Harvard battles Trump administration in court over $2.6bn funding cut
US district judge Allison Burroughs heard arguments from both sides in Boston, Massachusetts, in what is known as a summary judgment in the civil case.
Harvard is arguing that while it acknowledges there have been instances of antisemitism on campus, there is no link between antisemitism and the vital medical and scientific research the university undertakes.
Instead, the Ivy League school says it is being pressured into capitulating to the government's demands, arguing that its First Amendment rights are being violated.
"This case involves the government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard," the university said in its complaint.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions."
Meanwhile, the government is arguing that the funding freeze is justified because Harvard has not sufficiently tackled antisemitism on campus.
Whilst Burroughs didn't issue a ruling at Monday's hearing, US President Donald Trump still chose to call her a "TOTAL DISASTER."
Burroughs issued an injunction in June to prevent the government from banning international students from attending the university.
He noted she ruled in favour of Harvard in the past, saying they would appeal any unfavourable outcomes.
"When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.
'Real-life consequences'
The lawsuit, originally filed in April to challenge the $2.6bn federal funding freeze, marked an escalation in Harvard's fight to maintain academic autonomy in the face of the Trump administration's demands.
In a letter to the Harvard community at the time, the university's president, Alan M Garber, said the administration's "illegal demands" would impose "unprecedented and improper control over the university".
Garber also said the administration's threats would have "stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world".
What really happened at college campuses according to Jewish students Read More »
In its complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, the university said that within hours of receiving a funding freeze, the university began receiving stop work orders which "put vital medical, scientific, technological, and other research at risk', as well as news that the government was planning to pull an additional $1bn of funding for health research.
The complaint also said the government had threatened to terminate $8.7bn in federal funding to five hospitals in Boston - "independent corporate entities" that are "not under Harvard's control", calling it an arbitrary decision.
More critically, it said that the government "has not - and cannot - identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation."
Medical research said to be in jeopardy includes improving the prospects of children who survive cancer, understanding at the molecular level how cancer spreads throughout the body, and predicting the spread of infectious disease outbreaks.
The court case is the latest chapter of the tussle between Harvard University and the government.
The university is also taking the government to court after it revoked the institution's ability to host international students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
40 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
China seeks reduction of US tariffs and tech export controls
US and Chinese officials began a second day of talks in Stockholm on Tuesday to resolve longstanding economic disputes and step back from an escalating trade war between the world's two biggest economies. The meetings may not yield immediate large breakthroughs but the two sides could agree to another 90-day extension of a tariff truce struck in mid-May. It may also pave the way for a potential meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later in the year, though Trump on Tuesday denied going out of his way to seek one. The delegations met for more than five hours on Monday at Rosenbad, the Swedish prime minister's office in central Stockholm. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was seen arriving at Rosenbad on Tuesday morning after a separate meeting with Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson. China's Vice Premier He Lifeng also arrived at the venue. Neither side made statements after the first day of talks. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration, after reaching preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from US duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks follow Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods exports to the United States, and a deal with Japan. The Financial Times reported on Monday that the United States had paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with Xi this year. Trump pushed back against suggestions he was seeking a meeting with Xi. 