U.S. pauses cyber-offense activity against Russia as Trump tries to end Putin's war on Ukraine, reports say
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has instructed U.S. Cyber Command to pause offensive cyber and information operations against Russia, according to reports.
He recently ordered the unit to stand down planning against Russian cybersecurity threats, sources told The Record. The order doesn't apply to the National Security Agency or its signals intelligence targeting Russia.
Cyber Command has started putting together a "risk assessment" that lists what actions or missions were halted due to Hegseth's order and explains what potential threats could come from Russia, the report added.
"Due to operational security concerns, we do not comment nor discuss cyber intelligence, plans, or operations," a senior defense official told Fortune. "There is no greater priority to Secretary Hegseth than the safety of the Warfighter in all operations, to include the cyber domain."
Meanwhile, a separate report from the Washington Post said the pause that Hegseth ordered is meant to remain in effect while negotiations to end Russia's war on Ukraine are ongoing as President Donald Trump seeks terms that are seen as favorable to Moscow.
The cyber-offense operations being halted stop short of acts of war, sources told the Post, and could include disabling malware on Russian networks or blocking Russian hackers from servers they might use. Another source said planning for potential cyber-operations is continuing.
Such a pause in operations isn't unheard-of.
'I have seen many times when we are in some type of negotiation with another nation, especially if it's one that is considered an adversary, that we stop operations, exercises, we even cancel speeches sometimes,' Retired Lt. Gen. Charlie 'Tuna' Moore told the Post. 'It's fairly common to pause anything that could potentially derail the talks.'
But it comes as the administration has broken with European allies over Russia's war on Ukraine. That was underscored Friday, when a public meeting at the White House between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky turned into a screaming match.
Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) condemned Hegseth's order to the Cyber Command, saying the government now lacks the ability to counter Russian cyber threats.
'To capitulate now, as we appear to bail on our allies in Ukraine, is an inexplicable dereliction of duty that puts American critical infrastructure at risk,' Thompson told the Post.
Elsewhere in the Trump administration, there have been notable omissions of Russia as a cybersecurity threat.
In a speech before a United Nations working group on cybersecurity, Liesyl Franz, deputy assistant secretary for international cybersecurity at the State Department, raised cyberspace concerns about China and Iran, but didn't mention Russia.
In the same meeting, the European Union and the United Kingdom emphasized their concerns with Russian cyber threats. The U.K. said that Russia was using offensive and hostile cyberattacks in its illegal invasion of Ukraine.
The State Department did not immediately provide a comment.
And a memo released by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), a branch of the Department of Homeland Security that detects cyber threats to U.S. essential infrastructure, outlined the agency's new decree prioritizing China and safeguarding local systems. It, too, did not name Russia.
Although Russian threats have previously been the primary focus of the agency, a person familiar with the matter told the Guardian that analysts at CISA were verbally briefed to not follow or report threats from the country. They also said that ongoing work with 'Russian-related' projects was effectively 'nixed.'
Another person who worked on U.S. joint task forces to track and fight Russian cyber threats told the Guardian this was 'truly shocking.'
'There are thousands of U.S. government employees and military working daily on the massive threat Russia poses as possibly the most significant nation state threat actor,' they said. 'Not to diminish the significance of China, Iran, or North Korea, but Russia is at least on par with China as the most significant cyber threat.'
A DHS spokesperson told Fortune that the memo isn't from the administration and that CISA remains committed to addressing threats from Russia and hasn't changed its posture.
The U.S. has long considered Moscow as a threat to national cybersecurity. And last year, the U.S. reiterated the risk of Russian cyberattacks in its annual threat assessment.
'Russia will pose an enduring global cyber threat even as it prioritizes cyber operations for the Ukrainian war,' the report said. 'Moscow views cyber disruptions as a foreign policy level to shape other countries' decisions and continuously refines and employs its espionage, influence, and attack capabilities against a variety of targets.'
