logo
Seated among world leaders, Governor-General was struck by message she hoped they all received

Seated among world leaders, Governor-General was struck by message she hoped they all received

The Age28-04-2025

Rome: Governor-General Sam Mostyn hopes Pope Francis's legacy will inspire a global recommitment to peace and compassion, saying the world needs leaders grounded in humility, mercy and courage.
Speaking after representing Australia at both Francis's funeral in Vatican City and Anzac Day commemorations at Gallipoli, Mostyn said the rare convergence of the two solemn events had prompted deep reflection on global leadership and the moral clarity it demands.
'[The pope] showed that it is possible to be a great world leader but always act with compassion and concern for those that are often marginalised and left out,' she said. 'His life, to his church and to his faith, was grounded in humility and care for others.'
World leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and Argentine President Javier Milei attended the funeral Mass, underscoring the pontiff's global influence amid ongoing international conflicts.
Initially intended as a modest tribute, the funeral transformed into a significant diplomatic event, with US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky holding a private meeting in the basilica, marking their first face-to-face encounter since their Oval Office blow-up in February.
Loading
Mostyn and her husband, Simeon Beckett, were among the 250,000 gathered in St Peter's Square to farewell the Pope. She said the service, staged on a warm, cloudless Roman morning, was marked not by grandeur but by the quiet dignity that defined the Pope's life.
'There was a solemnity and serenity to the Mass and a beauty in every aspect of the event ... It felt appropriate for the celebration of this Pope's life,' she said. 'There was something extraordinary about all of us in that moment. To be there in person is something I will never forget.'
For Mostyn, a longtime student of leadership across sectors, the significance of Francis's final actions carried particular weight.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Entirely unacceptable': Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers
‘Entirely unacceptable': Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

‘Entirely unacceptable': Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers

At Ben-Gvir's direction his ministry purchased thousands of rifles for settler communities, where some groups have been dispossessing Palestinians and committing violent acts. Smotrich has also made inflammatory public remarks, including stating that Gaza 'will be entirely destroyed' and suggesting Palestinians be forced to emigrate. Last year, he indicated the deaths of 2 million Palestinians by starvation in Gaza might be 'justified', comments that drew rebukes from allies including Germany. But British officials said the sanctions were also designed to pressure Netanyahu to negotiate a ceasefire as humanitarian conditions in the strip become increasingly dire. Hamas has not agreed to release all the remaining hostages. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the international community's patience had run out, declining to rule out further sanctions on the government of Israel. 'The situation in the West Bank and the situation in Gaza are untenable, both for civilians and long-term peace in the form of a two-state solution,' she said in Canberra on Wednesday. Wong gave multiple media interviews and a press conference about the sanctions on Wednesday in a departure from Labor's more reserved tone on the matter in its previous term of government, when former opposition leader Peter Dutton frequently castigated the government for breaking with Israel. The Israeli ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said the Israeli government would meet early next week to determine how to respond. 'The decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers is deeply concerning and entirely unacceptable. These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable,' Maimon said. Coalition foreign affairs spokesman Michaelia Cash did not make any comments supporting the two most hardline members of Netanyahu's cabinet. But she did question whether the Magnitsky-style sanctions used by the government were appropriate to impose on a democratically elected government. 'We are concerned that there is a pattern of decisions by the Albanese government targeting the Israeli government, rather than Hamas,' she said. The rocky pathway to a two-state solution will capture global headlines later this month at a New York summit to be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron and Saudi Arabia. Australia has been involved in working groups for the summit, but officials at home and abroad have cast doubt on the prospects of reaching consensus, as diplomats hastily scramble to put together a clear agenda for the gathering. The two-state solution has been key Western policy for decades, but the Trump administration's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, suggested this week that the US was no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state. Asked by Bloomberg News if a Palestinian state remained a US aim, he said: 'I don't think so.' Under Australia's Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011, sanctions can be applied against individuals responsible for serious violations of human rights, including the right to life and protection from torture. Any Australian found to be dealing with the sanctioned individuals' assets faces penalties of up to 10 years' imprisonment or fines reaching $825,000. A leading Palestinian advocate in Australia, Nasser Mashne, said the sanctions were 'crumbs, tossed by the Australian government 613 days too late.' Loading 'While Australia has hesitated for more than 20 months, Israel has annihilated families, communities, journalists, aid workers, civil infrastructure, every last shred of life in Gaza,' he said. Daniel Aghion, of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said the two ministers' behaviour was 'reprehensible' and about 80 per cent of Israelis did not support them. 'However, if Australia were to sanction every cabinet minister in every government who has incited hatred and violence, we would end up breaking off diplomatic relations with half the world. This measure is an exercise in performative politics,' he said.

