Idaho legislative committee moves bill forward to ‘modernize' indecent exposure law
Hundreds of members of Idaho's LGBTQ+ community commemorate the 10th anniversary of Idaho's first and only public hearing on an 'Add the Words' bill at a gathering at the Idaho State Capitol on Jan. 28, 2025. "Add the Words" encourages the addition of the words "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" to Idaho's Human Rights Act. (Mia Maldonado/Idaho Capital Sun)
Idaho legislators are advancing a bill to update the state's indecent exposure law.
The House Judiciary, Rules and Administration Committee in a 12-3 vote along party lines on Tuesday advanced in a House Bill 270, which bill sponsor Rep. Jeff Cornilles, R-Nampa, said was inspired by a Canyon County Pride event in June.
The legislation aims to modernize Idaho's indecent exposure law, Cornilles said, which currently is defined as the exposure of someone's genitals in any public place. It's a misdemeanor on the first offense, and a felony on the second offense within five years.
The legislation would add to that law, also making it a misdemeanor to show the following in public spaces:
Developed female breasts, not including those of someone breastfeeding a child
Adult male breasts that have been medically or hormonally altered to appear like developing or developed female breasts
Artificial breasts
Toys or products intended to resemble male or female genitals
Nampa City Councilmember Sebastian Griffin helped craft the bill, and told the committee why this bill was brought forward.
Griffin attended an event at Lakeview Park in Nampa, where Canyon County Pride was held in June. At the event, he noticed a 'woman who was topless exposing herself,' he said.
'Shocked by this, I went over and saw a local Nampa police officer and said, 'why hasn't this individual been asked to either number one, cover up or number two, leave?'' Griffin told the committee. 'And to my surprise, the officer said what that person's doing isn't illegal.'
That's because it is not illegal for a man with breast enhancements to walk around topless, the officer said, according to Griffin.
'Committee will likely hear testimony today that says this bill is targeting and even discriminating against a certain group of Idaho citizens or population,' Griffin said. 'I would argue it does not. This targets bad actors in our community that have found a loophole within Idaho code to take advantage and disrupt society. That's it. It's addressing out of date code for a modern time. We need to modernize our code to address issues of today's day and age.'
Canyon County Pride President Tom Wheeler previously told the Idaho Capital Sun that multiple people had attended the event 'nipple pasties,' which inspired a rule to require shirts this year.
Fifteen people testified to the committee, most of whom opposed the bill. This includes Nixon Mathews, an LGBTQ+ advocate, who said the bill is too broad and imposes extreme penalties on transgender Idahoans.
'I'm a trans man, and I have opted to have chest surgery, so my chest looks like a cis man's chest,' Mathews said. 'If I'm shirtless in my own yard and my neighbor sees me and they find me offensive, could they call the cops and arrest me at my own home? According to this bill, an existing Idaho statute, yes, they could.'
William Mitchell, an attorney with Legal Voice, opposed the bill, arguing it would affect men experiencing gynecomastia, a hormonal condition that causes enlarged breasts in males.
'What I'm trying to tell you is that gynecomastia can happen naturally throughout the life of a male,' Mitchell said. 'It can also be caused by poorly managed hormonal therapies related to low testosterone in younger men, or from abuse of non-prescription or non therapeutic use of testosterone or anabolic steroids. With that background, I hope you can see that this bill would cast among the widest of nets in our criminal code.'
Proponents of the bill, such as Idaho Freedom Foundation Director of Legislative Affairs Fred Birnbaum, said the bill would protect children.
'What this bill is about, is restoring decency and community standards of behavior,' Birnbaum said to the committee.
Nampa City Councilwoman Natalie Jangula also spoke in support of the bill. While she thanked the Canyon County Pride event organizers for complying with the city's requests, she said organizers cannot control the actions of everyone who attends.
'That is why we need laws, city codes, security and law enforcement,' Jangula said. '…Our police did not have adequate legislation in place to take appropriate action.'
