
Trump orders review of Syrian leader's terrorist designation
Trump signed the order on Monday, easing broad financial restrictions while maintaining targeted sanctions against Assad and his former government, which was deposed late last year by militants led by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
US sanctions against designated terrorist groups will also remain in place. However, Trump's order directs Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review HTS's designation as a 'Foreign Terrorist Organization,' as well as al-Sharaa's label as a 'Specially Designated Global Terrorist.' Washington will also revisit Syria's status as a 'State Sponsor of Terrorism,' a designation first imposed in 1979.
The decision follows Trump's May meeting with al-Sharaa in Riyadh, where discussions focused on Syria's reconstruction and potential normalization of relations with Israel. At the time, Trump pledged to give the new leadership in Damascus 'a chance at greatness.' To oversee Washington's growing ties with Damascus, he appointed Thomas Barrack, his ambassador to Turkey and longtime confidant, as US Special Envoy for Syria.
Speaking to reporters on Monday, Barrack acknowledged the 'controversy here, of somebody who had been al-Nusrah and had been considered a bad guy who all of a sudden becomes the leader' – drawing a historical parallel between Syria's political shift and the early years of American independence.
'If you remember, we had a revolutionary war that lasted 14 months. And we had brutality… And from 1776, when we declared independence, it was 12 years until we got a president. And who was the president? The president was a general… It was George Washington,' Barrack told reporters during a State Department briefing call.
So if you take Syria… you have a general who transitioned from wartime into a position of being the leader of a reframed new country that needs everything – and that's basically what's happening.
Rubio previously warned that Syria had become 'a playground for jihadist groups, including ISIS and others,' acknowledging that the new Syrian leadership 'didn't pass their background check with the FBI,' but insisted the US must support them to prevent wider regional instability.
'The US is taking further actions to support a Syria that is stable, unified, and at peace with itself and its neighbors,' Rubio wrote in a post on X on Monday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
One step forward, two steps back: The illusion of a Russian-American thaw
Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has announced that US President Donald Trump has lifted financial sanctions against Russia that had blocked Rosatom from continuing construction of the Paks Nuclear Power Plant 2 in Hungary. Although the Biden administration's sanctions late last year were formally directed at Moscow, Budapest arguably suffered the most, since the two new reactor units at Paks were viewed as vital for Hungary's long-term energy independence. (The first four units were built during the Soviet period.) A year ago, Hungary managed to have the Paks-2 project removed from the European Union's sanctions list, but at significant political cost. Nevertheless, the Democratic administration in Washington remained unyielding – which Budapest saw as a political vendetta for its outspoken support of Trump. Against this backdrop, the current US decision to ease sanctions on Gazprombank looks far more like a favor to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban than to Russian President Vladimir Putin. It also indirectly benefits French firms participating in the Paks-2 project. The move has rekindled a faint hope that Russian-American relations might see a thaw. Yet overall, there has been precious little positive news from Washington. The State Department recently postponed a scheduled meeting on removing 'irritants' from bilateral ties. Trump has shown no enthusiasm for Moscow's offer to mediate between Iran and Israel. And American officials continue to criticize Russia's 'hard' stance on a Ukrainian settlement. Could the Gazprombank decision signal a new phase of improvement in Russian-American relations? Might it foreshadow similar easing for other Russian financial institutions? Could there even be a revival of bilateral high-tech cooperation? One would like to answer these questions with optimism – but the evidence simply is not there. Moscow and Washington continue to have fundamentally different approaches to restoring normal relations, and that affects the entire nature of their dialogue. Russia's position could be described as systemic. In Moscow's view, great-power relations must be treated holistically, with progress across political, military, economic, diplomatic, and humanitarian areas all developing in parallel. The Kremlin believes that unless movement happens on all these fronts together, genuine normalization will remain out of reach, even if such an approach takes time and patience. For the 47th president of the United States, foreign policy appears more transactional: a series of short-term 'deals' with everyone from NATO members to Mexico, Canada, Iran, or China. Each partner gets its own checklist – Iran is asked to abandon nuclear ambitions, China to accept trade tariffs, NATO Europeans to raise defense spending. Trump is not a man to wait. He does not want to tout a big deal years down the line, or even by the next midterm elections. He wants results today, or at the latest tomorrow. In Russia's case, Washington is eyeing a single, momentous deal: an agreement to end the armed confrontation with Ukraine. Trump seems to have little concept of what a lasting political settlement would involve, let alone how a future European security system might look. His overriding priority is to secure a temporary ceasefire at all costs, so he can declare victory where his predecessor, Joe Biden, fell short. In Trump's eyes, this historic Ukraine deal would overshadow any long-term, painstaking effort to rebuild a proper Russian-American dialogue. Meanwhile, in other areas, Moscow is simply not ready to engage in the one-sided give-and-take Washington expects. This was underscored by America's European NATO partners, who nearly unanimously agreed to boost their defense spending to an unprecedented 5% of GDP by 2035. Likewise, Kiev has shown its willingness to meet US expectations by offering up its natural resources wholesale to American corporations. At the same time, it must be remembered that Trump is almost alone in his desire to reestablish a functional dialogue with Moscow. Most of his own administration views Russia with indifference or hostility, keeping it well down the priority list. Moreover, the deeply entrenched anti-Russian consensus that has dominated Washington for decades remains solidly in place. There is no powerful political or business lobby in the United States today pushing for a fresh 'reset' with Russia. Trump will continue to face pressure from the right. Even as the Gazprombank sanctions decision emerged, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told ABC News that Trump had already given the green light on Capitol Hill to launch a new package of anti-Russian measures – something Graham has been pushing for months. Whether the senator is speaking from fact or wishful thinking, it is far too soon for Moscow to relax. In short, the Russian-American relationship remains a rollercoaster. Occasional encouraging signals – like the easing of sanctions on a single bank – should not be misread as a sea change. One can hope for a broader normalization, but for now the outlook is uncertain. Moscow's systemic, steady approach still clashes with Washington's transactional, headline-driven instincts. Unless both sides find a way to bridge these philosophies, the hope of a truly stable Russian-American partnership will remain fragile at best. This article was first published by Izvestia newspaper, and was translated and edited by the RT team.


