Goldfish Swim School encourages early swim lessons to prevent drownings
AMHERST, N.Y. (WIVB) — Goldfish Swim School in Amherst is joining a global effort to raise awareness about swim safety as part of The World's Largest Swim Lesson, an annual drowning prevention event.
The school offers free lessons to local families while sharing water safety tips. General Manager Nick Patterson said starting children in swimming lessons as early as four months old is critical.
'That's why we open our doors at four months old and continue up to 12 years,' Patterson said. 'Getting kids involved in the water early means that by age one to four, they're able to swim on their own, without floaties of course, with parent supervision.'
According to Patterson, drowning is the leading cause of death among children ages 1 to 4. He said lessons can reduce the risk by 88 percent.
Instructors teach practical life-saving skills, including the 'sea otter back float,' which helps children float and breathe if they find themselves struggling in the water.
'All they need to do is roll over to their back so they can get that rescue breath and continue swimming to safety,' Patterson said.
Children are also taught how to safely exit the pool using a technique called the 'fin-fin belly flipper.'
'It's grabbing the wall with both arms, putting their belly against the wall, and guiding their leg out of the water to push them up to safety,' he said.
Beyond physical safety, Patterson said early swimming education helps build confidence in the water, especially for families where parents never learned to swim themselves.
'A lot of parents bring their kids here because they grew up scared of the water and don't want that for their children,' Patterson said.
The school also recommends parents dress their children in bright-colored swimsuits for visibility and ensure they wear a U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket near open water.
Whether heading to the pool, lake, or any body of water this summer, experts say ensuring your child can swim is one of the best ways to keep them safe.
For more information on swim classes, click here.
Gwyn Napier is a reporter who joined the News 4 team in 2025. See more of her work by clicking here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
AHS 2025
Please confirm that you would like to log out of Medscape. If you log out, you will be required to enter your username and password the next time you visit. Log out
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In unanimous decision, Supreme Court makes it easier for students with disabilities to sue schools
WASHINGTON − A unanimous Supreme Court on June 12 made it easier for families to use the Americans with Disabilities Act to sue schools for damages, ruling a lower court used too tough a standard to dismiss a lawsuit from a student with a rare form of epilepsy. Writing for the court, Chief Justice John Roberts said the student's family did not have to show the school acted in 'bad faith or gross misjudgment." That's more difficult to prove than the 'deliberate indifference' standard courts often use when weighing other types of disability discrimination claims. The court also rejected an argument from the school that would have raised the bar for all victims of disability discrimination rather than lowered it for educational instruction claims. The case, A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, was closely watched by disability rights groups. They say the courts have created a 'nearly insurmountable barrier' for schoolchildren and their families. But schools across the country worry that making lawsuits easier to win will create a more adversarial relationship between parents and schools in the difficult negotiations needed to balance a student's needs with a school's limited resources. In this case, Gina and Aaron Tharpe said they spent years asking Osseo Area School District to accommodate their daughter's severe cognitive impairment and rare form of epilepsy called Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. Her seizures are so frequent in the morning that she can't attend school before noon. A previous school in Tennessee shifted Ava's school day so it started in the afternoon and ended with evening instruction at home. But the Tharpes say the Minnesota school system, where she is currently enrolled, refused to provide the same adjustment. As a result, she received only 4.25 hours of instruction a day, about two-thirds of what nondisabled students received. When the Tharpes sued under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, lower courts dismissed the case. More: For students with disabilities, what's the difference between IEPs and 504 plans? Judges on the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said their hands were tied because of a 1982 circuit decision – Monahan v. Nebraska − that said school officials need to have acted with 'bad faith or gross misjudgment' for suits to go forward involving educational services for children with disabilities. The Tharpes 'may have established a genuine dispute about whether the district was negligent or even deliberately indifferent, but under Monahan, that's just not enough,' the appeals court said. More: Will a Texas-led legal fight over gender dysphoria threaten disabled student protections? Hundreds of district court decisions across the country have been litigated under that standard, with most of them ending in a loss for the families, according to the Tharpes' attorneys. The Justice Department backed the Tharpes' argument that there should not be a different standard for disability discrimination cases involving education. The school district's attorneys pushed the court to apply a tougher standard for all cases rather than lower the bar for cases like Ava's. But because the school district didn't make that argument until after the court agreed to take the case, the justices said they could not consider it. 'We will not entertain the District's invitation to inject into this case significant issues that have not been fully presented,' Roberts wrote for the court. Two justices said the school district raised an important issue that the court should consider in a future case. 