Foundation's $15 million gift to train police supervisors to help reduce gun violence
Hoping to reduce gun violence in Chicago, the Sue Ling Gin Foundation announced a $15 million gift Friday to develop a leadership and management education program for police supervisors.
The gift, which will be made to the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago, will fund the new five-year program, working with the University of Chicago Crime Lab.
Slated to launch in January 2026, all Chicago Police Department supervisors — from sergeants to the superintendent — will participate in mandatory leadership training to be better equipped to solve crimes, connect with the community and prevent gun violence, according to Roseanna Ander, founding executive director of the University of Chicago Crime Lab.
'Policing invests almost nothing in the human capital of people who go into policing,' Ander told the Tribune. 'This is a huge leap forward in changing that and puts Chicago at the forefront.'
The new program builds on the 40 hours of required annual training for all officers implemented through a 2019 consent decree in the wake of the 2014 police shooting of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald. The management education will focus on effective leadership, data-driven analytics, officer wellness and building community trust. The curriculum will involve a mix of scenario-based and hands-on training, as well as classroom study, Ander said.
'As part of our ongoing efforts to strengthen safety and build trust across the city, we have to invest in the frontline supervisors who are managing day-to-day operations,' Chicago police Superintendent Larry Snelling said in a news release. 'We are deeply grateful to the Sue Ling Gin Foundation for its partnership and support in making this a reality.'
Like many large cities, Chicago saw a spike in crime during the pandemic, peaking at 804 homicides in 2021, mostly from gun violence. While the total declined to 573 last year, Chicago remained the city with the most homicides in the U.S., according to research from AH Datalytics, which tracks crime statistics.
Gun violence continues to be a major problem in Chicago, although statistics have been steadily improving in the post-pandemic landscape. There were 2,282 shootings in Chicago last year, down from 2,452 in 2023, according to CPD data. Gun violence is down 36% from 2021, when there were 3,554 shootings in the city.
Chicago entrepreneur Sue Ling Gin, who died more than a decade ago, has been posthumously fighting gun violence through her foundation in the city where she built her career.
The Aurora-born daughter of immigrants, Gin worked in her family's suburban Chinese restaurant growing up and later became a Playboy Bunny at the original Playboy Club in Chicago. In 1983, she launched Flying Food Group at Chicago's Midway Airport, building it into a network of 20 catering kitchens from Honolulu to New York, servicing more than 70 airlines. Gin also managed and developed an extensive Chicago-area real estate portfolio.
When she died in 2014 at age 73 after suffering a stroke, Gin left a sizable estate, which was used to fund her foundation.
In 2021, the foundation made its first major gift, a $21 million three-year donation to Chicago CRED, a nonprofit community intervention program that focuses on reducing gun violence in some of the city's most underserved neighborhoods.
The foundation's latest gift to fund police supervisor training will take a page from the business world where Gin proved so successful, according to Robert Hamada, former chairman of the Flying Food Group and the estate's trustee.
'Corporations do this kind of continuing education all the time, but government agencies are often unable to prioritize this kind of investment,' Hamada said in a news release.
rchannick@chicagotribune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
44 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Los Angeles Remains Under Curfew as Protests Spread
Protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles have spread to other US cities, including New York, Chicago, and Milwaukee, with clashes between protesters and law enforcement. LA was under a curfew Tuesday as tensions remain high and the city tries to stop acts of vandalism and looting. (Source: Bloomberg)
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
A scam that targeted elderly victims collected more than $11 million. An Arcadia woman pleaded guilty
A San Gabriel Valley woman pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering on Tuesday for her involvement in a scheme that garnered more than $11 million from as many as 180 victims across the United States. Cynthia Song, 43, from Arcadia was arrested in October 2024 by federal authorities and has been in federal custody since, according to a release by the U.S. Department of Justice. For a little under two years, Song worked with a network of co-conspirators to target mainly elderly victims and scam them into sending money to multiple bank accounts in the Los Angeles area, according to authorities. The co-conspirators who contacted the victims worked overseas, impersonating government officials, law enforcement and customer support services. The posers tricked victims with fake threats, like demanding payments to avoid legal consequences and potential computer issues, according to the Department of Justice. The money was sent to bank accounts in the Los Angeles area, controlled by Song and other conspirators she had recruited. It was then immediately sent overseas — mainly to China, the