![Afghan Article On U.S. 'Great Failure' In Afghanistan: 'From The Very Beginning, [China] Was Kept Out Of The Afghanistan Equation'](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.memri.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fnew_images%2Forg%2F11900_SD_thumb_320.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Afghan Article On U.S. 'Great Failure' In Afghanistan: 'From The Very Beginning, [China] Was Kept Out Of The Afghanistan Equation'
A Dari-language article in the Afghan press assesses the lessons learnt from the Western failure in Afghanistan, arguing that any strategy should have also included regional players such as China, Russia, and Pakistan, in order to avoid a power vacuum.
"Western governments, by focusing solely on state-building and neglecting other consequential factors, essentially failed to properly understand the shifting balance of power in the region and the world," the article states.
The article, titled "The Great Failure Of The United States In The War In Afghanistan" and published by Sarie News, notes that European countries will need their own military power to enter Afghanistan-like situations.
"In the current situation, where the significant migration of the Afghan people to European countries is increasing, Europe may soon conclude that it should not have relied on the capabilities of a country like the United States to enter the battlefield in Afghanistan," it says, adding: "Without American military planes, America's allies could not have evacuated their forces and personnel from Afghanistan."
Following are excerpts from the article, as translated from Dari:
"The United States Spent Over Two Trillion Dollars In Afghanistan In An Attempt To Establish Governance Institutions And Structures – However, We Witnessed That All Of These Infrastructures Collapsed Within A Few Weeks"
"The war in Afghanistan has always and at all times been considered a major failure and a great defeat for the United States. The high costs of this war, contrasted with its very limited achievements, highlight a fundamental question: Why was this war initiated? Over the course of 20 years of war in Afghanistan, more than 48,000 Afghan civilians, at least 66,000 Afghan military personnel, and 3,500 NATO soldiers lost their lives.
"The United States spent over two trillion dollars in Afghanistan in an attempt to establish governance institutions and structures. However, we witnessed that all of these infrastructures collapsed within a few weeks.
"The irresponsible withdrawal of the United States, which created a power vacuum, proved that the people of Afghanistan have been left stranded and abandoned in the absence of a state and national leadership. For the West, the current duty and mission is to review its lessons from Afghanistan and take them as a guiding principle moving forward.
"The first lesson that can be drawn from the Afghanistan disaster is that the use of foreign military force is not a wise strategy for effectively and sustainably advancing the agenda of 'regime change.' The West completely failed in building a modern, democratic, and strong state that could significantly counter threats.
"Within this framework, the United States effectively fell into a similar trap to the one it faced after its illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003. Only a short time after the U.S. attack on Afghanistan, Iraq witnessed a surge in terrorist activities, which in turn paved the way for the emergence of the group 'ISIS.' Similarly, we witnessed this in Libya, where NATO's action in overthrowing Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi plunged the country into chaos, insecurity, and civil war."
"China Could Have Been An Effective Player In Afghanistan's Developments. However, From The Very Beginning, It Was Kept Out Of The Afghanistan Equation – Without A Doubt, China Could Have Made Significant Investments In Afghanistan And Helped Move The Country Forward"
"Overall, it must be said that the very idea of 'nation-building' from the top down (forced nation-building) is fundamentally flawed and doomed to failure from the outset. This model assumes that military presence in a country and the influx of resources will inevitably lead to security, development, and democratic governance. However, nation-building requires popular support and can only succeed when carried out by local representatives who are perceived as legitimate by the people.
"This element was significantly absent in Afghanistan. The United States, by relying on warlords who had committed numerous wrongful acts on Afghan soil and who also fled during the recent crisis in Afghanistan, effectively made a substantial portion of the Afghan nation lose trust in it.
"From a broader perspective, the idea that existing institutions in a country can easily be replaced with new ones has largely proven to be incorrect. Most governments have been formed through a gradual process of cooperation and compromise over time, rather than by external forces and actors. Therefore, persuading nations, as opposed to coercion and superficial imitations in the context of nation and state-building, will yield far better results.
"The second lesson that can be drawn from 20 years of failure and war in Afghanistan is that state-building must be accompanied by regional strategies. Approaches that ignore key regional players are not realistic. Western governments, by focusing solely on state-building and neglecting other consequential factors, essentially failed to properly understand the shifting balance of power in the region and the world.
