What is Sizewell C and what does it mean for Suffolk?
Plans for the Sizewell C nuclear power station have taken a step closer to the final go-ahead after the government announced significant funding. But what exactly is Sizewell C and what are the arguments for and against it?
French energy company EDF wants to build a new two-reactor nuclear power station on the east Suffolk coastline that could generate 3.2 gigawatts of electricity.
It claims Sizewell C could power the equivalent of about six million homes and will generate electricity for 60 years.
The power station will sit right next to Sizewell B that has been operating since 1995, just off Sizewell beach, close to the town of Leiston.
The decommissioned Sizewell A site, which first opened in 1967, can also be found here.
To generate nuclear power in non-military reactors, uranium atoms are bombarded by much smaller neutron particles.
This causes the atoms to break down in process called nuclear fission, which releases huge amounts of energy as heat.
The heat is used to boil water, producing steam, which drives turbines and generates electricity.
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the plants are among the "safest and most secure facilities in the world" and are subject to strict international safety standards.
In 2008, the then Labour prime minister, Gordon Brown, said the UK needed to increase its nuclear power capacity.
Two years later during the coalition government between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, Sizewell was identified as a site suitable for a new power station.
In November 2012, EDF launched its first public consultation to get the feedback of local people ahead of any formal planning application.
Three other public consultations were held, with the final one finishing in September 2019.
Sizewell C said more than 10,000 East Suffolk residents had been involved in the consultations.
In May 2020, EDF submitted an application for a development consent order to build the power station.
This is a legal document that grants permission for large-scale and nationally significant projects in England and Wales.
This was granted by the government in July 2022 despite the Examining Authority recommending it was not approved over water supply and nature concerns.
The site has also had its nuclear licence granted too in May 2024.
While both these have been given, there were still questions over how it would be funded.
The power station is expected to cost about £20bn.
EDF previously rejected claims the project would cost £40bn, but did accept its nuclear plant being built at Hinkley Point, in Somerset, would cost more than that figure.
The government confirmed a total of £3.6bn worth of investment had been put into the project so far.
This included some funding from a subsidy scheme called Devex.
The government said it would now be investing £14.2bn to build Sizewell C - this figure included £2.7bn announced in November last year, a spokesperson for the Department for Energy Security confirmed.
It means £17.8bn has been invested in the project in total.
However the government said a final decision on the funding model was due later this summer as the project was still in need of private investors.
Ministers and EDF previously said there had been plenty of potential investors coming forward and an agreement was close to being finalised.
No new nuclear power plant has opened in the UK since 1995 when Sizewell B began operating.
According to the government, all existing nuclear stations with the exception of Sizewell B, are likely to be phased out by the early 2030s.
The government has previously said it was on a "mission" to deliver clean power by 2030 and reach its net zero target.
Nuclear power stations do not produce greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane while in operation and therefore it could be key to help with this goal.
The government also said this "clean, homegrown power" could play a part in building economic growth, improve its energy security and reduce the country's dependency on fossil fuels.
Another key argument around the project is the jobs it could create for the surrounding areas.
While in construction, the project could employ up to 10,000 people and once in operation there will be 900 people employed at Sizewell C.
There has been strong opposition against Sizewell C since it was announced.
Campaign groups Stop Sizewell C and Together Against Sizewell C both fear the plant could have negative effects across a range of different areas.
Both have significant worries over the environmental impact and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has similarly protested in the past over this fear.
Sizewell C has argued it has worked to protect the wildlife around the site by rehoming displaced animals in new nature reserves it has created.
The campaign groups also argue the project is "too slow" to combat climate change and is too expensive.
Alison Downes, director of Stop Sizewell C, said the government would come to "regret" its most recent investment announcement and felt the money could be spent elsewhere.
If the final investment decision on the funding model this summer goes ahead without issue, Sizewell C could be operational by the 2030s.
Sizewell C also recently announced plans to open a post-16 college in Leiston which it hoped would help train up its future workforce.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Sizewell C boss 'optimistic' it will get go-ahead
Latest legal challenge against Sizewell C launched
What does Leiston make of Sizewell C's plan for a college?
'Nothing prepared us for Sizewell C devastation'
EDF reject claims Sizewell C will cost £40bn
Five signs Sizewell C is gearing up for go-ahead
Sizewell C

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Road crossing scheme gets cash after years of 'frustrating' delays
NEWS that a new pedestrian bridge has finally been given funding has been welcomed after many 'frustrating' years of little progress. Plans for a crossing at the busy A629 – a 70mph road that divides Steeton and Silsden – have been in the planning stages for years. But work on the crossing has yet to start. The scheme – which will be a pedestrian and cycle bridge over the road – was recently awarded £12.9m from the West Yorkshire City Region Sustainable Transport Settlement, a huge pot of cash given to West Yorkshire Combined Authority by Government. This money will help fund the first stage of the scheme – the bridge. But no funding has yet been allocated for the second phase, which is expected to cost an additional £11m. That phase will include an additional one-and-a-half miles of pedestrian and cycle paths linking Steeton and Silsden, and more road crossings. The transport settlement was discussed at a meeting of Bradford Council's Executive last week. Referring to the second stage of the scheme, the report said: 'The potential for a second phase to this project has been identified, however no funding has so far been allocated for this purpose.' Councillor Rebecca Poulsen (Cons, Worth Valley) spoke of the long delays to the project at the meeting. In 2016, £700,000 was secured from the Conservative Government for a feasibility study into a crossing on the road. Despite this, the project is still yet to begin. On the new cash for the scheme, Councillor Poulsen said: 'I welcome this funding and am pleased to see Steeton and Silsden bridge included. 'This has been going on for years and years and residents have become increasingly frustrated that it is taking so long. 'It took four years to get a feasibility report done. 'I hope we get phase two up and going as soon as possible.' Councillor Alex Ross Shaw, Executive for Planning, Regeneration and Transport on Bradford Council, said: 'This scheme is a good example of the benefits of devolution. 'We've got a grant this big because of devolution. 'The Steeton and Silsden bridge is something we've wanted to see for some time. 'We had funding for a feasibility study from the previous Government, but it came with no funding attached. 'It was not the case that we had funding to deliver the scheme, not until recently.'


Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
US Assails Sanctions by UK, Other Allies on Israeli Ministers
Secretary of State Marco Rubio rebuked five allies over sanctions they imposed on two members of Israel's cabinet as fissures between the US and its partners widen over the war in Gaza and the treatment of Palestinians. In a statement released late Tuesday, Rubio criticized the UK, Canada, Norway, New Zealand and Australia for penalties imposed on Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government urged to disrupt ‘addictive grip' of smartphones on children's lives
The Government is being urged to create child-friendly playful neighbourhoods and disrupt the 'addictive grip' of smartphones on children's lives. Closures of playgrounds, busier roads, shortened school break times and the dominance of screentime have restricted children's opportunities to play, a report has suggested. Urgent action is needed to create more opportunities for children to play outdoors and away from digital devices and social media, according to a report by the Raising the Nation Play Commission inquiry. It warned: 'Too many of our children are spending their most precious years sedentary, doomscrolling on their phones and often alone, while their health and wellbeing deteriorates.' The commission was chaired by Paul Lindley, founder of organic baby food manufacturer Ella's Kitchen, in partnership with the Centre for Young Lives think tank, which was co-founded by the former children's commissioner for England Baroness Anne Longfield. It has called on the Government to establish a National Play Strategy for England, backed by an annual £125 million investment and led by a 'minister for play'. The strategy should include a commitment to a 'step-change' in the quantity and quality of children's use of digital devices through stronger regulation, public engagement and information, and addressing addictive 'push' factors that have driven children online, the report added. The inquiry has called on the Government to raise the digital age of consent to 16 and introduce a ban on smartphones in schools during the school day. It added that it should become easier for parents to organise 'safe play' in their streets, and there should be a national ban on 'No Ball Games' signs. A poll of 2,000 parents in England, commissioned by the inquiry, suggested that 55% of parents believe their youngest child plays outside less than they did when they were children. Around three in four (76%) parents agree that people are generally less accepting of children playing outside on the street than when they were a child, according to the poll. The Raising the Nation Play Commission brought together 19 expert commissioners to conduct a year-long inquiry into how play can be restored to every childhood in England. Lady Longfield, executive chairwoman of the Centre for Young Lives, said: 'Too many of our children are spending their most precious years sedentary, doomscrolling on their phones and often alone, while their health and wellbeing deteriorates. 'It is no coincidence that the least happy generation, the generation with the highest rates of obesity and rising ill health, is the generation that plays less and less. 'As we have heard from a swathe of experts and professionals working with children over the last year, play is being squeezed out of childhoods, with drastic implications for children, our economy and public services. 'With so much at stake children really have everything to play for: their health, wellbeing, happiness, learning, and development depends on our ability to reignite the role of play. 'This report provides a blueprint for how we can get children playing again and also tackle the scourge of addictive doomscrolling, so we can prevent future generations from becoming glued to screens.' Technology Secretary Pete Kyle has indicated he is considering an 'app cap' for children. On Sunday, the minister signalled he was looking at measures to restrict the amount of time children spend on their phones, including through a possible 10pm curfew. Mr Lindley, chairman of the Raising the Nation Play Commission, said: 'Creating truly playful communities is not just about better street design, traffic management, and reduced crime, but also about a reversal of the growing culture of intolerance towards children playing. 'This will also encourage more parents to have confidence they can let their children play out more freely, in the knowledge that their children will be both having a great time and are also safe. 'We need to give our children back the time, space, opportunity, freedom – and the right – to play again.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise the vital importance of play and access to nature as part of children's development and wellbeing as we strive to create the healthiest and happiest generation of children ever. 'Through our Plan for Change, we are setting young people up to achieve and thrive – both inside and outside the classroom. 'We have given hundreds of thousands of children the tools to turn their grey school spaces green as part of our National Education Nature Park, we are opening up grassroots sports to all with £100 million investment in facilities and we are working with experts to develop a framework to improve access to activities outside of school. 'Schools already have the power to completely ban phones in the classroom and the overwhelming majority – 99.8% of primary schools and 90% of secondary schools – limit or restrict use. 'And from July, new rules under the Online Safety Act will require social media platforms to protect children in the UK from seeing harmful content online.'