Renaming of submarine Agincourt ‘woke nonsense', says ex-defence secretary
A decision to rename nuclear-powered submarine HMS Agincourt is 'woke nonsense', a former defence secretary said.
The Astute-class attack submarine, which is still under construction, was due to be named in honour of Henry V's 1415 victory over the French.
But the boat will now be called HMS Achilles, a famous name in Royal Navy history.
Amid speculation the change was prompted to avoid offending the French, former defence secretary Grant Shapps said: 'Renaming the HMS Agincourt is nothing short of sacrilege.
'This submarine carries a name that honours a defining moment in British history.
'Under Labour, woke nonsense is being put ahead of tradition and our armed forces' proud heritage.'
Former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace told Times Radio the French would not have been offended by the name.
He said: 'We're very close to the French. The French are one of our strongest allies.
'They don't get put off by names like that.
'I mean, that shows a very pathetic grasp of foreign policy and relationships.'
He added that the French 'celebrate their successes' but 'also know in their history they didn't have all the successes'.
'So, if that is the actual reason it's been renamed, then I would be concerned that it shows we're focusing on superficial nonsense rather than rebuilding our defence,' he said.
A Royal Navy spokesman said: 'We are proud of our nation's rich military history and the many famous battles fought.
'The seventh boat in the Astute class is to be called Achilles, a name which is particularly appropriate this year as we mark the VE and VJ Day 80th anniversaries.
'Achilles received battle honours during the Second World War.
'The name was proposed by the Royal Navy Ships Names and Badging committee and approved by His Majesty the King.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
By-election shows Reform could stop Labour winning power in Scotland
The result of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election underlined the scale of the impact that the rise of Reform could have on the future shape of Scottish politics. With 26 per cent of the vote, Reform came a highly creditable third, trailing the victorious Labour candidate by just five points. The party's performance was well above its 19 per cent tally in the most recent Scottish polls – even though Hamilton did not seem like particularly fertile ground for Nigel Farage's party. Polls indicate that much of Reform's support comes from those who back Brexit while, at 38 per cent, support for Leave in the constituency in 2016 was just as low as in Scotland as a whole. Yet this did not stop Reform from turning Hamilton into a three-way marginal in which no party won as much as a third of the vote. In the meantime, support for the Conservatives collapsed to just 6 per cent, 11 points down on the tally in the constituency at the last Holyrood election in 2021. Never before has the party's support fallen so heavily in a Scottish Parliament by-election. However, its doleful performance was fully in line with its current standing of 12 per cent in Scotland-wide opinion polls. Between a fifth and a quarter of those who voted Conservative in last year's general election are now backing Reform. The outcome in Hamilton confirms that, as a result of the rise of Reform, the Conservatives are at risk of recording their worst-ever performance in a Scottish Parliament election next year and could find themselves occupying a much diminished space in the Holyrood chamber as only the fourth-largest party. Reform is, however, not only taking votes from the Conservatives, but is also damaging Labour. According to the polls, more than one in six of those who backed Anas Sarwar's party last year have now switched to the pro-Brexit insurgents. Labour might have gained Hamilton from the SNP, but the party's share of the vote was, in line with the polls, two points down on 2021, an election at which the party came no better than third across Scotland as a whole. Its 31 per cent of the vote in Hamilton is well below the near 50 per cent the party achieved locally in last year's Westminster election. So, despite giving the party the sweet taste of victory, Labour's performance was well short of what it needed to demonstrate it is currently on course to win next year's Holyrood election. Its narrow victory in Hamilton is very different from the outcome of the Rutherglen Westminster by-election in October 2023, when a 24-point increase in Labour's share of the vote (to 59 per cent) presaged the party's success in the following year's general election. Labour's narrow victory did, however, underline how little progress the SNP has made in restoring its fortunes following the drubbing it received last year. The party's vote in Hamilton was down 17 points on 2021, similar to the 15-point fall being registered in the polls. Although the party is losing fewer votes to Reform than either Labour or the Conservatives, it still finds itself able to command the support of only a little over half of those who say they would currently vote yes in an independence vote. This position is a far cry from the near 90 per cent support the party enjoyed among yes supporters in 2021. Unlike then, yes supporters appear less forgiving than they once were of what many perceive as the SNP's poor record in government. Unless those voters are won back, the SNP faces the prospect of finding itself after next May's election as very much a minority government in a parliament in which Unionists – headed by Reform – enjoy a majority. While the SNP could still be in office after next May, the party might no longer be in power.
