatek is no closer to solving her Ostapenko conundrum.
GO DEEPER
How to be a tennis pigeon: The worst matchups and how players prepare for them
Charlie Eccleshare
Chile's tennis federation lost its appeal to tennis authorities over its recent Davis Cup tie with Belgium, issuing a statement in which it decried the 'apathy and indifference' of the International Tennis Federation (ITF) and said that Belgian player Zizou Bergs showed 'a lack of respect towards his opponent lacking the most basic sporting values'. A spokesperson for Bergs declined to comment; the ITF told The Athletic the appeal process was confidential.
The tie had ended acrimoniously when Bergs crashed into Cristian Garin at a changeover during their singles rubber, after breaking the Chilean's serve.
Garin went to the ground. Bergs got a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. Chile's team physio assessed Garin. Then, with the area near his right eye swelling and, according to him, his head cloudy, Garin refused to play on. But the Davis Cup's neutral doctor cleared him to return to the court, so when he did not resume, the umpire issued a series of time violation penalties. Because it was 6-5 to Bergs in the deciding set, the game penalty Garin conceded lost him the match.
Chile's tennis federation argued that the umpire erred when he only issued Garin a warning, saying that an aggression like the one their player experienced, even when unintentional, requires an immediate default. The default rules do not ascribe any outcome or impact of an action when considering whether or not a player should be defaulted, nor do they consider intent — that the collision was accidental should not matter in the final decision.
Speaking in a news conference after the match, ITF match referee Carlos Ramos said: 'I consider it was a very unfortunate accident between two players — caused unfortunately by a player without any intention.'
Following Chile's appeal, ITF president David Haggerty sent a letter to Sergio Elias Aboid, president of the Chilean tennis federation. In the confidential letter, which The Athletic has reviewed, Haggerty writes: 'There is no 'mandate' in the code as to exactly what should happen in the unfortunate and unique circumstances that arose in this match. The referee applied the code in the manner he considered appropriate and whilst not everyone will agree with every decision reached by a Referee, the ITF does not consider that the referee acted outside of his powers. The Davis Cup regulations are clear that such decisions are reserved to the referee.'
Advertisement
Haggerty also said the ITF code states a referee's decisions are final and cannot be overturned, so Chile had no grounds for appeal. Separately, the Chileans argued that the tournament doctor who examined Garin and decided he was fit to play did not ask the proper questions about his symptoms.
Haggerty responded: 'Although the independent doctor's opinion did not align with that of the Chilean team doctor, that does not mean that the opinion of the independent doctor was incorrect. The ITF has no reason to believe that the independent doctor did anything other than undertake an appropriate assessment of Mr Garin in order to reach an objective and informed view on whether or not he was fit to continue playing.
'Independent doctors are appointed to all Davis Cup ties in order to provide their opinions in circumstances such as these. It was entirely appropriate for the referee to rely upon the determination of the independent doctor in directing that play should resume.'
GO DEEPER
'A shameful international incident': How Cristian Garin and Zizou Bergs created tennis farce
Matt Futterman
It's happened again: A big-hitting American woman touted as the next big thing doesn't conform to the expectations set for them, enters a lull, then storms back to win a big title.
Three weeks after Madison Keys' Australian Open triumph, Amanda Anisimova delivered the latest don't-forget-about-me performance, winning Doha for her first title at the 1,000 level — the one just below the Grand Slams. She beat Jelena Ostapenko 6-4, 6-3 for her first title in three years, when she won the Melbourne Summer Set 2, which replaced the usual Australian Open tuneup tournaments during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Anisimova barely played in 2023, taking an extended break from tennis starting in the May to address some burnout and her mental health. She had described simply being at tournaments as 'unbearable' before beginning her hiatus. Returning to the tour in earnest last spring, she had her best result in Montreal in August, where she made the final before losing to Jessica Pegula.
Advertisement
'Super-proud of myself,' she said in comments after the Doha win that the WTA Tour distributed. 'Just the way I was able to stay mentally tough in a lot of difficult matches against some amazing players.'
In the final against Ostapenko, Anisimova came on court aware she was going to have to find a way to go on the attack, easier said than done against the free-swinging Latvian, who had just dispatched tournament favorite Iga Swiatek in the semifinals. 'I knew I was going to step it up and play the most aggressive tennis of the week,' she said.
