
When will Finance produce?
Presented by NFIB
With help from Benjamin Guggenheim
WHAT YOU GOT? It's all eyes on the Senate Finance Committee, which is working to produce its especially key portion of the GOP megabill.
Senate GOP leaders had hoped that the Finance Committee would be able to release its work this week. But it looks like the panel's portion of the Republican fiscal package will get pushed into the following week, as it deals with dicey issues like the higher cap for state and local deductions that might be crucial to getting a bill through the House and the phasing out of green energy incentives that has caused some heartburn in the Senate.
All of which underscores the particular microscope currently on Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), who's charged with producing a tax section that responds to the concerns of his Senate colleagues — without upending a fragile peace in the House, where the Republican fiscal package passed by a single vote.
It's far from Crapo's first difficult set of negotiations, as Pro Tax's Benjamin Guggenheim noted. But it might be the highest stakes that the Finance chair has faced in his more than three decades in Congress — six years in the House, followed by 26 and counting in the Senate.
The questions for Crapo are likely to only get tougher this week, with his committee now expected to need more time to craft a tax section. The Finance chair is expected to start briefing his Senate GOP colleagues on the measure by the middle of the week.
Still, don't expect him to let too much slip in public about where Finance might go on key issues in the interim, as he works on a tax package that seeks to preserve the expiring parts of the Trump tax cuts and deliver on other tax relief items.
MORE ON THAT in a bit. Welcome back to Weekly Tax, where we have to say that this is among our parental fears.
Back when there were fewer metaphors in a horse race: Today marks 52 years since Secretariat won the Triple Crown by dominating the Belmont Stakes — winning by 31 lengths and in a time (2:24) that's still the fastest a horse has ever run a mile and a half on dirt in the U.S.
Help get this newsletter to the finish line. Send your best tips and feedback.
Email: bbecker@politico.com, bfaler@politico.com, bguggenheim@politico.com and teckert@politico.com.
You can also reach us on Twitter at @berniebecker3, @tobyeckert, @brian_faler, @ben_guggenheim, @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
A QUICK BACKWARDS GLANCE: Let's be clear — Crapo might work quietly, but he's also not afraid to throw his weight around.
He had no issues, for instance, killing a bipartisan tax bill a year ago that had broad support in both the House and among Senate Democrats.
That's made for some interesting dynamics between Crapo and House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.), who helped write that bipartisan agreement, as Benjamin noted — though the two promise they've had no issues working closely on the tax negotiations in front of them.
Worth discussing: Crapo's decision to work against the 2024 bipartisan agreement affected more than just the interpersonal dynamics in this year's talks.
For instance, Crapo has been very explicit about wanting to permanently restore a trio of incentives for businesses that are either lapsed or phasing out. He's not alone in that among Senate Republicans, though the House was only able to revive those preferences through 2029.
But here's the wrinkle: The math on enacting immediate research write-offs, full expensing for capital investments and a more generous interest deduction might be easier if last year's bipartisan tax deal had been enacted.
That's because the 2024 agreement would have already brought back those three tax breaks for businesses, which is important because Crapo also wants to use a budget baseline that assumes that it costs nothing to extend the temporary parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
It's not clear whether the current policy baseline will fly with hardline deficit hawks in the House. But if it does, then having the three business incentives currently in place likely would mean that extending them would cost nothing against the baseline as well, instead of being a roughly half-trillion dollar proposition.
Now, Republicans are in the midst of an internal debate about both the budget math in enacting those provisions permanently, and how they can best be employed to help the economy.
LOTS OF TRADE-OFFS: Still, advocates for those three business breaks sound confident that Senate Republicans will find a way to make them permanent.
And it's worth noting that Crapo scored other victories by killing last year's agreement. Crapo publicly criticized 2024's proposed expansion of the Child Tax Credit, which included help for lower-income families, arguing that it diminished work incentives for the program.
As it happens, the 2025 tax bill includes a CTC expansion that's more up Crapo's alley, with the benefits largely funneled more to the middle of the income scale.
That's prompted some criticism from advocates for lower-income people, who maintain that the proposal needlessly leaves behind those who need the child credit the most.
For instance, researchers from the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University found that a standard family of two adults and two children would need to make a third more — $48,000 a year, instead of $36,000 — to get the full CTC under the House GOP bill.
Looking ahead: Outside advocates are still trying to nudge Republicans toward an even more generous CTC expansion in their bill, after some of the party's populists — like Vice President JD Vance and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) — have called for a far more sweeping credit.
For instance, the National Baptist Convention of America and Jabez Ministries are out with similar letters this morning that urge Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson to think more about those at the bottom of the income ladder.
GOP policymakers, the groups wrote, should 'continue exploring ways to help working families keep more of their hard-earned money through policies that make the CTC fully refundable against all taxes and by providing optional flexibility in the timing of how it's paid out.'
The driving force behind those letters was Tony Lowden, the lead pastor and founder of Jabez Ministries. Lowden was formerly the pastor of Maranatha Baptist Church in Plains, Ga., where his congregants included former President Jimmy Carter and his wife, Rosalynn Carter.
