US lobbies UN rights council forsaken by Trump, diplomats say
GENEVA (Reuters) - Two months after President Donald Trump announced a halt to U.S. engagement with the United Nations Human Rights Council, Washington is influencing its work by applying pressure publicly and behind the scenes, seven diplomats and rights workers said.
The United States left its seat empty during a six-week session of the 47-member council ending on Friday, but its lobbying and pressure had some success, the sources told Reuters.
They said the U.S., which has accused the council of an anti-Israel bias, had focused on blunting a proposal by Pakistan on the creation of an International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism (IIIM), the most rigorous type of U.N. investigation, on Israel's actions in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
The version of Pakistan's proposal that was passed on Wednesday by the council, whose mission is to promote and protect human rights worldwide, did not include the creation of the IIIM.
The council already has a commission of inquiry on the Palestinian Territories, but Pakistan's proposal would have created an additional probe with extra powers to gather evidence for possible use in international courts.
A March 31 letter sent by Brian Mast, Chairman of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, and James R. Risch, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, cautioned against voting the proposal through.
"Any HRC member state or U.N. entity that supports an Israel-specific IIM ... will face the same consequences as the ICC faced," the letter said.
It appeared to be referring to sanctions approved by the House of Representatives on the International Criminal Court in protest at its arrest warrants for Israel's prime minister and former defence minister over Israel's campaign in Gaza.
The final version of Pakistan's proposal referred only to an invitation to the U.N. General Assembly to consider an IIIM in future.
Two Geneva-based diplomats said they had received messages from U.S. diplomats before the change of wording asking them to oppose the new investigation.
"They were saying: 'back off on this issue'," said one, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Reuters could not establish whether the revision was a direct result of U.S. actions.
A U.S. State Department spokesperson said it was complying with the executive order signed by Trump on Feb. 4 withdrawing the U.S. from the council and would not participate in it, adding: "As a matter of policy, we do not comment on private diplomatic conversations."
Pakistan's diplomatic mission in Geneva did not respond to a Reuters request for comment.
'RAW POWER'
The U.S. and Israel are not members of the council but, like all U.N. member states have informal observer status and a seat in the council's meeting chamber.
International human rights institutions are now at a critical juncture, said Phil Lynch, Director of International Service for Human Rights, a non-governmental organization.
"We are potentially confronting a future characterised by lawlessness and raw power," he said.
The U.S. was once the top donor to the U.N. rights system, but Trump has said the U.N. is "not being well run" and aid cuts by his administration have forced scalebacks.
The U.S. and Israel have also opposed the mandate of one of the council's independent experts up for renewal this week.
The Israeli ambassador said on March 24 that Francesca Albanese, a critic of Israeli actions in Gaza, had breached a U.N. code of conduct through "blatant antisemitic behaviour and discourse", a diplomatic note showed.
The U.S. State Department spokesperson said Albanese was "unfit for her role".
"The correspondence received is under consideration," council spokesperson Pascal Sim said, adding that he expected Albanese's term be renewed.
The internal body that ensures U.N. experts adhere to a code of conduct condemned what it described as a coordinated campaign against Albanese, according to a letter from the Coordination Committee of Special Procedures dated 28 March.