"China could have been an effective player in Afghanistan's developments. However, from the very beginning, it was kept out of the Afghanistan equation. Without a doubt, China could have made significant investments in Afghanistan and helped move the country forward. Nevertheless, this did not happen, and this opportunity was wrongly wasted, leaving the people of Afghanistan unable to benefit from the country's development."
"Similarly, Greater Cooperation And A More Active Presence Of Russia In Afghanistan Could Have Transformed Afghanistan's Northern Corridors Into Hubs That Would Bring Prosperity And Economic Growth To The Country"
"Similarly, greater cooperation and a more active presence of Russia in Afghanistan could have transformed Afghanistan's northern corridors into hubs that would bring prosperity and economic growth to the country. However, this did not happen, and Afghanistan remains largely dependent on the southern corridors along the Pakistan border for trade and meeting its essential needs. This has effectively given Pakistan a significant leverage in Afghanistan's affairs.
"Moreover, the United States, through actors such as Saudi Arabia, which has made significant investments in Pakistan and is a close partner of Washington, could have exerted pressure on the Pakistani government to play a more effective and constructive role in Afghanistan's affairs. However, this opportunity was also lost.
"Ultimately, the last lesson that can be learned from the Afghanistan disaster is related to Europe. It is a lesson that reminds Europe that it must develop its capabilities in alignment with its strategic interests. Given the shifting balance of power and the global power corridors, Europe must significantly reconsider its reliance on the power and international capabilities of the United States.
"The process of the withdrawal of American forces and their allies from Afghanistan by American planes clearly shows what is at stake. Without American military planes, America's allies could not have evacuated their forces and personnel from Afghanistan. In the current situation, where the significant migration of the Afghan people to European countries is increasing, Europe may soon conclude that it should not have relied on the capabilities of a country like the United States to enter the battlefield in Afghanistan."
Source: Sarie.news (Afghanistan), February 24, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
a day ago
- Shafaq News
Afghan PM urges exiles to return following Trump travel ban
Shafaq News/ Afghanistan's government called on nationals abroad to return home, promising safety even for those who worked with US forces, according to a speech aired Saturday. US President Donald Trump had signed an executive order earlier banning travel from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, citing the lack of competent authorities to process passports and conduct security vetting. In response, Prime Minister Hassan Akhund addressed the nation during Eid al-Adha celebrations, assuring returnees of protection under a general amnesty declared by Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada. 'Even if you served the Americans for decades… you will not face abuse or trouble,' Akhund said in a speech broadcast on state media. The call for return comes amid continued reports by the United Nations of extrajudicial killings and abuses, despite the Taliban's 2021 pledge of amnesty for former government and military personnel. The Taliban administration has imposed Islamic law since taking power in 2021, drawing condemnation for bans on women's education and employment that the UN has described as 'gender apartheid.' Afghan migration routes have also narrowed sharply under Trump's renewed presidency. The United States closed its embassy in Kabul in 2021, and Afghans must now seek visas in third countries—primarily Pakistan, which has stepped up expulsions of undocumented Afghans.


Memri
2 days ago
- Memri
Pro-ISIS Poster: Disobeying The Emir Is A Sin Even When Waging Jihad Online
On May 26, 2025, a media outlet of the Islamic State (ISIS) released an English-language poster with text from an article in ISIS's official weekly, highlighting the importance of obeying ISIS leadership not only when waging jihad on the battlefield, but also when waging "online" jihad.


Shafaq News
2 days ago
- Shafaq News
Tehran warns E3 ahead of IAEA vote
Shafaq News/ On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned European powers of a severe response if they pursue what he called a 'major strategic mistake' at next week's IAEA Board of Governors meeting. In a post on X, Araghchi accused Germany, France, and the UK of 'opting a malign action against Iran' instead of engaging in good faith. 'Mark my words,' he wrote, adding that 'As Europe ponders another major strategic mistake, Iran will react strongly to any violation of its rights.' After years of good cooperation with the IAEA—resulting in a resolution which shut down malign claims of a "possible military dimension" (PMD) to Iran's peaceful nuclear program—my country is once again accused of "non-compliance". Instead of engaging in good faith, the E3 is… — Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) June 6, 2025 Western powers, including the US and the European trio, plan to submit a resolution accusing Tehran of failing to meet its nuclear obligations, based on a recent IAEA report. Multiple diplomatic sources say the motion could lead to referring Iran's case to the United Nations.