US-Iran nuclear talks shift to Rome over logistics, diplomatic optics—the details
Stepping on the American flag at a Tehran university may once have been a routine act. However, after the start of U.S.-Iranian negotiations, that no longer seems to be the case, as the university administration chose to cover the flag.
It was a symbolic gesture reflecting the positive atmosphere surrounding the U.S.-Iranian talks, which began last Saturday in Muscat and are set to resume on Saturday, April 19.
However, the second round will not be held in Oman but in the Italian capital, Rome, even as Muscat continues to play the role of mediator, relaying indirect messages between the two sides— especially since the talks are expected to take place inside the Omani Embassy in Rome.
The talks are also expected to coincide with U.S. Vice President JD Vance's visit to Italy, though his participation in the U.S.-Iranian negotiations remains unconfirmed.
Rome was chosen as the new location for logistical reasons at Washington's request, given its relative proximity.
Vienna was not selected—as in previous rounds—for two main reasons: First, Italy maintains good relations with both the United States and Iran; second, Tehran prefers to hold this round in a "neutral venue" far from the headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is based in the city and has been criticized by Iran, according to some observers.
This second round will be indirect, as confirmed by the Iranian side, even though the first round included a few minutes of direct contact between the Iranian and American delegations.
That brief meeting drew global attention, with the news site Axios reporting it lasted about 45 minutes—a claim denied by a source familiar with the talks, speaking to LBCI.
In this round, both delegations are expected to sit in the same room, according to the same site, with the Omani delegation facilitating the exchange of messages between them.
The talks will focus solely on the Iranian nuclear file in exchange for the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Tehran.
In this context, IAEA head Rafael Grossi is expected to arrive in Tehran on Wednesday for talks with Iranian officials about monitoring and verifying the activities of nuclear facilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ya Libnan
an hour ago
- Ya Libnan
Lebanon blasts Iran's'unacceptable' interference' over Hezbollah disarmament
Ali Akbar Velayati, senior advisor on international affairs to the leader of the Iranian regime. Lebanon's Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a strongly worded statement condemning his recent remarks about disarming the Hezbollah militia which is backed by Iran Beirut warns Tehran to stop interfering as dispute over Hezbollah's disarmament escalates into a diplomatic confrontation. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates of the Republic of Lebanon has issued a strongly worded statement condemning recent remarks by Ali Akbar Velayati, senior advisor on international affairs to the leader of the Iranian regime, as a 'flagrant and unacceptable interference' in Lebanon's internal affairs. The statement, released on Saturday, came after Velayati denounced Lebanon's plans to disarm Hezbollah, calling them part of a 'conspiracy led by America and Israel.' Lebanese Government: Sovereignty Is Non-Negotiable In the official statement, the Foreign Ministry stressed that Lebanese sovereign decisions are not subject to foreign input. UMSTANCES.' The ministry emphasized that Lebanon will not allow 'any external party, whether friend or foe, to speak on behalf of its people or claim tutelage over its sovereign decisions.' It also urged Tehran to focus on the needs and demands of its own people instead of intervening in Lebanese affairs. 'Lebanon's future, its policies, and its political system are decided solely by the Lebanese people, through their democratic institutions, free from interference, pressure, or dictates,' the statement added. Triggering the Diplomatic Clash The diplomatic tension follows a decision by the Lebanese cabinet on Tuesday ordering the army to develop a comprehensive plan to fully monopolize arms by the end of this year — a move that would effectively disarm Hezbollah. The measure is part of implementing a ceasefire agreement signed last November to end the war between Hezbollah and Israel. In an interview with the regime-affiliated Tasnim News Agency, Velayati dismissed the Lebanese government's decision as doomed to fail, declaring that 'the resistance will stand firm' and that Iran's support for Hezbollah 'will continue.' He also insisted Hezbollah had the right to defend Lebanon even during the ceasefire. Hezbollah has rejected the cabinet's decision, calling it a 'grave sin' and 'unconstitutional.' The group insists its weapons are essential for defending Lebanon against Israeli threats. The government, however, maintains that consolidating state authority over all arms is crucial for national sovereignty and for fulfilling the ceasefire terms. The dispute has exposed a deep political and security rift inside Lebanon, one now complicated by direct Iranian involvement. Analysts warn that the Iranian regime's continued interventions could further strain relations between Beirut and Tehran. Hezbollah, the largest armed faction in Iran regime's so-called 'axis of resistance,' has long relied on Tehran's financial and military backing. Yet, observers note that since the death of Hassan Nasrallah, the group's military capabilities and influence have significantly diminished. Iranian regime officials remain steadfast in their opposition to Hezbollah's disarmament — but Lebanon's latest statement signals that Beirut may now be prepared to push back more forcefully to defend its sovereignty. Iran News
