‘Beaten With Leather Whip': Members of Student Groups Allege Harrowing Torture in Detention by Delhi Police Special Cell
Atul Howale
The detained students and activists told The Wire that they were forcibly detained by police officials, who were in civil clothing, without following any legal procedure.
New Delhi: Members of the Delhi-based student organisation Bhagat Singh Chhatra Ekta Manch (BSCEM) and the Forum Against Corporatisation and Militarisation (FACAM) have alleged that at least six individuals associated with them, and one person working with Nazariya Magazine, were detained and assaulted by the Delhi Police's Special Cell without due process.
The individuals, aged between 19 and 26 years of age, have claimed they were subjected to extreme physical and mental torture between July 9 and July 21, under the guise of 'interrogation' by the special cell over the whereabouts of an IAS officer's daughter.
Timeline of detentions
The police allegedly detained Gurkirat (20), Gaurav (23) and Gaurang (24), who are associated with the BSCEM, on July 9 around 3:30 PM from Ber Sarai in Delhi. They told The Wire that they were forcibly detained by police officials in civil clothing, without following any legal procedure.
The Delhi Police's Special Cell had detained these students and activists from various locations in the capital.
Two days later, on July 11, Ethemam (26) and Lakshita (Badal) (21) of the FACAM were detained in Delhi around 1:00 PM.
Samrat, a professor and social activist, was detained the next day, on July 12, from his home in Haryana.
On July 19, Rudra, who is associated with Nazariya Magazine, was detained at the New Delhi railway station.
Speaking to The Wire about the detention, BSCEM member Gurkirat said, 'On July 9, Gaurav, Gaurang and I were in Ber Sarai, Delhi, collecting some books from Rudra's house. Around 3:30 PM, three to four men in civil clothing , who were police officers, came and questioned us. 'They said, 'You are terrorists, not students. You have to come with us to the office.' We countered and asked them to show a warrant and demanded their police ID cards. After this, one of the officers showed his ID card and said, 'Now you must come.''
When they resisted, one of the officers slapped both Gaurav and Gaurang five to six times, Gurkirat claimed. 'One of the policemen pushed me and threatened me, too. He said, 'I don't care that you're a girl.' After that, they called a woman constable and forced me into a police vehicle.'
Similarly, describing her detention, Lakshita, a member of the FACAM, said, "I reached Delhi from Ahmedabad around 11 AM on July 11. At 1 PM, some policemen came to my house and forcibly put me and my friend, Ehtemam, into a vehicle. They confiscated our phones, laptops, and iPads, and as soon as we were in the car, they put all the devices on airplane mode. They did not give us any information about where we were being taken."
She added, 'An FIR (First Information Report) has been filed against us, we have not been provided with a copy. When I received a notice (police served her an online notice, she mentioned) for interrogation, it mentioned an FIR number, but I was unaware of the specific allegations mentioned in the FIR against me.'
'Not taken to police station'
According to the detained activists, they were not taken to any official police station by the Delhi Police. Instead, the students who spoke to The Wire claimed they were held at an unknown location in Delhi's New Friends Colony.
All seven individuals, who were picked up from different locations on different days, were kept at this place.
Gurkirat and Lakshita claimed that the location was 'not a common police station' but a large 'bungalow', which they were told was an office of the Delhi Police's Special Cell.
Interrogation, physical torture, threats and harassment
Students and activists have alleged that the police interrogation after their detention was a process of harassment and physical and mental torture of them.
To intimidate Gurkirat, Gaurav and Gaurang were stripped naked in front of her and brutally beaten on the soles of their feet with a leather whip, the activists alleged.
Gurkirat said, "They took us to a room where we could see what was happening in the next room through a glass. There, the police officer called my friends Gaurav and Gaurang, stripped them, and made them lie down on a cold steel table. Then, using a leather belt with a wooden handle, the officers repeatedly whipped them on the soles of their feet. They would beat them and ask them to stand up, and when they couldn't, they would beat them again.'
'This wasn't for any interrogation process; it was done just to show me a 'demo' of what could happen to me. After that, they took me to the same room and beat me in the same way,' she said.
While Gurkirat was not stripped completely, the policewomen , also in civil clothing, tortured her and beat her on the foot with the leather whip. She also alleged that prior to that, the policemen slapped her and pulled her by the hair.
The students and activists, while speaking to The Wire, claimed that in the end, they were forced to sign 'several blank sheets of the paper and false confessions' without even being allowed to read them.
