Michelle Obama's 'The Look' reflects on her fashion choices
Michelle Obama has a new book out this fall that offers a fresh take on her public life, a story not of politics but of fashion.
Obama announced on social media Thursday that 'The Look' will be released Nov. 4 by the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House. With commentators ranging from Obama to stylist Meredith Koop to makeup artist Carl Ray, 'The Look' traces Obama's style choices throughout the rise of her husband, Barack Obama, to the presidency, and into their post- White House years.
During her eight years as first lady, fashionistas praised her for everything from her cardigan sweaters to her sleeveless dresses to her favoring ballet flats over high heels.
'During our family's time in the White House, the way I looked was constantly being dissected — what I wore, how my hair was styled,' Michelle Obama wrote Thursday, calling her book 'a reflection on my lifelong journey with fashion, hair and beauty.'
'The Look,' illustrated with more than 200 photographs, has a hardcover list price of $50. Obama's previous books include 'Becoming,' one of the bestselling political memoirs in history, and 'The Light We Carry.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump news at a glance: Elon Musk rift deepens as president says ‘poor guy's got a problem'
Donald Trump appeared in no mood to patch things up with former top adviser Elon Musk on Friday, doubling down on his new hostility towards the Tesla and Space X tycoon with a number of disparaging statements. The US president appeared to deny reports of a potential peacemaking phone call with Musk, telling ABC News he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to his former confidant right now. The president also spoke to CNN, saying: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' Trump told Politico that the relationship with Musk was 'going very well, never done better'. Here are the key Trump administration stories of the day: Donald Trump appeared to dismiss a peace overture from his former close political ally Elon Musk, calling him someone who had 'lost his mind' as the extraordinary falling out between the two men looked set to continue. The US president and the richest person in the world – who had been tasked with slashing the federal government – fell out in spectacular fashion on Thursday in a series of escalating social media posts that roiled the political world. Read the full story Kilmar Ábrego García – the man whom the Trump administration mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador in March – returned to the US on Friday to face criminal charges. In a press briefing, the US attorney general, Pam Bondi, said a federal grand jury in Tennessee had indicted the 29-year-old father on counts of illegally smuggling undocumented people as well as conspiracy to commit that crime. Read the full story The US supreme court on Friday permitted the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), a key player in Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to the personal information of millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. The court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with Doge. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented. Read the full story The US economy added 139,000 jobs in May, a slowdown compared with recent months as American businesses cope with uncertainty around Donald Trump's continuing trade war. Read the full story A staffer for Missouri Republican senator Eric Schmitt was previously fired from Ron DeSantis's unsuccessful presidential campaign after making a video containing neo-Nazi imagery, and later peddled far-right conspiracy theories in a Marco Rubio-linked thinktank. Read the full story A Republican representative is facing a widespread backlash after saying that a Sikh should not have conducted a prayer in the US House. Mary Miller, an Illinois representative, on Friday published – then deleted – a post saying that Giani Singh, a Sikh Granthi from southern New Jersey, should not have delivered the House's morning prayer. Read the full story Enrique Tarrio, the former national leader of the far-right Proud Boys group, and four other members convicted of orchestrating the deadly 6 January 2021 US Capitol attack are suing the federal government for allegedly violating their rights. Russia is at war with Britain, the US is no longer a reliable ally and the UK has to respond by becoming more cohesive and more resilient, according to a former White House adviser. Senior US administration officials will meet with a Chinese delegation in London on Monday for the next round of trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing, Donald Trump said on Friday. An event by the International Pride Orchestra this week swung from classical Gershwin favourites to choral patriotism to high drag in a rebuff to Trump's takeover of the Kennedy Center and its subsequent snub of the LBGTQ+ ensemble. Catching up? Here's what happened on 5 June 2025.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Congresswoman's outrageous Muslim slur that has enraged everyone in DC
A Republican congresswoman is under fire after she misidentified a Sikh religious leader as Muslim and declared he should never have been allowed to deliver the House's morning prayer. Rep. Mary Miller (R-Illinois), a far-right lawmaker with a history of inflammatory remarks, drew immediate condemnation from both sides of the aisle after the shocking social media post on Friday. Miller claimed it was 'deeply troubling' for a non-Christian to lead the prayer and falsely stated the United States was founded as a Christian nation. The backlash was swift, and within hours, Miller had deleted the post without explanation. Leaders in both parties slammed her remarks as ignorant, bigoted, and fundamentally un-American. The controversy began after Miller misidentified Giani Surinder Singh, a Sikh religious leader from New Jersey, as a Muslim declaring on X that he 'should have never been allowed' to lead the House of Representatives' morning prayer. Even worse, she invoked a debunked claim that America was 'founded as a Christian nation' and demanded the government 'reflect that truth.' Her comments, posted in the early morning hours, were later edited and saw her replacing 'Muslim' with 'Sikh', before ultimately being hastily deleted altogether. Miller later edited her tweet which saw her replacing 'Muslim' with 'Sikh', before ultimately being hastily deleted altogether But the damage was done and Miller was condemned with a ferocity rarely seen in the capital's often polarized chambers. 