logo
Who should control education?

Who should control education?

Time of India21-05-2025

In recent days,
debates
among
politicians
and academicians have resurfaced over moving
education
back to the state list. These discussions seem prompted by controversies surrounding centrally conducted exams such as NEET, NET, and
CUET
, which have been riddled with paper leaks, impersonation, grace marks, corruption, and other irregularities.
The debate over education being in the concurrent list carries strong political undertones. States opposing it are largely ruled by opposition parties, which at times use the issue for vote-bank politics.
The British introduced the Govt of India Act, 1935, which for the first time established a federal structure in the country. Legislative subjects were divided between the federal govt (present-day Union) and the provinces (now states).
Education, seen as an important "public good", was placed in the provincial list. After independence, this continued, and education was included in the state list under the Constitution's distribution of powers.
Following the Emergency in 1975, the Congress govt set up the Swaran Singh Committee to recommend constitutional amendments. One was to move education to the concurrent list, allowing the Union govt to frame national education policies.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Kan 3 millioner kr vare 30 år inn i pensjonisttilværelsen?
Fisher Investments Norden
Undo
This led to the 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976, which shifted education from the state to the concurrent list, though no rationale was given for the move. Even before the 42nd Amendment, Entries 65 and 66 of the Union list gave the Centre powers to set up professional, vocational, and training institutions and regulate standards in higher education and research, which was how the University Grants Commission (UGC) was established in the 1950s.
After the Emergency ended in 1977, the Janata govt came to power and introduced the 44th Constitutional Amendment (1978) to reverse several changes made by the 42nd Amendment. One was to return 'education' to the state list. While it passed in the Lok Sabha, it failed in the Rajya Sabha, so education remained in the concurrent list. The 1983 Sarkaria Commission, set up by the Govt of India to study Centre-state relations, recommended maintaining the status quo.
However, it advised that the Union govt consult states before legislating on concurrent list subjects.
Education, as a concurrent subject, is a shared responsibility. While the Centre sets national policies, states adapt and implement them based on local needs and resources. Central and state govts can enact laws on education. However, in case of a conflict, the central law prevails unless the state law has received the President's assent, in which case it can take effect.
This ensures uniformity and smoother coordination in implementing education-related laws.
Concurrent jurisdiction in education covers areas such as curriculum, pedagogy, teacher training, vocational and adult education, infrastructure, standards, and quality assurance. Central and state govts can frame policies and regulations in these domains, and the shared status enables collaboration to achieve common goals in the education sector.
It also allows both govts to monitor institutions for compliance with laws and standards.
Funding, too, is shared, with the central govt providing support through grants and schemes.
Those advocating for shifting education back to the state list offer several arguments. States, they say, bear 75% of education-related expenditure and should have greater authority to regulate educational institutions without interference from the Centre.
Also, restoring education to state control would enhance autonomy, allowing them to frame policies tailored to local aspirations. States would have the freedom to launch new schemes and develop educational models suited to their regions without waiting for central approval.
This flexibility could lead to more creative approaches to learning and teaching.
Accountability is another factor. When states design their own policies, they are more likely to take responsibility for their success or failure.
Also, central policies such as NEET, CUET, and the NEP conflict with state-level frameworks designed to meet regional needs. Those in favour of keeping education in the concurrent list say the Centre plays an important role in ensuring standards and equal access to quality education.
Many states lack the resources to improve quality and enrolment, especially in higher education, which central involvement helps address through targeted schemes and financial support.
A standardised national curriculum is also essential to align youth skills with the demands of a pan-India and global job market.
It would also enable the Centre to address emerging national and global issues such as sustainability, climate change, digital literacy, and AI with suitable policies, while accommodating state-specific concerns. Central leadership offers policy direction, supervision, and consistency in implementation across institutions.
Ten years before the 1976 shift, the Kothari Commission advocated for a common national educational framework to promote national integration and cultural exchange.
A balance between national standards and state flexibility supports both unity and diversity. The concurrent list status also allows the Centre to establish and manage institutions of national importance such as IITs, IIMs, NITs, and AIIMS, whose innovation and research have a global impact.
At the core of the issue lie two competing needs: national coordination and standards, and greater state autonomy and flexibility. A possible way forward may lie in reconciling the two through "collaborative federalism", a concept recommended by the Kothari Commission. Under this model, the Centre can set broad national policies, standards, and guidelines, while allowing states the autonomy to adapt and implement them based on local needs.
Many of the arguments made for shifting education to the state list, such as tailoring policies to regional demands, can still be achieved under the concurrent list if collaborative mechanisms are implemented.
With many states struggling to fund their universities, the concurrent list enables the Union govt to offer financial and technical support while ensuring states have the resources to manage their systems effectively. What truly matters is not where education sits constitutionally, but how well the principles of federalism are applied to improve the quality of education and research nationwide. The way forward lies in collaboration, not confrontation.
(The writer is a former member of the Union Public Service Commission and former Vice Chancellor of Anna University.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Karnataka to seek increase in devolution funds under 16th Finance Commission
Karnataka to seek increase in devolution funds under 16th Finance Commission

The Hindu

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Karnataka to seek increase in devolution funds under 16th Finance Commission

