'Fewer pimples, more pronouns': Cinema's classic coming-of-age genre suffers most in Hollywood's shift to woke storytelling
When did going to the cinema start to feel like attending an HR seminar?
And how did we go from plot twists and real dialogue to one-dimensional characters regurgitating ideological talking points?
Somewhere along the line, Hollywood clearly handed the writers' room over to political activists.
Films were no longer about escapism, but about productions more interested in moralising and telling you off.Hollywood no longer sells dreams.
It peddles guilt, replacing characters we once cared about with vacuous mouthpieces who speak in hashtags.
This shift, although underway for a while, gained momentum during the infamous #OscarsSoWhite scandal in 2015.
It triggered a full-blown identity audit across the industry, with film houses tripping over themselves to 'out-woke' each other.
By 2020, a complete overhaul was underway.
It led to diversity checklists, which, in the case of the Academy, determined whether films could even qualify for Best Picture.
'Diversity', as we once knew it, had been boiled down to a person's race and/or genitalia.
And true creativity suffered in the process.Today, writers second-guess every joke, plot twist and character flaw, for fear of causing offence.
Instead of leaning into what makes stories compelling (i.e. tension, conflict, and the messy bits of humanity), we get glossy morality tales that no one asked for.
Hollywood, the long-standing epicentre of debauchery, addiction, opportunism and every other human vice you can think of, has now become too scared to explore the human condition.
Isn't it ironic?
It no longer tells timeless stories of love, jealousy, power, addiction or conflict. Every love story has to be 'modernised' and told through the lens of feminism and the impact of the patriarchy.
Even protagonists and antagonists have to be clearly good or indefensibly bad.
It's ridiculous.
Yet no genre has suffered more from this shift in storytelling than coming-of-age films.
It's now practically extinct, like cinema's equivalent of the dodo bird.
Films like 'The Breakfast Club', 'Stand By Me', and 'Dazed and Confused', which captured the awkwardness of adolescence with honesty and humour, would never get made today.
Modern replacements are now all about introspection and identity politics. Fewer pimples, more pronouns.
Teenage angst is no longer worthy of storytelling because it's not seen as progressive enough.
Unless, of course, it's the angst of a one-eyed, trans-identifying Muslim teenager called Sandra.
Meanwhile, Eastern cinema is picking up where Hollywood left off. Films like 'Parasite', 'RRR', and 'Shoplifters' have succeeded not because they're diverse, but because they tell damn good stories.
They treat audiences like grown-ups, not mentally challenged misfits.
Something that used to be Hollywood's job. Is it any surprise that audiences are now looking elsewhere in search of raw storytelling power?
Of course, Hollywood has always been political to some extent.
From 'Gentleman's Agreement' to 'Guess Who's Coming to Dinner', it never shied away from difficult themes.
But it did so with nuance and craft, things which are nowhere to be found. So people are returning to the classics not just for nostalgia, but because they're starved for universality.
From 'Rocky' to 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'Gone with the Wind', these stories endure because they speak to something timeless. In today's climate, they wouldn't make it past a pitch meeting.
They'd be too problematic, too white or too male.
Even 'The Wizard of Oz' would be binned for its lack of intersectional munchkin representation.
That is the era we've entered now, where cultural self-censorship is flattening the vibrancy of cinema.Even criticism isn't what it used to be anymore.
Instead of lively debate based on plot, pacing and cinematography, it has now become a moral tribunal.
The only question that matters is whether the message of the film aligns with a particular virtue, not vision.
We no longer ask, "Was it good?". But rather "Was it correct?"
Industry jobs, too, are not being lost for poor scripts, but for poor optics. White, male writers are being quietly dropped.
Agents whisper that 'they had to hire a diversity candidate.'
And no one dares to push back because it's become easier, and safer, to stay silent.
Those willing to put their heads above the parapet are saying similar things.
Quentin Tarantino argues that ideology is trumping art.
And Mike White admits people are too scared to speak freely.
How can we expect anything decent out of Hollywood when creatives are writing with a fire extinguisher pointed at their faces?
Take 'Woke', for example, a series that was meant to satirise the very culture it ended up drowning in.
Black writers who wanted to push boundaries were shut down.
The show lost its voice, its viewership and had a Rotten Tomatoes score so low that it ended up becoming the quintessential cautionary tale of what happens when ideology micromanages art.
Even the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures managed to erase the Jewish immigrants who built Hollywood from the ground up.
Diversity, apparently, has its limits.
