Donald Trump-Elon Musk press conference LIVE: US President to hold first presser with Tesla boss after exit announcement
Donald Trump-Elon Musk press conference LIVE: United States President Donald Trump has said he will hold a press conference with outgoing DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) leader Elon Musk on Friday at 1:30 pm EST.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump said that Musk will be 'helping' the US government in the days to come.
'I am having a Press Conference tomorrow at 1:30 P.M. EST, with Elon Musk, at the Oval Office,' the US President said.
'This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way. Elon is terrific! See you tomorrow at the White House," he added.
In the past two weeks, Musk has sworn off future political donations and criticized Trump's signature tax-and-spending-cut proposal, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.'
On May 28, in a post on his social media site X, Elon Musk announced that he was stepping down from his White House role.
The announcement came a day after Elon Musk, on May 27, criticised the price tag of Republicans' tax and budget legislation making its way through Congress.
Since Musk's announcement of exit from his DOGE role, Tesla investors rejoiced, which sent the stock of the EV maker up by 2 per cent.
Follow updates here:
30 May 2025, 07:06 PM IST
The Donald Trump Elon Musk press conference is scheduled to begin at 1:30 pm EST, which is 11 pm IST. The press conference will be streamed live from the Oval Office of the White House.
30 May 2025, 07:06 PM IST
In a post on Thursday on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump announced he will be holding a press conference from the White House, where Elon Musk would be present.
'This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way. Elon is terrific,' he wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bablu's Phuchka Model: Global supply chain, local love story
With my fondness for Nirvana, German Expressionism, and Guinness, it may come as a surprise that I'm a vocalist for local. There's a certain kind of happiness I feel when I buy chicken, go out to have phuchka , get a haircut, or buy medicine from my course, the chicken is probably of distant (read: non-neighbourhood) provenance. The barber uses tools, creams, and lotions made in different parts of India (the fan in his saloon is China-made). Barring the potatoes and chillies in Bablu's perfect phuchka cocktail being locally sourced (our area is urban-agricultural), the atta, tamarind and everything else are most likely from 'outside'. And my stash of Met XL50 that I get from the local med store is manufactured in Guwahati by a company headquartered in Kandivili each contribution of dosh to my immediate 'desh' - my locals for whom I harbour a disproportionate amount of material and metaphysical loyalty - is part of a larger, great chain of economic being. Of course, it would have been grand if my neighbourhood manufactured printers, made EV batteries, had bookstores that I would gladly have I'm not a postcolonial nutter who thinks manufacturing GPUs is one hop away from spinning khadi. Truth be told, my Swadeshi Lite is firmly based on availability, ease of procuring, and quality, with the hope to see my neighbourhood grow more prosperous by the main difference - heck, the only difference - between Trump's call for a swadeshi andolan and Modi's shout-out to Make India Great Again is in their nuance. The former, French farmers' union style, doesn't want anything that is consumed by the American people to be produced outside America. The latter, Bapu-style, doesn't want the Indian people to consume anything that is produced outside India. It's a subtle difference, but a telling both versions - 'make what you consume' vs 'consume (only) what you make' - the real intention is to see that the Country-That-Must-Not-Be-Named is denied two of its biggest markets. If all goes well, the Country-That-Must-Not-Be-Named will shrivel to the size of an economic shih tzu, while America returns to its rightful place in the comity of nations that it had in the 1950s-1960s, and India goes back to its own hallowed position from which it was displaced before the very moment Babur crossed the Chenab in a self-sustaining economy should not be a problem for a country that makes everything it uses. For a country that doesn't have much use for jet skis, like, say, landlocked Vatican City, not having a homegrown jet ski-manufacturing industry isn't a problem. Unless, for some sentimental reason, the new pope decides to start exporting jet skis to Peru and/or problem is that the Country-That-Must-Not-Be-Named has, over the years, infiltrated their merchandise everywhere in almost everything. And we're not just talking about Ganesh idols that Kiren Rijiju may have bought online by mistake. We're talking about also infiltrating things that go into making things that make all this gung-ho hungama about ' Make in India ', everyone is thinking only quantitatively. This may be understandable for a country that takes (perverse) pride in having more people than any other country - 'Kya hai tumhare paas? 'Mere paas demographic dividend hai!' But quality has a quantity of its own that goes beyond shifting units Soviet Union ball a reason why after the swadeshi movement did what it had set out to do, we didn't quite become a nation of charkha spinners. Tagore was bang on in his 1925 essay, 'The Cult of the Charkha': 'I am afraid of a blind faith on a very large scale in the charkha in the country, which is so liable to succumb to the lure of short-cuts when pointed out by a personality about whose moral earnestness they can have no doubt.'Instead, we invested in the tech descendants of the spinning jenny, despite its Lancashire 'satanic mills' origins. If we do get seriously vocal for local - and I think it's a splendid idea - we mustn't fall for any cult. Instead, invest monetarily and imaginatively in making things that will make us want to buy if Bablu's phuchkas were Chinese, you think people wouldn't have lined up to gobble them? They're just 'world-class', you see.