'This is not correct, I am not SEEKING anything! I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest!' he wrote on Truth Social. Meanwhile, in Washington, US senators from both major parties plan to introduce bills this week targeting China over its treatment of minority groups, dissidents, and Taiwan, emphasizing security and human rights, which could complicate the talks in Stockholm. Taiwan President Lai Ching-te is also set to delay an August trip his team had floated to the Trump administration that would have included stops in the United States, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday. The potential visit would have infuriated Beijing, possibly derailing the trade talks. China claims Taiwan as its own territory, a position Taiwan rejects, and denounces any show of support for Taipei from Washington. Previous US-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing US and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips, and other goods halted by the United States. Among broader economic issues, Washington complains that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, while Beijing says US national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption − a decades-long goal for US policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on US industries. China stocks ended higher on Tuesday as a new round of Sino-US trade talks continued, while the Hong Kong benchmark declined with some investors booking profits near the month-end. China's blue-chip CSI300 Index and the Shanghai Composite Index reversed morning session's losses, closing up 0.39 per cent and 0.33 per cent, respectively. Hong Kong benchmark Hang Seng dropped 0.34 per cent, while Hang Seng Tech fell 0.35 per cent. Market sentiment cooled slightly as investors awaited details from the ongoing US-China trade talks that started on Monday in Stockholm. China faces an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement; both China and US are expected to push for an extension of the trade truce. 'A truce extension would calm markets... a confrontational tone or vague outcomes could reignite fears of renewed tariffs down the line, resulting in a risk-off sentiment,' Charu Chanana, Saxo chief investment strategist, said in a note on Tuesday. Reuters
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli settlers repeat attack on Palestinian Christian village in occupied West Bank
Israeli settlers have launched an attack on the Christian village of Taybeh, east of Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank. The incursion began at dawn on Monday. They set fire to two cars owned by Palestinian residents and spray painted racist graffiti on walls in the village. 'You'll regret it later,' read one message, not clarifying what the villagers had done to earn the settlers' wrath. Once the settlers left, the Israeli military raided the village spreading further panic among residents. The campaign of settler intimidation, with Israeli army backing, coincides with the establishment of a new Israeli settlement near Taybeh in June. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Monday's attack is the second on this small Palestinian village in as many weeks. Just a fortnight earlier on 14 July, settlers set the village's historic Church of Saint George alight, along with its adjoining graveyard. That attack was severe enough to prompt rare condemnation of Israeli settlers by the American ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee. 'It's my desire to do everything possible to let the people of this peaceful village know that we will certainly insist that those who carry out acts of terror and violence in Taybeh - or anywhere - be found and be prosecuted,' he said. Living in danger 'When I saw them, I started screaming loudly,' said Taybeh resident Farid Kawneh about the latest settler attack. He told Middle East Eye that his neighbour called him just after 2am to tell him that his car was on fire. His initial thought was that the cause was a technical fault with the car but as Kawneh rushed towards it, he found a group of settlers speaking to each other in Hebrew. "They were surprised by me and ran towards the Khalleh area,' he said. 'At the sound of my shouting, a number of villagers arrived at the scene.' The earlier attack on the Church of Saint George had drawn international condemnation and visits to the village by senior Christian figures, as well as Huckabee. Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem Pierbattista Pizzaballa and Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem Theophilos III during a visit of solidarity to Taybeh on 14 July (AFP/Zain Jaafar) Harsh condemnation, even by a normally committed Christian Zionist like Huckabee, was not enough to deter further settler violence. Taybeh resident Kamal Taye also had his car set alight by the settlers. He told Middle East Eye that the village's residents felt a sense of abandonment and were living without a sense of safety. 'No one is capable of protecting us in our homeland' - Kamal Taye, resident of Taybeh "My family and I were scared because our lives were in danger," he said. He added: "My elderly mother lives with me in the house, and she was terrified. There are no elements of safety in this country under the current circumstances." Taye explained that the psychological impact of the attacks far outweighed the immediate material damage to their homes and property, as they had no idea what the settlers would do next. "No one is capable of protecting us in our homeland. We are forced to protect ourselves," Taye said. "I demand that state officials assume their responsibility to protect us and make us feel safe in our homes." Settler intimidation Taybeh is an ancient village, believed to have its origins during the Canaanite period more than 3,000 years ago. It has a predominantly Christian population of 1,340, according to the 2017 census conducted by the Palestine Central Bureau of Statistics. The area boasts abundant pastoral land and the village's residents primarily make their living raising sheep. But that abdundance has drawn the attention of settlers who have encroached on the village's territory with the backing of the Israeli military. Israeli settlers beat Palestinian-American to death, fatally shoot another Read