A story about resilience, talent, and the American dream apparently didn't fit the vibe they were going for. In the rush to elevate new voices, Hollywood has forgotten to honour the ones who laid its foundation.
Hollywood once thrived on the belief that talent could come from anywhere.
It didn't matter where you were from, as long as you could write, act, direct, or produce.
That meritocracy is now under siege. Your identity matters more than your ideas. What used to be an industry obsessed with innovation is now paralysed by fear.Let's be clear: representation matters.
But not at the expense of quality.
And not if it means filtering every story through the same narrow ideological sieve.
We need to separate the art from the artist, stop demanding that every film be a political statement, and let flawed characters be flawed.
Art isn't meant to make us comfortable.
It's meant to make us feel something; sometimes joy, sometimes discomfort, but always something real.
Otherwise, audiences will keep leaving.
If Hollywood is going to survive, then it's time to bring back the Hollywood that used to say, 'here's something to think about', not 'here's what to think'.
Esther Krakue is a British commentator who has regularly appeared on Sky News Australia programs, as well as on TalkTV and GB News in the UK. She launched her career with Turning Point UK, with whom she hosted a show featuring guests including Douglas Murray and Peter Hitchens
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
2 days ago
- Sky News AU
'Fewer pimples, more pronouns': Cinema's classic coming-of-age genre suffers most in Hollywood's shift to woke storytelling
When did going to the cinema start to feel like attending an HR seminar? And how did we go from plot twists and real dialogue to one-dimensional characters regurgitating ideological talking points? Somewhere along the line, Hollywood clearly handed the writers' room over to political activists. Films were no longer about escapism, but about productions more interested in moralising and telling you no longer sells dreams. It peddles guilt, replacing characters we once cared about with vacuous mouthpieces who speak in hashtags. This shift, although underway for a while, gained momentum during the infamous #OscarsSoWhite scandal in 2015. It triggered a full-blown identity audit across the industry, with film houses tripping over themselves to 'out-woke' each other. By 2020, a complete overhaul was underway. It led to diversity checklists, which, in the case of the Academy, determined whether films could even qualify for Best Picture. 'Diversity', as we once knew it, had been boiled down to a person's race and/or genitalia. And true creativity suffered in the writers second-guess every joke, plot twist and character flaw, for fear of causing offence. Instead of leaning into what makes stories compelling (i.e. tension, conflict, and the messy bits of humanity), we get glossy morality tales that no one asked for. Hollywood, the long-standing epicentre of debauchery, addiction, opportunism and every other human vice you can think of, has now become too scared to explore the human condition. Isn't it ironic? It no longer tells timeless stories of love, jealousy, power, addiction or conflict. Every love story has to be 'modernised' and told through the lens of feminism and the impact of the patriarchy. Even protagonists and antagonists have to be clearly good or indefensibly bad. It's ridiculous. Yet no genre has suffered more from this shift in storytelling than coming-of-age films. It's now practically extinct, like cinema's equivalent of the dodo bird. Films like 'The Breakfast Club', 'Stand By Me', and 'Dazed and Confused', which captured the awkwardness of adolescence with honesty and humour, would never get made today. Modern replacements are now all about introspection and identity politics. Fewer pimples, more pronouns. Teenage angst is no longer worthy of storytelling because it's not seen as progressive enough. Unless, of course, it's the angst of a one-eyed, trans-identifying Muslim teenager called Sandra. Meanwhile, Eastern cinema is picking up where Hollywood left off. Films like 'Parasite', 'RRR', and 'Shoplifters' have succeeded not because they're diverse, but because they tell damn good stories. They treat audiences like grown-ups, not mentally challenged misfits. Something that used to be Hollywood's job. Is it any surprise that audiences are now looking elsewhere in search of raw storytelling power? Of course, Hollywood has always been political to some extent. From 'Gentleman's Agreement' to 'Guess Who's Coming to Dinner', it never shied away from difficult themes. But it did so with nuance and craft, things which are nowhere to be found. So people are returning to the classics not just for nostalgia, but because they're starved for universality. From 'Rocky' to 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and 'Gone with the Wind', these stories endure because they speak to something timeless. In today's climate, they wouldn't make it past a pitch meeting. They'd be too problematic, too white or too male. Even 'The Wizard of Oz' would be binned for its lack of intersectional munchkin representation. That is the era we've entered now, where cultural self-censorship is flattening the vibrancy of criticism