The bill is now headed to the House floor in the coming days or weeks.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions
Democratic House of Delegates hopeful Kimberly Pope Adams raised the second-highest amount in Virginia of contributions to House campaigns for the latest campaign reporting period, according to the nonpartisan Virginia Public Access Project. Pope Adams, who has already locked up the Democratic nomination in the 82nd House District, reported a total of $262,048 in money raised for the April 1-June 5 window, based on data from the Virginia Department of Elections that was compiled by VPAP. That trailed only House Speaker Don Scott of Portsmouth, who raised just over $344,000 for the period. Political watchers were keeping a close eye on this round of reports, the last before the crucial June 17 party primaries across Virginia. Like Pope Adams, Scott already has the Democratic nod sewn up. He also does not appear to have any GOP opposition this year. The only House primary next week in the Tri-City area is in District 75 where three Democrats are vying to oppose Republican incumbent Carrie Coyner. In that contest, Lindsey Dougherty continues to outdistance Dustin Wade and Stephen Miller-Pitts. For the reporting period, Dougherty raised $171,695, compared to $136,276 for Wade and $4,471 for Miller-Pitts. As of June 5, Wade showed more than $100,000 in cash on hand over Dougherty and five times more than Miller-Pitts. VPAP reported Dougherty raising the sixth-highest amount of contributions for the period, and Wade the 12th. Dougherty and Miller-Pitts ran against Coyner in the 2019 and 2023 elections, respectively. The 75th District covers all of Hopewell and portions of Chesterfield and Prince George counties. More: The primary menu for June 17: Heavy on the state races and a first time for Petersburg In the 82nd District [Petersburg, Surry County, portions of Dinwiddie and Prince George], Pope Adams continues to run away from GOP incumbent Kim Taylor in campaign contributions. For the latest reporting period, Pope Adams' total was more than four times that of Taylor, who listed receiving $64,489 in donations. Her cash-on-hand amount of $289,468 was eight times more than Taylor's $34,502. The race is a rerun of 2023's race, one of the top three most expensive contests in recent Virginia political history. Taylor squeaked out a victory over Pope Adams by only 53 votes following a recount, and Democrats are clocking the 2025 race as pivotal in holding their slim majority in the House for the next two years. Pope Adams' contributions included $25,000 from the Clean Virginia Fund on April 23, $7,500 from the Jane Fonda Climate PAC on May 14, and three $5,000 donations from Elizabeth Simons on May 29, The Next 50 PAC on April 30 and Fund Her PAC on April 29. Taylor's largest contributions for the period were $20,000 from the Dominion Energy PAC on May 8, $10,000 from the Wren Williams for Delegate campaign on April 24, and identical $7,500 amounts from Friends of Scott Wyatt on April 2 and Chris Runion for Delegate on June 5. The reports indicate Taylor getting three donations of $100 or less, and Pope Adams receiving 1,461. More: House GOP incumbent lauds endorsement from local Democratic group. Democrats cry 'foul' In the 75th District primary, Dougherty received two contributions totaling $80,000 from the super PAC Secure Progress and $35,000 from the campaign of Democratic Del. Dan Helmer. Wade's top donations were $5,000 from himself and two donations from Anita Thurston totaling $4,500. Miller-Pitts' sole contribution of over $100 for the period was $250 from Rhonda Clanton-Davis. Coyner, a Republican seeking her fourth term in the House, received $69,056 in contributions over the period. Her largest donations were $10,000 from Carolyn Williams, $7,500 from Strong Start PAC, and three of $5,000 each from Thomas McInerney, Vision Management Services, and Clean Virginia Fund. Records indicate her having $315,350 in cash on hand as of June 5. The district traditionally leans Republican. Coyner has won re-election with as much as 55% of the vote, but Democrats still target her as vulnerable. In Petersburg, history is being made with the first-ever Democratic primary for the constitutional officer Commissioner of the Revenue. Incumbent Brittani Flowers is being challenged by Mary 'Liz Stith' Howard for the right to be the Democrat on the November ballot. Five years ago, the Virginia General Assembly voted to allow any local-office candidate [except School Board] to seek official party backing. The law went into effect last year, as Petersburg Vice Mayor Darrin Hill received the Democratic nomination for his Ward 2 seat by acclimation. The commissioner primary is the first contested one in Petersburg. Campaign records show Flowers receiving just shy of $3,000 in contributions for the reporting period. Her largest donations were $500 from former state Senate candidate Waylin Ross and $300 from Bernard Flowers Jr. Howard did not record any contributions for the reporting period. Petersburg City Councilor Marlow Jones, who is running as an independent for Virginia's lieutenant governor, raised $700 in donations during the latest reporting period. Five hundred dollars came from three contributions of more than $100. The remaining $200 was split among five contributions of less than $100. To see the latest donation data for any race this year, click on the VPAP website. Bill Atkinson (he/him/his) is an award-winning journalist who covers breaking news, government and politics. Reach him at batkinson@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @BAtkinson_PI. This article originally appeared on The Progress-Index: Virginia primary 2025: Campaign finance reports show money pouring in
