Trent Alexander-Arnold reacts to ‘incredible' Real Madrid debut: ‘What every player dreams of'
Trent Alexander-Arnold has hailed his Real Madrid debut as something 'almost every player dreams of' despite a frustrating first outing against Al-Hilal.
Following his arrival from Liverpool at the beginning of June, Alexander-Arnold's bow in Real colours lasted 65 minutes as he struggled up against the challenge of live wire Salem Al-Dawsari.
Despite his side missing out on victory in their Club World Cup opener, Alexander-Arnold nevertheless reflected positively on his first appearance.
"After playing a game, it is hard to concentrate that much to speak Spanish,' he told Channel 5."An amazing day to make my debut for Real Madrid. Almost what every player dreams of.
"Some disappointment to not have won the game. The mentality you need to have as a Real Madrid player is to expect to win every game you're playing, but a lot of positives, especially in the second half.
'I felt the support from the moment I signed for the club. The fanbase that is truly global all over the world. You feel it every single day. A huge thank you for that. We dominated the stands today, which was incredible.'
Gonzalo Garcia, stepping in for the fever-stricken Kylian Mbappe, gave Real an early lead with a composed finish, but Ruben Neves levelled from the spot before half-time as Simone Inzaghi's men showed defensive grit and enough attacking intent to rattle their illustrious opponents.
Federico Valverde blew the chance to snatch a winner in 90th minute, fluffling a late penalty to ensure a statement result for the Saudi club.
Alexander-Arnold, who unlike fellow debutant Dean Huijsen didn't last the full game, also added detail on how he came to boast such strong Spanish - something he showed off at his unveiling.
"A couple of months,' he said, speaking on how long he'd been learning the language. 'It was something important that I had to do.
"It is important to show the intent that I want to embrace the culture and adapt as best as possible."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
What uncomfortable detail links the weddings of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with Edward and Wallis Simpson? Royal biographer Robert Hardman reveals all on new Mail podcast
Podcast All episodes Play on Apple Spotify On the latest episode of Queens, Kings and Dastardly Things, Royal biographer Robert Hardman reveals a striking parallel between the weddings of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and Edward and Wallis Simpson. The episode, the second instalment in a new podcast miniseries examining the 'objectionable' lives of the first celebrity Royal couple, focuses on how the British establishment turned its back on Edward and Mrs Simpson following the King's abdication. Edward abdicated under the mistaken belief that he and his twice-divorced bride would be permitted back into the Royal fold. The Duke of Windsor expected his new wife to receive the royal titles and privileges due to a former King's bride. During preparations for their June 1937 wedding, it became apparent that Mrs Simpson would never gain full Royal status and that the couple faced complete exile from the family. The Wedding of Edward and Wallis Simpson After failing to convince the government and Commonwealth to accept Mrs Simpson as Queen, Edward abdicated on December 11, 1936. Simpson was deemed unacceptable because she was an American divorcée with two living ex-husbands, which violated both the Church of England's stance on divorce and the constitutional requirement that the monarch be the head of that church. The crown passed to Edward's brother George VI, who made him Duke of Windsor. Edward then fled to Europe while Simpson's divorce from Ernest Simpson was finalised. The former King reportedly felt relieved, 'liberated' from the great burden of the crown. As Mail Columnist Robert Hardman explained: 'Winston Churchill was said to have been in tears when he listened to the announcement of the abdication on the radio. 'One man who was not in tears was the King himself. His view was that the crown had been a terrible burden and that now, he was, in a sense, liberated. 'Edward believed he could continue being much loved without any of the hassle of going about his Royal duty.' 'He was definitely deluded – Edward failed to understand that the nation moves on quite quickly. They were a serious threat to the institution they had left behind.' Planning his wedding to Mrs Simpson, any hopes Edward had of retaining some form of Royal power were dashed. George VI forbade his brother from returning to England, forcing the couple to celebrate their union in France. The Church of England also refused to sanction the marriage, leaving an obscure clergyman, Robert Anderson Jardine, to conduct the service. On top of this, the new King, on the advice of the government, pressured members of the Royal family and aristocracy not to attend the wedding. 'Edward hoped to have lots of members of his family there', Hardman began. 'But he's told – they are not coming at all. George VI and Queen Elizabeth send a telegram – but that's it. They told all the other Royals they were not to attend. 'Dickie Mountbatten, always trying to ride two horses at once, writes to Edward saying he does want to be there, but the King won't let him. 'Even members of the aristocracy are told they cannot turn up. For example, Ulik Alexander, keeper of the Privy Purse and a great friend of Edwards is told he will lose his position if he attends. 