Trump allowed to keep using national guard in LA for now
U.S. President Donald Trump can continue to use national guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles as a legal challenge over his use of the military proceeds, a federal appeals court ruled.
In a win for the White House, a three-judge panel in San Francisco on Thursday said the Trump administration can keep using California National Guard troops to respond to the protests. In effect, it doesn't change the situation on the ground in Los Angeles, where the federal government has been deploying the military for more than a week.
Thursday's decision isn't the final ruling on the matter and is likely to be immediately challenged. California could appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, or a bigger panel in the same appeals court. The lower court that had ordered the federal government to return control of the troops to the state will also hold a hearing on Friday.
California and the Trump administration have been sparring over the federal government's response to the protests, including the deployment of thousands of the state's National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines.
California and its Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, have blasted Trump's deployment as a "power grab' and an unnecessary intrusion on the work of local officials to police the protests. Lawyers for the state also have said it's "terrifying' that Justice Department lawyers said the presidents actions can't be second-guessed by the courts, and argue that the deployment sets a dangerous precedent.
Representatives for Newsom and the White House didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
The Trump administration has maintained that the president has the power to unilaterally federalize national guard troops when he determines there is a "rebellion' or "invasion' that necessitates military intervention. And presidents are permitted to call up the state troops when "regular forces' are unable to enforce federal law.
The appeals court judges said Trump likely acted lawfully when he federalized the national guard, but they objected to arguments raised by Justice Department lawyers that his decision cannot be reviewed by the courts.
"We conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority,' the appeals court said in a unanimous ruling late Thursday.
The judges also stressed that the decision is limited to whether Trump was allowed to call for the deployment, but does not address "the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage.'
The appeals court panel, which heard arguments Tuesday by lawyers from both the Justice Department and California, is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump and one by former President Joe Biden. The court stepped in last week at the administration's request to pauses U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's order declaring that Trump's deployment without California's consent was "illegal.'
Trump issued a proclamation authorizing their deployment on June 7 and said protests in the city against his deportation initiative represent a form of "rebellion' against the authority of the federal government. In court filings, lawyers for the administration cited reports of violence and threats against federal property and officers conducting immigration enforcement.
Breyer said in his June 12 ruling he was troubled by the idea that a protest against the federal government on its own could "justify a finding of rebellion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
7 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Appeals court lets Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES (AP) -- An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. "The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters 'pinned down' several federal officers and threw 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers. Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows," the court wrote. "The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant." It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order. Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social platform, calling it a "BIG WIN." He wrote that "all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done." Newsom issued a statement that expressed disappointment that the court is allowing Trump to retain control of the Guard. But he also welcomed one aspect of the decision. "The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court," Newsom said. "The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens." The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. Two judges on the appeals panel were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of "rebellion or danger of a rebellion." "The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'" wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.
Japan Times
11 hours ago
- Japan Times
Trump allowed to keep using national guard in LA for now
U.S. President Donald Trump can continue to use national guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles as a legal challenge over his use of the military proceeds, a federal appeals court ruled. In a win for the White House, a three-judge panel in San Francisco on Thursday said the Trump administration can keep using California National Guard troops to respond to the protests. In effect, it doesn't change the situation on the ground in Los Angeles, where the federal government has been deploying the military for more than a week. Thursday's decision isn't the final ruling on the matter and is likely to be immediately challenged. California could appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, or a bigger panel in the same appeals court. The lower court that had ordered the federal government to return control of the troops to the state will also hold a hearing on Friday. California and the Trump administration have been sparring over the federal government's response to the protests, including the deployment of thousands of the state's National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines. California and its Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, have blasted Trump's deployment as a "power grab' and an unnecessary intrusion on the work of local officials to police the protests. Lawyers for the state also have said it's "terrifying' that Justice Department lawyers said the presidents actions can't be second-guessed by the courts, and argue that the deployment sets a dangerous precedent. Representatives for Newsom and the White House didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. The Trump administration has maintained that the president has the power to unilaterally federalize national guard troops when he determines there is a "rebellion' or "invasion' that necessitates military intervention. And presidents are permitted to call up the state troops when "regular forces' are unable to enforce federal law. The appeals court judges said Trump likely acted lawfully when he federalized the national guard, but they objected to arguments raised by Justice Department lawyers that his decision cannot be reviewed by the courts. "We conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority,' the appeals court said in a unanimous ruling late Thursday. The judges also stressed that the decision is limited to whether Trump was allowed to call for the deployment, but does not address "the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage.' The appeals court panel, which heard arguments Tuesday by lawyers from both the Justice Department and California, is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump and one by former President Joe Biden. The court stepped in last week at the administration's request to pauses U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's order declaring that Trump's deployment without California's consent was "illegal.' Trump issued a proclamation authorizing their deployment on June 7 and said protests in the city against his deportation initiative represent a form of "rebellion' against the authority of the federal government. In court filings, lawyers for the administration cited reports of violence and threats against federal property and officers conducting immigration enforcement. Breyer said in his June 12 ruling he was troubled by the idea that a protest against the federal government on its own could "justify a finding of rebellion.'
Japan Today
12 hours ago
- Japan Today
Appeals court lets Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles
California National Guard stand in formation guarding the federal building in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer) An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, the court concluded that 'it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority' in federalizing control of the guard. It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order. The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. The ruling comes from a panel of three judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, two of whom were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which only allows presidents can take control during times of 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