isn't what it used to be anymore. Instead of lively debate based on plot, pacing and cinematography, it has now become a moral tribunal. The only question that matters is whether the message of the film aligns with a particular virtue, not vision. We no longer ask, "Was it good?". But rather "Was it correct?" Industry jobs, too, are not being lost for poor scripts, but for poor optics. White, male writers are being quietly dropped. Agents whisper that 'they had to hire a diversity candidate.' And no one dares to push back because it's become easier, and safer, to stay silent. Those willing to put their heads above the parapet are saying similar things. Quentin Tarantino argues that ideology is trumping art. And Mike White admits people are too scared to speak freely. How can we expect anything decent out of Hollywood when creatives are writing with a fire extinguisher pointed at their faces? Take 'Woke', for example, a series that was meant to satirise the very culture it ended up drowning in. Black writers who wanted to push boundaries were shut down. The show lost its voice, its viewership and had a Rotten Tomatoes score so low that it ended up becoming the quintessential cautionary tale of what happens when ideology micromanages art. Even the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures managed to erase the Jewish immigrants who built Hollywood from the ground up. Diversity, apparently, has its limits. A story about resilience, talent, and the American dream apparently didn't fit the vibe they were going for. In the rush to elevate new voices, Hollywood has forgotten to honour the ones who laid its foundation. Hollywood once thrived on the belief that talent could come from anywhere. It didn't matter where you were from, as long as you could write, act, direct, or produce. That meritocracy is now under siege. Your identity matters more than your ideas. What used to be an industry obsessed with innovation is now paralysed by be clear: representation matters. But not at the expense of quality. And not if it means filtering every story through the same narrow ideological sieve. We need to separate the art from the artist, stop demanding that every film be a political statement, and let flawed characters be flawed. Art isn't meant to make us comfortable. It's meant to make us feel something; sometimes joy, sometimes discomfort, but always something real. Otherwise, audiences will keep leaving. If Hollywood is going to survive, then it's time to bring back the Hollywood that used to say, 'here's something to think about', not 'here's what to think'. Esther Krakue is a British commentator who has regularly appeared on Sky News Australia programs, as well as on TalkTV and GB News in the UK. She launched her career with Turning Point UK, with whom she hosted a show featuring guests including Douglas Murray and Peter Hitchens

ABC News
24-05-2025
- ABC News
Shark-obsessed killers and musings on masculinity: Here's what Aussies brought to Cannes this year
Every year during May, hundreds of the world's biggest stars and thousands of film industry workers descend on a sunny, French seaside town. That's right, it's the Cannes (pronounced like can, not like the FNQ city) Film Festival. On the surface it might seem like an excuse for celebs to step in front of the camera, but Cannes has historically allowed a peek into what will be rocking cinemas and award ceremonies over the next year. As the festival wraps up today, here's what you need to know. What is the Cannes Film Festival? Now in its 78th year, Cannes is one of the 'big five' international film festivals, alongside Venice, Berlin, Sundance and Toronto. Hundreds of filmmakers submit their projects to a jury in the hope they'll be selected to be a part of the official competition. Only around 20 are chosen (22 for 2025) to be officially "un competition" but there are numerous screenings and premieres outside of the official race. At the end of the two-week festival, a number of awards are given out, including Prix de la mise en scène (Best Director), Prix d'interprétation masculine and Prix d'interprétation féminine (Best Actor and Actress) and the highly coveted Palme d'Or for the best film of the whole festival. While the Palme has always been a prestigious award, in recent times it's also been a crystal ball for Oscar nominees and winners. The trend began bubbling over with Bong Joon Ho's Parasite, which rode a 2019 Palme win all the way to Best Picture at the 2020 Academy Awards —the only foreign language film to ever do so. Last year, Sean Baker's Anora took the Palme before coming from behind in a stacked category to take 2025's Best Picture statue. In fact, 40 per cent of the gongs at this year's Oscars were won by films that were awarded at Cannes. That's not to say there haven't been controversial Cannes choices: last year's Jury Prize went to Emilia Perez, kicking off one of the most chaotic Oscars campaigns of the 2020s. Outside the competition, Cannes also dabbles in more blockbuster fare — this year saw the premiere of the final Mission Impossible. It's also how we got this historic picture of Jerry Seinfeld dressed as a giant bee, zip lining into the 2007 festival to promote his starring role in The Bee Movie. Yes, that is internationally renowned comedian Jerry Seinfeld in a fluffy