PGG Wrightson (NZSE:PGW) shareholders have endured a 55% loss from investing in the stock three years ago
Investing in stocks inevitably means buying into some companies that perform poorly. But the last three years have been particularly tough on longer term PGG Wrightson Limited (NZSE:PGW) shareholders. Sadly for them, the share price is down 60% in that time. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 13% in the last 90 days.
Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns.
We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free.
To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.
During the three years that the share price fell, PGG Wrightson's earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 39% each year. This fall in the EPS is worse than the 26% compound annual share price fall. This suggests that the market retains some optimism around long term earnings stability, despite past EPS declines.
The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
Dive deeper into PGG Wrightson's key metrics by checking this interactive graph of PGG Wrightson's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, PGG Wrightson's TSR for the last 3 years was -55%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!
It's good to see that PGG Wrightson has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 16% in the last twelve months. Of course, that includes the dividend. There's no doubt those recent returns are much better than the TSR loss of 1.4% per year over five years. This makes us a little wary, but the business might have turned around its fortunes. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for PGG Wrightson you should be aware of, and 2 of them shouldn't be ignored.
Of course PGG Wrightson may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on New Zealander exchanges.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk backs Warren Buffett's proposal to ‘end the deficit in 5 minutes' as the bold idea gains steam again
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. The U.S. government has been running budget deficits for years — consistently spending more than it collects. And while neither party has managed to rein in the red ink, legendary investor Warren Buffett once offered a surprisingly simple fix. "I could end the deficit in five minutes,' Buffett told CNBC's Becky Quick in a 2011 interview. 'You just pass a law that says that any time there's a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election.' Now, that old clip is going viral again — and it's gaining fresh support in high places. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) Utah Senator Mike Lee reposted the video on X, asking the public, 'Would you support this amendment?' The question sparked a wave of responses, including one from Tesla CEO and X owner Elon Musk, who replied: '100%. This is the way.' But Lee isn't just crowdsourcing opinions — he's trying to turn the idea into a reality. 'I'm drafting a constitutional amendment to oust every member of Congress whenever inflation exceeds 3%. It's better to disqualify politicians than for an entire nation to suffer under the yoke of inflation,' he wrote on X. While Lee referenced both inflation and deficits, the logic echoes Buffett's frustration: tying lawmakers' job security to the nation's fiscal health. Economists have long noted a connection between excessive government spending and inflation. The late Nobel Prize–winning economist Milton Friedman once famously said, 'What produces [inflation] is too much government spending and too much government creation of money and nothing else,' adding, 'Only Washington can create money.' But enshrining that accountability into law — especially one that threatens every member of Congress with job loss — is a heavy lift. Buffett's threshold was a deficit of more than 3% of GDP. In fiscal 2024, the U.S. economy generated $28.83 trillion in GDP, while the federal government spent $6.75 trillion and collected $4.92 trillion in revenue. That left a $1.83 trillion deficit — or 6.3% of GDP. By Buffett's rule, every sitting member of Congress would be out — and many X users were quick to point that out. 'The only problem is that the people we are suggesting be fired are the ones who get to vote on that. And they're never going to vote for their own cancellation,' X user Lorrie Ann wrote. 'This is why we need term limits and why they won't even entertain the idea!' While the odds of implementing Buffett's fix to solve America's deficit problem are slim, there are plenty of tactics you can use to improve your own fiscal health — and in this case, your vote is the only one that counts. Here are a few ways to avoid running a deficit — and start building a personal surplus — in 2025 and beyond. If you want to improve your finances, the first step is understanding where your money goes each month. Track all your expenses for 30 days, then sort them into two categories: necessities — like rent, groceries, utilities and health care — and discretionary spending, such as dining out, entertainment, shopping and hobbies. This breakdown gives you a clear picture of