Opinion - Is Irish America in decline?
For Irish politicians, the annual trip to America to mark St. Patrick's Day is usually about as low-risk and high-reward as anything in public life. The presentation of a bowl of shamrock had muted beginnings: In 1952 Irish ambassador John Hearne sent a gift to President Harry S. Truman, who was out of town at that time but sent a warm note of thanks. Four years later, John Costello became the first prime minister of Ireland to present the shamrock in person to President Dwight Eisenhower. It was Prime Minister Garret FitzGerald in the 1980s who began regularly making the trip to Washington in person.
This relationship has traditionally been win-win. Successive Irish heads of state have banged the drum for American investment in Ireland, while presidents have been able to parade their Irish ancestry and Blarney stone bonhomie in front of Irish American voters.
Gradually it has become a significant event for Northern Ireland's leaders too. The prime minister of Northern Ireland, aristocratic Anglo-Irish Terence O'Neill, visited Washington in 1964, but until 1999 it was only Nationalist and Republican leaders who found a welcome. Since then, intermittently, first ministers and deputy first ministers have represented the devolved Northern Ireland executive.
This year, everything changed.
If you are willing to take at face value President Bill Clinton's tenuous claims of Irish lineage, President Trump is the first chief executive since Eisenhower to have no familial links with the Emerald Isle, and inevitably does not have the instinctive attachment to Ireland and Irish America of some of his predecessors. Of the 45 men to have held the presidency, 23 had Irish roots — mostly Protestant Ulster-Scots. Joe Biden, although only five-eighths Irish, positively weaponized his identity, often quoting W.B. Yeats and Seamus Heaney. Two years ago, Biden dismissed a question from the BBC with the scornful response 'BBC? I'm Irish.' (I described the effect of this identity on his presidency in 2023.)
But it has not simply been an issue of a new president who is cooler towards Ireland. In February, Northern Ireland's Nationalist SDLP party, then the Republican Sinn Féin party, announced that it would boycott the Saint Patrick's Day celebrations in Washington. The two parties, both of which support a united Ireland, made the decision in protest at the Trump administration's stance on the war in Gaza, in which they have been sharply critical of Israel's conduct.
Sinn Féin's boycott meant the absence of the first minister of Northern Ireland, Michelle O'Neill, who said she was 'taking a stand against an injustice which I see unravelling every day from the dangerous rhetoric from this new U.S. president.' It also ruled out the party's president and leader of the opposition in the Irish Parliament, Mary Lou McDonald.
Trump sees little more than Ireland's membership of the European Union, an organization he hates and claims was 'formed to screw the United States.' He is imposing severe tariffs on EU imports and has already announced additional taxes on imported cars and car parts. Ireland has been offered no exceptions.
Micheál Martin, who began his second stint as the Republic of Ireland's prime minister three days after Trump's inauguration, made the traditional visit to the White House, even if others chose to stay away. The atmosphere, however, was worlds away from the usual merriment and backslapping. Although Trump made some semi-humorous but barbed remarks about his guest, his perennial sense of injustice was barely beneath the surface.
'We do have a massive deficit with Ireland, because Ireland was very smart. They took our pharmaceutical companies away from presidents that didn't know what they were doing … This beautiful island of five million people has got the entire U.S. pharmaceutical industry in its grasps … We don't want to do anything to hurt Ireland. But we do want fairness.'
Martin wisely said little. And in simplistic terms, Trump was not wrong. More than half of Ireland's 72 billion euro ($77.5 billion) in exports to the U.S. last year consisted of medical and pharmaceutical products made in Ireland by American-owned firms such as Eli Lilly and Pfizer. Trump plans tariffs on this sector too, and the effects on the Irish economy could be devastating, perhaps shrinking its GDP by 3.7 percent over the next five to seven years and costing 80,000 jobs.
