MEG Energy advises shareholders to reject Strathcona's $4.42bn takeover bid
The bid is estimated at nearly C$6bn ($4.42bn), according to Reuters.
On 30 May 2025, Strathcona made a formal offer to acquire all issued and outstanding MEG shares it does not already own, combining 0.62 of a Strathcona share and $4.10 in cash per MEG share.
The offer is set to remain open until 15 September 2025.
A special committee formed by MEG's board, with the support of financial and legal advisors, conducted a thorough evaluation of the offer.
Following the review, the board determined that the compensation proposed for shareholders under the offer is insufficient from a financial perspective and does not serve the best interests of the company or its shareholders.
The board has unanimously advised shareholders to reject the offer by not tendering their shares.
In the directors' circular, the board outlined several reasons for its recommendation. It highlighted that the offer's share consideration would expose shareholders to a company with inferior assets compared to those of MEG.
MEG's assets, including the Christina Lake project, are situated in the prime Athabasca oil sands region and boast approximately five billion barrels of discovered bitumen initially-in-place, supporting low-risk growth for decades.
Furthermore, the board contrasted MEG's extensive and high-quality asset portfolio with Strathcona's assets, which it described as scattered, lacking scale and situated in less prolific areas.
The board also raised concerns about the potential for downward pressure on the combined company's share price due to Waterous Energy Fund's concentrated 51% ownership position, if the deal is finalised.
Additionally, the board criticised the offer for lacking a real premium, stating that the advertised premium was opportunistically calculated based on Strathcona's relatively thin trading volume.
The board has authorised the company to commence a strategic review of alternatives that may yield an offer superior to the company's stand-alone strategy.
"MEG Energy advises shareholders to reject Strathcona's $4.42bn takeover bid" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nature's Sunshine Products (NASDAQ:NATR) shareholders have earned a 18% CAGR over the last three years
Explore Nature's Sunshine Products's Fair Values from the Community and select yours By buying an index fund, investors can approximate the average market return. But if you choose individual stocks with prowess, you can make superior returns. For example, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NASDAQ:NATR) shareholders have seen the share price rise 63% over three years, well in excess of the market return (49%, not including dividends). On the other hand, the returns haven't been quite so good recently, with shareholders up just 26%. So let's assess the underlying fundamentals over the last 3 years and see if they've moved in lock-step with shareholder returns. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. Over the last three years, Nature's Sunshine Products failed to grow earnings per share, which fell 0.3% (annualized). Based on these numbers, we think that the decline in earnings per share may not be a good representation of how the business has changed over the years. Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics. Do you think that shareholders are buying for the 2.0% per annum revenue growth trend? We don't. While we don't have an obvious theory to explain the share price rise, a closer look at the data might be enlightening. The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). Take a more thorough look at Nature's Sunshine Products' financial health with this free report on its balance sheet. A Different Perspective It's nice to see that Nature's Sunshine Products shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 26% over the last year. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 10% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Nature's Sunshine Products you should know about. Of course Nature's Sunshine Products may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
JAKKS Pacific (NASDAQ:JAKK) shareholders have earned a 30% CAGR over the last five years
Explore JAKKS Pacific's Fair Values from the Community and select yours It hasn't been the best quarter for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (NASDAQ:JAKK) shareholders, since the share price has fallen 19% in that time. But that scarcely detracts from the really solid long term returns generated by the company over five years. In fact, the share price is 268% higher today. Generally speaking the long term returns will give you a better idea of business quality than short periods can. The more important question is whether the stock is too cheap or too expensive today. Now it's worth having a look at the company's fundamentals too, because that will help us determine if the long term shareholder return has matched the performance of the underlying business. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement. During the last half decade, JAKKS Pacific became profitable. That kind of transition can be an inflection point that justifies a strong share price gain, just as we have seen here. The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). We like that insiders have been buying shares in the last twelve months. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on JAKKS Pacific's earnings, revenue and cash flow. What About Dividends? When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for JAKKS Pacific the TSR over the last 5 years was 276%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence! A Different Perspective While the broader market gained around 19% in the last year, JAKKS Pacific shareholders lost 22% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 30%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand JAKKS Pacific better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks, for example - JAKKS Pacific has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of. There are plenty of other companies that have insiders buying up shares. You probably do not want to miss this free list of undervalued small cap companies that insiders are buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Air Canada Flight Attendants Say They Will Defy Back-to-Work Order
The union representing Air Canada's 10,000 flight attendants said on Sunday that it would defy a back-to-work order and continue a strike that shut down Canada's dominant carrier and severely disrupted travel throughout the country. The announcement came at the same time that Air Canada had ordered the flight attendants to show up for work Sunday afternoon to restart service that evening. 'We will be challenging this blatantly unconstitutional order that violates the charter rights of 10,000 flight attendants, 70 percent of whom are women, and 100 percent of whom are forced to do hours of unpaid work by their employer every time they come to work,' the Canadian Union of Public Employees said in statement. 'We remain on strike. We demand a fair, negotiated contract and to be compensated for all hours worked.' The flight attendants went on strike over wages. They are also seeking to be paid for work they perform on the ground before takeoff and after landing. Less than 12 hours after the attendants went on strike early Saturday morning, Patty Hajdu, the federal labor minister, told the Canada Industrial Relations Board to use binding arbitration to come up with a contract and to shut down the strike. The independent board ordered the flight attendants to return to work at 2 p.m. Eastern time on Sunday. The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld the right of workers to strike even when it causes disruptions. It has not, however, specifically addressed using arbitration to end walkouts. Air Canada asked the government to impose it last week before the strike began. Before the union's announcement on Sunday, Air Canada said it would resume some flights in the evening. The labor board can issue fines, which can be turned into court orders, for defying its order.