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House to vote on repealing DC local laws on noncitizen voting, policing, immigration enforcement
The Brief House Republicans are voting on three bills that would override D.C. laws on noncitizen voting rights, limiting police powers, and restricting immigration enforcement cooperation. One bill, HR 884, repeals D.C.'s 2022 law allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections. HR 2056 would dismantle D.C.'s sanctuary city protections by mandating cooperation with federal immigration authorities. WASHINGTON - The House of Representatives are voting Tuesday on three Republican-backed bills that would override several local D.C. laws. The bills would roll back D.C. efforts expand voting rights for non-citizens, restrict police and force the District to work with immigration enforcement efforts on a federal level. D.C. passed the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act in 2022, granting noncitizens in D.C. the right to vote in local elections. That includes mayoral races, D.C. Council positions, attorney general, ANC members, attorney general and D.C. ballot measures. Noncitizens can also run for elected office in the D.C. government. HR 884 would repeal the act, removing voting powers from noncitizens. Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton released a statement, pushing back at Congress' power of local D.C. matters. "Last Congress, Republicans introduced 14 bills or amendments to prohibit noncitizens from voting in D.C. or to repeal, nullify or prohibit the carrying out of D.C.'s law that permits noncitizens to vote," said Norton. "Yet, Republicans refuse to make the only election law change D.C. residents have asked Congress to make, which is the right to hold elections for voting members of the House and Senate." The Protecting Our Nation's Capital Emergency Act, would dismantle parts of D.C.'s Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022. HR 2096 would allow D.C. police officers to negotiate disciplinary matters through collective bargaining. It would also restore a statute of limitation for claims against the Metropolitan Police Department. "This bill was introduced three days after House Republicans passed a continuing resolution that cut D.C.'s local budget by one billion dollars. That act of fiscal sabotage, which did not save the federal government any money, has led to a freeze on overtime, hiring and pay raises, and furloughs or layoffs may be next," said Norton. "Nine weeks ago today, the Senate passed the D.C. Local Funds Act to reverse the cut. The D.C. Local Funds Act is just sitting in the House. Like President Trump and the National Fraternal Order of Police, I call on the House to pass immediately the D.C. Local Funds Act." READ MORE: Congress' spending bill error leaves DC scrambling to cut $400M from budget HR 2056 would strike down D.C. policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. It would prohibit DC officials from "sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging with any Federal, State, or local government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual." The bill would effectively dismantle D.C.'s sanctuary city policies. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser made moves to quietly overturn a law that prevents local police from cooperating with ICE, including it in a provision of her 2026 budget proposal. Big picture view The D.C. Home Rule Act of 1973 allows the city to elect its own mayor and council. It's also allowed for D.C. to choose Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners to handle community concerns. Congress still maintains control over D.C., including the ability to review all local legislation and appoint the city's judges. D.C. has no voting member in Congress, though it has a nonvoting Delegate. In February, legislators from Utah and Tennessee introduced a bill to strip D.C. of its ability to govern itself. The bill is named after D.C.'s Mayor Muriel Bowser – the "Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident (BOWSER) Act." The bill would eliminate D.C. Home Rule Act of 1973 and would place D.C. under the full control of Congress. The Source This story includes information from the US House of Representatives, Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, and previous FOX 5 DC reporting.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Condo bill passed to protect condo owners from rising costs. Will DeSantis sign HB 913?