It found no evidence to support Israel's complaints against Albanese. However, it is introducing social media guidelines for U.N. experts in light of some concerns raised about her X posts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Highlights of Putin statement after summit with Trump
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) -Following are key quotes from Russian President Vladimir Putin's statement after meeting U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday. Translation by Reuters. ON RUSSIA-U.S. TIES As is known, Russian-American summits have not been held for more than four years. This is a long time. The past period was very difficult for bilateral relations. And, let's be honest, they have slid to the lowest point since the Cold War. And this is not good for our countries, or the world as a whole. Obviously, sooner or later, it was necessary to correct the situation, to move from confrontation to dialogue. And in this regard, a personal meeting of the heads of the two states was really overdue... ON UKRAINE As you well know and understand, one of the central issues has become the situation around Ukraine. We see the desire of the U.S. administration and President Trump personally to facilitate the resolution of the Ukrainian conflict, his desire to delve into the essence and understand its origins. I have said more than once that for Russia the events in Ukraine are associated with fundamental threats to our national security. Moreover, we have always considered and consider the Ukrainian people, I have said this many times, brotherly, no matter how strange that may sound in today's conditions. We have the same roots and everything that is happening for us is a tragedy and a great pain. Therefore, our country is sincerely interested in putting an end to this. But at the same time, we are convinced that in order for the Ukrainian settlement to be sustainable and long-term, all the root causes of the crisis must be eliminated... All of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account, and a fair balance in the security sphere in Europe and the world as a whole must be restored. I agree with President Trump — he spoke about this today — that Ukraine's security must, without a doubt, be ensured. We are ready to work on this. I would like to hope that the understanding we have reached will allow us to get closer to that goal and open the way to peace in Ukraine. We expect that Kyiv and the European capitals will perceive all of this in a constructive manner and will not create any obstacles. That they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue. ON ECONOMIC TIES It is obvious that Russian-American business and investment partnership has enormous potential. Russia and the United States have something to offer each other in trade, energy, the digital sphere, high tech and space exploration. Cooperation in the Arctic, resumption of interregional contacts, including between our Far East and the American West Coast, also seem relevant... I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also launch the restoration of business-like, pragmatic relations between Russia and the United States. ON COOPERATION WITH TRUMP Overall we have established very good business-like and trusting contact with President Trump. And I have every reason to believe that by moving along this path, we can - the quicker the better - reach an end to the conflict in Ukraine.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fresh clashes erupt in Serbian capital after days of unrest
Thousands of anti-government protesters again clashed with police in Serbia's capital on Friday, as days of unrest fuelled fears of a worsening crackdown on a months-long push for early elections. After a tense stand-off between right-wing government loyalists and the larger crowd of protesters, fireworks, tear gas, and stun grenades erupted among the anti-graft demonstrators, according to an AFP journalist in the crowd. It sparked a series of clashes with riot police in central Belgrade on Friday, and marks the fourth straight night of violence between police and rival groups in the Balkan nation. Almost daily protests -- some drawing hundreds of thousands -- have gripped Serbia since November, after a railway station roof collapse crushed 16 people to death. The tragedy became a symbol of deep-rooted corruption in the Balkan nation, as frustrated demands for a transparent investigation grew into calls for early elections. The mostly peaceful demonstrations escalated this week as large groups of pro-government supporters, many masked and some armed with batons and fireworks, attacked protesters. "I don't want to live in a country of police repression," 46-year-old Zeljko from Belgrade told AFP, as he stood with protesters outside government buildings before the violence. A hundred metres away, dozens of government supporters, dressed in black T-shirts, aimed green lasers at the crowd, an apparent attempt to provoke the larger group. "They beat the people and protect criminals with crowbars. I came to say we won't accept that," Zeljko said, referring to alleged police violence against protesters. Dozens have been arrested at rallies around the country in recent days, after violence between the groups ended in the ransacking of the ruling party's offices in the northern city of Novi Sad. While opposition MPs and activists have accused pro-government "thugs" of brutal attacks, sharing images of graphic injuries sustained at the rallies. Several videos shared online showed police striking unarmed protesters with batons. In one video from Thursday night, around 20 officers surround and beat a man while he is on the ground. Police have rejected allegations of excessive force, instead accusing demonstrators of attacking their members, with over 120 officers injured in violence over the past few nights. "All those who have spent these past days spreading lies about police brutality should comment on these figures," Interior Minister Ivica Dacic told journalists on Friday. Similarly, President Aleksandar Vucic has denied that his supporters are behind the violence, instead blaming the anti-corruption movement, which he routinely labels "terrorists". But protesters told AFP they felt police were unfairly protecting Vucic's supporters while targeting the student-led movement for arrest. "We are completely powerless because the police are working with the criminals," said 52-year-old Nevena. "They've hijacked the state and we're trying to take it back." While the protests have so far led to the resignation of the prime minister and the collapse of his cabinet, Vucic remains at the helm of a reshuffled government. oz/al/dc
