logo
Letters: The Tribune Editorial Board is correct about the gutting of degree programs at Indiana University

Letters: The Tribune Editorial Board is correct about the gutting of degree programs at Indiana University

Chicago Tribune11-07-2025
Thank you for your editorial on the gutting of degree programs at Indiana's public universities ('Indiana University, Ball State and Purdue are gutted without logic or thought,' July 7). As a professor at Indiana University Bloomington as well as an IU parent, it hits close to home. My only quibble is that 'carnage' may underestimate the damage caused by the cuts.
Gov. Mike Braun claimed that streamlining degree offerings 'will help students make more informed decisions about the degree they want to pursue and ensure there is a direct connection between the skills students are gaining through higher education and the skills they need most.' However, the reduction of degree programs was not based on skills: There was no discussion or analysis of the skills taught in any of the programs, nor any identification of 'the skills they need most.' The cuts were by the numbers and on such a rushed schedule that there was no time (or provision) for discussing the relationships linking skills, degrees and jobs.
Nor was there any explanation for the numbers chosen as thresholds for eliminating degree programs. Even worse: The numbers are one-size-fits-all, which means that they apply equally to the large flagship campuses and to the small regional campuses. If IU Bloomington, with more than 46,000 students, cannot meet the thresholds and has to eliminate or consolidate 116 degree programs, and IU Indianapolis (with more than 20,000 students) has to cut 50 programs, how much more will the university's five smaller, regional campuses, whose enrollments are fewer than 5,000 students and which serve many low-income and rural students, be hit?
The reduction of programs is, in effect, a reduction of opportunities that will disproportionately affect students from low-income and rural backgrounds.
Many of the programs being eliminated are housed within liberal arts schools. At IU Bloomington, the motto of the College of Arts & Sciences is: 'Question critically, think logically, communicate clearly, act creatively, live ethically.' My colleagues and I take pride in teaching students transferrable skills that will help them navigate a job market that artificial intelligence is changing by the minute. However, Indiana's Republican-dominated legislature is squelching these skills in the name of promoting 'workforce-ready skills' at the college and high school levels alike.
Younger generations are being prepared to be worker bees — for jobs that are disappearing. In the end, it's not just the students who lose with these cuts. The whole state does.The Tribune Editorial Board believes that, in protesting the Indiana University cuts, it is helping. However, the inaccurate reporting is hurting more than helping. I teach in the Art History Department at Indiana University in Bloomington. Despite what the editorial states, art history is not 'dead' at IU, nor is a commitment to consolidate or merge synonymous with 'dead,' as the editorial implies. Rather, 'consolidate or merge' means precisely what it says. Discussions are underway to consolidate the art history degree with one or more other degree programs. We are very much still in business.
Unfortunately, because of such irresponsible reporting, we are getting queries from across the U.S. and indeed the world that simply assume our demise. Recommendation letter writers think that they no longer need to send requested letters (they do); students believe they are no longer enrolled in their degree program (they are); and so on.
Despite our department being mentioned in the editorial, neither I nor, as far as I know, any of my colleagues were contacted to comment or to confirm or deny the editorial board's claims. Please feel free to contact us in order to bring more accuracy to your reporting.Thank you for your incisive editorial concerning the Indiana Commission for Higher Education (ICHE) destruction of its state university system.
I graduated from Indiana University in 1986. My four years there opened my eyes to other worlds, people and even areas of study I had never heard of before. Had I wished to, I could have studied and received a degree in Uralic and Altaic languages or folklore.
While I did take some philosophy classes, my major was history after I briefly dabbled in political science. You may wonder if anything I learned is directly applicable to my present life. The answer is none and everything. Studying something you are not familiar with may not be useful in your life or your job, but it will change the way you view the world, other people and cultures.
I can safely state that nothing I learned in three years of law school was ever directly applied to my career as a personal injury lawyer, yet the education I received in the alleged 'soft sciences' of history and philosophy is something I use daily in my interpersonal interactions, assessments of situations and people, and evaluations of situations.
The short-sighted destruction of 'nonpractical' degree programs only increases the territorial small-mindedness that universities have attempted to modify for years.
While the ersatz motto of the fictional Faber College in the movie 'Animal House' — 'Knowledge is Good' — is intended tongue-in-cheek, I would argue lack of knowledge is emphatically not good. Not for people, not for society and not for open minds.
Shame on Indiana.I'm writing in response to the July 4 article about paratransit services ('At odds over paratransit services,' July 4) and would like to broaden the topic of the challenges faced by those with disabilities. In 'To Kill a Mockingbird,' Atticus Finch teaches his daughter, Scout, about empathy. 'You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view … until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.' In my case, I would ask you to roll around in mine.
I use a wheelchair and have for many years. I applaud the important advances in accessibility over the last 34 years, which we will celebrate on National Disability Independence Day on July 26. There is, however, more work to be done to enable those with physical disabilities to participate fully in society. Many of the barriers are unseen by most people. It's only when you're faced with them that they become clear as day.
From my personal experience, I sometimes find restaurants or other places of business are about 80% there. That's to be commended. However, most people would not drive over a bridge that spanned only 80% across a river.
Here are just a few examples of partial accessibility. I have used a ramp only to find there is no electronic door opener, which prevents entry. Or, if there is an opener, there are other doors within the building that I cannot open. I also find tables and chairs so close together, I am unable to maneuver my wheelchair. Bathrooms can be especially challenging — 'handicap accessible' means more than a grab bar in a stall. I could go on.
I know everyone has good intentions, and nobody creates these problems on purpose. They just need better data.
I have two suggestions: Ask customers with disabilities to provide feedback on their experience at a restaurant or hotel. Better yet, invite people with disabilities to provide input during the design phase of a building. There are people with disabilities who stay home because they find going out too difficult. That's a shame. We can do better.
Moreover, improving accessibility will benefit customers and boost business. It would be a win-win situation. It's time to listen to Atticus.In his letter ('We need AI therapy,' July 6), Slingshot AI co-founder Daniel Cahn makes the case for therapy by artificial intelligence. The problem is that therapy is not solely about saying, 'Do this and don't do that.' The emotional connection between therapist and patient is integral to the process.
AI represents an inherent loss to the patient, as he or she is exploring intimate issues with a machine. One could argue that AI therapy is better than no therapy. I see that in the same light that I see arguments for AI lovers. I can't imagine that either is particularly satisfying.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mikie Sherrill dodges again on Mamdani, drawing fire from Ciattarelli and GOP
Mikie Sherrill dodges again on Mamdani, drawing fire from Ciattarelli and GOP