your spending habits and helps identify areas where you can cut back. But trimming waste isn't just about skipping lattes or takeout. Even in essential categories, you may be spending more than you need to. The good news? With a bit of research, those costs can often be significantly reduced. For instance, car insurance is a major recurring expense, and many people overpay without realizing it. According to Forbes, the average cost of full-coverage car insurance is $2,149 per year (or $179 per month). However, rates can vary widely depending on your state, driving history and vehicle type, and you could be paying more than necessary. By using you can easily compare quotes from multiple insurers, such as Progressive, Allstate and GEICO, to ensure you're getting the best deal. In just two minutes, you could find rates as low as $29 per month. Meanwhile, home insurance is another major expense where smart shoppers can save big. With OfficialHomeInsurance, comparing home insurance rates is fast and hassle-free. Just enter a few basic details and the platform will instantly sort through over 200 insurers to find you the best deals available in your area. You'll be able to review all your offers in one place, and quickly find the coverage you need for the lowest possible cost, saving an average of $482 a year. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — Trimming expenses is one way to create a surplus — but boosting income can be just as powerful. And while asking for a raise doesn't always lead to results, there are ways to earn money without clocking in extra hours. That's where passive income comes in: money that keeps flowing with minimal day-to-day effort. One of the most popular ways to tap into passive income potential is through real estate. When you own a rental property, tenants pay you rent each month — providing a steady stream of cash flow. It's also a time-tested hedge against inflation, since both property values and rental income tend to rise along with the cost of living. Of course, purchasing a property requires significant capital — and finding the right tenant takes time and effort. But thanks to new investment platforms like Arrived, you don't need to own a property outright to gain exposure to real estate. Backed by world class investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived allows you to invest in shares of rental homes with as little as $100, all without the hassle of mowing lawns, fixing leaky faucets or handling difficult tenants. The process is simple: Browse a curated selection of homes that have been vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Once you find a property you like, select the number of shares you'd like to purchase, and then sit back as you start receiving positive rental income distributions from your investment. Another option is Homeshares, which gives accredited investors access to the $35 trillion U.S. home equity market — a space that's historically been the exclusive playground of institutional investors. With a minimum investment of $25,000, investors can gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning or managing property. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, this approach provides an effective, hands-off way to invest in owner-occupied residential properties across regional markets. JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late) Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among America's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now Access to this $22.5 trillion asset class has traditionally been limited to elite investors — until now. Here's how to become the landlord of Walmart or Whole Foods without lifting a finger This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Is Throwing Money at This Company Before He Retires — Should You Do the Same?
Warren Buffett's decades-long reign as the country's premier investing guru is sunsetting, but Berkshire Hathaway's SEC filings show that the Oracle of Omaha has made some surprising portfolio moves as his impending 2025 retirement draws near. With opportunities to follow the lead of history's most successful value investor dwindling, should you take advantage of what might be your last chance to parrot Warren Buffett's trades? Keep reading to find out. Check Out: Read Next: Berkshire Hathaway's most recent 13F filing revealed that Buffett completely exited his position in two stocks and thinned another by nearly half: Formula One (FWONK): -48% Citigroup (C): -100% Nu Holdings (NU): -100% While dramatic, the Formula One halving didn't make as many waves as Buffett's complete offloading of Citigroup and Nu. His decision to abandon Citigroup altogether is interesting because, despite Buffett being a die-hard advocate for long-term, buy-and-hold investing, he first purchased the stock only in 2022. However, his relatively short time in the position paid off in spades — Citigroup gained about 41% during its short stint in the Berkshire portfolio. His dumping of NU is noteworthy because, according to Fortune, the Latin American bank exposed Buffett — a passionate crypto skeptic — to Bitcoin, which the