Drivers caught behind wheel of unroadworthy vehicles up 52% in a year
A total of 13,109 British drivers were convicted of the offence in 2024, official data obtained by the RAC revealed.
This is up from 8,614 during the previous 12 months.
The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency statistics, released in response to a freedom of information request, show the number of penalty point endorsements issued for driving vehicles with defective brakes, tyres, steering or other problems.
The offence attracts three penalty points which stay on drivers' licences for four years.
As the figures only reflect those caught, the RAC believes they represent the 'tip of the iceberg' when it comes to the number of unroadworthy vehicles being used.
RAC mobile servicing and repairs team leader Nick Mullender said: 'The steep increase in drivers receiving points on their licences for unroadworthy vehicles is a cause for alarm, as it could indicate more drivers are running the gauntlet and driving unsafe vehicles – although it's also possible more drivers are being caught by the police.
'Whether it's brakes, tyres, steering or something else, every mechanical component in a vehicle plays a critical role in ensuring it can be driven safely and confidently.
'By getting behind the wheel of vehicles that are defective, a minority of drivers are needlessly putting the law-abiding majority at serious risk.
'For every person caught there will doubtless be more who are knowingly in charge of unroadworthy vehicles that could be involved in completely avoidable collisions in the future.
'We strongly urge drivers to keep on top of routine maintenance and get any issues checked by a well-qualified mobile mechanic or reputable garage.'
Chief Superintendent Marc Clothier, part of the portfolio for roads policing at the National Police Chiefs' Council, said: 'These figures are shocking.
'If you are driving an unroadworthy vehicle with defects such as tyres or brakes, you are not only putting yourself at risk but you are putting the lives of other road users at risk too.
'Ensuring your vehicle is roadworthy and safe to drive is your responsibility and we would encourage everyone to routinely check their vehicle before getting behind the wheel.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Photos of taxi drivers in Zimbabwe showing off team colors for the Premier League soccer season
Minibus taxi drivers in the African nation of Zimbabwe gear up for the start of the Premier League soccer season by adorning their vehicles with the colors of their teams. ___ This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Teenage killer of Bhim Kohli keeps seven-year sentence at Court of Appeal
A teenage boy who killed elderly dog walker Bhim Kohli in a Leicestershire park will not have his sentence for manslaughter changed, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Mr Kohli, 80, was punched and kicked, slapped in the face with a shoe and racially abused in an attack in Franklin Park, Braunstone Town, near Leicester, on September 1 last year, and died the next day. The 15-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to seven years' custody in June. The Solicitor General (SG), Lucy Rigby, referred the sentence to the Court of Appeal under the unduly lenient sentence scheme. At a hearing on Wednesday, Lady Justice Macur, sitting alongside Mrs Justice Cutts and Mr Justice Murray, ruled that the boy's sentence was neither unduly lenient nor manifestly excessive. She said: 'We consider that the judge conscientiously executed the necessary sentencing exercise and conveyed his remarks to offender and co-defendant with great skill. 'We do not find that the sentence was unduly lenient.' Of the attempt to reduce the sentence, she said: 'The sentence was a very significant sentence and necessarily so. 'It is entirely warranted by the seriousness of the offence. It is unarguable that the sentence was manifestly excessive.' Paul Jarvis KC, for the SG, said that although the sentencing judge did not identify a high risk of death, he did say there was a high risk of very serious harm. He added: 'We say, if not unduly lenient, most certainly not manifestly excessive.' Balraj Bhatia KC, for the boy, told the court that Mr Kohli's frailty meant 'little or no force was required' to kill him. He said: 'Sadly, the vulnerability of the deceased's neck was such that had he spent a day on his beloved allotment and fallen accidentally, the result would have been the same.' The boy was convicted after a six-week trial in June at Leicester Crown Court, alongside a 13-year-old girl who also cannot be named. She encouraged the attack by filming parts of it while laughing, with video clips showing the balaclava-clad boy hitting Mr Kohli with a shoe. Another clip showed Mr Kohli lying on the ground motionless. The girl took a photograph of Mr Kohli on her phone the