Road crossing scheme gets cash after years of 'frustrating' delays
NEWS that a new pedestrian bridge has finally been given funding has been welcomed after many 'frustrating' years of little progress.
Plans for a crossing at the busy A629 – a 70mph road that divides Steeton and Silsden – have been in the planning stages for years.
But work on the crossing has yet to start.
The scheme – which will be a pedestrian and cycle bridge over the road – was recently awarded £12.9m from the West Yorkshire City Region Sustainable Transport Settlement, a huge pot of cash given to West Yorkshire Combined Authority by Government.
This money will help fund the first stage of the scheme – the bridge. But no funding has yet been allocated for the second phase, which is expected to cost an additional £11m.
That phase will include an additional one-and-a-half miles of pedestrian and cycle paths linking Steeton and Silsden, and more road crossings.
The transport settlement was discussed at a meeting of Bradford Council's Executive last week.
Referring to the second stage of the scheme, the report said: 'The potential for a second phase to this project has been identified, however no funding has so far been allocated for this purpose.'
Councillor Rebecca Poulsen (Cons, Worth Valley) spoke of the long delays to the project at the meeting.
In 2016, £700,000 was secured from the Conservative Government for a feasibility study into a crossing on the road. Despite this, the project is still yet to begin.
On the new cash for the scheme, Councillor Poulsen said: 'I welcome this funding and am pleased to see Steeton and Silsden bridge included.
'This has been going on for years and years and residents have become increasingly frustrated that it is taking so long.
'It took four years to get a feasibility report done.
'I hope we get phase two up and going as soon as possible.'
Councillor Alex Ross Shaw, Executive for Planning, Regeneration and Transport on Bradford Council, said: 'This scheme is a good example of the benefits of devolution.
'We've got a grant this big because of devolution.
'The Steeton and Silsden bridge is something we've wanted to see for some time.
'We had funding for a feasibility study from the previous Government, but it came with no funding attached.
'It was not the case that we had funding to deliver the scheme, not until recently.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Pentagon Review of Aukus Security Pact Worries U.K., Australia
The Pentagon is reviewing a defense pact with the U.K. and Australia, throwing into doubt a strategic partnership that aims to give Australia nuclear-powered submarines and deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific. The three-way alliance—known by the acronym Aukus—was signed back in 2021 under the Biden administration. It encompassed not only the sharing of key technology with Australia to equip it with nuclear-powered submarines, but also close cooperation between the allies on a range of other matters including the development of hypersonic missiles, quantum computing and undersea weapons.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The UK Spending Review's Choices
UK Spending Review 2025 By Dr Linda Yueh, London Business School Former French Prime Minister Pierre Mendès-France once said, 'To govern is to choose.' The government in its UK Spending Review has made choices as to how it will spend and invest in hopes of raising economic growth. As evident in Mendès-France's observation, there are trade-offs in making those choices. The additional challenge with setting out a three-year spending plan and a four-year investment plan is that the global economic environment is highly uncertain with the return of the Trump administration that has quickly announced, then paused, a wide swathe of tariffs and other policies. Given the challenging global economy, strengthening domestic growth drivers is even more important. The focus on investment in this Spending Review makes that apparent as the UK's growth has lagged behind other major economies due in part to its lower rates of business investment. So, the Chancellor's additional fiscal rule that allows the government to borrow to invest means that investment will grow to about £113 billion. Unlike the day-to-day spending, government investment is less impacted by any downgrades to economic growth since it does not need to be balanced by taxes which fall when the economy slows. That greater certainty around investment is not just helpful, but necessary since firms need to be assured before they will invest. The revamping of the Treasury's 'green book', which assesses where investments should go around the country, will also place the investment in parts of the UK that could boost their ability to catch up to London and the southeast. Wales, Northern Ireland and parts of the north of England will receive investments in technology, defence, and other areas. This is 'low hanging' fruit in the sense that bringing up the level of productivity everywhere to the highest level found within a country can raise growth. There are other challenges of course, particularly around planning and energy costs. But, the focus on investment is one strand of the Spending Review that has shown a choice by the government that has