The report specified that Russia maintains the ability to attack underwater cables and industrial control systems within the U.S., its allies, and partner countries.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
a minute ago
- USA Today
Kim Jong Un's sister calls South Korea 'faithful dog' of Washington
SEOUL/WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - North Korea is stepping up criticism of South Korea's new President Lee Jae Myung as he prepares for his first summit with President Donald Trump, calling Lee's efforts to engage with Pyongyang a "pipedream". Since taking office in a snap election in June, the liberal Lee has taken steps to lower tensions with the nuclear-armed North, and the issue is one where he is expected to find common ground with Trump, who still boasts of his historic summits with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. But North Korea's envoys have yet to accept any of Trump's latest letters, and Kim's powerful sister, Kim Yo Jong, has issued a steady stream of dismissive statements rejecting and ridiculing Lee's overtures. "Lee Jae Myung is not the sort of man who will change the course of history," she told a gathering of North Korean diplomats, state news agency KCNA reported on Wednesday. She called South Korea a "faithful dog" of Washington, accused Lee of speaking gibberish, and said his government maintains a "stinky confrontational nature…swathed in a wrapper of peace". More: Meet Kim Yo Jong, the sister of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un Kim said the Lee administration is pursuing a two-faced policy of engagement as well as threatening joint military drills with the United States, which bases around 28,500 troops in South Korea as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War. Leader Kim Jong Un has ordered his diplomats to take "preemptive counteraction" against enemy states, the KCNA report said, without providing details. In response to her statement, South Korea's presidential office said the administration would open a new era for joint growth with North Korea, and its recent measures were meant for the stability and prosperity of both Koreas. South Korea and its ally the United States kicked off joint military drills this week, including testing an upgraded response to heightened North Korean nuclear threats. More: North Korea's Kim Jong Un vows to win anti-US battle as country marks Korean War anniversary Earlier this week, Kim Jong Un said that the joint U.S.- South Korea drills were an "obvious expression of their will to provoke war" and that his country needed to rapidly expand its nuclear armament. North Korea has surged ahead with more and bigger ballistic missiles, expanded its nuclear weapons facilities, and gained new support from its neighbours. "The North Korean leader sees little need to engage with Washington since he is receiving far more substantial benefits from Russia with fewer conditions than he could attain from the United States," said Bruce Klingner, a former U.S. intelligence analyst now with the Mansfield Foundation. Still, Kim could eventually respond to Trump in the hopes of providing the American president the "illusion of success though it would do nothing to actually reduce the North Korean threat to the U.S. and its allies," he said. North Korea in recent years has also changed its policy toward the South, dismissing the idea of peaceful unification and called Seoul a main enemy. Lee this week ordered his cabinet to prepare a partial step-by-step implementation of existing agreements with North Korea, and South Korea has begun removing loudspeakers that had been blaring anti-North Korea broadcasts along the border. "There's nothing new here and it's not going to get them anywhere," said Jenny Town, managing director Washington-based North Korea project 38 North. More: North Korea wired an agent $2M to smuggle weapons, tech and disguises out of California If anything of substance is discussed at the summit it will likely be the joint drills, which Trump scaled back during his first term, Town said. (Reporting by Joyce Lee in Seoul and David Brunnstrom in Washington; additional reporting by Ju-min Park; Writing by Josh Smith; Editing by Stephen Coates and Michael Perry)
San Francisco Chronicle
a minute ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NATO defense chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees
NATO defense chiefs were due to hold a virtual meeting Wednesday, a senior alliance official said, as countries pushing for an end to Russia's war on Ukraine devise possible future security guarantees for Kyiv that could help forge a peace agreement. Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO's Military Committee, said that 32 defense chiefs from across the alliance would hold a video conference as a U.S.-led diplomatic push seeks to end the fighting. U.S. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, will take part in the talks, Dragone said on social platform X. U.S. President Donald Trump met last Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska and on Monday hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Trump is trying to steer Putin and Zelenskyy toward a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbor, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia won't mount another invasion in coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, have signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the U.S. might play in is unclear. Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending U.S. troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Zelenskyy said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential.'
Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
Nikki Haley: Trump Needs To Rebuild U.S.-India Relationship
In July 1982, President Ronald Reagan welcomed Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to a state dinner at the White House. Toasting the friendship between our "two proud, free peoples," he said: "although our countries may travel separate paths from time to time, our destination remains the same." Four decades later, the U.S.-India relationship is at a troubling inflection point. To achieve the Trump administration's foreign policy goals—outcompeting China and achieving peace through strength—few objectives are more critical than getting U.S.-India relations back on track. The last few weeks have seen an explosive series of events. The Trump administration has threatened India with 25 percent tariffs for purchasing Russian oil, on top of the 25 percent President Donald Trump already slapped on Indian goods. These developments followed months of rising tension, including over the U.S. role in India-Pakistan ceasefire negotiations. Trump is right to target India's massive Russian oil purchases, which are helping to fund Vladimir Putin's brutal war against Ukraine. India has also traditionally been among the most protectionist economies in the world, with an average tariff rate more than five times the U.S. average in 2023. But India must be treated like the prized free and democratic partner that it is—not an adversary like China, which has thus far avoided sanctions for its Russian oil purchases, despite being one of Moscow's largest customers. If that disparity does not demand a closer look at U.S.-India relations, the realities of hard power should. Scuttling 25 years of momentum with the only country that can serve as a counterweight to Chinese dominance in Asia would be a strategic disaster. WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley announced that she would vote for former President Donald Trump during an event at the Hudson Institute on May 22, 2024 in Washington, DC. WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley announced that she would vote for former President Donald Trump during an event at the Hudson Institute on May 22, 2024 in Washington, the short term, India is essential in helping the United States move its critical supply chains away from China. While the Trump administration works to bring manufacturing back to our shores, India stands alone in its potential to manufacture at China-like scale for products that can't be quickly or efficiently produced here, like textiles, inexpensive phones, and solar panels. When it comes to defense, India's expanding military ties with the United States, Israel, and other American allies make it a crucial asset to the free world's security, and a rapidly growing market for U.S. defense equipment and cooperation. India's growing clout and security involvement in the Middle East could prove essential in helping to stabilize the region as America seeks to send fewer troops and dollars there. And India's location at the center of China's vital trade and energy flows could complicate Beijing's options in the case of a major conflict. In the longer term, India's significance is even more profound. Home to more than a sixth of humanity, India surpassed China as the world's most populous country in 2023, with a young workforce that contrasts with China's aging one. It is the world's fastest-growing major economy—soon to eclipse Japan as the world's fourth largest. India's rise represents the most significant geopolitical event since China's, and is among the greatest obstacles to China's goal of reshaping the global order. Simply put, China's ambitions will have to shrink as India's power grows. Yet, unlike Communist-controlled China, the rise of a democratic India does not threaten the free world. Partnership between the U.S. and India to counter China should be a no-brainer. India and China are unfriendly neighbors that have conflicting economic interests and ongoing territorial disputes, including a lethal skirmish over contested borders as recently as 2020. It would serve America's interests to help India stand up to its increasingly aggressive northern neighbor, both economically and militarily. And it would be a massive—and preventable—mistake to balloon a trade spat between the United States and India into an enduring rupture. If that were to happen, the Chinese Communist Party would be quick to play India and the United States against one another. For its part, India must take Trump's point over Russian oil seriously, and work with the White House to find a solution. As for the United States, the most urgent priority should be to reverse the downward spiral, which will require direct talks between President Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The sooner the better. The administration should focus on mending the rift with India and giving the relationship more high-level attention and resources—approaching what the U.S. devotes to China or Israel. Decades of friendship and good will between the world's two largest democracies provide a solid basis to move past the current turbulence. Navigating challenging issues like trade disagreements and Russian oil imports demand hard dialogue, but difficult conversations are often the sign of a deepening partnership. The United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals. To face China, the United States must have a friend in India. Nikki Haley, the Walter P. Stern Chair at the Hudson Institute, was US ambassador to the United Nations and governor of South Carolina. Bill Drexel is a fellow at the Hudson Institute. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