A NOT SO MID INCENTIVE: Here's something that hasn't proved to be much of an issue for Republicans this year — extending the limits on the mortgage interest deduction first enacted in TCJA.
The mortgage interest deduction was for many years thought to be a third rail in tax policy — too controversial for policymakers to restrain, despite many experts thinking its benefits accrued too much to better-off taxpayers.
Then the Trump tax cuts lowered the amount of mortgage on which a taxpayer can deduct their interest, from $1 million to $750,000. And now, the Yale Budget Lab is out today with a new report examining further possibilities for cutting the deduction.
For instance, getting rid of the MID for second homes could raise more than $100 billion over a decade, the group found. Also worth noting, from the group: The House's proposal to hike the SALT cap from $10,000 to $40,000 would nearly double how much the tax system subsidizes mortgage interest.
Around the World
Financial Times: 'UK special investigations team doubles tax haul in crackdown on the rich.'
Bloomberg: 'Brazil Lawmakers Gear Up for Fight Over Corporate Tax Exemptions.'
Also Bloomberg: 'ION Founder to Pay €280 Million to Settle Tax Probe: Carlino.'
Around the Nation
Cleveland.com: 'Ohio has spent a decade cutting income taxes: How much has it saved you?'
Iowa Capital Dispatch: 'Gov. Kim Reynolds signs unemployment insurance tax bill into law.'
Wyoming Public Radio: 'Electeds might do away with Wyoming's ability to tax property.'
Also Worth Your Time
From the Golden State: 'Newsom floats withholding federal taxes as Trump threatens California.'
What's happening at OMB? 'Like Elon Musk, Russ Vought wants to break Washington. Unlike the billionaire, the budget guru might just succeed.'
Associated Press: 'Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts — but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain.'
Did you know?
Secretariat also holds the record for fastest time in the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness Stakes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take job with conservative nonprofit
Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen, a Monument Republican, listens to opening day proceedings on the first day of the 2025 session of the Colorado Legislature on Jan. 8, 2025, at the Colorado Capitol. (Lindsey Toomer/Colorado Newsline) Senate Minority Paul Lundeen announced Monday that he is resigning from the Legislature to join the leadership of a conservative nonprofit. His resignation is effective immediately. 'Serving Colorado has been an honor and blessing,' the Monument Republican said in a statement. 'I am grateful to the people of Senate District 9 for the opportunity to fight for policies that empower individuals, protect our communities, and promote prosperity. As I transition to a national platform, I am eager to continue advocating for personal freedom, economic opportunity, and common-sense conservative values.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX He will lead the American Excellence Foundation, an organization that awards grants to advance conservative public policy. Lundeen served as a state representative from 2015 to 2018 and as a senator since 2019. He is term-limited and could not seek re-election in 2026. Before his time in the Legislature, he served on the State Board of Education, including as chair for two years. He worked on an array of education-related policies while in office. The Senate Republican caucus will meet on Thursday evening to select a new minority leader. A vacancy committee of Republicans from Senate District 9 will also need to meet to select a replacement for Lundeen. In a statement, Gov. Jared Polis thanked Lundeen for his public service. 'Paul has always found ways to work across the aisle, and do what is best for the people he has served,' the Democrat wrote. 'We've often found common ground on the issues that matter most to Coloradans, like education, public safety and growing our economy. Senator Lundeen has spent decades in public service, in addition to his time leading small businesses, and his presence and leadership will be missed at the Capitol.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty
Oklahoma's top prosecutor said Monday that the state intends to pursue a new murder trial against Richard Glossip but without the death penalty after the U.S. Supreme Court vacated his capital conviction in a rare victory for a death row prisoner. State Attorney General Gentner Drummond's decision to retry Glossip, 62, on a first-degree murder charge came out of a status conference hearing. Drummond said in a news release that the evidence still implicates Glossip in the 1997 murder of Oklahoma City motel owner Barry Van Treese. Glossip, a motel manager working for Van Treese, has maintained his innocence while on death row for almost three decades. While Drummond, a Republican, has not agreed with Glossip's innocence claims, he was supportive of the Supreme Court's ruling in February, when the majority of justices agreed, as Drummond put it, that "it is now an undeniable fact that he did not receive a fair trial." Drummond said Monday that he would ensure Glossip now receives an impartial trial. "While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence," Drummond said in a statement. "After the high court remanded the matter back to district court, my office thoroughly reviewed the merits of the case against Richard Glossip and concluded that sufficient evidence exists to secure a murder conviction." Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna, a Democrat, had previously indicated that Glossip would not be eligible for the death penalty now if he were to be retried. Drummond said he would seek a life sentence for Glossip at his next trial. "While I cannot go back 25 years and handle the case in the proper way that would have ensured true justice, I still have a duty to seek the justice that is available today," he added. The continuation of the state's prosecution against Glossip resumes a twisting case that saw him dodge death several times with nine separate execution dates that had to be postponed. Various courts delayed the executions as he appealed, while state corrections officials also came under scrutiny a decade ago for botched execution attempts. But Glossip's case had been championed in recent years by a bipartisan group of Oklahoma legislators after an independent report they commissioned in 2022 found that "no reasonable jury hearing the complete record would convict Glossip of first-degree murder." The report centered on the state's primary witness, Justin Sneed, who had confirmed to the report's investigators that he had discussions with multiple family members about "recanting" his testimony over an 11-year period. Investigators also said the district attorney's case file included documentation describing how the state provided Sneed information "so he could conform his testimony to match the evidence" from other witnesses. Glossip's original 1998 conviction was overturned in 2001, when a state appeals court found that the evidence against him was weak. But the state took him to trial again, and a second jury found him guilty in 2004. At Glossip's trial, Sneed, a motel handyman, admitted that he had killed Van Treese, but said that it was at Glossip's direction and that he had been promised $10,000. In exchange for testifying against Glossip, Sneed received a life sentence while Glossip was given the death penalty. Prosecutors said Glossip orchestrated the plot because he was embezzling from the motel and feared being fired. The Supreme Court on Monday tossed out Glossip's capital conviction in a 5-3 ruling. Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate, presumably because he was involved in the case when he was on a federal appeals court that includes Oklahoma. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the majority's ruling that prosecutors "knew Sneed's statements were false" and that "because Sneed's testimony was the only direct evidence of Glossip's guilt of capital murder, the jury's assessment of Sneed's credibility was necessarily determinative here." "Hence, there is a reasonable likelihood that correcting Sneed's testimony would have affected the judgment of the jury," she added. After the Supreme Court's decision, Glossip was moved off death row, but was held without bail in the Oklahoma County Detention Center on a first-degree murder charge. A next court date in Glossip's case is scheduled for June 17. Glossip's attorney, Don Knight, did not immediately comment about the prosecutors' decision, but he welcomed the Supreme Court's ruling in February that spared his longtime client from the death chamber. "He had nine execution dates, three last meals, and obviously, to finally get relief has been huge for him," Knight said, "and he's thrilled beyond words." This article was originally published on
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State Legislature Acts To ‘Make Texas Healthy Again'
Under Senate Bill 25, which awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature, Texas could become one of the first states to mandate warning labels on foods containing artificial dyes and specific chemicals. The bill, dubbed the Make Texas Healthy Again Act, requires labels on products containing one or more of some 40-plus additives, such as Blue 1, Red 40, Yellow 5, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), and titanium dioxide. The label would state: 'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.' The warning label must be prominent, readable, and would apply to products packaged after January 1, 2027. A loophole allows producers using existing packaging through 2036 to avoid the requirement. The bill also invalidates state labeling rules if federal regulations supersede them. 'Texas can really lead here. … These bills represent a Texas way that prioritizes transparency, prioritizes good education and prioritizes incentive change,' Calley Means, a top adviser to U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., said during a Senate Health and Human Services Committee hearing. Beyond labeling, SB 25 increases physical activity requirements for middle school students from four to six semesters of 30-minute daily sessions and mandates nutrition education for undergraduates, developed by a seven-member Texas Nutrition Advisory Committee appointed by the governor by December 31, 2025. The committee would include experts in metabolic health, a licensed physician, a Texas Department of Agriculture representative, and others. In addition, doctors and nurses must complete continuing education on nutrition to maintain their licenses. 'This sweeping legislation is not just another bill. It's a call to action — one that so many Texans and Americans are realizing — that something is wrong and that something needs to change in our food industry and in our sedentary lifestyle,' Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R-Brenham), the bill's sponsor, told The Texas Tribune. The bill garnered bipartisan support, with 10 Senate Democrats and three House Democrats sponsoring or co-sponsoring. 'This is about the MAHA parents and the crunchy granola parents coming together to say, 'We are sick and tired of being sick and tired,'' said Rep. Lacey Hull (R-Houston) before the House passed the bill on May 25. Food industry groups, including Walmart, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, General Mills, and Frito-Lay, opposed the labeling, warning in a letter that it 'could destabilize local and regional economies.' Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins (D-San Antonio) expressed concern that 'the cost of food will continue to rise,' the Tribune reported. Kolkhorst countered in February that 'the market will adjust.' Supporters, like the Episcopal Health Foundation, see health benefits. 'The amount of money and time we're spending treating diabetes as opposed to preventing it is huge, especially in Texas,' said Brian Sasser, the foundation's chief communications officer, per the Tribune. Andy Keller of the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute added, 'In a world that pretends the brain is not part of the body, this bill will put tools in the hands of children, parents and teachers to begin truly addressing emotional health and wellbeing.' The bill aligns with federal Make America Healthy Again initiatives, with Kolkhorst noting Kennedy's personal call urging its passage. 'As in so many cases, we're not waiting on Washington,' said Sen. Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola) in February. 'Texas will act.'