Wikipedia vs ANI case: SC reiterates power to postpone judicial reporting, sets aside Delhi HC order
The Supreme Court referenced the Sahara India case regarding postponing reporting judicial proceedings. Wikipedia won its appeal against a Delhi High Court order to remove information. A division bench refused to stay the single-judge bench's order to take down alleged defamatory content about Asian News International, ANI. The court stated Wikipedia must comply with IT Rules.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In a big relief to Wikimedia Foundation , the Supreme Court on Friday set aside the Delhi High Court 's earlier order that had directed the platform to delete allegedly defamatory content related to Asian News International (ANI) from its page.Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, delivering the Supreme Court's judgment, reiterated the principle laid down in the Sahara India case, affirming that courts do have the power to postpone the reporting of judicial proceedings—but only when there is a real and substantial risk to the fairness of a trial.The judgment noted that while courts must remain open to debate and constructive criticism, including discussions on sub judice matters, judges themselves cannot respond publicly. However, if a publication scandalises the court, appropriate action may be taken. Crucially, the court stated it is not the judiciary's role to direct media outlets to remove posts.Earlier, a division bench of the Delhi HC had refused to stay a single-judge order directing Wikipedia to remove certain descriptions of ANI. The bench—comprising Justices Pratibha Singh and Rajneesh Kumar Gupta—had ruled that Wikipedia and its host, the Wikimedia Foundation, are subject to the Information Technology ( Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. The court held that if defamatory content was not removed within 36 hours, ANI could approach the court for further relief.The bench also clarified that as an intermediary, Wikipedia cannot contest a takedown directive on merits. 'If you claim to be an intermediary, your job is to comply with court orders. You cannot argue the content's merit,' the bench remarked.However, the court stayed parts of the single-judge's order that had directed Wikipedia to remove the 'protection status' of ANI's page and barred users from posting defamatory content. Protection status on Wikipedia limits editing access to administrators only.Justice Singh stated that if similar content appears again, ANI could inform Wikipedia, which would be expected to act accordingly.Earlier, on April 2, Justice Subramonium Prasad had passed an interim order directing the removal of allegedly defamatory descriptions from ANI's Wikipedia page. The order came in response to a defamation suit filed by ANI against Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation, seeking the removal of the content and damages amounting to Rs 2 crore.ANI alleged that Wikipedia had published false and defamatory content with malicious intent, damaging the agency's reputation. The Wikipedia page reportedly described ANI as a 'propaganda tool' and 'mouthpiece' for the government and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
When Rajinikanth chose reconciliation over rhetoric with Karnataka during the 2008 'Kuselan' controversy
In 2008, ahead of the release of his film 'Kuselan,' Superstar found himself at the center of a storm over the long-standing between and . During a Tamil film industry protest in Chennai demanding the implementation of the Supreme Court's order on the water issue, Rajinikanth made strong remarks urging the Karnataka government to release water. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now His words, though echoing the sentiments of Tamil Nadu, sparked a sharp backlash in Karnataka. A ban looms over the film Pro-Kannada groups responded swiftly, calling for a ban on the release of 'Kuselan' across Karnataka. The situation escalated, and distributors in the state began to pull back, fearing violence and loss. Realizing the gravity of the situation and how it could impact his fans and the film industry, Rajinikanth decided to take a conciliatory path. He issued a public apology to the people and government of Karnataka, stating that he did not intend to hurt anyone's sentiments. The superstar steps back for peace In a televised message, Rajinikanth said, 'If my words have hurt the people of Karnataka, I sincerely apologize.' His heartfelt gesture was seen as a move to diffuse tensions and restore peace. The apology was widely circulated and helped ease the pressure around the film's release. Following this, 'Kuselan' was allowed to be released in Karnataka, although with limited screening due to lingering protests. A moment that defined the man This incident remains a key moment in Rajinikanth's political and public image, portraying him as a statesman-like figure who prioritized harmony over confrontation. His balanced response was appreciated by many, even as some in Tamil Nadu debated the need for an apology. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Nonetheless, Rajinikanth's 2008 move is still recalled today as a rare instance of a megastar navigating the political sensitivities between two states with restraint and maturity. This incident is now cited in contrast to current controversies, like 's 'Thug Life' and the Kannada language row, where no apology was issued. Rajinikanth's gesture is viewed as a diplomatic move that helped protect his film's release and maintain public goodwill.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Acted like thugs:' Canadian journalist shares ordeal after being assaulted by Khalistani extremists