Oracle once derided as 'rat poison.' Learn More: Buffett didn't add any new holdings to Berkshire's portfolio, but he did grow several existing positions. Most notably, he more than doubled up on: Constellation Brands (STZ): +114% Pool Corporation (POOL): +145% According to Entrepreneur, Buffett's affection for Constellation is par for the Buffett course, as it checks many of the value investor's long-standing boxes — long-term growth potential, strong fundamentals and a reliable customer base. However, it was Buffett's choice to increase his POOL holdings by a multiplier of nearly one and a half that grabbed the most headlines. Pool Corp. is the world's largest wholesaler of swimming pool products, and Buffett's growing affection for the company is making a splash — and it's easy to see why. Had you invested in POOL when it went public in 1995, you would have enjoyed returns of more than 33,400%. While off from its December 2021 high of $563 (it's trading at around $309 as of June 4), Buffett is, as always, looking forward to its future potential, not back to its past performance. While only you and your investment advisor know if POOL is a good match for your portfolio, The Value Investor writes that the company is a perfect match for Buffett's investment philosophy because it: Is an industry leader with a dominant market position Has consistently strong cash flow Regularly reports high revenue and solid margins, and maintains overall attractive financials Has a resilient business model Is strategically and consistently growing, expanding, investing in technology and acquiring subsidiaries More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy These 10 Used Cars Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle This article originally appeared on Warren Buffett Is Throwing Money at This Company Before He Retires — Should You Do the Same? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Said Apple's Steve Jobs Asked, What Should We Do With 'All This Cash'? — Then Did Nothing That Buffett Told Him What to Do
Long before Warren Buffett became one of Apple's (NASDAQ:APPL) biggest shareholders, he had a rare one-on-one with the company's legendary co-founder—and offered up a piece of financial advice Steve Jobs simply... ignored. In a 2012 interview with CNBC, Buffett shared a surprising weekend phone call he received "one Saturday" from Jobs himself. The Apple CEO opened with a now-iconic question: "We've got all this cash. What should we do with it?" Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Buffett, never short on ideas when it comes to cash, walked Jobs through the standard playbook. "There's only four things you could do," Buffett told CNBC. "Stock buybacks, dividends, acquisitions... and sitting with it." Jobs ruled out acquisitions. He wasn't interested. Buffett then pivoted to buybacks. "I would use it for repurchases if I thought my stock was undervalued," Buffett said he told Jobs. "How do you feel about that?" Jobs didn't hesitate. "I think our stock's really undervalued," he replied. It was trading around $200. Buffett's follow-up was blunt: "Well, you know, what better can you do with your money?" Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . But Jobs didn't act. "He didn't do anything," Buffett said. "He just liked having the cash." Buffett later learned Jobs had apparently told others that Buffett agreed with doing nothing. "That was not the case," Buffett added with a laugh. Jobs passed away in 2011, and it wasn't until 2012 under Tim Cook's leadership that Apple began a massive buyback program. Over the next decade, Apple would go on to repurchase more than $467 billion in shares—one of the most aggressive capital return programs in corporate history. Buffett, for his part, didn't start buying Apple until Q1 2016, years after that Saturday phone call. At the time, Apple stock traded at about 10 times trailing earnings. Buffett admitted he didn't know much about iPhones, but he understood customer loyalty—and Apple had plenty of it. It paid off. By 2025, Apple is Berkshire Hathaway's largest holding, with about 300 million shares in the portfolio. Even after trimming the position in 2024, it still makes up roughly a quarter of Berkshire's equity has repeatedly praised Tim Cook's leadership. At Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE:BRK, BRK.B)) 2025 annual shareholders meeting, he stated, "I'm somewhat embarrassed to say Tim Cook has made Berkshire a lot more money than I've ever made for Berkshire." He added, "Nobody but Steve could have created Apple, but nobody but Tim could have developed it like it has." So, what happens when the Oracle of Omaha gives you advice and you ignore it? In Apple's case, things still turned out just fine. But if Jobs had listened back then, Apple might've gotten a head start on making shareholders very, very happy—with no new product launch required. Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Warren Buffett Said Apple's Steve Jobs Asked, What Should We Do With 'All This Cash'? — Then Did Nothing That Buffett Told Him What to Do originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