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Bablu's Phuchka Model: Global supply chain, local love story
With my fondness for Nirvana, German Expressionism, and Guinness, it may come as a surprise that I'm a vocalist for local. There's a certain kind of happiness I feel when I buy chicken, go out to have phuchka, get a haircut, or buy medicine from my neighbourhood. Of course, the chicken is probably of distant (read: non-neighbourhood) provenance. The barber uses tools, creams, and lotions made in different parts of India (the fan in his saloon is China-made). Barring the potatoes and chillies in Bablu's perfect phuchka cocktail being locally sourced (our area is urban-agricultural), the atta, tamarind and everything else are most likely from 'outside'. And my stash of Met XL50 that I get from the local med store is manufactured in Guwahati by a company headquartered in Kandivili West. So, each contribution of dosh to my immediate 'desh' - my locals for whom I harbour a disproportionate amount of material and metaphysical loyalty - is part of a larger, great chain of economic being. Of course, it would have been grand if my neighbourhood manufactured printers, made EV batteries, had bookstores that I would gladly have visited... But I'm not a postcolonial nutter who thinks manufacturing GPUs is one hop away from spinning khadi. Truth be told, my Swadeshi Lite is firmly based on availability, ease of procuring, and quality, with the hope to see my neighbourhood grow more prosperous by the day. The main difference - heck, the only difference - between Trump's call for a swadeshi andolan and Modi's shout-out to Make India Great Again is in their nuance. The former, French farmers' union style, doesn't want anything that is consumed by the American people to be produced outside America. The latter, Bapu-style, doesn't want the Indian people to consume anything that is produced outside India. It's a subtle difference, but a telling one. In both versions - 'make what you consume' vs 'consume (only) what you make' - the real intention is to see that the Country-That-Must-Not-Be-Named is denied two of its biggest markets. If all goes well, the Country-That-Must-Not-Be-Named will shrivel to the size of an economic shih tzu, while America returns to its rightful place in the comity of nations that it had in the 1950s-1960s, and India goes back to its own hallowed position from which it was displaced before the very moment Babur crossed the Chenab in 1519. Being a self-sustaining economy should not be a problem for a country that makes everything it uses. For a country that doesn't have much use for jet skis, like, say, landlocked Vatican City, not having a homegrown jet ski-manufacturing industry isn't a problem. Unless, for some sentimental reason, the new pope decides to start exporting jet skis to Peru and/or America. The problem is that the Country-That-Must-Not-Be-Named has, over the years, infiltrated their merchandise everywhere in almost everything. And we're not just talking about Ganesh idols that Kiren Rijiju may have bought online by mistake. We're talking about also infiltrating things that go into making things that make things. In all this gung-ho hungama about 'Make in India', everyone is thinking only quantitatively. This may be understandable for a country that takes (perverse) pride in having more people than any other country - 'Kya hai tumhare paas? 'Mere paas demographic dividend hai!' But quality has a quantity of its own that goes beyond shifting units Soviet Union ball bearing-style. There's a reason why after the swadeshi movement did what it had set out to do, we didn't quite become a nation of charkha spinners. Tagore was bang on in his 1925 essay, 'The Cult of the Charkha': 'I am afraid of a blind faith on a very large scale in the charkha in the country, which is so liable to succumb to the lure of short-cuts when pointed out by a personality about whose moral earnestness they can have no doubt.' Instead, we invested in the tech descendants of the spinning jenny, despite its Lancashire 'satanic mills' origins. If we do get seriously vocal for local - and I think it's a splendid idea - we mustn't fall for any cult. Instead, invest monetarily and imaginatively in making things that will make us want to buy them. Frankly, if Bablu's phuchkas were Chinese, you think people wouldn't have lined up to gobble them? They're just 'world-class', you see. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. What's slowing Indian IT's AI deals? The answer is hidden in just two words. Jolt to Çelebi could turn a big gain for this Indian firm that once had deep Turkish ties Nestlé India's outgoing CEO Narayanan weathered the Maggi storm; Tiwary must tackle slowing growth Uncle Sam vs. Microsoft: Which is a safer bet to park money? ONGC squandered its future once. Can it be different this time? Will revised economic capital framework lead to higher RBI dividend to govt? These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 30% return in 1 year, according to analysts Buy, Sell or Hold: Emkay Global upgrades SAIL to buy; YES Securities sees 13% upside in VA Tech Wabag Railways stocks: Time to be contrarian; will bearish analysts go wrong again? 6 stocks, 2 with buy recos, 4 with sell recos