In trying to solve one huge problem, Florida lawmakers added a big headache for condo owners in the form of a sudden need for a lot of money. A bill passed this legislative session is intended to alleviate the financial pressure a bit. In 2021, a 12-story condominium in Surfside collapsed without warning, leaving 98 people dead. Investigations into the cause discovered degraded concrete supports from water penetration, among other issues, and delays in maintenance. Lawmakers responded to the deadly event and the likelihood of future tragedies by overhauling state condo laws and mandating all condo developments over 30 years old — which is about two-thirds of all condos in Florida —to undergo "milestone inspections," and all condos three stories or higher to get "structural integrity inspections." Condo associations were ordered to maintain enough reserve funds to cover any necessary maintenance or repair those inspections turned up. However, many condo associations didn't have that much money in reserves, and for some the amount required to be in compliance was staggering. Condos scrambled to catch up and many hiked up condo association fees — in some areas drastically — or added assessment fees to make up the cash before the deadlines. Rising insurance premiums from last year's powerful storms haven't helped, either. All of that has resulted in an exodus for residents who could afford to move (or were abruptly priced out of their homes) and much higher monthly bills for those who stayed. Sales of condos in Florida are also down. House Bill 913, which overwhelmingly passed in the House and unanimously passed in the Senate, seeks to lighten the load while still addressing dangerous structures in the state. It pushes the structural integrity inspection deadline off a year for some condo associations, allows associations in some situations to use special assessments, lines of credit or loans to fund their reserves and to pool reserve accounts, and changes which buildings need structural integrity inspections, among other things. As of June 10, HB 913 has been enrolled (passed by the Legislature) to be turned into an act to present to Gov. Ron DeSantis to sign, but it has not been sent to him yet. DeSantis initially called for a special session in January to address rising condo costs, among other issues, but the Legislature pushed it off until the regular session when they'd have more information. The governor said in early May that at first he preferred the Senate version of the bill (SB 1742, from Sen. Jennifer Bradley, R-Fleming Island) because he felt it was geared more toward condo owners than developers, but most lawmakers made substantial adjustments to their bills before passage. 'It should have been done in January," he said at a stop in Miami. "It did get done. I'm glad that the Bradley bill is basically what passed.' Lawmakers take on condo fees: 8 Florida condo bills aim to ease, relax burden of inspections. Here are the details HB 913, from Rep. Vicki L. Lopez, R-Miami, is a big bill that seeks to protect condo owners and clarify association accountability and responsibilities. Among its many changes, the bill: Extends the deadline for certain associations to have a structural integrity reserve study (SIRS) to Dec. 31, 2025, rather than Dec. 31, 2024 Changes requirement for mandatory structural inspections to apply to buildings that are three habitable stories or more, rather than just three stories or more, adds four-family dwellings Allows condo association members to vote to create special assessment or secure a line of credit or a loan to fund the maintenance reserves required by law Allows condo associations to pool for two or more required components rather than earmarking amounts for each item, without a vote of the unit owners Allows condo associations to invest reserve funds in certificates of deposit or depository accounts without a vote of the unit owners Changes the minimum deferred maintenance expense or replacement cost for reserve fund budgeting from $10,000 to $25,000, to be adjusted annually for inflation Allows multi-condominium associations to use approved alternative funding method to satisfy reserve funding obligations Requires SIRS inspections to include a recommendation for a reserve funding schedule Allows condo associations who have completed a milestone inspection to delay a SIRS for not more than two consecutive budget years to enable them to focus on the recommendations of the milestone inspection Allows some condo associations who have completed a milestone inspection in the previous two years to vote to temporarily pause fund contributions to the maintenance reserve fund for no more than two consecutive annual budgets, for budgets adapted on or before Dec. 31, 2028 Requires local enforcement agencies responsible for milestone inspections to annually report to Department of Business and Professional on the following stats for their area: number of buildings subject to inspections, number of inspections completed, the number and type of permit applications received to complete repairs, and a list of buildings deemed unsafe or uninhabitable, among other things Bans anyone performing structural integrity reserve studies from repairing, contracting to repair, or having financial interests in anyone else repairing any issues found in the inspection, adds other restrictions to prevent collusions, kickbacks and bribes by blocking connections between design professional and licensed contractors and the firm or person providing the milestone inspection. Creates additional requirements relating to the licensure and regulation of community association managers and community association management firms. Require associations to maintain adequate property insurance based on the replacement cost of the property, which must be determined every three years at a minimum. Allows video meetings and electronic voting (if agreed upon by a majority of the association) but requires full notification ahead of time, recordings become an official record and links or downloads must be provided to members Exempts nonresidential condominiums with 10 or fewer units from restrictions on who can vote to elect members of the board of administration or cancel contracts Requires the association to provide timely financial reports and disclosures related to inspections and studies to unit owners. Requires condo associations to create and maintain an online account with the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes by Oct. 1, 2025, to track contact information, basic info, assessments, inspection results and more Requires official documents to be made available on the association's website or made available for download through an application on a mobile device within 30 days after it is created or received Allows condo association boards to pause or reduce contributions to the reserve funding if the building has been determined to be uninhabitable due to a natural emergency until the local building official determines it is habitable again, allows reserve funds to be used to make it habitable Clarify that unit owners are not responsible for the cost of necessary removal or reinstallation of hurricane protection unless previously agreed otherwise If Gov. DeSantis signs it, the bill becomes law on July 1, 2025. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Florida condo costs would see relief if DeSantis signs bill into law