'Whether federal courts are applying the correct legal standard is an issue of national importance, and the District has raised serious arguments that the prevailing standards are incorrect,' Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. 'That these issues are consequential is all the more reason to wait for a case in which they are squarely before us and we have the benefit of adversarial briefing.' Ava's lawyers had warned that the school's argument threatened 'to eviscerate protections for every American who endures disability discrimination – and quite possibly other kinds of discrimination too.' Roman Martinez, who represented the Tharpes, said the court's decision "gets the law exactly right, and it will help protect the reasonable accommodations needed to ensure equal opportunity for all." 'We are thrilled for Ava and her family," Martinez said in a statement. The court's action revives, but does not settle, the Tharpes' lawsuit. Attorneys for the district said the school had not shown 'deliberate indifference," the lower standard. Although the school declined to provide after-school support at Ava's home, officials said they offered other measures to accommodate her needs while 'effectively utilizing scarce resources shared among all students, including others with disabilities.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court makes it easier to sue schools in disability cases
Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
New Heart Risk Tool Reveals Hidden Ethnic Patterns
TOPLINE: The American Heart Association's Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) equations successfully identified the risk for heart problems in a group of 361,778 ethnically diverse patients. Over a mean follow-up of 8.1 years, researchers observed 22,648 cardiovascular events, with the equations showing modest variation in performance across disaggregated ethnic subgroups. METHODOLOGY: The retrospective cohort study analyzed 361,778 primary care patients aged 30-79 years across the Sutter Health system in Northern California from January 2010 to September 2023, with participants requiring at least two primary care visits during the study period. Participants were required to have several baseline data points for the PREVENT equations to evaluate, including non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, BMI, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes status, and smoking status, all while being free of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Primary outcomes included identifying CVD events, defined as total CVD, atherosclerotic CVD, and heart failure, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes, with a mean follow-up duration of 8.1 years. TAKEAWAY: Among Asian populations, C statistics for total CVD ranged from a C statistic of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77-0.81) in Filipino patients to a C statistic of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.87) in Asian Indian patients, with calibration slopes generally under 1.0, except for Asian Indian participants. Hispanic subgroups showed consistent C statistics — a measure of how well a model distinguishes between two groups — between 0.80 and 0.82 for total CVD and good predictive performance. The PREVENT equations outperformed the pooled cohort equations for predicting atherosclerotic CVD across all racial and ethnic groups and subgroups. The researchers observed small differences in the performance of PREVENT equations for atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure among racial and ethnic groups and subgroups. IN PRACTICE: 'Our results show that PREVENT equations performed well in this study cohort and similarly to the original equation development and validation cohort on the discrimination measure,' the researchers reported. 'In particular, the performance was slightly better in discriminating CVD events for Asian and Hispanic participants compared to Black or White participants in the study population. The equations slightly overestimated CVD risk for all three CVD event types in Asian and most Asian subgroups and accurately predicted CVD events among Hispanic and disaggregated Hispanic subgroups.' 'As the burden of CVD and its risk factors is forecasted to increase in the coming decades alongside rapid growth of the Asian and Hispanic populations in the US, the imperative for equitable clinical CVD prevention is more urgent than ever,' wrote Nilay S. Shah, MD, MPH, of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, in Chicago, in an editorial accompanying the journal article. 'Although best practices for clinical implementation of the PREVENT cardiovascular disease risk prediction models should be further investigated, [the new study shows] that the PREVENT equations are an important step forward for Asian and Hispanic communities that until now were unseen in CVD prevention recommendations.' SOURCE: The study was led by Xiaowei Yan, PhD, MS, MPH, of the Center for Health Systems Research at Sutter Health in Walnut Creek, California. It was published online on June 25 in JAMA Cardiology. LIMITATIONS: Despite disaggregation of Asian and Hispanic subgroups, the researchers were unable to fully examine other disaggregated groups due to small sample sizes. As a study based on data from a healthcare system, the population may be biased toward less healthy individuals compared to the general population. Almost half of eligible patients had incomplete data and were excluded from the analysis, potentially introducing selection bias. DISCLOSURES: The study received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the American Heart Association/Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development program; and the Doris Duke Foundation, as well as consulting fees from multiple organizations including Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Esperion Therapeutics, and others. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