Gaurav, a student at the Delhi School of Journalism, who has now returned to his native, Nawada in Bihar, spoke to The Wire about his eight-day-long ordeal. He said, 'Gurkirat, Gaurang and I were picked up from Ber Sarai on July 9. In the first three days, the police tortured us a lot. They would wake us up at 1:30 or 2:00 am and take us to the interrogation room. There, they would strip us completely naked, make us lie on the floor, and beat us with belts and sticks.'
'On the day of release on July 17, they asked us to sign several documents. Some of them were blank papers. We were being threatened that if we did not sign, they would not release us," he added.
When asked what the police asked them during the interrogation, four of them (Lakshita, Gaurav, Gurkirat and Ehtamam) said that the initial and most persistent question was about IAS officer Archana Verma's daughter Valika.
The police were constantly asking, 'Where is Valika?'.They kept asking questions like, 'Why did she leave home?', and whether anyone had helped her 'escape'.
Lakshita and Gurkirat claimed that of the seven detainees, Ehtemam faced the most severe and inhuman torture.
Throughout the entire detention, Ehtemam, a lawyer-activist with FACAM who studied at Jamia Millia Islamia, was deliberately and more brutally targeted because of his 'Muslim identity', they alleged.
He was constantly beaten while being subjected to Islamophobic slurs like " Mulla" and " Katwa", they said. Lakshita claimed that the police also tried to falsely cast her and Ehtemam's relationship in a "love jihad" angle – a conspiracy theory used by the right-wing groups that falsely accuses Muslim men of duping Hindu (non-Muslim) women with promises of love and marriage to religiously convert them.
What's the IAS officer and her daughter's connection with the detentions?
Lakshita and Gurkirat claimed that primary reason they were subjected to sustained torture is a 'personal dispute' between a senior bureaucrat IAS officer Archana Verma and her daughter, Valika Verma.
According to some of the detainees, Valika, a 24-year-old law graduate from Jindal University, Haryana, and the editorial member of the Nazariya Magazine, had left her home due to the ideological differences with her mother and was living independently in Delhi's Ber Sarai.
Gurkirat said, "We do not know where Valika is. She had ideological differences with her mother and left the house. But the police have been after us and have brutally tortured us. During our questioning, they repeatedly asked us where Valika was.'
Lakshita also said that they have still not been provided with a copy of the FIR, whose number was mentioned on the notice she received. She is unaware of the specific allegations mentioned against them.
She said, "An FIR has been filed. I too received an online notice, I have that notice, the one summoning me for an investigation under that FIR. But the police are not giving us the FIR, they are not giving us anything. The police were constantly telling us, 'If you come to Delhi, we will arrest you.''
She added that the notice that she received from the police was sent online to her parents' mobile on July 20.
Parents summoned
Throughout this entire issue, the parents of the detained students have also faced harassment. Both Lakshita and Gurkirat stated that their parents were summoned to Delhi and were forced to sign documents so that their children were released.
Lakshita said, "They made our parents write, and sign it, that if they send us back to Delhi, then police will arrest us. Due to this fear, my parents are not allowing me to speak with anyone and are pressuring me to remain at home.'
The parents of the other students also took their children back home and kept them away from any form of legal or public response.
Ehtemam is currently living in Lucknow with his family after the harrowing detention. Speaking to The Wire, he said: "The police physically and mentally harassed me. They kept asking me during the interrogation where Valika was, which I did not know. They called me 'Mulla' and said they would create a 'love jihad' angle with my friend Lakshita. They threatened to plant weapons at my house and said they will arrest my parents for arms trafficking.'
He claimed that when the police released him, they did not return his belongings.
He added, "The police took my phone, my wallet, my Bar Association ID card, my Aadhaar card, my PAN card and most importantly, they did not return my flat keys, which they had initially taken from me.'
Amongst the seven detainees, Rudra was the youngest, and only 19 years old. A student at Delhi University's Zakir Husain College, he was working with Valika for the Nazariya Magazine.
Rudra was the last person to be detained by the police, on July 19, at the New Delhi railway station, and was taken after some of the initially detained individuals had already been released.
From the time the student activists were detained on July 9 until July 18, Nazariya Magazine has been posting calls for their release on their social media handles on Facebook, X, Instagram, as well as on its website. However, the last post on their Facebook page was on July 18.
Following Rudra's detention on July 19, there have been no further posts on any of the platforms.
The detained students were released in stages between July 16 and July 21. After eight days of detention, Gurkirat was the first to be released on the night of July 16. Only after her release did the outside world receive concrete information about the case and the detention of the other students.