'It's deeply troubling that such an ignorant and hateful extremist is serving in the United States Congress. That would be you, Mary,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) blasted on X, leading a chorus of denunciations that crossed party lines. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-New York), one of the first Republicans to speak out, didn't mince words. 'A Sikh prayer on the House floor doesn't violate the Constitution, offend my Catholic faith, or throttle my support for Israel,' he posted. 'Live and let live.' LaLota later expanded: 'While our nation's founding was indeed shaped by Judeo-Christian values, the First Amendment unequivocally guarantees that our government remains neutral toward all religions.' Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-New Jersey), who invited Singh to offer the prayer, stood firmly behind his guest. 'As a Catholic, I take my faith seriously and I also believe part of being American is respecting other people's faiths too,' Van Drew said in a statement. 'The Sikh community is peaceful, generous, and deeply rooted in family and service - values we should all appreciate, no matter our religion.' Democrat Rep. Grace Meng (D-New York) was fuming at Miller's actions Democrats were no less scathing. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-New Jersey) wrote: 'It's deeply troubling that someone with such contempt for religious freedom is allowed to serve in this body.' 'What's deeply disturbing is the blatant ignorance and anti-Sikh, anti-Muslim xenophobia coming from my colleague across the aisle,' Rep. Grace Meng (D-New York) fumed, adding, 'The tweet may have been deleted, but we still have the receipts.' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California) couldn't resist a biting historical jab: 'I often say that I serve in Congress with some of the greatest minds of the 18th century. With Miller, I may need to take it back a few more centuries.' The uproar extended far beyond Capitol Hill as civil rights groups, religious organizations and advocacy coalitions piled on. The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) issued a blistering statement accusing Miller of 'anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim bigotry.' 'Sikhs and Muslims practice two separate and distinct religions, and conflating the two based on how someone looks is not only ignorant but also racist,' the group said. The Sikh Coalition demanded a formal apology, with Executive Director Harman Singh declaring: 'Congresswoman Miller should apologize for her remarks - to both the Sikh and Muslim communities, because no one should be targeted on the basis of their identity.' Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-New Jersey) wrote: 'It's deeply troubling that someone with such contempt for religious freedom is allowed to serve in this body.' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California) couldn't resist a biting historical jab House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) blasted Miller on X, leading to a chorus of denunciations that crossed party lines The Muslim Public Affairs Council echoed the call. 'We were intentionally founded as a nation of all faiths,' said Haris Tarin, the group's vice president. 'Apparently she must have forgotten about the First Amendment in this country.' Even the Hindu American Foundation weighed in, lambasting Miller's comments as 'racist, xenophobic, and plainly un-American.' For Miller, this was not a first offense. Her political career has been punctuated by repeated incendiary remarks. In 2021, she faced fierce criticism for stating, 'Hitler was right on one thing: Whoever has the youth has the future,' a comment for which she later apologized. In 2022, at a Trump rally celebrating the fall of Roe v. Wade, Miller raised eyebrows again when she declared it a 'victory for white life,' a gaffe her office attributed to a misread of prepared remarks. Despite Miller's claims, the United States was not founded as a Christian nation. The First Amendment expressly prohibits any establishment of religion, safeguarding the rights of all faiths - or none at all. Article VI of the Constitution further enshrines this principle, stating: 'No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.' The tradition of opening House sessions with prayer dates back centuries, with faith leaders from a wide array of religious backgrounds - including Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism - offering invocations. Giani Surinder Singh, the man at the center of this controversy, was praised by Van Drew for embodying American values through his 'peace, humility, and service toward all.'
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court will hear Alabama appeal in bid to execute man found to be intellectually disabled
The Supreme Court will consider making it harder for convicted murderers to show their lives should be spared because they are intellectually disabled, according an order released early on Friday after an apparent technological glitch. The justices' action comes in an appeal from Alabama, which is seeking to execute Joseph Clifton Smith. He was sentenced to death for killing a man in 1997. Lower federal courts found Smith is intellectually disabled and thus can't be executed. When it's argued in the fall, the case could be the first in which the Supreme Court cuts back on its 23-year-old landmark ruling that barred the death penalty for people who are intellectually disabled. At issue is what happens in borderline cases, when scores on IQ tests are slightly above 70, which is widely accepted as a marker of intellectual disability. In 2014 and 2017, the court somewhat eased the burden of showing intellectual disability in those cases. It's the second time in about a year that an online error resulted in an early release from the high court. An opinion in an abortion case was accidently posted on its website a day early in June 2024. The court's landmark opinion overturning abortion as a constitutional right also went out early, though those circumstances were different because the case was leaked. This time, the court released a set of orders set for Monday after an 'apparent software malfunction' sent out early notifications.