release said. More than 180 victims sent funds to these bank accounts. The payments demanded from victims ranged from $1,000 to $400,000. Once the money was sent overseas, it could not be recovered even after the victim reported the fraud to authorities, according to prosecutors. To take part in the money laundering ring, the release said that Song recruited around 15 people living in the Los Angeles area, mostly of Chinese descent and some who were in the country unlawfully. The recruits were tasked with creating business entities and opening bank accounts, as well as transferring victim payments. Song also trained the recruits to deceive banks from uncovering the fraudulent accounts, according to the release. Documentation from the victims taken by the scammers was used to provide faulty verification for the 'large and suspicious wire transfers from victims,' the release said. Song and others participating in the scheme took around 5% to 10% of the payments received, before the money was sent overseas, according to prosecutors. Song's next court hearing is scheduled for Sept. 16, when she faces a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years and must pay restitution to her victims, according to the release. Homeland Security Investigations and IRS Criminal Investigations were investigating the case, the release said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside the murky case of the Chinese ‘bioterrorists'
A plot of some kind is afoot. It is August 12 2022 and Yunqing Jian, a young Chinese plant scientist, is flying from Seoul to San Francisco. But she has a problem. She is apparently carrying contraband – seeds she needs to smuggle through customs. She sends a worried message on the Chinese social media platform WeChat to her boyfriend, Zongong Liu, with whom she had studied plant diseases at Zhejiang University in eastern China. Mr Liu is calm but practical. He warns that 'teacher Liang's seeds must be placed well' and reminds her she will have to pass through security again after picking up her bags. Ms Jian is anxious. She considers hiding the seeds in her shoes, but cannot remove the insole, according to a 'condensed' and 'machine-translated' transcript provided by the FBI. Eventually, they hit on a solution: Ms Jian stuffs the seeds into a tiny zip-lock bag and hides them in her Dr Martens, slipping through airport security undetected. What the seeds were, no one seems to know. Nor would anyone have found out had Mr Liu allegedly not been more careless on his own trip from Shanghai to Detroit last July. Following a routine search, US agents discovered a sheet of filter paper and four small resealable plastic bags concealed in a wad of tissue tucked into a hidden pocket of his backpack. This time, US investigators were able to make a positive identification. Mr Liu was allegedly carrying Fusarium graminearum, a highly destructive fungal pathogen responsible for billions of dollars in agricultural losses every year. The 'toxic' fungus, the FBI said, was 'a potential agroterrorism weapon'. Mr Liu was deported. Last week, after an 11-month investigation, the FBI arrested Ms Jian, who has been working as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Michigan. Citing evidence that she had taken an oath of allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the FBI hinted at possible state backing. The case deepened on Sunday when US authorities arrested another Chinese researcher, Chengxuan Han, upon arrival at Detroit airport. She is suspected of sending four shipments of 'concealed biological material' to the same Michigan lab where Ms Jian worked. Federal officials were quick to allege a broader conspiracy to harm the United States. 'The alleged actions of these Chinese nationals, including a loyal member of the Chinese Communist Party, are of the gravest national security concerns,' said Jerome Gorgon, US attorney for Michigan's eastern district. 'These two aliens have been charged with smuggling a fungus that has been described as a 'potential agroterrorism weapon' into the heartland of America, where they apparently intended to use a University of Michigan laboratory to further their scheme.' Some senior figures in the Trump administration echoed the alarm. Kash Patel, the FBI director who has courted controversy for promoting conspiracy theories, wrote on X: 'This case is a sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply… putting American lives and our economy at serious risk.' Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, praised the investigation and vowed to protect 'our nation from hostile foreign actors who would do us harm.' But not everyone in the scientific community is convinced the case is as clear-cut as investigators and politicians claim. It is possible, they say, that Ms Jian and Mr Liu were undercover operatives on a mission to harm US interests. However, it is just as plausible that they were simply a pair of earnest, slightly nerdy researchers engaged in irregular but ultimately harmless research who foolishly tried to skirt American bureaucracy. There is no doubt that Fusarium graminearum is a dangerous pathogen. It infects cereal crops, leading to shrivelled grains and yield loss. In some cases, it can make livestock and humans sick through mycotoxin contamination. Yet, as scientists point out, the fungus is already endemic in the United States – and has been for more than a century. It is also widespread in the UK and Europe. Weaponising the fungus is theoretically possible, says a senior agricultural specialist at the United Nations, who asked not to be named. Both the US and the Soviet Union once explored using a related fungus, Fusarium oxysporum, nicknamed 'Agent Green', in biowarfare targeting crops. But neither fully developed it. 