
Ministers in talks over welfare concessions as Labour rebellion grows
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and Government were 'ongoing' on Thursday night as Downing Street seeks to head off what would be Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat.
It came as six more Labour MPs added their names to an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks, arguing disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed.
The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards.
North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names.
The new names takes the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the so-called 'reasoned amendment,' tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hiller, to 126.
The Prime Minister has insisted the reforms are set for a Commons vote on Tuesday as planned, but ministers are locked in talks with backbenchers about the possibility of making changes to soften the impact of the Bill as a major revolt looms.
Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Government, Ms Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers that they would not be expected to betray the party's traditional values.
'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme.
'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.'
She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them.
'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.'
The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year.
Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes.
But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains.
One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country.
'It's not very grown up.'
They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.'
According to the Government's impact assessment, the welfare reforms as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty.
Asked whether she thought there were hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits who were not disabled, Ms Rayner said: 'No, what we're saying though is that the welfare system has to be able to have longevity.'
Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'.
At a press conference at the Nato summit in The Hague, the Prime Minister said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be.
'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.'
Later on Wednesday, armed forces minister Luke Pollard echoed the Deputy Prime Minister, telling Sky News's Politics Hub show that 'of course' the Government was in talks about possibly making changes.
'Of course we are, and I think there's a concern that's very valid and real for lots of my colleagues. They're not doing this to cause trouble or be argumentative,' he said.
'They're doing it because they have a genuine, heartfelt concern about some of the impacts. '
He said some of the reforms would be supported across the party but 'where there is concerns… those discussions will continue until the vote and beyond.'
Speaking to BBC Newsnight, Mr Pollard said the Government had 'between now and Tuesday to listen to those concerns' and 'to address them' before making the case for reform in the Commons debate next week.
Asked whether the Government would listen to calls for it to change course over planned cuts to Pip, he said: 'I think that's for many colleagues where the real concern is.'
Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their opposition to the plans.
Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
SNP MPs join Labour rebels in bid to kill off benefit cuts
The party has given its backing to a backbench amendment that would thwart proposals in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. The bill seeks to cut back disability benefit payments by around £5 billion per year. The amendment opposing the cuts has been signed by more than 120 Labour MPs in what marks the biggest rebellion Keir Starmer has faced since he came to power. Twelve Scottish Labour MPs are among those to have signed the amendment, which notes that the UK Government's 'own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of [the bill], including 50,000 children'. READ MORE: Labour's welfare cuts 'to cost 300,000 Scots £500 per year' – Trussell Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner confirmed to the House of Commons on Wednesday Labour are planning to press ahead with a vote despite mounting opposition to the reforms. Stephen Flynn, SNP Westminster leader, said all SNP MPs have signed the amendment. He called on all parties to unite to 'stop Keir Starmer's attack on disabled people'. Flynn asked, in particular, Scottish Labour MPs who are yet to sign the amendment to 'do the right thing'. 'The best way to kill this bill and stop Labour's attack on disabled people is to ensure this amendment is taken and voted on next Tuesday and the best way to ensure that happens is if this amendment is cross-party,' he said. 'That's why all SNP MPs have now signed this amendment. It is essential that parties and MPs across the parliament now unite to stop Keir Starmer's attack on disabled people. READ MORE: Here's what we learned from John Curtice's new polling report 'The SNP is clear that these cuts to disability can't just be delayed, they need to be stopped altogether. We will continue to use every parliamentary tactic to make sure that happens. 'I would urge more MPs and parties to follow our lead – in particular the two thirds of Scottish Labour MPs who have yet to sign this amendment. If they refuse to do the right thing, it falls on Anas Sarwar to instruct every one of his MPs to vote against Labour's attack on disabled people.' On Wednesday, the Trussell Trust warned that 300,000 disabled and sick Scots are set to lose £500 a year if the Labour Government's plan are pushed through – with new claimants hit by as much as £3000. Under the proposals in the bill, eligibility for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) will be limited, along with the health-related element of Universal Credit. Prime Minister Starmer said on Wednesday morning from The Hague: 'We're pressing on with a vote on this because we need to bring about reform.' Defending the plans while at a Nato summit, Starmer said the current system 'traps people in a position where they can't get into work'. 'In fact, it's counterproductive, it works against them getting into work,' he said. 'So we have to reform it, and that is a Labour argument, it's a progressive argument.'