bee suit. ( Getty: George Pimentel ) Australians at Cannes 2025 While no Australian films are competing in the official section of Cannes this year, there are several selected to premiere at independent competitions running parallel to Cannes. Australian creatives have also been honoured at this year's festival: Nicole Kidman was presented with the 2025 Women in Motion award for her commitment to working with female directors; and Academy award-winning Australian cinematographer Dion Beebe (Memoirs of a Geisha; Chicago; The Little Mermaid) was presented with the 2025 Pierre Angénieux Tribute for his contribution to cinematic imagery. Jai Courtney stars in Dangerous Animals. ( Supplied: Kismet Films ) Shark-infested horror Dangerous Animals is the first Australian film to compete in independent Cannes sidebar the Director's Fortnight in more than a decade. The movie follows American tourist Zephyr (Hassie Harrison; Yellowstone) as she is abducted by a deranged shark enthusiast (Jai Courtney) who imprisons her on his cage-diving boat. With great whites circling and a serial killer at the helm, Zephyr has to figure out how to escape before she becomes fish food. Directed by Sean Byrne — the Tasmanian creative who also helmed 2009's cult classic The Loved Ones — Dangerous Animals was filmed on the Gold Coast with backing from Screen Queensland. Early reviews out of Cannes have been warm, with Deadline saying the exploitation flick is "tailor-made for summer movie-going" and Roger Ebert critic Brian Tallerico giving it three out of four stars. Dangerous Animals will be released into Australian cinemas on June 12. The Plague Joel Edgerton stars in and co-produces The Plague, which had its premiere at the 78th Cannes Film Festival. ( Supplied: Cannes ) While ~technically~ a shared production with the US, The Plague stars Aussie staple Joel Edgerton and is the first feature under his Five Henry's production house — so we're pulling a Russell Crowe and claiming it. Set in 2003, Edgerton stars as Daddy Wags, the coach of a pre-teen water polo team. The Plague delves into the murky world of teen masculinity and coming-of-age queasiness through the setting of a teen sports camp. The Plague premiered as a part of Cannes' Un Certain Regard section, which highlights more eclectic and non-traditional stories. The debut feature from Charlie Polinger, the writer/director took inspiration from his own experiences at an all-boys summer camp to create the black comedy/horror. The Body (short film) The poster for The Body short film. ( Supplied: IMDB ) Also debuting in the Director's Fortnight section, The Body is the first short film from Melbourne playwright Louris van de Geer. Laura Wheelwright (Animal Kingdom) stars as Jane, an actor cast as a dead body in a crime show — but as she settles into the role she comes to realise that the role has settled into her. Other films to look out for


Perth Now
22-05-2025
- Perth Now
Busy Philipps urged Batman Ben Affleck to 'save' Oscars during Best Picture mishap
Busy Philipps urged Ben Affleck to "save" the night during the Oscars Best Picture mix-up in 2017 "because he was Batman". The 'Girls5Eva' actress had been seated next to the 52-year-old star - who portrayed the Caped Crusader in 'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice', 'Justice League', 'Suicide Squad', and 'The Flash' - at the Academy Awards when Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway accidentally announced 'La La Land' had won the night's biggest honour, instead of correctly presenting it to 'Moonlight'. And Busy and best friend Michelle Williams recalled the confusion that occurred immediately afterwards and how they put their faith in Ben. Speaking on her show 'Busy This Week', Busy said: "We knew, cause we were right there in the front row. "We knew something weird was happening. Ben Affleck was next to me. You reminded me just earlier of what I said to him, which I totally forgot." Michelle explained: "You turned to him, and said, 'Do something! Do something!' Because he was Batman, and he was going to save the rest of us. "He was just as shocked as the rest of us." Busy added: "He was literally looking back at Matt Damon, who was sitting right behind his brother [Casey Affleck], who was, like, two doors down from you. And I don't know Ben Affleck. I just was like, 'He's Batman. He's a movie star. He can go onstage and handle it.' He could not. It turns out, it was very difficult to handle." A photo of the stars looking confused went viral at the time but Busy joked her show couldn't afford to use the image, so she and Michelle simply crossed their legs and dropped their mouths open to recreate it. She noted: "It's iconic." Shortly after the mishap took place, Busy, 46, described the confusion and how she and Michelle were among the first to realise what had happened. She explained on her Instagram Story at the time: ''La La Land' got up there, all of a sudden this stage manager or somebody who worked there with a microphone crouched in front of Casey [Affleck] and started whispering into his microphone really urgently and saying, 'It's a mistake! Moonlight is supposed to be Best Picture. It's a mistake! It's a mistake! Moonlight is Best Picture!' 'We all heard it right there — like right in the front. Nobody else heard it.'