Many presidents would have hesitated before risking the wrath of Irish American voters by punishing the old country like this. Trump, however, appears typically unperturbed, telling reporters 'the Irish love Trump' — 'we won the Irish with a tremendous amount … I got it locked up pretty good.'
It may be more complicated than that. It is now more than 400 years since the first significant Irish immigration to North America, and 176 years since the first Kennedy arrived in Boston. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a fifth-generation Irish American. Statistics show that Irish Americans earn more than the average Americans and are better educated.
Perhaps it is simply no longer possible to see 'Irish Americans' as a monolithic voting bloc; instead they will react to any Trumpian conflict with the Emerald Isle according to a range of interests and identities. Once so proudly hyphenated, many may now simply see themselves as 'Americans.'
Eliot Wilson is a freelance writer on politics and international affairs and the co-founder of Pivot Point Group. He was senior official in the U.K. House of Commons from 2005 to 2016, including serving as a clerk of the Defence Committee and secretary of the U.K. delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says Show Caption Hide Caption Anti-ICE raid demonstrators protest into fourth night Anti-immigration raid protests are continuing into the fourth night as the Pentagon deployed active-duty U.S. Marines. President Donald Trump mulled invoking the Insurrection Act, which would give him more leeway to use the military for domestic purposes, as he deploys troops to Los Angeles in response to protests prompted by ICE raids in the region. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said June 10 during an event in the White House. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a lawsuit from the state. Marines were also sent to help the guard after protests erupted over his immigration enforcement efforts. The troops are limited to protecting federal property and law enforcement officers. The Insurrection Act would give Trump authority to use them more broadly. More: 'High-stakes game': Trump-Newsom clash pits two political heavyweights Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." Newsom described Trump's actions as "the acts of a dictator" and accused the president of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' Legal experts say invoking the Insurrection Act is an extreme step. It has been done 30 times in U.S. history. "The invocation of it would be viewed as a pretty dramatic act," said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Powell said the law is "dangerously broad." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in May 1992, by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California's governor, to quell rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
JPMorgan raised its forecast for municipal bond sales in 2025 to $560 billion as US lawmakers deliberate over President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill in the Senate. Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX). Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LA protests far different from '92 Rodney King riots
The images of cars set ablaze, protesters tossing rocks at police and officers firing nonlethal rounds and tear gas at protesters hearkens back to the last time a president sent the National Guard to respond to violence on Los Angeles streets. But the unrest during several days of protests over immigration enforcement is far different in scale from the 1992 riots that followed the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. President George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to call in the National Guard after requests from Mayor Tom Bradley and Gov. Pete Wilson. After the current protests began Friday over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines despite strident opposition from Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom. Trump cited a legal provision to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit Monday saying Trump had overstepped his authority. Outrage over the verdicts on April 29, 1992 led to nearly a week of widespread violence that was one of the deadliest riots in American history. Hundreds of businesses were looted. Entire blocks of homes and stores were torched. More than 60 people died in shootings and other violence, mostly in South Los Angeles, an area with a heavily Black population at the time. Unlike the 1992 riots, protests have mainly been peaceful and been confined to a roughly five-block stretch of downtown LA, a tiny patch in the sprawling city of nearly 4 million people. No one has died. There's been vandalism and some cars set on fire but no homes or buildings have burned. At least 50 people have been arrested for everything from failing to follow orders to leave to looting, assault on a police officer and attempted murder for tossing a Molotov cocktail. Several officers have had minor injuries and protesters and some journalists have been struck by some of the more than 600 rubber bullets and other 'less-lethal' munitions fired by police. The 1992 uprising took many by surprise, including the Los Angeles Police Department, but the King verdict was a catalyst for racial tensions that had been building in the city for years. In addition to frustration with their treatment by police, some directed their anger at Korean merchants who owned many of the local stores. Black residents felt the owners treated them more like shoplifters than shoppers. As looting and fires spread toward Koreatown, some merchants protected their stores with shotguns and rifles.