What is the ‘Mann Act' in Diddy verdict?
Combs could face up to 20 years behind bars after being convicted on two prostitution charges.
REUTERS
Each count he was convicted of has a max sentence of 10 years and could theoretically be added together for a 20-year sentence.
Advertisement
There is no minimum sentence for those charges of transportation to engage in prostitution — or Mann Act Transportation.
The Mann Act prohibits transporting individuals across state lines for the purpose of prostitution.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Diddy Seeks Acquittal or a New Trial Over Convictions for Prostitution-Related Charges
Sean 'Diddy' Combs is asking to be acquitted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution — or, he wants a new trial. Us Weekly obtained a new motion filed by Diddy's lawyers late Wednesday, July 30, arguing that he is not in violation of the Mann Act, a federal law that prohibits the transportation of individuals over state or international lines for the purposes of prostitution. According to his lawyers, Diddy did not arrange transportation for people hired for his alleged 'freak offs,' nor did he have sex with them. His lawyers said that Diddy's involvement was limited to watching and/or filming the sex acts, pointing out that 'multiple state courts have held that paying for voyeurism — to watch other people have sex — is not prostitution.' During Diddy's trial, ex-girlfriend Cassie, 38, testified that a 'freak off' 'basically entails the hiring of an escort and setting up this experience so that I could perform for Sean.' She added that Diddy would 'actually direct us on what we were doing.' She and another witness — identified only as 'Jane Doe' — both testified that Diddy would film these 'freak offs.' A Complete Timeline of All the Allegations and the Verdict in the Diddy Trial 'To our knowledge, Mr. Combs is the only person ever convicted of violating the statute for conduct anything like this,' the motion states. 'It is undisputed that he had no commercial motive and that all involved were adults. The men chose to travel and engage in the activity voluntarily. The verdict confirms the women were not vulnerable or exploited or trafficked or sexually assaulted during the freak offs or hotel nights. And Mr. Combs never had sex with the supposed 'prostitutes.'' A Complete Timeline of All the Allegations and the Verdict in the Diddy Trial In September 2024, Diddy was indicted on federal charges including two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, two counts of sex trafficking and one count of racketeering conspiracy. He was cleared of the sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges during his trial, which concluded in early July. (Diddy has maintained his innocence since his initial arrest and denied all charges against him.) Should Diddy not be acquitted, his lawyers are asking Judge Arun Subramanian to grant him a new trial solely related to the two prostitution-related charges. They said a new trial should exclude video evidence presented at the initial trial that showed him assaulting then-girlfriend Cassie in a hotel hallway in 2016. That footage, they said, was admitted in relation to the sex trafficking and racketeering charges and was 'irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial' to the two charges of which he was ultimately found guilty. 'Sean Combs sits in jail based on evidence that he paid adult male escorts and entertainers who engaged in consensual sexual activities with his former girlfriends, which he videotaped and later watched with the girlfriends,' the motion says. 'That is not prostitution, and if it is, his conviction is unconstitutional. The Court should grant an acquittal, or at an absolute minimum, a new trial on the Mann Act counts alone.' Diddy's Celebrity Connections Through the Years: From Friends to Collaborators Diddy was convicted on the two transportation to engage in prostitution charges on July 2 following the conclusion of a two-month trial. He could face up to 20 years in prison less time already served when he is sentenced on October 3. In a Tuesday, July 29, court filing, Diddy's lawyers again asked Judge Subramanian to release the music mogul on bail pending the October sentencing. They are asking he is released on a $50 million bail. 'Sean Combs should not be in jail for this conduct,' the motion, obtained by Us, said. 'In fact, he may be the only person currently in a United States jail for being any sort of john, and certainly the only person in jail for hiring adult male escorts for him and his girlfriend, when he did not even have sex with the escort himself.' This week, Deadline and TMZ both reported that President Donald Trump is considering pardoning Diddy. Us understands that the White House does not comment on potential pardons. Diddy's reps didn't respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.