'There's a lot of establishment pressure to completely boycott and ostracise this event. In the end, only seven British guests are in attendance.' The government's opposition to senior British establishment figures attending was not solely born out of spite. Officials knew that within Britain and across the Empire, there would be outrage at the prospect of Simpson being honoured as a full Royal. If the wedding resembled a state occasion, there were fears it might embolden Mrs Simpson to use the title Her Royal Highness. Hardman told the podcast: 'There is very strong pressure, from the other realms and dominions – that people do not want Simpson given Royal status. 'If she's made Her Royal Highness, people would have to curtsy to her. That cannot happen.' The event was equally poorly attended on the bride's side, leading the Royal biographer to draw a comparison with Harry and Meghan's wedding some 80 years later. Hardman said: 'Wallis had one member of her family there, her aunt Bessie. This slightly echoes Harry and Meghan's wedding in 2018, where only Meghan's mother attended.' To hear more stories of historical Royal gossip and court intrigue, listen to Queens, Kings and Dastardly Things now, wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes are released every Thursday.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Thursday's briefing: Mudryk charged and Real held on Alexander-Arnold debut
Chelsea's Mykhailo Mudryk has been charged by the Football Association over an alleged breach of anti-doping regulations. Trent Alexander-Arnold's Real Madrid debut ended in frustration at the Club World Cup, but Manchester City's Rico Lewis endured an even more disappointing night as he was sent off. England edged their way into the European Under-21 Championship quarter-finals despite defeat by Germany. Mudryk charged Chelsea winger Mykhailo Mudryk has been charged by the Football Association with violating anti-doping rules. The 24-year-old, an £88.5million signing from Shakhtar Donetsk in January 2023, has not played since being handed a provisional suspension in December after he returned a positive test, reportedly for the banned substance meldonium. An FA statement said: 'We can confirm that Mykhailo Mudryk has been charged with anti-doping rule violations alleging the presence and/or use of a prohibited substance, in terms of regulations three and four of the FA's anti-doping regulations.' Rico sees red Pep Guardiola leapt to the defence of Rico Lewis after the Manchester City defender's 'unnecessary' sending-off in their Club World Cup opener. Lewis was dismissed by Brazilian referee Ramon Abatti after catching Samuel Obeng in the face following a sliding challenge two minutes from the end of a 2-0 victory over Wydad Casablanca. City boss Guardiola said: 'He touched the ball. For the speed they go to touch the ball – for the Newton's theory your leg has to be a little bit higher and the other player was down. 'Rico had no intention. It was unnecessary, honestly, the red card, but the referee had a different opinion and he's the boss.' Madrid pay the penalty Debutants Trent Alexander-Arnold and Dean Huijsen suffered a frustrating evening in Miami as Real Madrid were held to a 1-1 Club World Cup draw by Saudi side Al Hilal. Madrid boss Xabi Alonso and opposite number Simone Inzaghi were both taking charge of their new clubs for the first time. Gonzalo Garcia fired the Spanish giants into a 34th-minute lead but Ruben Neves levelled from the penalty spot before the break. Alonso's men had the better of the second half, but could not find a way past stubborn opponents as Federico Valverde's stoppage-time penalty was saved. Reigning champions limp into last eight England will play Spain in the quarter-finals of the European Under-21 Championship after they were beaten 2-1 by Germany in their final group game in Slovakia to finish runners-up in Group B. Lee Carsley's side needed a victory in Nitra to go through to the knockout rounds in first place, but despite already-qualified Germany making 11 changes, the reigning champions struggled to impose themselves. Goals from Ansgar Knauff and Nelson Weiper sent the 2023 winners to defeat and left them to face pre-tournament favourites Spain – who they beat in the final two years ago – in Trnava on Saturday. Bournemouth's Alex Scott tapped home 15 minutes from time from Omari Hutchinson's cross to make it 2-1, with Slovenia's defeat by the Czech Republic enough to secure England's passage. What's on today? The Club World Cup is the focus once again as Lionel Messi's Inter Miami look to register their first win of the competition when they take on Porto in Atlanta, having drawn their opening fixture against Al Ahly 0-0. The Egyptian side are also in action again, this time against Palmeiras.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
28 Years Later review: Zombie-apocalypse horror is a 'never-dull' monster mash-up