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Mikie Sherrill dodges again on Mamdani, drawing fire from Ciattarelli and GOP

Democrat New Jersey gubernatorial hopeful Mikie Sherrill once again sidestepped questions about whether she will go across the Hudson River to endorse socialist Zohran Mamdani's mayoral candidacy, despite previously expressing interest in him. 'Look, I haven't weighed in, I haven't made endorsements in New York because I'm running in New Jersey,' Sherrill told PIX11 News on Friday. Two days after the New York City mayoral primary, Sherrill had a different tune, telling NBC 10 Philadelphia that she assumed she would back him and voiced interest in his plans to 'deliver efficient government.' Democrats in New York and the tri-state area have scrambled over how to navigate Mamdani's shock win over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) last month, given his far-left agenda. Top leaders such as Gov. Kathy Hochul (D), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) have refrained from endorsing Mamdani — for now. 3 Mikie Sherrill has echoed the strategy of top New York Democrats in evading questions about Zohran Mamdani. REUTERS 3 Zohran Mamdani has struggled to win support from establishment Democrats. Andrew Schwartz / Republicans have seized their silence and sought to use Mamdani's victory to help boost their otherwise dim prospects in the off-year elections. New Jersey Republican gubernatorial contender Jack Ciattarelli quickly ripped into Sherrill for sidestepping on Mamdani and highlighted how she expressed interest in him shortly after he won the Democratic primary during a June 26 interview. 'First Mikie Sherrill endorses Zohran Mamdani and calls his radical policies 'interesting'… now she's pretending she never heard of him? Come on, Mikie — NJ voters aren't stupid,' Ciattarelli chided on X. 'Roll the tape. You said it. You own it,' he added with a compilation of Sherrill's responses to questions about Mamdani. The Republican Governors Association also blasted Sherrill. 'New York's failures become New Jersey's problems,' the RGA swiped. '[Mikie Sherrill] said she'd support Mamdani saying, 'If he's the Democratic candidate, which it sounds like he is, I assume I will.' Now, she's acting like she doesn't know him,' the GOP group said on X. Mamdani is the favorite to win the Big Apple mayoral primary, though he still faces general election competition from Mayor Adams, Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa. Sherrill, a former Navy pilot who rode the blue wave to Congress in 2018, has sought to portray herself as a moderate Democrat. She first arrived in the House in 2019 with fellow national security buffs Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) and former Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), who is the favorite in the Virginia gubernatorial primary. All three women had fashioned themselves as centrists and touted their national security backgrounds. 'I will tell you here, people are deeply concerned about the affordability that I've laid out,' she added to PIX11 News, after evading a question on Mamdani. 'They want to see the plans and policies that are going to make a difference and [have] a sense that what Trenton is doing in the entrenched interests there and the regulations and the red tape and the bureaucracy are not delivering for them.' 3 Republican Jack Ciattarelli is facing an uphill battle against Mikie Sherrill, though polls underestimated him during the last gubernatorial contest. AP Ciattarelli lost to outgoing New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) by a measly three points in 2021, and President Trump lost the Garden State by about six points in 2024, indicating that Republicans can be competitive in the Democratic stronghold state. The off-year election in New Jersey, alongside the elections in New York City and Virginia, are widely seen as bellwethers that could be harbingers of what's to come in the 2026 midterm cycles.