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Want to fix the nation's broken higher-ed system? Look to the South
Universities in the American South are becoming models for fixing higher education. After the COVID lockdowns and amid antisemitic violence and the anti-American and DEI-infused agendas that have taken hold over the past two decades, Southern colleges are now displacing the broken universities in the Northeast that were once benchmarks for elite education. The number of Northeastern high-school students going to Southern colleges has nearly doubled in the last 20 years, thanks largely to lower costs and less-ideologically driven campus cultures. College-admissions experts note that the rise in these schools' popularity has allowed them to become more selective, boosting their prestige even further among high-school students. From 2014 to 2024, the last full year for available admissions data, Auburn University's freshman-class acceptance rate decreased from 85% to 46%; Clemson University's dropped from 52% to 38%. The trend line holds even for the South's most selective colleges: Rice University's acceptance rate dipped from 14% to 8%; Emory University's, from 26% to 15%. By contrast, elite Northeastern universities have only been able to maintain their enrollments by taking in more foreign students. Why are young people are flocking to Southern universities? Because, on the whole, they're run better. They take a pragmatic approach to education that's attractive to students who want to learn without the far-left craziness that prevails at so many schools. As an adjunct professor at the University of Kentucky, I'm immersed in a common-sense-oriented culture that's absent at elite Northeastern schools, one that lets administrators run the institution more sensibly based on what works best and not the optics of a vocal minority's radical ideology. This summer, the University of Kentucky swiftly fired a professor who launched an online petition calling for international warfare against Jews. About the same time, Columbia University was agreeing to a $221 million settlement with the Trump administration over its multi-year failures to police protesters who caused millions of dollars in damage and harassed peers in the name of far-left ideology pushed by their professors. The contrast could not be starker. Common-sense governance in higher education inspires leaders to be pragmatic and take action to keep students safe and the campus running normally. Pragmatism translates into rational decision-making and logical solutions across all areas of university life. The Universities of Florida and North Carolina systems, for example, have among the strongest track records of enforcing DEI bans and fortifying campus safety against wanton protesters. These policies transcend collegiate bureaucracies and change campus cultures for the better. At the University of North Carolina, students shut down their peers' anti-American protest by raising the American flag in front of them. At the University of Florida, Jewish students felt reassured after Oct. 7 because then-President Ben Sasse immediately issued a zero-tolerance statement for campus antisemitism. Southern universities' resolve to defy far-left craziness resonates with prospective college students because the results give young people positive visions of what they can experience on campus, achieve as students and accomplish after graduation. When learning devolves into activism, education loses its purpose as a tool for practical future success. Seminar discussions and quad gatherings simply won't translate into good jobs after graduation. Students fleeing the Northeast are reacting to that disconnect between college as a stagnant, unserious experience versus a real vehicle for future success. Southern universities are more disposed to traditional approaches to education, which prioritizes civics education and reinforces the campus as a place for cultivating intellectual and spiritual growth. Public institutions like the University of South Carolina and North Carolina State University have recently invested millions on civic-engagement curriculum. Texas, Florida and Tennessee have also allocated millions to beef up civics and classical education at their state universities. And Southern schools are more willing to welcome students of faith — a draw for some. The 2023 Christian revival at Asbury University in Kentucky was an expression of students' attraction to traditional education. The 16-day prayer celebration numbered 20,000 participants and inspired thousands more at Baylor, Texas A&M and Auburn to hold similar events that year. Students said their search for truth, connection and self-discovery in a society dominated by hyper-politicization motivated them to attend such events. Northeastern colleges thought pursuing radical change through social-justice activism would keep them on top — but that course has only precipitated their decline in reputation and relevance. They could learn much from the South. Zachary Marschall is editor-in-chief of Leadership Institute's Campus Reform and an adjunct assistant professor of arts administration at the University of Kentucky.