'You could theoretically introduce a new strain during flowering, when cereals are most vulnerable,' he said. 'But as an act of agricultural sabotage, it wouldn't make much sense. It would be detected quickly as monitoring systems are already very stringent.' While all three Chinese scientists allegedly lied about the work they were doing and the materials they brought into the US, scientists suggest other motives for the cover-up, such as trying to bypass complex phytosanitary importation regulations. 'It seems to me this was bad judgment fuelled by scientific excitement, not agroterrorism,' Caitilyn Allen, of the University of Wisconsin, told Chemistry World, the Royal Society of Chemistry's monthly journal. She also disputed the FBI's classification of the fungus as an agroterrorism threat: 'Fusarium graminearum does not pose a national security threat.' Other elements of the FBI case are also under scrutiny. While the agency emphasised Ms Jian's apparent pledge of allegiance to the CCP, this is not unusual among Chinese researchers – it is often a bureaucratic requirement for securing state research funding. Whether the Chinese scientists were masterminds of a sinister plot or simply reckless is still unclear. Even sympathetic scientists concede their behaviour is, at times, puzzling. Ms Jian failed to tell her supervisors – or the FBI – that she was working on Fusarium graminearum isolates, some of which her boyfriend in China had provided. Mr Liu claimed he was merely visiting his girlfriend, yet the contents of his backpack suggested otherwise. Even so, scientists caution that to brand this as 'terrorism' would be a leap. Further complicating matters is the broader political climate in both countries. Chinese science is often conducted under heavy secrecy. Beijing has also fuelled international suspicion – particularly over its handling of the Covid-19 outbreak. Accusations of Chinese involvement in agricultural sabotage are not new. In 2016, four Chinese nationals were arrested in Indonesia for allegedly contaminating chilli seeds with another crop-damaging pathogen. In 2020, mystery seeds postmarked from China arrived at thousands of homes in the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, raising fears of a co-ordinated biowarfare campaign. Yet early alarm often gives way to more mundane explanations. Indonesia later convicted the Chinese nationals on visa charges, not agroterrorism. The seed packets were likely part of a marketing ploy known as a 'brushing scam'. So far, Ms Jian and Ms Han have so far only been charged with visa fraud, making false statements and smuggling, not espionage. US politics may also be playing a role. Donald Trump, the US president, has pushed to revoke visas for Chinese students as part of a wider immigration clampdown. His administration is actively seeking misconduct cases at American universities to bolster his attacks on higher education. Some fear the upshot of the case will be a greater suspicion of research and international scientific collaboration – a development, they warn, that would benefit no one. Yet a balance must be struck between the shared pursuit of research that could aid humanity and the need to protect Western food security from potential state threats, analysts say. In intelligence circles, concern is growing over the risk of biological warfare targeting agriculture, even if confirmed attacks remain rare or unproven. The US military, after all, has previously tested pathogens such as stem rust, rice blast and Agent Green with the aim of using them to destroy opium poppies in Afghanistan and coca crops in Colombia, well after the Cold War. Since the 9/11 attacks, US security agencies have warned that agriculture is a 'soft target' for bioweapons – a concern shared in the UK where the Ministry of Defence stepped up monitoring of potential bioterror threats following the BSE and foot-and-mouth outbreaks. Worryingly, as Barry Pavel and Vikram Venkatram noted in a 2021 paper for the Atlantic Council think-tank, the tools for biological sabotage are now more accessible than ever. 'Terrorist groups could use synthetic biology to craft bioweapons, using data to manufacture dangerous pathogens or modifying easily accessible pathogens to make them more virulent,' they wrote. The work the Chinese researchers were doing, then, can arguably be interpreted in two ways. Either they were modifying pathogens to increase their virulence – a theory the FBI appears to favour – or they were continuing China's century-long quest to develop resistance to Fusarium and combat a blight that has devastated cereal crops across the temperate world. Which interpretation is correct remains unclear. China has said little about the detention of the two scientists, who remain in custody. But on Tuesday evening, the Ministry of State Security – China's main intelligence agency – issued a statement that, while not directly referring to the case, seemed to offer a third explanation. It accused foreign research institutions of recruiting volunteers inside China and inducing them 'illegally to collect data on the distribution of biological species in China'. In other words, the three researchers may not have been Chinese agents or naive rule-breakers – but perhaps something altogether more startling: covert operatives working for the United States. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