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Wall Street loves the laughs: Trump acronym parodies like TACO and FAFO take meme markets by storm
Wall Street traders are using acronyms to comment on Donald Trump's policies. These acronyms, like TACO and FAFO, reflect market volatility. They also highlight investor concerns about economic risks. The White House dismisses these acronyms as ridicule. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What are traders saying with acronyms like TACO and FAFO? How are markets reacting to Trump's unpredictable policies? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How did the White House react to the acronym parodies? Could these acronyms be considered as mere jokes or do they serve as meaningful indicators? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Wall Street is more than just numbers and financial jargon; apparently, it's also got jokes. During President Donald Trump's second term, traders are transforming his slogan-heavy style into meme-worthy "TACO" to "FAFO," these acronym parodies are popping up on trading desks and in market chatter. Although they are often amusing, these memes reflect serious investor concerns regarding changing policies and economic risks during Trump's second observers have taken advantage of President Trump's habit of shortening slogans into acronyms like MAGA, DOGE, and MAHA, and they have been circulating among trading desks for the past four months of his second abbreviations devoid of a trading strategy capture elements that traders claim are crucial in Trump-era markets, like volatility and uncertainty, which investors should take into account when making strategies that benefited from Trump's trade, economic, and international relations policies are linked to some of the new labels. Others discuss his economic ramifications or abrupt reversals in response to his proposals from trade partners and to Potomac River Capital LLC 's chief investment officer Mark Spindel, the market is stuck in a "pinball machine as a result of Trump's policymaking process."In an email, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said that these ridiculous acronyms demonstrate how uncritical analysts have ridiculed President Trump and his agenda, which has already produced a number of inflation and employment reports that exceeded expectations, as quoted in a report by the following acronyms have gained popularity in the investment community, as per a report by Reuters:A Financial Times columnist came up with the term "TACO" (Trump Always Chickens Out), which has been used to characterize Trump's back and forth on tariffs following his "Liberation Day" speech on April 2. During a recent press conference, the president snapped at a question about TACO, calling it "nasty."The term "MEGA" (Make Europe Great Again) was first used to discuss European competitiveness last year, but it reappeared this spring to refer to the surge of investor interest in and flows into European markets. Online shopping for MEGA hats, which mimic their MAGA counterparts, is simple. Due to the outperformance of European stocks immediately following Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff bombshell, traders and investors have given it new America Go Away (MAGA): Although the original Trump trade was also referred to as the MAGA trade, this version adopted the president's motto. It initially surfaced in reaction to Vice President JD Vance's short-lived and unsuccessful trip to Greenland, a Danish autonomous territory that Trump has indicated he would like to annex. The joke is circulating among trading desks in Toronto and Montreal, according to at least one Canadian investor, and it is causing "wishful thinking" about merely boycotting U.S. (Fuck Around and Find Out) is an acronym that was coined long before Trump was elected president, but it is becoming more and more common in trading desk discourse. It is employed to record the chaos and volatility of the financial markets brought about by Trump's policymaking process."YOLO (You Only Live Once) seemed to encourage outsized risks in concentrated investment themes," Art Hogan, a strategist at B. Riley Wealth, stated after the tendency that was a part of that Trump trade to pursue high-momentum strategies, like cryptocurrency, is referred to by the acronym YOLO. "While the term YOLO was popular for a period of time, it contradicts all conventional advice," Art Hogan stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out,' it mocks Trump's inconsistency on key issues such as tariffs, implying that he frequently backs down from bold use them to mock the chaos, volatility, and mixed signals in Trump-era markets. They're entertaining, but they also address legitimate investor concerns.