Alex Garland and Danny Boyle have reunited for a follow-up to their 2002 classic. It has visual flair, terrifying adversaries and a scene-stealing performance from Ralph Fiennes. 28 Years Later is part zombie-apocalypse horror, part medieval world-building, part sentimental family story and – most effectively – part Heart of Darkness in its journey toward a madman in the woods. That mashup is not necessarily a bad thing, since most of those parts work so well in this follow-up to the great 2002 film 28 Days Later, about a virus that decimates London. The new film is one of the year's most anticipated largely because it comes from the original's creators, director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland. It glows with Boyle's visual flair, Garland's ambitious screenplay and a towering performance from Ralph Fiennes, whose character enters halfway through the film and unexpectedly becomes its fraught soul. But as with Frankenstein's monster, the seams are conspicuous, making for a patchwork that is never dull but not as fully engaging as it might have been. A lot has changed in the 23 years since the original, of course. Boyle, then known for smart indie films like Trainspotting, went on to win an Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire. Garland, then a novelist and screenwriter – 28 Days was his first – is now the director of politically pointed films including Civil War. In 28 Years Later, the central problem is that Garland's political bent and Boyle's commercial instincts don't entirely mesh. The world they have created is specific and impressive though, starting with an island where people have survived the decades since the outbreak by isolating themselves from the still-plague-ridden mainland of England, reached by a causeway that can only be walked across at low tide. It is a community that might have existed in the Middle Ages. Without 21st-Century resources, they make their own arrows for weapons and use wood for fuel. Aaron Taylor-Johnson is impressively solid as Jamie, a harried but responsible husband and father. Jodie Comer plays his wife, Isla, bedridden and occasionally delirious in this community which has no doctor to diagnose her. Mostly, Comer has to look woeful. Isla can barely remember why Jamie is about to take their son, Spike (Alfie Williams), on a ritualistic trip to the mainland. It is time for him to make his first kill of an infected creature, a survival tactic he will need to know. Boyle takes full advantage of his striking technical skills in the father-son hunting scenes, which are pure zombie action-horror, full of kinetic camera movements and quick cuts as Jamie and Spike race through the woods, shooting arrows and trying to outrun the infected. The creatures are officially not zombies, as much as they look and act that way, but victims of the same blood-borne virus that caused people to become full of rage in the original film, turning them into lumbering, mush-brained marauders. Decades later they have morphed. Some, called the Slow-Lows, look like hippos crawling on all fours. Others are faster and smarter than ever. All are naked, caked in dirt, and spout geysers of blood when an arrow hits them. The danger feels visceral. Some stylish flourishes briefly comment on this embattled world. A scratchy, ominous 1915 recording of the Rudyard Kipling poem Boots, about infantrymen, (the same used in the film's trailer) is heard over recurring images of war, from the Crusades to the 20th- Century World Wars. Text at the start of the film tells us that Europe managed to push the virus away, quarantining it in Britain, which has been abandoned by the rest of the world. French and Swedish boats patrol the waters to enforce the quarantine. But that politically acute theme, which might have been so resonant with the issue of isolationism today, goes nowhere. Spike, whose story is so central, is a bland character. A thread of the narrative about the boy and his mother strains for emotion and includes a twist about a pregnant infected woman that is ludicrous even for a horror film. And separated from the original in every way except its source story, for a long stretch the film lands as a more visually stunning, less emotionally rich variation on The Last of Us. But it takes on a quieter, more psychological tone and becomes infinitely better when Fiennes arrives. It's here that Boyle and Garland truly elevate and reimagine the genre. Fiennes's character, Kelton, lives on the mainland and was once a doctor. Spike believes he might be able to help his mother, although Jamie warns that everyone knows Kelton is insane. Fiennes plays him with a shaved head, a dash of wit, and skin that looks orange. "Excuse my appearance. I paint myself in iodine," he politely says when he first meets Spike and Isla. "The virus doesn't like iodine at all." (I did wonder how he got so much iodine after all those apocalyptic years, but let's not be pedantic about it.) And he shows them his lovingly designed temple, with tall columns made of bones elegantly laid out alongside a tower of skulls. It is, he explains, a Memento Mori, a reminder that we all die. Each skull reminds him that it was once part of a living person in the flesh, not a monster. Creepy, yes, but Fiennes also makes Kelton gentle, a man of deep compassion, who regrets that there are no longer hospitals where the sick like Isla can be treated. He is the most humane person on screen, which is largely down to Fiennes's vivid, layered performance. One of the film's strengths is that you can leave debating just how unhinged Kelton really is. 28 Years Later is the first in a projected new trilogy. The second part, written by Garland and directed by Nia DaCosta, has already been shot and is scheduled to be released in January. That one is called 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, an excellent sign considering how Fiennes's character runs away with this imaginative but uneven film. ★★★★☆ 28 Years Later is released in cinemas in the UK and US on 20 June. -- If you liked this story sign up for The Essential List newsletter, a handpicked selection of features, videos and can't-miss news, delivered to your inbox twice a week. For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X, and Instagram.