More » Israel initially appropriated huge tracts of land surrounding the village for the construction of roads and the settlers soon followed. Small bands of settlers, known as the "Youths of the Hills" have set up outposts in the land surrounding Taybeh. These outposts include "agricultural barracks", which Palestinians cannot approach, restricting their ability to graze their animals freely. Through a mixture of intimidation of Palestinian shepherds and protection by the Israeli military, the settlers then use Taybeh's land to graze their own animals. Palestinian farmers and shepherds are subjected to other forms of routine harassment, including the burning of trees, the theft of tools, the demolition of homes and pastures, the arrest of shepherds, and the imposition of heavy fines by the Israeli authorities. The Israeli humans rights group B'Tselem and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) have documented more than 1,200 incidents of violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians in 2024 alone, an average of three attacks per day, according to an OCHA report issued in December 2024.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
British Museum justification for Israel embassy event under scrutiny after FOI response
Revelations from a Freedom of Information (FOI) request have raised questions around the British Museum's claim that it had no say in a decision to host an event for the Israeli embassy, as it 'cannot undermine' UK foreign policy. On 13 May, the museum hosted an event organised by the Israeli embassy celebrating the anniversary of Israel's 77th Independence Day. Amid mounting anger from staff, who previously told Middle East Eye that they had been kept in the dark about the event, the museum issued statements insisting that, as an arms-length body, it cannot 'deviate from or undermine the UK government's foreign policy'. But a response to an FOI request asking for documentation evidencing this requirement reveals that the museum does not hold any legal advice or policy documents to support the claim, indicating that it did have a choice about whether or not to host the event. The response states that: 'As a Public Body, all money spent by the Museum is classified as public money and some of this money is provided by the Government. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'In this context it is the responsibility of the Board and the Executive, to which the Board delegates responsibility for running the Museum, to judge how the Museum must fulfil its duty to the public'. 'This duty is not prescribed but the Trustees and the Executive are helped by guidance such as the Cabinet Office Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies', it stated. The response suggests that the museum was not obliged, or otherwise forced, to hold the Israel embassy event but rather it was a choice made by its management. British Museum set to return ancient Greek statue looted from Libya Read More » A British Museum staff member described the revelations as 'very, very embarrassing'. 'This proves once again that they've been lying to British Museum employees,' the staff member told MEE. 'The museum has to give us an explanation, but also take a clear stand now because this means we don't have to follow the UK government,' they said. 'We can at least take some steps such as refusing to lend objects to Israel or have any cultural interaction with them'. They added that some members of staff are contemplating leaving as a result of management's handling of the event. 'We're all quite disgusted. I think that's the only way to put it. And we're wondering what to expect next - is there something worse?' the staff member said. 'Actively deceived' A spokesperson for the campaign group Energy Embargo for Palestine (EEFP) said that the revelations prove that the museum 'actively deceived' both its staff and the public, and 'purposefully lied about why it chose to host the event'. 'The insight obtained by MEE demonstrates that the museum was not forced to host the event, but that it chose to, and that the interests of the museum directorate are aligned with those celebrating and profiting from genocide - whether it's the Zionist consulate in Britain or BP, which it has a £50m sponsorship deal with,' the spokesperson added. 'We're all quite disgusted' - Member of staff at the British Museum MEE previously revealed that, as of 16 April, the museum had corresponded with the museum's sponsoring department, the Department for Culture, Media and Sports (DCMS). In response to a request for comment by MEE, the British Museum said: 'Fundamentally, this was a commercial event – and as such is different to activities or events the Museum generates or hosts itself.' According to the ex-civil servant who made the FOI request, it is irregular for a non-departmental government body to engage with its sponsoring department concerning private events or anything at the level of day-to-day operational detail. Meanwhile, a separate FOI request to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology revealed an email from Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely requesting the department's secretary of state, Peter Kyle, attend the event as the 'UK government's representative' delivering the evening's 'keynote speech'. In her email, Hotovely's framing of the event suggests it was not a corporate function but a joint effort by the UK and Israeli governments 'to highlight the strong bilateral links' and to endorse 'the existence, safety and security of the State of Israel'.
