logo
Four years ago, 800 teenagers left school. Then, they were tracked

Four years ago, 800 teenagers left school. Then, they were tracked

The Age14-06-2025

The study monitored 800 students who left high school in 2020 while receiving support from the charity.
Unsurprisingly, better school attendance, higher grades and completing year 12 were all associated with better employment and training outcomes, the research found, but access to career advice was fundamental to success.
'Highly engaged young people had clear goals, strong support networks and well-developed career management skills. They successfully navigated alternative pathways, overcame setbacks and adjusted plans while staying on track,' the report said.
Last year, the long-awaited Universities Accord set a target for students from poorer backgrounds to make up 25 per cent of university places. The Rudd government in 2009 set a target of 20 per cent, but universities have so far failed to achieve anywhere close to that.
There were 66,000 students from disadvantaged backgrounds in tertiary education in 2023, federal Department of Education data shows, about 16.9 per cent of all students.
There has also been a decline in the number of students taking up initial teacher education degrees, as well as a slight decrease in those taking up nursing, while society and culture courses were also down. By comparison, information technology, engineering and hospitality and personal service courses were up, the data released in March showed.
Loading
The Smith Family said its report indicated schools needed to focus on intentional career development learning which should include personalised career advice and support.
The report also found while 87 per cent of young people from a disadvantaged background were either working or studying three years after leaving high school, those who had work were often in insecure, part-time jobs which had very limited opportunities for promotion.
The charity's head of research and advocacy Anne Hampshire said career counselling must connect young people with the world of work beyond school.
'Many of the young people we spoke to wanted much more personalised careers advice, thinking about what they were interested in, helping them to connect to employers, helping them to get exposure to different industries and particularly new jobs that are going to be created in the future,' she said.
'We cannot expect the one lone careers adviser to provide that support for the whole of the school. What works much, much more is when there are partnerships developed ... to really support within the school, young people to have access to employers, to universities.'
McCullough knows the value of supporting boys from disadvantaged backgrounds first-hand.
After his stints as a plumber and plasterer, he landed a job as a trainee with Top Blokes, a charity organisation which runs mentoring programs for young men focused on healthy masculinity, respectful relationships, mental health, leadership, and positive decision-making.
'I wanted to do something where I can connect with people more on that psychological level,' he said.
Sara Abdalhadi graduated from Liverpool Girls High School last year and knew she always wanted to be a doctor. Having the goal was the easy part: actually securing a spot in a pre-med program meant she needed to be tactical about her academic focus. Fortunately, career counselling was readily available at her school.
'My career adviser was my rock,' she said.
She met her every fortnight last year and, Abdalhadi said, helped her balance the competing priorities of getting the required ATAR, scoring well in the medical school admissions test and succeeding in an interview.
'I think she kept me going. Like, obviously, everyone has their bad days, and everyone loses hope sometimes, especially when you're coming from, like, a school that is not as recognised as other schools,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How WA's wealthiest private schools have their cake – and eat it too
How WA's wealthiest private schools have their cake – and eat it too

The Age

time18 hours ago

  • The Age

How WA's wealthiest private schools have their cake – and eat it too

The West Australian private schools serving the richest families in the state raked in millions of dollars from donations, investment income and other income in a year, new data shows. The Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission has just released the data for 2023 which shows that 20 schools across the state with a median adjusted taxable family income of over $200,000 a year received a combined $46.5 million. They received $14.6 million in donations, $8.4 million as investment income and $22.6 million in other income. Other income could be in the form of rental properties, hire of facilities and sale of assets. Of the 20 schools, just six received $31 million of the total. Christ Church Grammar topped the list at $8.1 million, including $2.9 million in donations and $5.3 million from investments. According to data the Department of Education released to Senate Estimates, the median family income was the highest in the state at $376,000. The top 25 per cent of families in the school earned more than $690,000. Save Our Schools convenor Trevor Cobbold, who aggregated the data, said these other income streams were problematic because they were not considered by the federal government when determining taxpayer funding of these schools.

How WA's wealthiest private schools have their cake – and eat it too
How WA's wealthiest private schools have their cake – and eat it too

Sydney Morning Herald

time18 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

How WA's wealthiest private schools have their cake – and eat it too

The West Australian private schools serving the richest families in the state raked in millions of dollars from donations, investment income and other income in a year, new data shows. The Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission has just released the data for 2023 which shows that 20 schools across the state with a median adjusted taxable family income of over $200,000 a year received a combined $46.5 million. They received $14.6 million in donations, $8.4 million as investment income and $22.6 million in other income. Other income could be in the form of rental properties, hire of facilities and sale of assets. Of the 20 schools, just six received $31 million of the total. Christ Church Grammar topped the list at $8.1 million, including $2.9 million in donations and $5.3 million from investments. According to data the Department of Education released to Senate Estimates, the median family income was the highest in the state at $376,000. The top 25 per cent of families in the school earned more than $690,000. Save Our Schools convenor Trevor Cobbold, who aggregated the data, said these other income streams were problematic because they were not considered by the federal government when determining taxpayer funding of these schools.

