
Over-60s free travel costs taxpayers three times as much as fare dodgers
Providing free transport for over-60s in London is costing taxpayers £500m a year, prompting calls for the benefit to be scrapped.
A rapidly ageing population means more than 1.5 million people now travel for free across London's buses, Tubes, trains and trams.
They do so via the 60+ Oyster Card, for those aged between 60 and 65, and the Freedom Pass, available to those aged 66 and older.
Telegraph analysis shows the 60+ Oyster Card alone will cost Transport for London (TfL) £135m this year, up from £60m in 2016. By 2027, costs are expected to reach £185m.
The Freedom Pass, which now has more than 900,000 users, costs £350m a year – a bill that is forecast to reach £498m by the end of the decade.
By comparison, traditional fare dodgers – such as those recently exposed by Tory MP Robert Jenrick for skipping barriers at Underground stations – cost the organisation £130m a year.
According to TfL, the majority of 60+ Oyster card holders (60pc) are still in paid employment, and one in five use the free travel to get to and from work.
This is despite the fact that those aged 60 and 64 earn an average salary of £42,000, double that of those aged between 20 and 24 at £24,000.
Reem Ibrahim, of the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: 'It is difficult to justify a system where the wealthiest age group in the country is having their travel funded by taxpayers.
'The 60+ Oyster card and Freedom Pass schemes are financially unsustainable, and are not targeted to those genuinely in need of support. We urgently need a more targeted approach, rather than entrenching an unfair and costly system.'
Liz Emerson, chief executive of the Intergenerational Foundation, a research charity, said: 'At the very least, the Freedom Pass should be aligned with the state pension age.
'It's a perfect example of intergenerational unfairness at work with younger workers having to subsidise their older colleagues free travel to work.'
The 60+ Oyster Card was first introduced by then Mayor of London, Boris Johnson in 2012.
It is funded by Sir Sadiq Khan's mayoral precept in council tax bills and the congestion charge – the daily fee for driving into central London.
Once Londoners reach the age of 66, they continue to receive free travel in the form of a Freedom Pass, which is also provided to eligible disabled people regardless of age. This £350m bill is shouldered on to London's 33 boroughs – 28 of which increased council tax by the legal maximum of 5pc in April.
The body that runs the scheme on behalf of the boroughs, has warned it will cost taxpayers £498m by 2029-30, a figure it described as 'unsustainable'.
Sir Sadiq, 54, who is five years away from qualifying for free travel himself, banned the use of 60+ Oyster cards and the Freedom Pass before 9am during the pandemic. The move generated an extra £15m in fares.
However, he rejected plans to increase the qualifying age for the 60+ Oyster card by six months a year for the next 12 years, allowing for it to be slowly phased out until it matched the qualifying age of the Freedom Pass.
A spokesman for Transport for London said: 'Both the Mayor and TfL are committed to making public transport in London as accessible, convenient, and affordable as possible.
'We regularly review our range of concessions to ensure that they continue to benefit Londoners, while also remaining affordable for TfL to operate.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
20 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Conservative Cllr Lauren Knight joins Nigel Farage's party
Knight said she felt left behind by the Conservative Party. She noted: 'I am committed to being a strong voice for those who are too often unheard and to working tirelessly to ensure that every child, regardless of their needs, is given the opportunity to thrive. This is not just a political responsibility — it is a personal mission." 'Scotland has been abandoned by the two-party establishment, which continues to prioritise self-interests and party politics over genuine change," Knight added. Lauren Knight represents Huntly in Aberdeenshire. (Image: Aberdeenshire Council) The Huntly councillor's defection was presaged by the departure of four other Conservatives. Former council chief Mark Findlater, Mearns councillor Laurie Carnie, Ellon councillor John Crawley, and East Garioch councillor Dominic Lonchay have also joined Reform UK. Councillors Robbie Withey and John Cox have also signed up to the party, but continue to sit as independents. Glasgow City Council's Thomas Kerr, who defected to the party in January, travelled to Aberdeenshire to welcome Knight to the party. Kerr said: 'Lauren Knight brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to Reform UK and I'm delighted to welcome her onto our team. 'We're now Scotland's fastest growing political movement and it's clear why – the SNP, Labour and Tories have broken Scotland. Reform is on a mission to fix it.' Read more: Aberdeen councillor Duncan Massey defects to Reform Analysis: Scottish Tories face 'existential crisis' as Reform support grows Finally, we have proof the BBC is helping Reform. It's become a danger to democracy A Scottish Tory spokesman said: "Under Russell Findlay, we're reconnecting with common sense conservative values of enterprise, self-reliance, fiscal responsibility and the rule of law. 'Every poll shows that Reform will only help the SNP. As we saw in last year's general election, they handed several seats to the SNP which would have otherwise gone to a pro-UK party. "Reform are likely to stand pro-independence candidates in the 2026 election and Nigel Farage has even said he's not worried about the SNP getting another five years in power. 'The Scottish Conservatives will continue to work hard to rebuild trust with disillusioned voters by holding the failing SNP Government to account and promoting common sense conservative values."


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Norfolk council considers waste bin collections every three weeks
Cutting waste bin collections to once every three weeks is being considered by a idea is being looked at by South Norfolk District Council as a way to help reduce costs, with a meeting told collecting general waste less frequently could help increase recycling some councillors were sceptical, suggesting it could result in a build-up of unpleasant waste, including used nappies.A meeting of the scrutiny committee was told the council's cabinet would discuss the idea in more detail at a later date. Currently, general waste bins are collected every to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the proposal to make changes emerged in discussions about the implementation of weekly food waste collections, which will be introduced next government is requiring councils to bring in the service and Conservative-run South Norfolk recently started buying the necessary vehicles and is planning to start phased collections from the deadline of April next year but said it would not be able to procure enough vehicles for a full district rollout immediately. The upcoming changes to waste collections has led to the authority looking at other aspects of the service, with officials asked to consider how reducing the frequency of non-recyclable waste collections could help to increase recycling rates and cut councillor Deborah Sacks said changing to collections of general waste every three weeks would be "a big step" and wanted to know more about how much they would Kathryn Cross warned making such a change would be "complicated"."Added to the fact that you have waste like nappies and things, which, building up over three weeks is not going to be very nice," she said. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Canford incinerator protest held as council debates plan
Opponents of a planned energy-from-waste incinerator have held a protest ahead of a council meeting to decide if it should go Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council's planning committee is discussing the planning application by MVV Environmental Ltd for the proposed facility at Canford Resource Park near facility would burn up to 260,000 tonnes of non-recyclable and non-hazardous domestic, commercial and industrial waste a year to generate have described it as "inappropriate development" on green belt land and have warned it would cause air pollution for surrounding areas. It would provide 28.5MW of electricity to businesses at Churchill Magna Business Park as well as to Arena Way and Magna Wednesday, the Environment Agency said it had granted the scheme a permit to operate - covering the management and operation of the plant along with monitoring of EA permit is separate to the council granting planning permission, although the plant could not operate until both have been granted. The council said 469 objections to the scheme had been received during the planning included objections to building on green belt land, issues over transporting waste into the site and removing residue, as well as air also pointed to the emissions of CO2 from the plant and said that waste incinerators were considered the "dirtiest" way the UK generates outside Bournemouth Town Hall before the meeting, Joanna Bury from Wimborne Extinction Rebellion described the plant as a "a polluting giant" and said it would affect residents of nearby Wimborne, which lies outside the BCP Council area."It will send a six-mile toxic plumb around the area."It's totally unfair, unjust and particularly for children whose lungs are extremely vulnerable," she committee's decision is expected later. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.