Canada-based independent journalist Mocha Bezirgan expressed concerns over extremists associated with the Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) outfit exercising freedom of speech and glorifying violence read more Pro-Khalistani radicals reportedly assaulted a Canadian independent journalist while he was covering a rally in Vancouver on Sunday (June 8). Mocha Bezirgan revealed that he was targeted by violent Khalistani elements over his editorial stance and previous Khalistan-related posts. 'It just happened 2 hours ago and I am still shaking. I was surrounded by multiple Khalistanis who acted like thugs. They surrounded me, threatened me, and got physical with me, and they grabbed my phone out of my hand,' said the journalist in a post on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He said he was attacked by an individual who had been harassing him for a 'long time online using dehumanising language'. 'I have been covering Khalistan protests in Canada, UK, US, New Zealand. My only goal is to do independent journalism and record and report what's going on and because I'm editorially independent, this frustrates some people,' Bezirgan added. 'What's up now bro!?' Here's the view from my main camera of two Khalistani thugs blocking my exit as I try to get away from a serial harasser who can't keep his distance from me. These intimidation tactics won't stop me or influence my editorial independence. — Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦 (@BezirganMocha) June 8, 2025 The independent journalist then claimed Khalistanis wanted to 'influence' and 'buy' him. 'These intimidation tactics won't stop me or influence my editorial independence,' Bezirgan said, sharing a video of the alleged incident, which shows a man confronting the journalist. 'He refused to keep his distance from my face and began making threats of violence if I were to touch him. I kept walking away from him but his harassing behaviour wouldn't stop… He continued following me around, mobilising others to interfere with my job, and kept appearing behind me despite being told to stay away from me,' Bezirgan explained. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He stated that the alleged attacker had previously targeted him, and he had reported it to the police then. He also filed another report today. While speaking to news agency ANI, he expressed concerns over extremists related to the Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) outfit exercising freedom of speech and glorifying violence. The SFJ is outlawed in India for terrorism. #WATCH | Vancouver, Canada: On being asked about Khalistani extremism, Canadian Investigative Journalist Mocha Bezirgan, says "This is a movement headed by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ). They are the ones organising it, and most of the time, it's the same people attending these… — ANI (@ANI) June 8, 2025 'Because of the tensions between Canada and India, it's a very highly political subject, but I feel like we are disregarding what's happening underground. What these people are saying, how they are exercising their free speech while they are celebrating the assassins of Indira Gandhi and saying that they are going to ambush and kill Indian Prime Minister Modi's politics at the G7. I asked them are you going to kill his politics the same way you killed Indira Gandhi's politics? Because they refer to the assassins as their forefathers. They say we are the descendants of the killers of Indira Gandhi, and they are glorifying these acts of violence…," he said. India has consistently voiced concerns about Canada's alleged leniency toward Khalistani extremists and their supporters. Ties between the two nations have reached a new low recently, primarily due to Ottawa's perceived failure to address the issue and its accusations that New Delhi is targeting pro-Khalistani elements in Canada
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ajit Jogi statue uprooted in Gaurela: Janata Congress Chhattisgarh (J) alleges government shielding culprits, warns of protest
RAIPUR: Janata Congress Chhattisgarh (J) State President Amit Jogi on Sunday strongly condemned the uprooting of former chief minister Ajit Jogi's statue in Gaurela and accused the state government of shielding the culprits. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He warned of a major agitation if the statue is not reinstalled at Jyotipur Chowk, Gaurela, by 25 June. Addressing a press conference at his Raipur residence on Sunday, the former MLA, Amit Jogi, alleged that the statue of Ajit Jogi, which stood on private land owned by the Jogi family, was uprooted using a hydra machine in the intervening night of 25 and 26 May, and dumped in garbage. He claimed the act was carried out in collusion with local officials and said the culprits were later seen having tea with the Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi district in-charge minister at a guest house, instead of being arrested. 'It has been over two weeks, yet the statue hasn't been reinstated, nor have the accused been apprehended. Everyone sees them, except the police,' Jogi said, calling the incident a 'deliberate insult' to Ajit Jogi and his legacy. He clarified that the statue was legally installed on land privately owned by the Jogi family and not on government property. The land, he said, was part of a property acquired before 1932 by the late Menzies and later transferred through a valid Power of Attorney to Atul Arthur in 2020. In 2021, a No Objection Certificate was issued by the landowners for the installation of a garden and Ajit Jogi's statue. Funds for the statue's platform and garden, amounting to Rs 3.5 lakh, were sanctioned from former MLA Dr Renu Jogi's MLA fund, with Gaurela Municipality appointed as the construction agency. Amit Jogi rejected claims that the statue was removed to install one of Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee, saying the municipal resolution pertained to Tikar Bypass, not Jyotipur Chowk. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'We support installing both statues, but they must be placed at their rightful locations,' he said. He further accused BJP leaders of engaging in 'statue politics' and urged them to act ethically. 'Ajit Jogi belongs to every Chhattisgarhi. Uprooting his statue is not only illegal and insensitive, but it also reflects a narrow, destructive mindset,' he said. Jogi announced that if the statue is not reinstated at its original spot by 25 June, it would be brought to Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai's residence in Raipur, demanding its formal unveiling. 'The CM once promised to visit Gaurela for the unveiling. Since he didn't, we'll bring Jogi Ji to his doorstep,' he added. He concluded by forgiving those involved in the act and said copies of a book authored by Ajit Jogi would be sent to them, urging them to 'read Jogi Ji and understand him.' Dr Renu Jogi also condemned the act and appealed for swift justice and reinstallation of the statue.
