logo
Judge questions legality of Trump administration's US$2 billion Harvard fund freeze

Judge questions legality of Trump administration's US$2 billion Harvard fund freeze

Straits Times3 days ago
A federal judge in Boston cast doubt on
the legality of the Trump administration's termination of more than US$2 billion in federal research funding for Harvard University over alleged institutional failures including antisemitism on campus.
In a hearing on July 21, US Judge Allison Burroughs raised questions about the constitutionality of the government's decision to slash the funding and called some of their arguments in defense of the move 'mind boggling.' She pushed back in particular on the administration's claims that the funding cuts were justified by Harvard's failure to tackle antisemitism.
'There are limits to what you can terminate, and why, and how,' Ms Burroughs said to Justice Department lawyer Michael Velchik during the hearing. 'It seems to be your idea that you can terminate a contract even if the basis for termination is a constitutional violation.'
President Donald Trump has
made Harvard the main target of his effort to force universities to reshape higher education by cracking down on alleged antisemitism, removing perceived political bias among the faculty and eliminating diversity programs. Harvard's lawsuit alleges Mr Trump's move violates the First Amendment right to free speech.
The Trump administration announced earlier this year that it was scrutinising billions in federal grants and contracts to Harvard. The government has also threatened Harvard's tax-exempt status and tried to prevent international students from enrolling.
Mr Velchik said at the hearing that he attended Harvard and considered it to be the best place to get an education. But he repeatedly echoed Mr Trump's argument that the school 'exhibited a wanton disregard for antisemitism' during campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza.
'I am both Jewish and American so I hear what you are saying,' the judge said.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World US President Trump 'caught off guard' by Israel's strikes in Syria
World US not rushing trade deals ahead of August deadline, will talk with China, Bessent says
Opinion Singapore's vaping crisis lays bare the drug addiction nightmare for parents
Singapore LTA seeks tailored solutions to improve Bukit Panjang LRT's maintenance inspections
Multimedia 'It's very sad': She comforts loved ones turned away by inmates
Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH
Opinion Sumiko at 61: 7 facts about facial skin ageing, and skincare ingredients that actually work
Opinion With Shatec cutting back operations, what's next for the hospitality sector?
Both sides of the case have asked Ms Burroughs to issue final rulings in their favour without a trial, an action known as a summary judgment. The judge ended the hearing without ruling and said she had not yet made a decision on the release of the funds.
The hearing came about a month after Mr Trump said in a social media post that the administration was nearing a deal with Harvard.
'We are confident that Harvard will eventually come around and support the President's vision, and through good-faith conversations and negotiations, a good deal is more than possible,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement on July 21.
On a social media post on Truth Social on July 21, President Trump referred to Ms Burroughs as an 'Obama appointed Judge' and 'an automatic 'loss'' for the government's case, but vowed to immediately appeal any ruling against the administration.
'Harvard has US$52 billion dollars sitting in the bank, and yet they are anti-semitic, anti-christian, and anti-America,' Mr Trump said in a post. 'Much of this money comes from the USA, all to the detriment of other Schools, Colleges, and Institutions, and we are not going to allow this unfair situation to happen any longer.'
After the hearing, dozens of Harvard alumni and professors held a rally outside the courthouse in support of the university, chanting the school's 'Veritas' motto and slogans like 'Stand up, fight back!'
Mr John Quackenbush, chair of the biostatistics department at Harvard's TH Chan School of Public Health, said the funding freeze threatens not only his own research related to cancer and other diseases, but the work of his post-doc researchers, who he said are now being recruited by foreign institutions.
'The drain on the future of American research is something none of us should stand for,' he said.
During the hearing, Ms Burroughs heard arguments by lawyers for the university and a group of professors, who argued that the funding freeze was unlawful and unconstitutional.
US lawyers claim the Trump administration properly froze funding because Harvard failed to curb antisemitism on campus, particularly after the Israel-Hamas war erupted in October 2023. They said Mr Trump rescinded grants because Harvard no longer complied with Mr Trump's policy of combating antisemitism.
'Harvard should have read the fine print,' Mr Velchik said during the hearing, arguing that the government can terminate grants at any time if a university is not aligned with its priorities.
The school claims Mr Trump retaliated when it rejected government demands to control its governance, curriculum and the viewpoints of faculty and students.
'In some ways you're justifying the conduct on protecting Jews and upholding American values but on the other hand taking steps that are antithetical to those things,' Ms Burroughs said at the hearing.
Later, at the end of the hearing, the judge told Mr Velchik that she hoped nothing had been said that would appear to diminish anyone's concerns about antisemitism.
'This is obviously a very fraught and emotional topic,' she said. BLOOMBERG
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US prepares to allow limited oil operations in Venezuela, starting with Chevron, sources say
US prepares to allow limited oil operations in Venezuela, starting with Chevron, sources say