The title puts Anisimova into the world top 20 for the first time, meaning that as well as there being four Americans in the top 10, there are six in the top 20.
Matt Futterman
Before the latter stages of the Argentina Open in Buenos Aires, Joao Fonseca's introduction to the tennis world had been all sparkle.
Crushed forehands, delivered with a liquid uncoiling of his relatively modest frame. Winners that scud through the court from all directions. The fervor of Brazilian fans, who took over the U.S. Open as he knocked out No. 9 seed Andrey Rublev before falling to Lorenzo Sonego, on a court harder to get into than the most exclusive nightclub in Rio de Janeiro. Whatever word comes to mind — aura, presence, stature, charisma — Fonseca, 18, exudes it.
In Argentina, he faced a different kind of challenge. In the third of three matches against players from the event's host nation, always a huge sporting rival to Brazil, he went down two match points to Mariano Navone in the quarterfinals. After saving one in a long rally, he rescued the second with a backhand lasered up the line.
Saving match point – Joao Fonseca style 😯@ArgentinaOpen pic.twitter.com/upiImxnR3D
— Tennis TV (@TennisTV) February 14, 2025
He blocked out the noise of the crowd by playing to his usual rhythm.
After being broken twice — once when serving for the match — against Serbia's Laslo Djere in the semifinals, he won a third set he shouldn't have had to play 6-1. In the final, another home hope, Francisco Cerundolo, served for the title twice in the third set. But he was broken each time and it went to a deciding tiebreak.
Advertisement
All match long, the crowd jeered and whistled to distraction between Fonseca's serves. It was the kind of barracking that had rattled world No. 2 Alexander Zverev into losing to Cerundolo from a set up earlier in the tournament. Fonseca however, the first man born in 2006 to reach an ATP Tour final, won the tiebreak 7-1.
There were plenty of winners from the teenager all week long, but his path to victory in Buenos Aires was paved with grit.
GO DEEPER
The seven points that prove Joao Fonseca is set for tennis stardom
James Hansen
Last week reminded tennis that nobody does goodbyes like Argentina.
A couple of months after Juan Martin del Potro's emotional farewell in Buenos Aires, one-time world No. 8 Diego Schwartzman said his farewell to the sport at the Argentina Open in the same city.
In his final match, in round two against Pedro Martinez, which came after a heroic opening win over Chile's Nicolas Jarry, Schwartzman wiped tears from his eyes as his opponent went to serve match point. The match paused briefly as the whole stadium chanted his name in appreciation of an extraordinary career.
A fitting finale 🥹
Pure goosebumps as the cathedral of Argentinian tennis hails 'Diegooo'@dieschwartzman | @ArgentinaOpen | #ArgOpen2025 pic.twitter.com/0Zf6QrD4wH
— ATP Tour (@atptour) February 13, 2025
Standing at just 5 feet 7 inches (170cm) in a sport of giants, Schwartzman was a natural underdog. He punched way above his weight, reaching the world's top 10 and making Rafael Nadal as uncomfortable as anyone else could manage at the French Open.
In 2018, Schwartzman briefly looked like he might do the unthinkable and beat Nadal there in Paris, when he led their quarterfinal by a set and 3-2 with a break of serve. Nadal came back to win after rain forced the match to be suspended until the next day, but it was a demonstration of the phenomenal power Schwartzman could generate despite his stature. His affectionate nickname, 'El Peque,' translates to 'Shorty.'
Advertisement
Schwartzman went one better at Roland Garros two years later by reaching the semifinals, where Nadal beat him again. He qualified for the ATP Tour Finals, for the world's eight best players, that year, and also made the U.S. Open quarterfinals twice.
Only 32, Schwartzman started having physical issues in 2022. He recently got engaged and wants to start a family in retirement.
Reflecting on his career, Schwartzman told the ATP last week: 'While it has been a little bit sad watching tennis lately, knowing this moment was coming, it was in a good way. I have a lot of amazing memories to think about and achievements to celebrate. I had the opportunity to check off many dreams and do more than people thought was possible for me.
'I have a small body, but it gave the biggest players in our history bad moments.'
Tennis players seem to be getting taller and taller and more homogenized. An always-popular figure, Schwartzman will be much missed.