New York Post
20 hours ago
- New York Post
Ukrainian officials arrested in ‘large scale' drone bribery scheme
At least four Ukrainian officials have been arrested in a 'large-scale corruption scheme' involving the purchase of drones designed to defend Kyiv against Russia, President Volodymyr Zelensky said. Just three days after Zelensky restored the independence of Ukrainian's top anti-corruption agencies following fierce public backlash, the prez said the National Anti-corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-corruption Prosecutor's Office unveiled a plot by a sitting lawmaker, two local officials and several national guard service members to skim money meant to defend their nation. 'The essence of the scheme was to conclude state contracts with supplier companies at deliberately inflated prices,' the agencies added Saturday in a statement, noting the kickbacks to the officials were up to 30% of the contracts' inflated costs. Advertisement 4 At least four Ukrainian officials were arrested in an alleged kickback scheme involving the government's purchase of drones. Getty Images 4 The charges came days after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (center) and lawmakers were pressured to restore the independence of Kyiv's top two anti-corruption agencies. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images The plot involved heads of district and city military civil administrations who allegedly helped cook the books on the purchases of drones and electronic jamming equipment — vital tools used to intercept the ever-escalating bombardments from Ukraine's Russian invaders. Drones have proven to be key to Ukraine's attacks on Moscow, too, with the majority of Ukrainian attacks on Russian military assets involving UAVs, including a recent overnight strike on an oil depot. Advertisement 'Unfortunately, these corruption schemes involved the procurement of electronic warfare systems and FPV drones. … There must be full and fair accountability for this,' Zelensky said on social media. 'There can only be zero tolerance for corruption. Clear teamwork to expose corruption and, as a result, a just sentence,' he said. 4 The scheme involved a Ukrainian lawmaker, two local officials and National Guard Service members, authorities said. REUTERS Advertisement While Ukrainian officials did not name the suspects in the case, the president said four people have been arrested so far. Ukraine's Interior Ministry added that the National Guard personnel implicated in the scheme were removed from their positions as the prosecutor's office moves forward with the case. The arrests come after the independence of NABU and SAPO were secured Thursday following nationwide protests over Zelensky ratifying a bill that would have put a political appointee in charge of the agencies. 4 The procurement of the jamming equipment used to defend Ukraine from Russia's ever-escalating missile and drone attacks also was involved in the bribery plot. via REUTERS Advertisement While Zelensky initially defended the move as a means to weed out Russian influence in the agencies, he later agreed to let the agencies operate as they were. NABU and SAPO were born following Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity in 2014, which called for a major clean up of Kyiv after ousting pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, whose administration was marred in corruption. The agencies have previously targeted some of Zelensky's close allies, including former Deputy Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov, with the cases often causing major shakeups in Kyiv while its leadership tries to focus on the war. Critics have warned Zelensky that ongoing corruption undermines Ukraine's ability to fight back against Russia, as well as threatens the country's hopes of joining the European Union. With Post wires
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
The US said it had no choice but to deport them to a third country. Then it sent them home
By Kristina Cooke and Ted Hesson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Trump administration says that some serious criminals need to be deported to third countries because even their home countries won't accept them. But a review of recent cases shows that at least five men threatened with such a fate were sent to their native countries within weeks. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, two sub-Saharan African nations. Immigrants convicted of crimes typically first serve their U.S. sentences before being deported. This appeared to be the case with the eight men deported to South Sudan and five to Eswatini, although some had been released years earlier. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in June that third-country deportations allow them to deport people 'so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won't take them back.' Critics have countered that it's not clear the U.S. tried to return the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini to their home countries and that the deportations were unnecessarily cruel. Reuters found that at least five men threatened with deportation to Libya in May were sent to their home countries weeks later, according to interviews with two of the men, a family member and attorneys. After a U.S. judge blocked the Trump administration from sending them to Libya, two men from Vietnam, two men from Laos and a man from Mexico were all deported to their home nations. The deportations have not previously been reported. DHS did not comment on the removals. Reuters could not determine if their home countries initially refused to take them or why the U.S. tried to send them to Libya. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin contested that the home countries of criminals deported to third countries were willing to take them back, but did not provide details on any attempts to return the five men home before they were threatened with deportation to Libya. 