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump threatens New York mayoral frontrunner with arrest
US President Donald Trump has warned that the presumptive Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, could be arrested if he follows through on his promise to prevent federal officials from enforcing immigration laws in the country's largest city. Uganda-born Mamdani said in his victory speech after the New York City Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday that he would 'stop masked ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents from deporting our neighbors.' 'Well then, we will have to arrest him,' Trump said when asked by journalists about the New York state lawmaker's pledge later in the day, as he visited the so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention center in Florida. 'Look, we do not need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I am going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation,' the president said, referring to Mamdani. Trump also claimed that 'a lot of people are saying he is here illegally. We are going to look at everything.' The president continued his attacks on the Democratic politician after returning to the White House, describing Mamdani as a 'total nut job' and threatening to withhold funding for New York City if he does not 'do the right thing.' Mamdani responded to Trump's comments in a statement on X, labeling them an 'intimidation' attempt that his supporters and him will not accept. The president threatened him with arrest and deportation 'not because I have broken any law, but because I will refuse to let ICE terrorize our city,' the 33-year-old argued. 'His statements do not just represent an attack on our democracy but an attempt to send a message to every New Yorker who refuses to hide in the shadows: if you speak up, they will come for you,' he said. Mamdani has been living in the US since the age of seven and became a naturalized citizen in 2018. He denies being a communist, describing himself as a democratic socialist.


Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump threatens Hamas with something ‘worse'
US President Donald Trump has publicly warned Hamas against rejecting a new American-backed ceasefire proposal, stating that the militant group's position will only deteriorate if it refuses to accept the deal, which has allegedly already been agreed upon with Israel. The warning was issued on Tuesday via Trump's Truth Social platform, following what he described as a 'long and productive meeting' between US and Israeli officials. 'Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War,' Trump wrote, thanking mediators Qatar and Egypt for their efforts. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. The exact details of the proposal, reportedly finalized during high-level US-Israeli consultations, remain unclear. The deal is believed to include a temporary pause in hostilities in Gaza in exchange for the release of Israeli hostages and broader humanitarian access to the enclave. Egyptian and Qatari mediators are expected to present the deal to Hamas leadership in the coming days. Trump's statement comes amid growing divisions within Israel's own government over the prospect of any ceasefire. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Monday that 'this war must end in a decisive victory… without agreements, without mediators.' The far-right official warned that halting operations would pose 'a greater danger' to Israel's future than continuing the war. Despite internal dissent, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has allowed talks on a possible pause in the fighting to proceed, under pressure from the US and in response to international concern over mounting civilian casualties in Gaza. Since the start of the war in October 2023, more than 56,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. The conflict began after a surprise Hamas assault on southern Israel that left around 1,200 people dead and 250 taken hostage. Israel's response has reduced much of Gaza to rubble and triggered a severe humanitarian disaster in the Palestinian enclave. Washington has supported Israel's military campaign while also urging restraint and promoting humanitarian efforts. In late May, the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating aid corridors following a three-month Israeli blockade. However, over 400 Palestinians have reportedly been killed near aid distribution points since then, according to UN data and local health authorities. The Israeli military recently intensified its offensive following reports that around 20 hostages are still alive in Hamas custody. Israel has claimed a series of high-profile assassinations in recent weeks, including those of Hamas military commander Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa and political leader Muhammad Sinwar. Hamas has denied placing its military infrastructure in civilian areas and has condemned the killings of non-combatants in the strikes.