the potential to generate returns to growth. The allocation of day-to-day spending is also aligned to growth, but those choices are driven by other factors. Health and defence received more funding than other departments. Given the pressures on the NHS since COVID-19, it was not surprising that more funding was needed. Improving health services could also help reduce the economic inactivity rate, which has stubbornly not returned to pre-COVID levels unlike other major economies. Increasing the employment rate would be positive for growth. Due to the wars that have erupted over the past few years, the government has pledged to increase defence spending to 2.6 percent of GDP by 2027, which would make the UK the second largest spender on security after only the United States. Funding this spending by cutting international aid was a choice that has been under criticism. Although the driver was not growth, defence spending can produce technologies that raise productivity and therefore boost GDP. A well-known example is GPS. It was a Cold War era project of the U.S. Department of Defense that has since powered SatNav and self-driving cars. Education, Net Zero and Energy as well as Science and Technology have also received better allocations. Investing in renewables and research as well as people are aligned to the government's long-term growth aims. But, these choices mean less public spending for other government departments, which could impact the quality of public services in the Justice Department, for instance. The government has emphasised that it will invest in the use of technology, including £2 billion for AI, to make the delivery of public services more efficient. As many organisations know, the potential to do more with less is possible, but transformation programmes are challenging and takes time. For example, the Home Office set out a decade or so ago to digitalise the passport process, which is now much more efficient. Doing so is also positive for economic growth since productivity is defined as output per worker or output per hour. It may be challenging to see the fruits of this for some time, but it is another choice that should support growth in the longer term. And that's the challenge for the Spending Review. The choices to support growth are likely to be judged some time down the line, while the choices around day-to-day spending will have a more immediate impact. To govern is to choose. But, those choices are not judged on the same time horizon. To complicate matters, during times of high uncertainty, the implementation of policy can be thrown off course. This Spending Review has certainly highlighted the challenges of choosing under uncertainty. Linda Yueh is Adjunct Professor of Economics at the London Business School; Fellow in Economics at St Edmund Hall, Oxford University; and the author of The Great Crashes and The Great Economists.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Premier League 'under strain' despite record £6.3 bn revenues
The combined revenue of Premier League clubs rose to a record £6.3 billion ($8.5 billion, 7.5 billion euros) in the 2023/24 season, but fan unrest and worsening competitive balance are cause for concern, according to financial experts Deloitte. The rise in income for England's 20 top-flight clubs was fuelled by commercial income surpassing £2 billion for the first time and a rise in matchday revenue beyond £900 million. English clubs continue to enjoy a huge financial advantage over their European rivals. Spain's La Liga, the second highest revenue-generating league, earned just over half that amount at 3.8 billion euros, almost 50 percent of which came from Real Madrid and Barcelona. However, fan protests have become a common sight at Premier League stadiums over rising ticket prices and the squeezing out of local supporters to make way for more tourists willing to spend more for a special matchday experience. "There can be no doubt that the system in English football is under strain," said Tim Bridge, the lead partner in the Deloitte Sports Business Group. "Repeated reports of fan unrest at ticket price and accessibility demonstrate the challenge in the modern era of balancing commercial growth with the historic essence of a football club's role and position in society: as a community asset." There is also uncertainty over the implications of an incoming independent regulator for England's top five leagues. And for the past two seasons, all three promoted clubs from the Championship have been immediately relegated back to the second tier. "The financial implications of the 'yo-yo effect' on clubs, their spending, and overall competitiveness are major factors to address in order to continue attracting high levels of investment across the system," added Bridge in Deloitte's Annual Review of Football Finance. Total revenue of European clubs rose by eight percent in the 2023/24 campaign to 38 billion euros, boosted by increased commercial revenue and stadium developments. The women's game also continues to grow commercially, particularly in England's Women's Super League (WSL). Collective revenues in the WSL rose 34 percent to £65 million in 2023/24 and are projected to reach £100 million in the upcoming season. kca/nf Sign in to access your portfolio