Business Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Times

US prepares to allow limited oil operations in Venezuela, starting with Chevron, sources say

[HOUSTON] The United States is preparing to grant new authorisations to key partners of Venezuela's state-run PDVSA, starting with Chevron, to allow them to operate with limitations in the sanctioned Opec nation and swap oil, five sources close to the matter said on Thursday. If granted, the authorisations to the US oil major, and possibly also to PDVSA's European partners, would mark a policy shift from a pressure strategy Washington adopted this year on Venezuela's energy industry, under US sanctions since 2019. President Donald Trump's administration might now allow the energy companies to pay oilfield contractors and make necessary imports to secure operational continuity. Some imports could be swapped for Venezuelan oil, as authorised in previous licenses, three of the sources said. A senior State Department official said in a statement they could not speak about any specific licenses to PDVSA's partners, but added the United States would not allow President Nicolas Maduro's government to profit from the sale of oil. A source in touch with US and Venezuelan officials said it was difficult to understand how Maduro's government would not benefit from cargoes Chevron can sell to the US, and later on Thursday Maduro hailed work done to keep Chevron in the country. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'There are already working groups so that Chevron can re-incorporate its functions,' Maduro told an interview with Telesur, adding that Chevron's top leadership had already been informed of licenses so it can keep operating in Venezuela. Chevron shares touched US$155.93 on Thursday, their highest level since April 3, according to LSEG data. 'Chevron conducts its business globally in compliance with laws and regulations applicable to its business, as well as the sanctions frameworks provided for by the US government, including in Venezuela,' a company spokesperson said. The move to ease some restrictions on Venezuela's oil sector follows a prisoner swap this month in which Maduro released 10 American detainees while accepting the return of more than 200 Venezuelans who had been deported from the US and held in an El Salvador prison. Relations between the two countries have been tense for years, and the Trump administration has publicly supported opposition leaders who say their candidate won last year's election, not Maduro. Trump in February announced the cancellation of a handful of energy licenses in Venezuela, including Chevron's, and gave until late May to wind down all transactions. The move left all operations in oil and gas joint ventures with Chevron and other partners in PDVSA's hands, but the companies were authorized to preserve their stakes and output remained almost unchanged. The US State Department, which in May blocked a move by special presidential envoy Richard Grenell to extend the licenses, is this time imposing conditions on any authorization modifications, so that no cash reaches Maduro's coffers, the three sources said. In the past, US officials have promised no money would reach Maduro from oil proceeds despite licenses. But it did because PDVSA demands tax and royalties to be paid before granting exports permits. Even if parties agree to oil swaps, those arrangements save PDVSA, and ultimately Maduro's government, millions of dollars per year in imports. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is not expected this time to ban the authorisations, but is negotiating their scope, they added. It was not immediately clear if the terms of the license that could be granted to Chevron would be reproduced for other foreign companies in Venezuela, including Italy's Eni and Spain's Repsol, which have been asking the US to allow them to swap fuel supplies for Venezuelan oil. The authorisations might remain private, one of the sources said. The US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control and PDVSA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Where will the oil go? Following the cancellation of Chevron's license earlier this year, Trump announced the imposition of secondary tariffs on buyers of Venezuelan oil. But the measure, expected to severely hit Venezuela's main crude buyer China, has not been enforced, allowing the South American country to divert to Asia crude grades that were previously sold to US and European refiners through PDVSA's joint-venture partners. The reshuffle, which has maintained Venezuela's oil output and exports close to the levels they were at before the license cancellations, has been criticised by politicians in Washington and was discussed as part of talks for the new authorisations, the sources said. During former US President Joe Biden's administration, targeted licenses to PDVSA's partners allowed Western refiners to regain access to Venezuelan supplies, but they also granted a stable source of cash to Maduro's administration as the companies were required by Venezuela to pay royalties and taxes. REUTERS

US House Speaker Johnson says Epstein case 'not a hoax', World News
US House Speaker Johnson says Epstein case 'not a hoax', World News