The following day, on July 17, Lakshita, Gaurav and Gaurang were released. Ehtemam, who had faced the most severe physical and mental torture, was released on July 18. Samrat, who was arrested in Haryana, was released on July 19. Finally, Rudra, who had been detained last, was released on July 21.
This is not the first time that the students of the BSCEM had been detained.
In May last year, during the Lok Sabha elections, BSCEM had made wall paintings in Delhi, calling for an election boycott. Two female students of the organisation, Lakshita and Uttara, were detained by the police while leaving their college after an exam.
A few months ago, the students associated with BSCEM alleged that after a wall painting in JNU depicting atrocities in Bastar, four members – Gaurav, Gaurang, Kiran and Rahul – were illegally detained for 15 hours at the Vasant Vihar police station, Delhi, where they were also allegedly beaten.
The Wire reached out to Delhi Police for a comment, but was not able to connect over telephone. We sent the email to the pro@delhipolice.gov.in, Delhi Police. This story will be updated if a response is received.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
41 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Protesters in Syria's Druze heartland demand govt forces withdraw
Hundreds gathered in Syria's Druze heartland on Friday to demand the withdrawal of government forces after deadly sectarian violence last month and the opening of an aid corridor from neighbouring Jordan. Sweida province has seen tough humanitarian conditions since week-long clashes killed around 1,400 people last month, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. The United Nations says more than 175,000 displaced people have yet to return to their homes. The violence initially pitted Druze fighters against local Sunni Bedouin tribes but rapidly escalated, drawing in Syrian government forces as well as Israel, which bombed them. The Islamist-led interim government said its forces intervened to stop the clashes, but witnesses, Druze factions and the Observatory accused them of siding with the Bedouin and of committing abuses including summary executions. Dozens of protesters, including women and children, gathered in a main square in Sweida, holding placards calling for the opening of a humanitarian corridor from Jordan, an AFP photographer said. Similar protests were held in other Druze towns, according to the Observatory, a Britain-based monitoring group. The government has deployed forces to several parts of Sweida province but not to the provincial capital. Residents accuse them of imposing a blockade, a claim the government has denied, instead blaming "outlaw groups", in reference to Druze fighters. Activist Rawan Abu Assaf said protesters' demands included "lifting the blockade imposed on Sweida province and the withdrawal of government forces from all its villages". The Observatory said the main Damascus-Sweida highway was still cut and accused armed groups linked to the government of blocking the resumption of normal trade. The monitor said the province was under de facto blockade despite the entry of several aid convoys. Interior ministry spokesman Noureddine al-Baba said the convoys gave the lie to Druze claims of a blockade. But the Observatory said the government was just keeping up appearances for the international community. UN humanitarian coordinator Adam Abdelmoula said on Thursday that the United Nations and its partners had sent a new convoy to Sweida province, with 40 trucks carrying "a broad range of life-saving assistance" including food, water and medical supplies. He called it "a significant step toward expanding access and scaling up the humanitarian response in affected areas of southern Syria".


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anil Ambani faces look out circular
New Delhi: A look out circular (LOC) has been issued against Reliance Group chairman and managing director Anil Ambani , close on the heels of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) summoning the businessman for questioning on August 5 in connection with an alleged Rs 17,000 crore loan fraud case. The ED sent a request to the authority concerned to issue an LOC against Ambani, soon after summoning him at its headquarters in the capital, said people familiar with the matter. 'The request for opening an LOC was sent minutes after summons was issued to Anil Ambani on Thursday. This was done to ensure that he does not leave the country,' a senior official told ET on condition of anonymity. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Artificial Intelligence Product Management Project Management Technology Public Policy Digital Marketing Data Science CXO Finance healthcare Management Operations Management Degree MBA others Healthcare Data Analytics Cybersecurity Leadership Others PGDM Data Science Design Thinking MCA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details An LOC is issued to prevent people, such as those involved in legal proceedings, from leaving the country and evading the law. It is issued by the Bureau of Immigration, which falls under the Ministry of Home Affairs. ET was the first to report on Friday that the ED had summoned Ambani for questioning in connection with its investigation into the alleged loan fraud case. In a related development, ED Friday carried out searches against Biswal Tradelink Pvt Ltd. Biswal Tradelink is an Odisha-based company that allegedly ran a 'fake' bank guarantee issuance racket for business groups, including providing an alleged Rs 68 crore assurance for a Reliance Group company, said people in the know. They said Reliance Nu Bess Ltd allegedly submitted a fake bank guarantee of Rs 68.2 crore to Solar Energy Corp of India (SECI). 