Childcare subsidy program leaks hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud and errors
Childcare subsidy program leaks hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud and errors

ABC News

time6 days ago

  • ABC News

Childcare subsidy program leaks hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud and errors

Australia's $14 billion childcare subsidy program is haemorrhaging hundreds of millions of dollars each year due to fraud, overpayments and administrative errors, according to a landmark report from the auditor-general. The report paints a disturbing picture of a system with serious oversight gaps and estimates more than $2.6 billion has been lost from incorrect payments in the five years to 2024. It describes oversight and governance of the subsidy program as "partly effective," and monitoring and enforcement as not being properly managed. The report notes that Services Australia was unable to track childcare-related tip-offs and relied on incomplete income data, while the Department of Education, despite holding broad enforcement powers, lacked clear policies on when or how to act. "Which means it is not able to assess whether decisions to take enforcement action are fair, impartial, consistent, or proportional," the report says. In 2023-24 alone, the auditor-general estimated $484 million in incorrect payments, including fraud and non-compliance. The education department identified but failed to investigate 970 potential overpayments, and it withdrew 42 per cent of fines issued, recovering less than 1 per cent of $6.4 million in outstanding debts. With the subsidy program worth more than $13 billion a year, experts warn the real losses could be much higher than reported. The childcare subsidy is one of the government's fastest growing payments programs, supporting 1.45 million children in approved care. By 2028, annual spending is set to surge by another $3.2 billion to almost $17 billion a year. Early Childhood Education Minister Jess Walsh defended the government's record, saying Labor had delivered the highest provider claim accuracy rate on record at 96.4 per cent, up from 93 per cent before it came to government. More than $300 million in savings had already been delivered through fraud investigations, strengthened audits, better data analytics and legislative changes. "The government doesn't tolerate crooks ripping off the Child Care Subsidy. We will always look for ways to continue to improve the integrity of the system," Walsh said. "Our integrity measures have delivered additional provider audits, more fraud investigations, improved targeting through better data analytics as well as education and support to the sector." The minister confirmed the department had accepted all seven recommendations of the auditor-general's report, and urged the public to report wrongdoing via the department's anonymous tip-off portal. Those recommendations include fixing oversight gaps, strengthening internal policies, publishing a joint compliance strategy, improving intelligence on risks and tip-offs, and upgrading critical systems. And since the audit commenced, a joint governance board was established between Services Australia and the Department of Education to maintain strategic oversight of regulatory activities across both agencies. This will ensure both agencies have a joined up view of the integrity activity underway across the breadth of the subsidy, and provide senior oversight and decision making on key cross cutting issues. But as costs rise and private operators chase profits, some experts say it is time to do something more radical and change the funding model. It comes against a backdrop of a major ABC investigation into the $20 billion childcare industry which exposed a sector in crisis, plagued by systemic failures, secrecy and a rising number of serious incidents at some of the country's largest for-profit providers. It triggered a parliamentary inquiry in NSW, spearheaded by Greens politician Abigail Boyd, and the release of tens of thousands of pages of regulatory documents, which include cases of inappropriate discipline, lack of supervision, unqualified educators and poor paperwork including expired Working With Children Checks and a failure to understand policies. The documents also reveal alleged subsidy fraud including centres over-enrolling children by up to 40 per cent to claim extra funding — an illegal and dangerous practice. Childcare advocate and consultant Lisa Bryant said the report's findings came as no surprise, given the sheer scale and complexity of the subsidy system. "The childcare subsidy is mind-numbingly complex," she said. "It's beyond human understanding how the payments are calculated. Families don't understand how the money and hours are calculated and providers are also frustrated … it's no wonder money is going astray," she said. Bryant said a simpler solution would be to fund childcare providers directly, much like schools, instead of processing subsidies for more than a million families. "If the government paid providers directly, it would have a stronger policy lever," she said "It could link funding to service quality and stop the funding if they don't meet the standards." Bryant said the subsidies should be directed to the centres themselves, similar to how schools work, and if they don't provide quality services, the government has a lever to withdraw the funds. Georgie Dent, the chief executive of The Parenthood, a parent advocacy organisation representing more than 80,000 parents, carers and supporters, said the system's failures are costing children and families dearly. "When almost half a billion dollars is lost to fraud or incorrect payments in a single year, it's not just a technical glitch, it's a policy failure," she said. "This is public money intended to support children's development, family workforce participation and economic productivity. We cannot afford to have it fall through the cracks." Dent said the findings make the case for funding reform clear. "We need a direct and transparent link between funding and the quality, accessibility and integrity of early childhood education services," she said. "Strong governance, clear accountabilities and aligned incentives are not optional, they are the foundation of public trust and better outcomes for children." Greens MP Abigail Boyd said the auditor-general's report revealed a deeply flawed system where billions of taxpayer dollars were being handed to early learning providers without the proper compliance and regulatory systems in place. "It's no wonder that so many large for-profit companies view the Australian early childhood sector as such a lucrative investment," she said. Boyd warned that injecting more money into the current model won't fix its structural failures: "We need a significant overhaul to ensure that everyone can have faith in this critical sector." Chey Carter, former educator and now industry consultant at Divergent Education, says she isn't surprised there is so much leakage in the system. She says she spent time working with a Child Care System management provider and saw firsthand the mass level of confusion directors face when managing childcare subsidy payments. "The support line was flooded with basic questions, how to fix overcharging, apply CCS correctly, or reconcile enrolments. These weren't one-off mistakes; they were routine," she said. "To be eligible for CCS, providers must have fraud prevention policies and procedures in place but if we look at the policy from 'Childcare Desktop' a nationally used childcare policy provider — it states: 'staff will attend regular training to assist in the identification of fraud and corruption'. I can guarantee that the majority of the ECEC workforce have never attended such training." It seems without deeper reform including linking funding to quality and tightening accountability and oversight, the childcare system will continue to bleed public money while failing the children it's meant to serve.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store