'If you come to our country illegally and break our laws, you could end up in CECOT, Alligator Alcatraz, Guantanamo Bay, or South Sudan or another third country,' McLaughlin said in a statement, referencing El Salvador's maximum-security prison and a detention center in the subtropical Florida Everglades. FAR FROM HOME DHS did not respond to a request for the number of third-country deportations since Trump took office on January 20, although there have been thousands to Mexico and hundreds to other countries. The eight men sent to South Sudan were from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam, according to DHS. The man DHS said was from South Sudan had a deportation order to Sudan, according to a court filing. The five men sent to Eswatini were from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam and Yemen, according to DHS. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini were 'the worst of the worst' and included people convicted in the United States of child sex abuse and murder. 'American communities are safer with these heinous illegal criminals gone,' Jackson said in a statement. The Laos government did not respond to requests for comment regarding the men threatened with deportation to Libya and those deported to South Sudan and Eswatini. Vietnam's foreign ministry spokesperson said on July 17 that the government was verifying information regarding the South Sudan deportation but did not provide additional comment to Reuters. The government of Mexico did not comment. The Trump administration acknowledged in a May 22 court filing that the man from Myanmar had valid travel documents to return to his home country but he was deported to South Sudan anyway. DHS said the man had been convicted of sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting. Eswatini's government said on Tuesday that it was still holding the five migrants sent there in isolated prison units under the deal with the Trump administration. 'A VERY RANDOM OUTCOME' The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is still being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court. Critics say the removals aim to stoke fear among migrants and encourage them to 'self deport' to their home countries rather than be sent to distant countries they have no connection with. 'This is a message that you may end up with a very random outcome that you're going to like a lot less than if you elect to leave under your own steam,' said Michelle Mittelstadt, communications director for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute. Internal U.S. immigration enforcement guidance issued in July said migrants could be deported to countries that had not provided diplomatic assurances of their safety in as little as six hours. While the administration has highlighted the deportations of convicted criminals to African countries, it has also sent asylum-seeking Afghans, Russians and others to Panama and Costa Rica. The Trump administration deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were held in the country's CECOT prison without access to attorneys until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. More than 5,700 non-Mexican migrants have been deported to Mexico since Trump took office, according to Mexican government data, continuing a policy that began under former President Joe Biden. The fact that one Mexican man was deported to South Sudan and another threatened with deportation to Libya suggests that the Trump administration did not try to send them to their home countries, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director at the pro-immigrant National Immigration Litigation Alliance. 'Mexico historically accepts back its own citizens,' said Realmuto, one of the attorneys representing migrants in the lawsuit contesting third-country deportations. The eight men deported to South Sudan included Mexican national Jesus Munoz Gutierrez, who had served a sentence in the U.S. for second-degree murder and was directly taken into federal immigration custody afterward, according to Realmuto. Court records show Munoz stabbed and killed a roommate during a fight in 2004. When the Trump administration first initiated the deportation in late May, Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum said her government had not been informed. 'If he does want to be repatriated, then the United States would have to bring him to Mexico,' Sheinbaum said at the time. His sister, Guadalupe Gutierrez, said in an interview that she didn't understand why he was sent to South Sudan, where he is currently in custody. She said Mexico is trying to get her brother home. 'Mexico never rejected my brother,' Gutierrez said. 'USING US AS A PAWN' Immigration hardliners see the third-country removals as a way to deal with immigration offenders who can't easily be deported and could pose a threat to the U.S. public. "The Trump administration is prioritizing the safety of American communities over the comfort of these deportees,' said Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports lower levels of immigration. The Trump administration in July pressed other African nations to take migrants and has asked the Pacific Islands nation of Palau, among others. Under U.S. law, federal immigration officials can deport someone to a country other than their place of citizenship when all other efforts are 'impracticable, inadvisable or impossible.' Immigration officials must first try to send an immigrant back to their home country, and if they fail, then to a country with which they have a connection, such as where they lived or were born. For a Lao man who was almost deported to Libya in early May, hearing about the renewed third-country deportations took him back to his own close call. In an interview from Laos granted on condition of anonymity because of fears for his safety, he asked why the U.S. was 'using us as a pawn?' His attorney said the man had served a prison sentence for a felony. Reuters could not establish what he was convicted of. He recalled officials telling him to sign his deportation order to Libya, which he refused, telling them he wanted to be sent to Laos instead. They told him he would be deported to Libya regardless of whether he signed or not, he said. DHS did not comment on the allegations. The man, who came to the United States in the early 1980s as a refugee when he was four years old, said he was now trying to learn the Lao language and adapt to his new life, 'taking it day by day.' Solve the daily Crossword