The National
25 minutes ago
- The National
UK nations unite over Labour's 'inadequate' devolution approach
The Labour administration in Westminster has received a letter signed by the Scottish Parliament's Social Justice and Social Security Committee, the Northern Ireland Assembly's Committee for Communities, and the Equality and Social Justice Committee at Senedd Cymru raising concerns about its handling of planned welfare cuts. Keir Starmer's Government is aiming to cut back disability and sickness benefits to the tune of £5 billion per year, primarily through cuts to Personal Independence Payments (Pip) and changes to the health element of Universal Credit. READ MORE: Seamus Logan: Using an election as plebiscite referendum is just not going to fly Despite a major rebellion among Labour MPs which could derail the proposals, Starmer has insisted he will try to plough ahead with plans which UK Government's assessments say will push 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – into poverty. In their letter to the UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), which is leading the plans, the three devolved parliament committees raised serious concerns about the 'lack of robust data and jurisdiction-specific impact assessments'. The letter said: 'Set against an economic backdrop that is already extremely challenging for disabled people and/or people with health conditions, the anticipated changes have led to significant concerns. 'Those affected and other stakeholders in each of our jurisdictions fear that the challenges faced entering or returning to the workplace will only worsen in the coming months and years. Labour's DWP Secretary Liz Kendall has spearheaded the cuts'For many, the benefits they receive are not symptomatic of a 'broken' system but make a significant contribution to their health and well-being and enable them to actively participate in the workplace.' They went on: 'The committees are agreed that inadequate consultation and engagement by the UK Government with stakeholders and the devolved institutions has contributed to this sense of concern. 'Limited in-person consultation at just nine events, and only in major cities, is also restricting further the opportunity to hear from the many people who fear their ability to enter or return to the workplace will be adversely affected by the UK Government's approach to reform. 'In addition, the lack of robust data and jurisdiction-specific impact assessments presents significant challenges for our three committees to effectively scrutinise potential impacts. READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: SNP must woo voters to turn our indy hopes into reality "As the elected members who make up the three committees, we are well placed to assess demographic and historical contexts and to ensure dialogue is constructive and reform is meaningful and positive. However, we remain constrained by the lack of quality information.' It concluded: 'Our committees fully support the stated ambition that 'no one should be consigned to a life on benefits just because they have a health condition or a disability, especially when they're able to and want to work with the right support in place'. 'However, in order to contribute meaningfully to the reform process, committees and citizens must be fully informed and offered every opportunity for meaningful engagement.' The letter was signed by committee chairs Jenny Rathbone, from Welsh Labour, Collette Stevenson, from the SNP, and Colm Gildernew, from Sinn Fein. READ MORE: Scottish Labour MPs set to rebel on UK welfare reform – see the full list Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham has added his voice to the senior figures calling on the Government to reconsider the welfare cuts, as has his London counterpart, Sadiq Khan, and Labour's First Minister of Wales Eluned Morgan. The joint letter echoes a similar joint intervention by the three devolved nations' first ministers in 2021, when the Tory-led UK government was looking to cut Universal Credit. At the time, Scotland's first minister Nicola Sturgeon, together with Welsh first minister Mark Drakeford, Northern Ireland first minister and deputy first minister Paul Givan and Michelle O'Neill, urged the UK government to stop the 'morally indefensible' benefit cuts. Since then, Labour have entered power at Westminster on a pledge to "reset" devolved relationships. The DWP was approached for comment. SNP MSP Stevenson, the convener of Holyrood's Social Justice and Social Security Committee, said: 'The Labour Party is balancing the books on the backs of the most vulnerable, and the effect will be devastating. Nowhere is that more stark than the UK Government's own warnings that they will push 50,000 more children into poverty. 'This does not reflect Scotland's values and must not happen. That's why the SNP opposes these cuts, and now the devolved legislatures have joined us.'


Scotsman
25 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Housing crisis will only get worse unless we act now
A year after Scottish Government declared a housing emergency, little has been done to end it, writes DJ Alexander Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It's just over a year since the Scottish Government declared a housing emergency. At the time – May 2024 – Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville declared that she would use all the powers at her disposal to try to address the housing situation which she described as 'one of the defining issues of a generation.' Move forward one year to the publication of the latest Scottish quarterly housing statistics. The figures highlight the continuing failure of the Scottish Government to address the country's current housing emergency. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad All sector newbuild starts are down by 11.2 per cent between financial year 23/24 to 24/25; private sector newbuild starts down 11.5 per cent; social sector newbuild starts down 10.1 per cent; and affordable housing supply starts down 21.3 per cent. At every level in housebuilding there is retreat, says David J Alexander At every level in housebuilding there is retreat. There is only contraction and not growth and yet we are expected to believe that 'one of the defining issues of a generation' is being tackled by this inaction, indifference, lack of engagement and an inability to focus funds, energy and commitment on an area which is central to the lives of all Scottish people. There needs to be a sense of real urgency in this to deliver more money, more financial and strategic encouragement to private housing, to social housing, and to affordable housing if this emergency is not to drag on for the next five to ten years. It is true that more finance has been provided for affordable housing and the overall budgets are higher, but this is barely touching the sides. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There needs to be much greater assistance for the private homebuilding sector, much more movement to generate more social housing and an approach which sets serious targets for the next five years. SNP Minister Shirley-Anne Somerville hoped to sort housing emergency (Picture: Jeff) When there are hundreds of thousands of people on social housing waiting lists; when the private rented sector is experiencing unprecedented demand; and when house prices are soaring because the number of newbuilds is declining, then action is required immediately on all fronts. These latest statistics show all newbuild housing starts to be back at their lowest level since 2013, we need to see a return to the housebuilding peaks of the recent past. Just four years ago in 2020-21 there were 20,902 all sector newbuild starts while six years ago that figure was at 25,324. We need a return to those levels of housebuilding immediately if we are going to address the enormous housing needs which Scotland currently faces. This is a decision not for next year or the year after but for today and it needs coordination between the private and social sector, the housebuilders, the landlords and property investors, the agents and the tenants to create a housing market that is fit for purpose. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This current situation cannot be allowed to go on. With fewer and fewer houses being started each year, we are creating a greater and greater emergency in the years to come. Without immediate action house prices will continue to rise; rents will continue to increase; waiting lists will continue to grow; and individuals and families will continue to be unable to find a suitable home in Scotland now or in the future.