To recover losses from reduced devolution to Karnataka under the 15th Finance Commission, the Karnataka government has proposed to seek additional grants under the 16th Finance Commission during a meeting in Delhi on Friday. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who also holds the Finance portfolio, and his economic adviser and MLA Basavaraj Rayaraddi, and senior officials would participate in the meeting and hold discussions with Arvind Panagariya, chairman, 16th Finance Commission. The 16th Finance Commission has already held one round of talks with the Karnataka government. Decreased devolution Karnataka, which has been complaining about discrimination in the devolution of funds by the NDA government, is expected to demand the increase in the devolution from 3.64% to 5% in the 16th Finance Commission. The 15th Finance Commission, in its award period (2020-21 to 2025-26), had dragged Karnataka's share (horizontal devolution) down from 4.71% in the 14th FC to 3.64%. Owing to this, according to sources in the State Secretariat, the State is likely to lose ₹62,098 crore during the 15th Finance Commission period. Karnataka gets back only 0.29 paisa for one rupee it contributes to the Central pool of taxes, while Bihar gets back ₹7.06 and Uttar Pradesh gets back ₹2.73. This has been flagged by the government several times. Cess and surcharges Currently, the Centre does not share cess and surcharges collected from States. Karnataka has been requesting the Centre to bring cess and surcharges colleges from States under the divisible pool. The Centre has been collecting about ₹5 lakh crore annually in the form of taxes from the State, but receiving about ₹55,000 crore, including grants from the Centre. The Finance Commission's award period would commence from April 1, 2026.

Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani among those killed in Ahmedabad plane crash
Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani among those killed in Ahmedabad plane crash

Scroll.in

time29 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani among those killed in Ahmedabad plane crash

Former Gujarat Chief Minister and Bharatiya Janata Party leader Vijay Rupani died in the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad on Thursday, Union Minister CR Paatil was quoted as saying by PTI. Rupani was among 242 persons onboard Air India flight AI171 headed for London, which crashed barely a minute after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport. 'Our leader and former Chief Minister, Vijay Rupani, was going [to London] to meet his family,' Paatil was quoted as saying by PTI. 'He is also a victim in this incident. May his soul rest in peace. This is a big loss for the BJP.' VIDEO | Ahmedabad Plane Crash: Union Minister and Gujarat BJP president, CR Patil (@CRPaatil) confirms former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani's demise. Speaking to reporters, he says, "Our leader and former Chief Minister, Vijay Rupani, was going (to London) to meet his family. He is… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 12, 2025 Rupani is the second Gujarat chief minister to die in a plane crash. The first was former Chief Minister Balwantrai Mehta, whose plane was shot down by a Pakistani fighter pilot during the 1965 India-Pakistan war. Rupani became Gujarat's chief minister in August 2016 following BJP leader Anandiben Patel's resignation and served office until 2021, when Bhupendra Patel succeeded him. At the time of his elevation, he was the Bharatiya Janata Party's state president and a minister. He had been a first-time MLA from Rajkot West and was widely seen as a protégé of Union Home Minister Amit Shah, The Hindu reported. He was the only BJP chief minister of Gujarat after Narendra Modi to have held the post for over five years.

Amit Shah reaches Ahmedabad hours after Air India plane crash
Amit Shah reaches Ahmedabad hours after Air India plane crash

Hindustan Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Amit Shah reaches Ahmedabad hours after Air India plane crash

New Delhi: Union home minister Amit Shah reached Ahmedabad on Thursday, hours after the horrific crash of the Air India flight to the UK as condolences poured from world over. The London-bound aircraft with 242 people on board crashed within minutes of taking off from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. On board and among the casualties was the former state CM, Vijay Rupani, who was on his way to meet his family. According to people aware of the details, the former CM's son lives in London. Shah left for Ahmedabad soon after news of the crash. 'Pained beyond words by the tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad. Disaster response forces have been quickly rushed to the crash site. Spoke with the Gujarat Chief Minister Shri Bhupendra Patel, Home Minister Shri Harsh Sanghavi, and Commissioner of Police Ahmedabad to assess the situation,' he said in a post on X. Shah visited the plane crash site in Ahmedabad to take stock of the situation on Thursday evening. In the state, the government called off functions, including media interactions that had been planned on the 11th anniversary of the union government. 'A few union ministers were in the state to address the media and take part in programmes about the 11 years of being in power, but these events were called off and the state unit workers have been instructed to join the rescue and relief work, in addition to helping the injured in hospitals and relatives of those who died in the crash,' said a BJP leader based in Gujarat. Several world leaders shared condolence messages on social media. 'The scenes emerging of a London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating...I am being kept updated as the situation develops, and my thoughts are with the passengers and their families at this deeply distressing time,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer wrote on X. British foreign minister David Lammy also condoled the crash and said the UK is working with local authorities in India to urgently establish the facts and provide support. 'Heartbroken to hear the news of a tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. My prayers are with all who lost their loved ones in this horrible incident. We continue to monitor developments and stand with the emergency responders working to help those impacted,' US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, wrote on X. Russian President Vladimir Putin sent condolences to President Droupadi Murmu and Modi over the passenger plane crash in Ahmedabad.. 'Please accept the deepest condolences over the tragic consequences of a passenger plane crash in Ahmedabad. Kindly convey the words of sincere sympathy and support to the families and near ones of the victims, as well as wishes for a speedy recovery to all those injured in this catastrophe,' said Putin Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also posted a message of condolence on social media 'Horrible news of a passenger plane crash in India. My deepest condolences to Prime Minister @narendramodi and the entire people of India on this tragic day. Our thoughts are with all victims' relatives and close ones in India, the UK, Portugal, and Canada. We share your shock and grief on this tragic day. We all pray for as many lives to be saved as possible and wish a speedy recovery to those injured.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store