'They apparently used related party Biswal Tradelink for this arrangement. The purpose was a tender for setting up a 1,000 MW/2,000 MWh standalone battery energy system in India issued by the SECI,' said one of the persons, who did not wish to be identified. According to people in the know, ED is likely to apprehend one of the directors of Biswal Tradelink soon, making its first arrest in the case. The ED has alleged that the founder directors of Biswal Tradelink were previously directors of the Reliance Group. It has further alleged that a forged bank guarantee along with a forged endorsement letter of State Bank of India (SBI) was submitted to SECI. 'The ED is in possession of the alleged forged email. Instead of 'sbi', the email address had 's-bi'. The SBI email ID given was sbi.17313@ the person said. According to the ED, a first information report (FIR) had been registered by the Delhi Police at the behest of Reliance Nu Bess against Biswal Tradelink. In its complaint, according to the ED, Reliance Nu Bess alleged that SECI floated a tender for which bank guarantee was required. If the bank guarantee were to be furnished by any foreign branch of a bank, it had to be confirmed by the Indian branch or SBI through a secure messaging platform, akin to SWIFT. As per the ED, Reliance Nu Bess further alleged in its complaint, 'M/s Biswal Tradelink contacted Reliance NUBESS limited and offered to provide bank guarantee for a fee. Subsequently, SECI found that the bank guarantee was fabricated as also the confirmation from SBI.' The ED has alleged that Reliance Nu Bess wrongly claimed that it was cheated. 'Documentary evidence reveals that apparently the two parties (Reliance Nu Bess and Biswal Tradelink) acted in collusion. The directors of Biswal Tradelink were found to be previous directors of Reliance group,' a senior official told ET. A statement issued by Reliance Group on Friday said, 'The company and its subsidiaries acted bonafidely and have been a victim of fraud, forgery and cheating conspiracy. The company has made due disclosure on this to the stock exchanges on November 7, 2024.' It further said that 'a criminal complaint in this regard has already been lodged with the Economic Offences Wing of Delhi Police against the third party on October 16, 2024' and that the 'due process of law will follow'. The alleged money laundering case being investigated by the ED stems from a November 2024 FIR of the Delhi Police Economic Offences Wing.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Silent protest held in Belagavi demanding release of arrested Kerala nuns
Belagavi: Hundreds of Christians gathered in Belagavi on Friday evening to stage a silent protest rally, demanding the immediate release of two Kerala-based Catholic nuns and a tribal youth, who were recently arrested in Chhattisgarh under controversial circumstances. Organised by the Catholic Association of Belgaum and other Christian organisations, the rally was led by Bishop Rev Dr Derek Fernandes. Around 400 participants, including priests, nuns, seminarians, and laypersons, assembled at the DC Compound at 4.40pm. The peaceful march concluded at the zilla panchayat CEO's office, where a memorandum addressed to the president of India, the prime minister, and the chief minister of Karnataka was submitted to deputy commissioner Mohammed Roshan. The memorandum highlighted the wrongful arrest of the nuns and the youth at Durg Railway Station on July 25 under Section 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 4 of the Chhattisgarh Religious Freedom Act (1968), which pertains to religious conversion through force or inducement. They were accompanying three adult tribal women, aged 18–19, from Narayanpur to Agra for nursing jobs. The women all signed parental consent letters and carried valid identification. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your IQ Is 140 If You Can Answer 10 of These Questions Correctly. IQ International Undo According to the memorandum, the arrests were prompted by pressure from a right-wing activist who falsely alleged forced conversion, sparking a mob protest. It is alleged that the charges were politically and communally motivated. Investigations and family statements later confirmed that the women travelled willingly and without any coercion. Speaking at the rally, Bishop Derek Fernandes condemned the arrests as 'unjust and frivolous,' asserting that Catholics are not involved in forced conversions. He also decried the physical assault on the nuns and warned against the rise of communal violence. "We demand the immediate release of the innocent and an end to baseless persecution. The govt must protect minority rights and uphold India's secular values," Bishop Fernandes stated. Deputy commissioner Mohammed Roshan, who received the memorandum, assured the gathering that appropriate action would be taken. Other notable participants included Rev Fr Philip Kutty, Rev Nooroddin Mulla, Clara Fernandes, Louis Rodrigues, Fr Pramod Kumar, Sr Pastor Ankalgi, and Sister Lourdes Joseph.