
Who should control education?
In recent days,
debates
among
politicians
and academicians have resurfaced over moving
education
back to the state list. These discussions seem prompted by controversies surrounding centrally conducted exams such as NEET, NET, and
CUET
, which have been riddled with paper leaks, impersonation, grace marks, corruption, and other irregularities.
The debate over education being in the concurrent list carries strong political undertones. States opposing it are largely ruled by opposition parties, which at times use the issue for vote-bank politics.
The British introduced the Govt of India Act, 1935, which for the first time established a federal structure in the country. Legislative subjects were divided between the federal govt (present-day Union) and the provinces (now states).
Education, seen as an important "public good", was placed in the provincial list. After independence, this continued, and education was included in the state list under the Constitution's distribution of powers.
Following the Emergency in 1975, the Congress govt set up the Swaran Singh Committee to recommend constitutional amendments. One was to move education to the concurrent list, allowing the Union govt to frame national education policies.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Kan 3 millioner kr vare 30 år inn i pensjonisttilværelsen?
Fisher Investments Norden
Undo
This led to the 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976, which shifted education from the state to the concurrent list, though no rationale was given for the move. Even before the 42nd Amendment, Entries 65 and 66 of the Union list gave the Centre powers to set up professional, vocational, and training institutions and regulate standards in higher education and research, which was how the University Grants Commission (UGC) was established in the 1950s.
After the Emergency ended in 1977, the Janata govt came to power and introduced the 44th Constitutional Amendment (1978) to reverse several changes made by the 42nd Amendment. One was to return 'education' to the state list. While it passed in the Lok Sabha, it failed in the Rajya Sabha, so education remained in the concurrent list. The 1983 Sarkaria Commission, set up by the Govt of India to study Centre-state relations, recommended maintaining the status quo.
However, it advised that the Union govt consult states before legislating on concurrent list subjects.
Education, as a concurrent subject, is a shared responsibility. While the Centre sets national policies, states adapt and implement them based on local needs and resources. Central and state govts can enact laws on education. However, in case of a conflict, the central law prevails unless the state law has received the President's assent, in which case it can take effect.
This ensures uniformity and smoother coordination in implementing education-related laws.
Concurrent jurisdiction in education covers areas such as curriculum, pedagogy, teacher training, vocational and adult education, infrastructure, standards, and quality assurance. Central and state govts can frame policies and regulations in these domains, and the shared status enables collaboration to achieve common goals in the education sector.
It also allows both govts to monitor institutions for compliance with laws and standards.
Funding, too, is shared, with the central govt providing support through grants and schemes.
Those advocating for shifting education back to the state list offer several arguments. States, they say, bear 75% of education-related expenditure and should have greater authority to regulate educational institutions without interference from the Centre.
Also, restoring education to state control would enhance autonomy, allowing them to frame policies tailored to local aspirations. States would have the freedom to launch new schemes and develop educational models suited to their regions without waiting for central approval.
This flexibility could lead to more creative approaches to learning and teaching.
Accountability is another factor. When states design their own policies, they are more likely to take responsibility for their success or failure.
Also, central policies such as NEET, CUET, and the NEP conflict with state-level frameworks designed to meet regional needs. Those in favour of keeping education in the concurrent list say the Centre plays an important role in ensuring standards and equal access to quality education.
Many states lack the resources to improve quality and enrolment, especially in higher education, which central involvement helps address through targeted schemes and financial support.
A standardised national curriculum is also essential to align youth skills with the demands of a pan-India and global job market.
It would also enable the Centre to address emerging national and global issues such as sustainability, climate change, digital literacy, and AI with suitable policies, while accommodating state-specific concerns. Central leadership offers policy direction, supervision, and consistency in implementation across institutions.
Ten years before the 1976 shift, the Kothari Commission advocated for a common national educational framework to promote national integration and cultural exchange.
A balance between national standards and state flexibility supports both unity and diversity. The concurrent list status also allows the Centre to establish and manage institutions of national importance such as IITs, IIMs, NITs, and AIIMS, whose innovation and research have a global impact.
At the core of the issue lie two competing needs: national coordination and standards, and greater state autonomy and flexibility. A possible way forward may lie in reconciling the two through "collaborative federalism", a concept recommended by the Kothari Commission. Under this model, the Centre can set broad national policies, standards, and guidelines, while allowing states the autonomy to adapt and implement them based on local needs.
Many of the arguments made for shifting education to the state list, such as tailoring policies to regional demands, can still be achieved under the concurrent list if collaborative mechanisms are implemented.
With many states struggling to fund their universities, the concurrent list enables the Union govt to offer financial and technical support while ensuring states have the resources to manage their systems effectively. What truly matters is not where education sits constitutionally, but how well the principles of federalism are applied to improve the quality of education and research nationwide. The way forward lies in collaboration, not confrontation.