AUKUS in doubt as US starts review into whether the deal is ‘America First'
AUKUS in doubt as US starts review into whether the deal is ‘America First'

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

AUKUS in doubt as US starts review into whether the deal is ‘America First'

However, Colby expressed more optimism about AUKUS at his confirmation hearing earlier this year, saying he wanted to remove red tape and barriers to submarine production so that the partnership could be expedited. News of the review comes just days before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expects to meet Trump on the sidelines of the G7 world leaders' summit in Canada. But on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president's schedule for those G7 meetings was still being finalised. Albanese's office has been contacted for comment, as was Australia's embassy in Washington, which referred questions to Canberra. At a meeting with Defence Minister Richard Marles at the start of his month, Hegseth urged Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP – a request reiterated by Colby on social media this week. Several AUKUS experts urged caution in interpreting the intent of the US review. They pointed to the fact the United Kingdom recently commenced a parliamentary inquiry into the pact, and said it was natural that the Trump administration would seek to ensure AUKUS aligned with its own priorities. The review also comes just weeks after the new US ambassador to Britain, Republican donor Warren Stephens, told a London audience that AUKUS was 'vital' to global peace and security. Under the first pillar of the pact, Australia will purchase three to five nuclear-powered submarines from the US, starting in the 2030s, and build more through a joint initiative with the US and UK. Under the second pillar, the three nations will collaborate on advanced defence technologies. Australia is also contributing at least $US3 billion to the US defence industrial base to shore up submarine production. The deal was announced in 2021 under then prime minister Scott Morrison and then US president Joe Biden. Sophia Gaston, UK foreign policy lead at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in London, said the British inquiry had 'injected new dynamism and political edge into the UK's approach', which was helpful in taking AUKUS forward under Trump. Loading She said it was perfectly reasonable for the new administration to conduct a review into a project as large and significant as AUKUS. 'We can never be certain of where another government's review will take them, but Britain and Australia must be confident in the rationale behind AUKUS and its alignment with America's core goals of deterrence and competition towards China,' Gaston said. 'The best thing both allies can do during this review process is to put themselves in a posture ready to deliver some quick wins, particularly on pillar two, which will demonstrate the value in America partnering with allies to amplify its strengths in both scale and innovation.' Alessio Patalano, a professor of war and strategy in East Asia at King's College London, said Colby's views on AUKUS before he joined the current administration would likely inform how AUKUS advocates perceived this review. Loading 'However, these views are now being channelled into a government effort to 'audit' how AUKUS advances the US economy and security,' he said. 'As such, the review represents an opportunity to assess whether the current governance structure and priorities would benefit from greater focus.' Supporters argue the pact is a strategic bulwark in an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific region, though critics warn that delays and shifting political dynamics could undermine its success. But British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last month declared the AUKUS defence pact the centrepiece of his government's national security strategy, promising the UK's largest military investment since the Cold War. At a high-level event in Westminster, Starmer described AUKUS as a 'national endeavour' and named former national security adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove as his special representative to lead the project.

AUKUS in doubt as US starts review into whether the deal is ‘America First'
AUKUS in doubt as US starts review into whether the deal is ‘America First'

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

AUKUS in doubt as US starts review into whether the deal is ‘America First'

However, Colby expressed more optimism about AUKUS at his confirmation hearing earlier this year, saying he wanted to remove red tape and barriers to submarine production so that the partnership could be expedited. News of the review comes just days before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expects to meet Trump on the sidelines of the G7 world leaders' summit in Canada. But on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president's schedule for those G7 meetings was still being finalised. Albanese's office has been contacted for comment, as was Australia's embassy in Washington, which referred questions to Canberra. At a meeting with Defence Minister Richard Marles at the start of his month, Hegseth urged Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP – a request reiterated by Colby on social media this week. Several AUKUS experts urged caution in interpreting the intent of the US review. They pointed to the fact the United Kingdom recently commenced a parliamentary inquiry into the pact, and said it was natural that the Trump administration would seek to ensure AUKUS aligned with its own priorities. The review also comes just weeks after the new US ambassador to Britain, Republican donor Warren Stephens, told a London audience that AUKUS was 'vital' to global peace and security. Under the first pillar of the pact, Australia will purchase three to five nuclear-powered submarines from the US, starting in the 2030s, and build more through a joint initiative with the US and UK. Under the second pillar, the three nations will collaborate on advanced defence technologies. Australia is also contributing at least $US3 billion to the US defence industrial base to shore up submarine production. The deal was announced in 2021 under then prime minister Scott Morrison and then US president Joe Biden. Sophia Gaston, UK foreign policy lead at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in London, said the British inquiry had 'injected new dynamism and political edge into the UK's approach', which was helpful in taking AUKUS forward under Trump. Loading She said it was perfectly reasonable for the new administration to conduct a review into a project as large and significant as AUKUS. 'We can never be certain of where another government's review will take them, but Britain and Australia must be confident in the rationale behind AUKUS and its alignment with America's core goals of deterrence and competition towards China,' Gaston said. 'The best thing both allies can do during this review process is to put themselves in a posture ready to deliver some quick wins, particularly on pillar two, which will demonstrate the value in America partnering with allies to amplify its strengths in both scale and innovation.' Alessio Patalano, a professor of war and strategy in East Asia at King's College London, said Colby's views on AUKUS before he joined the current administration would likely inform how AUKUS advocates perceived this review. Loading 'However, these views are now being channelled into a government effort to 'audit' how AUKUS advances the US economy and security,' he said. 'As such, the review represents an opportunity to assess whether the current governance structure and priorities would benefit from greater focus.' Supporters argue the pact is a strategic bulwark in an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific region, though critics warn that delays and shifting political dynamics could undermine its success. But British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last month declared the AUKUS defence pact the centrepiece of his government's national security strategy, promising the UK's largest military investment since the Cold War. At a high-level event in Westminster, Starmer described AUKUS as a 'national endeavour' and named former national security adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove as his special representative to lead the project.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store