Wales Online
36 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Lack of parks in part of Swansea 'a disgrace' but things are set to change
Lack of parks in part of Swansea 'a disgrace' but things are set to change A councillor claimed money had been set aside for new parks years ago, but nothing had happened. Now it seems things are finally moving Cllr Sam Bennett by land off Langdon Road, SA1, where a play area has long been planned and will be built (Image: Sam Bennett ) A lack of play areas in Swansea's SA1 - described as a "disgrace" by one councillor - is being addressed. Two new parks are to be created at the former docklands area off Langdon Road. Between them they'll include a pump track for BMX and scooter riders, a basketball area, play equipment, green space, benches and seats, trees, hedgerows and wildflowers. Swansea Council said they would be built in the coming months and that some preparatory work had started. Never miss a Swansea story by signing up to our newsletter here Cllr Sam Bennett, who was elected to represent the waterfront area in 2022 for the first time, said £1 million had been put aside for three new parks years ago and that he had regularly sought updates from the council on behalf of residents in SA1. He said he'd been told work would start at various points from 2022 onwards but that nothing had happened. He said he was assured earlier this year that work would start this May, and that he hadn't seen any sign of it yet. "The situation with the parks in SA1 is simply a disgrace," said the Liberal Democrat councillor. "In the 2022 (council) elections Labour made a big fanfare they had the £1 million for the parks in an effort to persuade the residents of SA1 to vote for them. Three years down the line, and residents still do not have even one park." Article continues below Another view of the land off Langdon Road where one of two new parks will be created (Image: Richard Youle ) Labour council leader Rob Stewart responded by saying Cllr Bennett had been kept fully updated on the plans for two new parks and had indicated in previous meetings he was happy with the progress being made. Cllr Stewart said topsoil had been delivered in preparation for the coming work. "It's therefore disappointing to see the local councillor claim works are not underway," he said. "He knows council officers and the administration are working hard to deliver these as soon as possible." Cllr Stewart said more than £8 million had been spent upgrading or creating new play areas at around 60 sites in Swansea by the Labour-run authority - including the Amy Dillwyn Park by Swansea Building Society Arena - since the Covid pandemic. He said this was many more than in the previous two decades including when the Lib-Dems were in power. Land at the far end of Langdon Road, near the Ibis Hotel, where the second park in SA1 will be created (Image: Richard Youle ) The situation in SA1 goes back to 2018 when the council's planning committee approved a legal agreement with landowner, the Welsh Government, for the council to create three public spaces with a children's play area. Welsh ministers were to provide £1 million for the work. It is understood the council has had the money for around six years, although the pandemic put a stop to many projects. Two sites off Langdon Road are being taken forward for new parks. Cllr Robert Francis-Davies, cabinet member for investment, regeneration, events and tourism, said soil for the new parks was being excavated and reused from places including Singleton Boating Lake. "We're confident that these great new places will be welcomed by residents of SA1 and that locals and visitors alike will work with us to keep the facilities in top shape for years to come," he said. Article continues below
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Everything we know about winter fuel payment U-turn
Everything we know about winter fuel payment U-turn Although the news is welcomed by many, there is still some confusion over what the announcement could mean Charities and MPs were among those who hit out at the move last year (Image: Getty Images/Image Source ) Huge changes have been announced to Labour's highly controversial policy, which limited how many pensioners could receive the Winter Fuel Payment. Rachel Reeves said more people would qualify for the allowance "this winter", and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he wanted to widen the threshold for winter fuel in a U-turn on one of his government's first major policies. However details of the changes and who will be eligible remain unclear, with Sir Starmer failing to confirm how many people will now get it during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. The payment - which is worth up to £300 to help with energy bills during the coldest months - was paid only to those on pension credit last year, but the policy was widely blamed for Labour's poor local election results. It saw 10 million fewer pensioners receive the money in 2024. Charities and MPs were among those who hit out at the move, showing concern for those whose income was slightly too high to qualify but then had expensive energy costs to pay. However, the restriction came in a bid to same save around £1.3 billion. Although the news is welcomed by many, there is still some confusion over what the announcement could mean. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here Here is everything we know about it so far. Article continues below Winter Fuel Payment means tested Last year, the Labour government introduced means-testing for the Winter Fuel Payment, meaning only certain pensioners over 66 would receive the money, rather than all pensioners. This resulted in over nine million UK pensioners losing the additional cash last winter. The move sparked significant backlash against Labour, which has persisted. Legal challenges have been launched against the government's decision, with charities warning it could push more elderly Brits into poverty. Research by Unite Union revealed that over two-thirds of its retired members had to reduce their heating last winter, a third took fewer baths or showers, and 16% had to cut back on hot meals due to the increased costs of trying to stay warm. The removal of the benefit was also linked to the rise in Reform Councillors in recent elections. Under the rules, you are eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment if you are over the state pension age of 66 and claiming one of the following benefits during the qualifying week: Income Support Income-based Jobseeker's Allowance Income-related Employment and Support Allowance Pension Credit Universal Credit What was announced this week? Although there have been no official announcements or changes today, one thing has been verified: Starmer's intention to increase the eligibility of pensioners for this winter's support payment. According to Jon Greer, Quilter's head of retirement policy, the Prime Minister's suggestion signifies a "notable shift in tone". Who will benefit from the U-turn? During Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir did not clarify who would benefit from the updated policy, despite acknowledging in a recent BBC interview that there was a pressing need for clarity. "We will look, again, as I said two weeks ago, at the eligibility for winter fuel, and of course, we'll set out how we pay for it," he responded when Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch queried about the number of pensioners, out of 10 million, who would have the allowance reinstated. The queries arose following Reeves' earlier statement that people "should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter". When will details be announced? Should the UK government wait until the Budget to announce the changes, it would be just prior to when payments are typically made. Eligible pensioners receive payments automatically in November or December. Under the current, short-lived system, individuals are required to claim pension credit - a top-up to the state pension for those on low incomes. Pressure from Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan, who had previously urged the government to rethink the cuts to millions of retirees, welcomed the PM's surprise reversal on Wednesday. She says that Keir Starmer should now provide winter fuel payments to the "majority" of pensioners. Speaking to the BBC, Ms Morgan said millionaires shouldn't be getting the payment. She said: "I'm not sure if millionaires should be getting a winter fuel allowance. So let's just make sure that they don't get it." But Ms Morgan added: "People below that, that's where the conversation got to be. I do want the majority of pensioners - I think they made a massive contribution to the country." Martin Lewis comments The Money Saving Expert founder said he was "delighted" about the news, in a social media post.. He said it was worth "explaining" the two issues he had always had with the way that the Winter Fuel Payment means-test had been put in place. He said: "The first one is the level. Currently, for a single pensioner, only those earning under £11,800 a year get the £200 or £300 winter fuel help. Now with energy bills still high and other energy bill help being taken away, that really was a big hit to the pensioners who were just above that limit. "I'm hoping to see this limit increase from the current £11,800 up to £20,000 or more. Perhaps they might only do it and link it to higher-rate taxpayers." He added: "The means test that they linked Winter Fuel payment to was Pension Credit. Now, Pension Credit has long been a flawed benefit which has been critically underclaimed, and even now, after all the communication over Winter Fuel, there are still 700,000 eligible pensioners who should get Pension Credit and thus winter fuel payments who don't because they don't claim. "Often, it will be vulnerable people with onset dementia or people who just can't go through the complicated process, especially on forms, or the message hasn't been passed on to them as it's quite difficult to explain the level of income that you need to get it. "So let's just put that into perspective, 700,000 people who have a total income of under £11,800 a year are missing out on the Winter Fuel Payment, even though that's the level the government says they should get it. Article continues below "So my big message to the Chancellor is, don't just increase the threshold. You have to look at the means test mechanism to make sure that the most vulnerable pensioners in this country, if they have income below your threshold, actually get the Winter Fuel Payment. And my fingers are crossed they'll be listening."