Calif., Illinois may fight new Texas congressional maps with their own
Calif., Illinois may fight new Texas congressional maps with their own

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Calif., Illinois may fight new Texas congressional maps with their own

1 of 2 | California Gov. Gavin Newsom says he may seek to change his state's congressional maps if Texas redraws its borders. File photo by Jonathan Alcorn/UPI | License Photo July 26 (UPI) -- As the Texas Legislature plans to redraw congressional maps in an effort to increase Republican members in the U.S. House, the governors of California and Illinois may devise their own new borders. Traditionally, the boundaries are changed every 10 years with the latest U.S. Census data but Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has called a special legislative session after pressure from the White House to preserve the GOP majority in the U.S. House. President Donald Trump believes an additional five seats could be created by changing the borders. Of the state's 38 districts, 25 are held by Republicans. Democrats hold seats in big cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, Laredo, McAllen, San Antonio. Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, Republicans hold a 219-212 advantage in the House with four vacancies -- three Democrats who died and one Republican who resigned this week. More than a dozen Texas House members flew to Illinois and California -- two blue states -- on Friday for a meeting with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzkeper, during which they revealed their intentions. "Donald Trump called up Governor Abbott for one simple reason: to rig the 2026 elections. California's moral high ground means nothing if we're powerless because of it," Newsom said after meeting with Democrats from the Texas House. "This moment requires us to be prepared to fight fire with fire. Whether that's a special election, a ballot initiative, a bill, a fight in court. If they proceed in Texas, we will be ready." "This is not a bluff. This is real, and trust me, it's more real after listening to these leaders today, how existential this is," Newsom said. As the most populous state in the nation, California has 43 Democratic members of the house and nine Republican members, while Illinois is represented by 14 Democrats and three Republicans. "Everything is on the table," Pritzer said. The Illinois governor said he doesn't want to redraw the maps but "if they're going to take this drastic action, then we might also take drastic action to respond." "We want the country to understand [that] what's going on in Texas is a national battle," State Rep. Richard Pena Raymond, a Democrat from Laredo, said. Raymond told Pritzner that redistricting is "clearly aimed at affecting the entire country." Responsibility for determining Congressional district maps differs from state to state. In California, an independent commission approved by voters in 2010 works on the maps. Illinois maps, on the other hand, are put together by the state lawmakers have been drawn strongly to favor the Democrat Party in the state. Newsom said he is considering having a referendum to change the rules before the 2026 election, unless the Legislature comes up with another solution, which would take two-thirds of legislators voting in favor of. "We have to fight fire with fire," Newsom said. Other states Two other Democratic governors are considering new maps -- Phil Murphy in New Jersey and Kathy Hochul in New York. "There's other states that are violating the rules," Hochul said during a news conference on Thursday. "I'm going to look at it closely with Hakeem Jeffries," a New York member of the House, as well has House minority leader. In New York, Democrats have a 19-7 advantage as a result of their districting maps. "It's deplorable," Murphy said during an interview at the summer meeting of the bipartisan National Governors Association in Colorado Springs. "If they're going to play these games, we're going to have to be just as aggressive. We can't bring a knife to a gunfight." Democrats hold nine of the 12 seats in New Jersey. In Florida, the state Supreme Court on July 17 upheld its newest congressional map. He said he believes the state had been "malappropriated" and redistricting "would be appropriate" in a few years. Florida's congressional delegation is controlled by Republicans, 20-8. In Ohio, legislators are required to redraw maps before 2026. The GOP has 10 of the 15 seats. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis is against redistricting more frequently. The state's maps are overseen by an independent commission and it's eight U.S. House seats are evenly split 4-4. Texas situation Texas last redrew its borders in mid-cycle in 2003 after the GOP gained control of both chambers for the first time since Reconstruction. In Texas, Abbott noted a July 7 letter from the Justice Department that said majority Black and Hispanic districts in Dallas need to be redrawn based on a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit last year. The DOJ said those districts are "unconstitutional racial gerrymanders," but Abbott argued the opposite in 2021. In federal court in El Paso, he argued race had not been taken into account there. "We are no longer compelled to have coalition districts," Abbott said in an interview with KDFW in Dallas. U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, a San Antonio Democrat, appeared at a state House hearing. "That's what's at stake here, whether you all are going to work for the people of Texas, as we used to do, to try to do, or whether you take your commandments from Donald Trump and the White House," Castro said. "I hope that you all will choose to do the business of the people of Texas, as this body has a history of being independent from the federal government."