(The writer is a former member of the Union Public Service Commission and former Vice Chancellor of Anna University.)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Politics, Leaks And The Final Turnaround: Inside Bastar's Naxal Purge
Last Updated: India's fight against Naxalism has shifted to Chhattisgarh's Bastar zone. After the 2021 Sukma-Bijapur ambush, joint operations have eliminated many Naxals, but challenges persist. In the critical sphere of India's internal security, which also makes the Centre ponder over possible 'collateral damage', the battle against Naxalism has witnessed a decisive shift since 2019. Six years ago, what began as a scattered cleanup of extremist elements – across eastern and central states, including Jharkhand, Bihar, Maharashtra, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh – eventually narrowed down to a single theatre known as the heart of 'Dandakaranya', Chhattisgarh's Bastar zone. When security forces were tightening their grip elsewhere, the Naxal movement regrouped deep within the forested core of Bastar. Government sources said this was due to political indifference and strategic leaks in the states. According to government sources, the killing of 22 jawans in the 2021 Sukma-Bijapur ambush was a critical turning point. It marked the beginning of a large-scale, intelligence-based and methodical offensive designed to isolate, and somewhat neutralise the remnants of the Naxal insurgency while dismantling their frontal organisational support structure. 'The plan was to systematically clear out the strongholds in phases. It was working in phases. We flushed them out of Bihar and Jharkhand. In fact, barring two small sectors, their units in Maharashtra and Andhra also collapsed under pressure. What remained regrouped in Chhattisgarh. However, our operations were facing some political obstacles in the state," a government source involved in anti-Naxal operations said. Even though the consolidation of senior Naxal leaders in one zone helped the forces, the primary problem was alleged non-cooperation by the state. After the elections, however, the situation has changed. The central security forces and the state police are conducting joint operations and everything is in sync. 'There is quiet confidence now. With a change in the state government, the anti-Naxal operations are back on track," the government source said. Bastar region, which was once a zone of political caution, is now an active grid of intelligence-backed movement and coordinated strikes. In the last few months alone, hundreds of Naxals including their topmost leaders and senior commanders have been eliminated in targeted encounters across the region. The security forces have seized a cache of arms and IEDs while the logistical networks of Naxals have been dismantled. The government, however, is cautious about declaring victory. 'We are in the last phase, and we are closing rapidly. But the last mile is always the toughest. The aim is not just to root out Naxalism and allow the people to live freely, but also to ensure it never returns," the government source said. The government source further said the strategy now is twofold. 'Sustained force on the ground and parallel development initiatives across the region to choke the ideological appeal of the movement. Roads are being laid in previously inaccessible zones. We have also reworked the surrender policies and that has been streamlined as well. The Centre is closely planning and monitoring every move with the state in tandem," the government source added.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Trump Card is coming': $5m gold card offering US residency now accepting applications; key details
(Source: Donald Trump's Truth Social account) The much-hyped 'Trump Card' is now officially open for registration, offering wealthy foreigners a chance to join a waiting list. US President Donald Trump describes it as a premium route toward US citizenship, for a hefty $5 million price tag. The official website, features an image of the shiny gold-coloured card, complete with Trump's photo, signature and name. The form asks for basic details like name, email, region of origin, and whether the applicant is applying as an individual or a business. The Trump Card is coming! Trump announced the launch on his social media platform Truth Social, 'For five million $DOLLARS, The Trump Card is coming! Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the greatest country and market anywhere in the world.' 'The waiting list is now open,' he added. The website lists eight regions for applicants to choose from: Europe, Asia (including the Middle East), North America, Oceania, Central America, South America, the Caribbean and Africa. Above the details, the site ensures that applicants will be notified when access opens: 'Enter your information below to be notified the moment access opens.' What the card promises — and what it doesn't Trump claims the card offers a 'path to citizenship,' but he has clarified that it does not guarantee immediate entry or naturalisation. 'It's somewhat like a green card , but at a higher level of sophistication,' the POTUS has claimed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo The Trump administration insists the new card does not require approval from Congress, as it doesn't provide citizenship outright. White House officials have said more information will be released soon, reports USA Today. Under the existing US naturalisation system, immigrants must typically be lawful permanent residents for at least five years, meet age and language criteria, and have a clean record. A replacement for EB-5? Trump first proposed the Trump Card earlier this year as a replacement for the EB-5 investor visa programme, which grants green cards to foreigners who invest between $800,000 and $1.05 million into US job-creating projects. The EB-5 programme has long suffered from backlogs and accusations of fraud. 'Wealthy people will be coming into our country by buying this card,' Trump said in February. 'They'll be wealthy, and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money, and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people.' He added, 'It's a road to citizenship for people and essentially people of wealth or people of great talent where people of wealth pay for those people of talent to get in.' Major tax advantage for card holders One of the key selling points of the Trump Card appears to be its potential tax benefits. Trump has suggested that gold card buyers would only be taxed on their US earnings, unlike green card holders, who are taxed on worldwide income. This is likely to appeal to many high-net-worth individuals who have avoided relocating to the US due to its global tax obligations. Trump Card does not seem to require applicants to create US-based jobs or launch businesses, unlike the EB-5 visa programme. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick has claimed that 1,000 cards were sold in a single day, even though the programme has yet to officially launch. According to Lutnick, some 37 million people worldwide could afford the Trump Card. Trump has claimed he was the first to purchase the Trump Card himself. 'I had no idea who would be the second,' he said. However, the programme is not designed for American citizens. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Women's quota in Parliament likely from 2029 Lok Sabha Elections: Report
Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Union government is planning to roll out reservation of seats of women in Parliament and state assemblies in the 2029 Lok Sabha elections, according to a report in The Indian Express. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, or the Women's Reservation Bill, reserves one-third of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and Assemblies. The women's reservation bill is linked to the delimitation process. We are aiming to roll it out in the next election. "The Census has been announced. Other steps will follow. The women's reservation bill is linked to the delimitation process. We are aiming to roll it out in the next election," the report said quoting a source. (This is a developing story. Check back for updates)