Nahar Net
3 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Iran tells Armenia Trump-backed land corridor may be part of US ploy
by Naharnet Newsdesk 11 August 2025, 18:47 Iran stepped up warnings to Armenia on Monday over a planned U.S.-backed corridor linking Azerbaijan to an exclave near the Iranian border, part of a recent peace deal between Yerevan and Baku. In a phone call with Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian "warned against possible actions by the United States, which could pursue hegemonic goals in the Caucasus region under the guise of economic investments and peace guarantees", according to a statement from Tehran. The land corridor dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" is part of a deal signed last week in Washington between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Under the deal, the United States will have the development rights of the proposed route, which would connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave, passing near the Iranian border. Iran has long opposed the planned transit route, also known as the Zangezur corridor, fearing it would cut the country off from Armenia and the rest of the Caucasus, and bring potentially hostile foreign forces to near its borders. Pezeshkian said Iran "welcomes any agreement that promotes the strengthening of peace" among its neighbors, but emphasized the need to prevent the "interference of any military or security force" in implementing the corridor project, according to the statement from his office. Armenia's deputy foreign minister is due in Tehran on Tuesday for talks on the issue, Tehran has said. On Saturday, a senior advisor to Iran's supreme leader said Tehran will not allow the creation of the planned corridor, warning that the area would become "a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries."
L'Orient-Le Jour
4 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Geagea warns against 'Iranian threat' to Lebanon
The head of the Lebanese Forces, Samir Geagea, warned Monday against the "Iranian threat against Lebanon," following statements by officials in Tehran rejecting the Salam government's decision to restore the state's monopoly on weapons and disarm Hezbollah as well as other armed groups. Confronted with what the LF leader — one of Hezbollah's most outspoken critics — sees as a threat that could lead to an "Iranian military intervention," Geagea called for meetings of the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) on the issue. Geagea also accused Hezbollah of "conducting an outright coup" against the state by claiming that the decisions announced by the government on Aug. 5 and 7 "do not exist." This position was expressed in a statement released as Iran's Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Ali Larijani is expected in Lebanon this week. In the statement, Geagea denounced a "grave error" committed by parties "insisting" on saying these decisions taken last week by the government — namely the disarmament of all militias by year's end and adoption of the American roadmap to ensure compliance with the cease-fire terms — "never existed." Hezbollah had used such wording after the Aug. 5 Cabinet session, during which the government tasked the army with drawing up a plan for disarmament by the end of the month. The LF leader stressed that the Salam government is "legitimate and legal" and has twice received a vote of confidence from Parliament: after its formation on Feb. 26, and again on July 16 following a public policy debate. "Those who pretend to ignore the government's decisions are conducting an outright coup," Geagea said, echoing the term used by pro-Hezbollah media after two consecutive Cabinet meetings to describe the government's decision-making. 'Threats and warnings' With these stances, Hezbollah and its allies — though not named directly in Geagea's statement — are showing they "recognize neither legitimate institutions nor their decisions, and by extension, do not acknowledge the Lebanese Constitution and, more clearly still, do not recognize the existence of the Lebanese state. This is very serious, indeed extremely serious." The LF leader also denounced statements by Iranian officials who "utter threats and warnings" regarding the steps taken by the government, saying they "amount to incitement and, on the other hand, the threat of military intervention against the Lebanese government." The government must "seriously consider convening the Arab League Council and the Gulf Cooperation Council for extraordinary sessions to address the Iranian threat to Lebanon, as well as filing a complaint with the U.N. Security Council." He further accused Iran's "interference over the past forty years" — since Hezbollah's creation — of having "brought Lebanon to ruin." On Saturday, an adviser to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said his country "certainly" opposed the Lebanese government's decision to disarm Hezbollah. On Aug. 6, Tehran stated it would support any decision taken by Hezbollah, and some media reported that Iran's foreign minister said the disarmament plan "will not work." These positions prompted reactions from the Lebanese foreign ministry, headed by Joe Rajji from the LF's share in the cabinet, which condemned Tehran's "unacceptable" interference, though it stopped short of summoning the ambassador.