AsiaOne

time25 minutes ago

  • AsiaOne

US House Speaker Johnson says Epstein case 'not a hoax', World News

WASHINGTON — Republican House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson said the Jeffrey Epstein scandal was "not a hoax" in an interview released on Thursday (July 24), as the case continued to stoke turmoil within President Donald Trump's party. Trump has denounced the furor over his late friend, a disgraced financier and convicted sex offender as "the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax" and urged his fellow Republicans without success to drop the issue. "It's not a hoax. Of course not," Johnson said in an interview with CBS News. Johnson said on Tuesday he would send lawmakers home a day early for a five-week summer recess to avoid a political fight over whether to make public additional files on Epstein, who hung himself in a New York City jail in 2019, according to New York City's chief medical examiner. Even so, a Republican-controlled subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday approved a subpoena seeking all Justice Department files on Epstein. Three Republicans joined five Democrats to back the effort, in a sign that Trump's party was not ready to move on from the issue. "We want full transparency. We want everybody who is involved in any way with the Epstein evils — let's call it what it was — to be brought to justice as quickly as possible. We want the full weight of the law on their heads," Johnson told CBS in the interview, conducted on Wednesday. A disclosure on Wednesday about Trump's appearance in the Justice Department's case records threatened to deepen a political crisis that has engulfed his administration for weeks. The Wall Street Journal reported that US Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump in May that his name appeared in investigative files related to Epstein. [[nid:720547]]

Infuriating Netanyahu, France's Macron says to recognise Palestinian state, World News
Infuriating Netanyahu, France's Macron says to recognise Palestinian state, World News

AsiaOne

time25 minutes ago

  • AsiaOne

Infuriating Netanyahu, France's Macron says to recognise Palestinian state, World News

PARIS/WASHINGTON — France intends to recognise a Palestinian state in September at the United Nations General Assembly, President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday (July 24), adding that he hoped it would help bring peace to the region, but drawing an immediate rebuke from Israel. Macron, who announced the decision on X, published a letter sent to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas confirming France's intention to press ahead with Palestinian recognition and work to convincing other partners to follow suit. "True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine," Macron said. "I will make this solemn announcement at the United Nations General Assembly next September." France, home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, will become the first major Western country to recognise a Palestinian state, potentially giving greater momentum to a movement so far dominated by smaller nations that are generally more critical of Israel. The announcement sparked anger from Israel and is likely to get a tough response from Washington. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned Macron's decision saying that such a move "rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy." "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel — not to live in peace beside it. Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel," Netanyahu said in a post on X. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz described the move as "a disgrace and a surrender to terrorism," adding that Israel would not allow the establishment of a "Palestinian entity that would harm our security, endanger our existence." In a statement on X on Thursday, Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney also pressed Israel to seek peace, condemning the "Israeli government's failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza" and reiterating Canada's support for a two-state solution in the region. Carney also accused Israel of violating international law over the blocking of Canadian-funded aid to civilians in the war-torn Palestinian enclave. "Canada calls on all sides to negotiate an immediate ceasefire in good faith. We reiterate our calls for Hamas to immediately release all the hostages, and for the Israeli government to respect the territorial integrity of the West Bank and Gaza," the prime minister said. In a diplomatic cable in June, the United States said it opposed any steps that would unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state even saying it could go against US foreign policy interests and draw consequences. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Macron had been leaning towards recognising a Palestinian state for months as part of a bid to keep the idea of a two-state solution alive despite the pressure not to do so. French officials initially weighed up the move ahead of a United Nations conference, which France and Saudi Arabia had planned to co-host in June to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. The conference was postponed under US pressure and after the 12-day Israel-Iran air war began, during which regional airspace was closed, making it hard for representatives of some Arab states to attend. It was rescheduled and downgraded to a ministerial event on July 28-29 with a second event taking place with heads of state and government on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in September. Creating momentum The decision to make the announcement ahead of next week's conference aimed to give the French team at the United Nations a framework to work with other countries who are also considering recognising a Palestinian state or still have misgivings in doing so. Diplomats say Macron has faced resistance from allies such as Britain and Canada over his push for the recognition of a Palestinian state. Some 40 foreign ministers will be in New York next week. Israeli officials have spent months lobbying to prevent what some have described as "a nuclear bomb" for bilateral relations. The idea that France, one of Israel's closest allies and a G7 member, could recognise a Palestinian state, would certainly infuriate Netanyahu. According to sources familiar with the matter, Israel's warnings to France have ranged from scaling back intelligence sharing to complicating Paris' regional initiatives — even hinting at possible annexation of parts of the West Bank. Israel has been waging a devastating war in Gaza since the Palestinian militant group Hamas' deadly attack on Israel in October 2023 and says recognising a Palestinian state now would be equivalent to rewarding Hamas. Thanking France, the Palestinian Authority's Vice President Hussein Al Sheikh said on X that Macron's decision reflected "France's commitment to international law and its support for the Palestinian people's rights to self-determination and the establishment of our independent state." [[nid:720593]]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store