Charlie Eccleshare
Yep, Joao Fonseca hit some winners, didn't he?
🎾 ATP:
🏆 Joao Fonseca def. Francisco Cerundolo (5) 6-4, 7-6(1) to win the Argentina Open (250) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It is the Brazilian's first ATP Tour title.
🏆 Ugo Humbert (2) def. Hamad Medjedovic 7-6(4), 6-4 to win the Open 13 Provence (250) in Marseille, France. It is his second consecutive title at the tournament.
🏆 Miomir Kecmanovic (7) def. Alejandro Davidovich Fokina (8) 3-6, 6-1, 7-5 to win the Delray Beach Open (250) in Delray Beach, Florida. It is his second ATP Tour title.
🎾 WTA:
🏆 Amanda Anisimova def. Jelena Ostapenko 6-4, 6-3 to win the Qatar Open (1,000) in Doha, Qatar. It is the American's first WTA 1,000 title.
📈 Amanda Anisimova ascends 23 spots from No. 41 to No. 18 after her win in Doha. It is a new career high for the American.
📈 Joao Fonseca moves up 31 places from No. 99 to No. 68 after his win in Buenos Aires. It is a new career high for the Brazilian.
📈 Jelena Ostapenko gains 11 places after her run to the Doha final, returning to the seeded positions for Grand Slams by moving from No. 37 to No. 26.
📈 Hamad Medjedovic rises 23 places from No. 96 to No. 73 after his run to the Marseille final.
🎾 ATP
📍Doha, Qatar: Qatar Open (500) featuring Carlos Alcaraz, Novak Djokovic, Alex De Minaur, Abdullah Shelbayh.
📍Rio de Janeiro: Rio Open (500) featuring Alexander Zverev, Joao Fonseca, Francisco Cerundolo, Yunchaokete Bu.
📺 UK: Sky Sports; U.S.: Tennis Channel 💻 Tennis TV
🎾 WTA
📍Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Dubai Tennis Championships (1000) featuring Aryna Sabalenka, Iga Swiatek, Coco Gauff, Elena Rybakina.
📺 UK: Sky Sports; U.S.: Tennis Channel
Tell us what you noticed this week in the comments below as the men's and women's tours continue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
22 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Coco Gauff Reveals Size Of French Open Replica Trophy
Whether you're a fan of tennis or not, you've probably heard that two of Gen Z's brightest sports stars, Coco Gauff and Carlos Alcaraz, came out on top at Roland-Garros this weekend, claiming their second and fifth Grand Slam victories, respectively. Along with the glory (and a pretty significant chunk of prize money), the winners of the French Open are presented with massive, shiny trophies on court, which they pose for tons of pictures with, as seen here. And here. Oh, and here's another one. So, given how cozy they're getting with those trophies, you'd think they'd get to keep them for a little while. Eat some cereal out of them, maybe? Well, you'd be wrong — they don't even get to take them home at all. Being the true Gen Z icon that she is, 21-year-old Coco filmed a TikTok on her flight back from Paris on Sunday, giving fans the tea on the trophy situation — and it's safe to say that people are pretty underwhelmed by the reality. 'This is the trophy that you guys see, the one that we take pictures with, do press with, and all that,' she said, gesturing to a picture of her posing with the fancy silverware. 'But, actually, we don't get to take this home. This stays with the tournament.' Unveiling the trophy that she actually gets to keep, Coco pulled out a smaller replica — and we're talking MUCH smaller. 'This is the one we take home. It's like a mini replica of the trophy,' she said, raising it above her head to compare just how much smaller it is. 'It's… really small.' If you weren't already convinced, Coco then put the mini trophy next to a Perrier bottle and a water glass for scale. 'That's how small it is,' she said, giggling. 'But, you know, it's the memories that matter the most.' She also hilariously included a side-by-side of her hugging the big trophy vs. the smaller one, and…you just have to laugh. If you're a tennis fan, you'll know that this is hardly a secret. The same thing typically happens at the other Grand Slam tournaments, too, like Wimbledon, for example, where the winners get to pose with the big fancy trophy at the presentation ceremony before giving it back to the venue and receiving a replica instead. Coco isn't the only tennis player to have discussed this either. If you want to see a ton of the replica winners' trophies, look no further than Serena Williams' trophy room tour for Architectural Digest. But, despite this being public knowledge, it's safe to say that fans are a little taken aback — and definitely amused — by the whole thing. As someone rightfully pointed out, the smaller the trophies, the easier it is to store them — and I'm sure there are many more on the way for Coco and Carlos. See you at Wimbledon!