Democrats desperately look for a redistricting edge in California, New York and Maryland
Democrats desperately look for a redistricting edge in California, New York and Maryland

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Democrats desperately look for a redistricting edge in California, New York and Maryland

Hochul's political allies believe there is little upside to drawing new lines. 'I understand those in New York who are watching what's happening in Texas and Ohio want to offset their unfair advantage,' said New York Democratic Chair Jay Jacobs. But 'the constitution seems pretty clear that this redistricting process should be done every 10 years. I don't know where someone could interpret it as something you can do every two years.' Beyond Texas, Republicans have their eye on picking up seats in other states like Missouri and Florida — which would put Democrats in a tough spot, given they don't have as much leeway to squeeze out extra seats. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy was noncommittal when asked by reporters earlier this week if he plans to pursue redistricting, noting that it's 'too early to make any definitive statement about it.' But he echoed what many other Democrats across the country have said when talking about the possibility of early redistricting: 'Never bring a knife to a gunfight.' New Jersey has its own constitutional impediment, which states that congressional districts, which are drawn by an independent commission, 'shall remain unaltered through the next year ending in zero in which a federal census for this State is taken.' Even if they were able to circumvent the state constitution, Democrats already have the majority in the New Jersey congressional delegation, and just two seats — the 7th, held by Republican Rep. Tom Kean Jr., and the 9th, held by Democratic Rep. Nellie Pou — are considered battlegrounds. Even some other Hail Mary options seem off the table. State lawmakers in Washington, Minnesota and Colorado balked at the suggestion they should pursue drawing new maps in the next few months. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, accompanied by several members of the Texas state Legislature, calls for a new way for California to redraw it's voting districts during a news conference In Sacramento, Calif., Friday July 25, 2025. | Rich Pedroncelli/AP 'It's just not in the cards,' said Washington House Majority Leader Joe Fitzgibbon, citing the requirement that a two-thirds majority is needed in both the state House and Senate to reconvene the state's bipartisan redistricting commission. And Minnesota State Sen. Aric Nesbitt shut down the idea quickly: 'We're not power-crats, we're Democrats. We should do things that improve democracy, even if that means sometimes we don't get our way.' Democrats hold the governorship and state Senate in Minnesota, but Republicans narrowly control the House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store