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why do athletes take pickle juice?
It might not be your tipple of choice. But for many athletes, pickle juice has become a staple. Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner were both seen sipping what was thought to be pickle juice during their five-set thriller of a French Open final. Advertisement But seeing athletes swigging the salty stuff isn't anything new. Former Arsenal midfielder Lucas Torreira was pictured drinking from a bottle labelled "pickle juice" back in 2019, and it became part of the England team's strategy to combat cramp in players at Euro 2024. Pickle juice is normally taken by athletes who are involved in sports with long durations, an hour and a half or more, or anything that involves intermittent or repeated muscle contractions. Collingwood's Nick Daicos was seen gargling pickle juice during an Australian Rules football match in March [Getty Images] How does pickle juice help athletes? Pickle juice is used by athletes as a means of easing muscle cramps. The acidic liquid is a concentrated source of electrolytes, containing sodium and potassium. It has been found to stop cramping 40% faster than drinking water. Advertisement It is thought that pickle juice works by disrupting 'neural signalling' - triggering a reflex in the mouth which sends a signal to stop muscles from cramping. This can happen almost instantaneously - relieving cramping quickly. How should athletes use pickle juice? Mayur Ranchordas - a professor of sports nutrition and exercise at Sheffield Hallam University - believes there is still a misconception that pickle juice can be used to prevent muscle cramps. There is no evidence to suggest that drinking the juice before a sports event would have any benefit. Instead, athletes should be taking it at the onset of cramp - but not drink it. Advertisement "Rather than drinking it, you need to rinse it in your mouth for 20 to 30 seconds. That's when the vinegar and salt start to act, then you can spit it out", Ranchordas told BBC Sport. The mistake that some athletes make is to rinse their mouth out with water, to get rid of the taste. Removing that sensation - of taking pickle juice and wanting to scrunch up your mouth in response - stops the mechanisms firing which ease the cramp. Ranchordas, who is also the head of nutrition at Aston Villa football club, says that adding chilli to the jar of pickles, and letting the chilli infuse, can make the pickle juice even more effective. Advertisement "The more horrible the taste, the more effective it is." What's wrong with a sports drink? The more palatable option - for the non-pickle-lovers out there - might be a sweet sports drink. But the unique offering of pickle juice that it can disrupt the message sent to the brain that a muscle is cramping. This is a much faster method of easing cramping than having an electrolyte, which you have to digest and absorb. But Emma Tester - a performance nutritionist currently working at the UK Sports Institute - told BBC Sport that more research is needed to understand the added benefits of pickle juice. Advertisement "There is not a huge amount [of research] out there definitely saying 'yes, it's really going to work. It is down to the individual, whether they feel it is beneficial." Could you just eat lots of pickles, then? Not quite. Pickle juice is thought to be effective because of the concentration of electrolytes, combined with the fluid. Eating lots of pickles might not be very comfortable on the stomach either, nor very practical. It might not be easy to munch some pickles on the side lines of a football pitch, or on court between games of a tennis match. Are there any risks? Pickle juice might not sit well with everyone, potentially causing digestive issues because it is so concentrated and salty. Advertisement Dr Tester says she has seen athletes "puke on the side of the pitch" after taking pickle juice, which can hinder performance rather than help it. "Everything needs to be practiced. Just like performance is practiced, nutrition performance should also be practiced," she said. This article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your questions. We want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you do. The team will find out everything you need to know and be able to call upon a network of contacts including our experts and pundits. Advertisement We will be answering your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and going behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting events. Our coverage will span the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered...


San Francisco Chronicle
35 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
US Open: When it starts, how to watch, what's at stake, betting odds for golf's next major
OAKMONT, Pa. (AP) — The U.S. Open long has been regarded the toughest test in golf, and this year it returns to what is arguably the toughest course in America. Oakmont Country Club outside Pittsburgh is the talk of the 125th U.S. Open, a course built in 1903 that is more about being feared than being fair. The rough is as thick as ever. The greens are as fast as any. There's also the famous Church Pew bunkers between the third and fourth holes. Scottie Scheffler shot 69 in his U.S. Open debut as a Texas teenager. He missed the cut the next day in 2016. Now he's the favorite as he comes to Oakmont having won three of his last four tournaments, including the PGA Championship. Here is a look at what you need to know leading up to the U.S. Open: When is the US Open? Golf's second-oldest championship — it dates to 1895 — starts Thursday at 6:45 a.m. Players in groups of three will start on the first and 10th tees, morning and afternoon. The biggest names typically start on No. 10 in the morning or on No. 1 in the afternoon to get peak TV coverage. The top 60 and ties make the 36-hole cut Friday and advance to the weekend. How can I watch the US Open? NBC and its platforms get their first major of the year, and there is wall-to-wall coverage of the U.S. Open. Thursday starts on USA Network from 6:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Peacock takes over until 8 p.m. Friday starts on Peacock at 6:30 a.m. until 1 p.m., and then NBC goes until 8 p.m. Saturday has USA Network from 10 a.m. to noon, and NBC goes from noon until 8 p.m. The final round Sunday starts at 9 a.m. until noon on USA Network, and NBC takes over until the end. Who are the betting favorites? The odds keep getting better for Scottie Scheffler, the No. 1 player in the world. BetMGM Sportsbook has him at +275. Next in line is defending U.S. Open champion Bryson DeChambeau (+750). Rory McIlroy was the second favorite on the BetMGM Sportsbook money line last week at +700. He missed the cut at the Canadian Open last week and goes into the U.S. Open at +1200, along with Jon Rahm. They are followed by Xander Schauffele at +2200. Phil Mickelson needs the U.S. Open to complete the career Grand Slam and this likely is his last appearance. The 54-year-old Mickelson is at +25000. Who are the players to watch? Scottie Scheffler is being compared to Tiger Woods based on modern statistics. He is being compared to Jack Nicklaus for the way he plays the game from tee-to-green with minimal mistakes. He has won three of his last four starts going into Oakmont. A victory at the U.S. Open would send Scheffler to the British Open with a shot at the career Grand Slam. Rory McIlroy is No. 2 and the Masters champion, along with becoming the latest player to complete the Grand Slam. There was thought the Masters title would give him freedom because he had gone 11 years without any major. But he missed the cut in Canada last week and said he found it hard to get motivated when he was practicing. Xander Schauffele is coming off a year in which he won two majors. He was out with two months because of a rib injury. But he plays this major well. Schauffele has played the U.S. Open eight times and only once has finished outside the top 10. Not to be overlooked is Bryson DeChambeau as the defending champion. He loves brute tests like Oakmont. And he was in the mix in the final round at the Masters and the PGA Championship. DeChambeau won his two U.S. Opens at Winged Foot (2020) and Pinehurst No. 2 (2024). What's at stake? The U.S. Open trophy doesn't have a name. The winner also gets the gold medal named after four-time champion Jack Nicklaus. The prize money hasn't been announced yet, but it was $21.5 million last year, with $4.3 million going to the winner. The champion also gets a 10-year exemption to the U.S. Open, along with a five-year exemption to the Masters, PGA Championship and British Open. What happens in case of a playoff? The U.S. Open has gone the longest of the four majors without a playoff. That was in 2008, when Tiger Woods famously made a 12-foot birdie putt on the 72nd hole to force an 18-hole Monday playoff against Rocco Mediate at Torrey Pines. That took 19 holes for Woods to win. Since then, the U.S. Open has gone to a two-hole aggregate playoff on the Sunday after the conclusion of regulation. That has not been used yet. What's the weather forecast? There's been a lot of rain in the last week that has softened the course. The weekday rounds should be reasonably dry. But there's a good chance of thunderstorms on Saturday and lingering rain on Sunday. What happened last year? Bryson DeChambeau got up-and-down from 55 yards away in a bunker, making a 4-foot putt for a 1-over 71 and a one-shot victory over Rory McIlroy at Pinehurst No. 2. McIlroy had the lead late in the round but bogeyed three of his last four holes. That included missing a 30-inch par putt on the 16th hole and a par putt just inside 4 feet on the last hole. DeChambeau captured his second U.S. Open. McIlroy left without talking to the media. ___