week before the alleged incident, but denied she used this to 'target' him, the trial heard. Police also recovered a video from her phone of a group of children 'confronting' an unknown man on a separate occasion, who was hit to the back of the head and called a 'Paki bastard' while she was heard laughing. The girl was sentenced to a three-year youth rehabilitation order by Mr Justice Turner, and her sentence was not referred to the Court of Appeal. Mr Kohli's children found him lying on the ground in agony, and he told his daughter he had been called a 'Paki' during the attack, the court heard during the trial. Jurors also heard the boy say in his evidence that he had a 'tussle' with Mr Kohli over his slider shoe before he slapped the elderly man with it out of 'instinct', which caused the pensioner to fall to his knees, but he denied kicking or punching him. In a letter written by the boy to a woman who had worked with him at the residential unit where he was being looked after, he wrote: 'I f****** hate what I did. I regret it so much. 'I have flashbacks of that day and it just upsets me. I kinda just needed anger etc releasing.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Tesla's Cybertruck could keep UK homes running for days
A Tesla could soon be used to keep the lights on in your home, or even to sell power back to the grid. Tesla cars could soon function as an effective "battery" to supply British homes with electricity as the electric vehicle (EV) maker's new energy venture also allows homeowners to sell surplus energy back to the grid. Elon Musk's company is plotting to enter the British energy market and supply households in the coming months. Tesla has sought approval for an energy licence and reportedly hopes to start supplying energy to homes and businesses in England, Scotland and Wales by next year. Tesla has been involved in the UK energy market since 2020, when it was granted a licence to be an electricity generator. How could a Tesla power a home? In the US, the group has been an electricity supplier for the past three years in Texas, where it supplies electricity via Tesla Electric. The company's "Powershare" technology means households that own one of Tesla Cybertruck models can essentially use their EV as a power source for the home. The process is referred to as V2X – vehicle-to-everything. Because of the sheer size of batteries in EVs, homeowners can effectively "store" electricity in their Tesla. When a power outage is detected, Powershare automatically provides back-up electricity for the home. The Cybertruck, for example, is capable of delivering 11.5 kilowatts of continuous power and is able to meet the energy needs of an average home for three days. The vehicle also has multiple 120V and 240V outlets, which can be used to power devices needed for, say, camping trips. Or even to turn the car into a remote workplace. Paired with other technology – such as home batteries - V2X could allow homes more control over how they buy and use electricity. Households in Texas have also been able to lower their electricity bills by powering a vehicle at night when electricity is cheap, and then using it to run home appliances during the day. What other functions might Tesla bring to the UK? Tesla Electric offers cheap, renewable energy, managed through a mobile app and is built particularly for people who own a Tesla Powerwall home battery or a Tesla vehicle. With Powerwall, consumers are encouraged to buy electricity at night and sell electricity back to the grid when prices are high – this means that the grid is more stable, and customers with Powerwalls can profit. Tesla currently offers Powerwall via energy provider Octopus in the UK. With multiple homes selling electricity to the grid, it works as a virtual power plant, which helps to support the grid at peak times. Tesla says: 'A virtual power plant (VPP) is a network of distributed energy sources such as homes with solar and battery systems, working together as a single power plant. The combined energy of these sources is used to support the electrical grid.' Tesla also sells solar panels, which can be used to top up Powerwall batteries. Declining sales across Europe The news comes amid a backdrop of waning demand for Tesla's electric vehicles across Europe in recent months. New car registrations in Britain and Germany more than halved in July from a year earlier. Some have argued Musk's political support for Donald Trump has impacted sales. However, it is also the case that competition has also increased. Sales of EVs made by China's BYD, for example, rose nearly five-fold in Germany and over four-fold in Britain in July. Nonetheless, industry figures showed an almost 60% plunge in the number of new Tesla registrations in the UK in July, compared with a year earlier. In further bad news for Musk, on 1 August a jury in Florida found Tesla liable to pay $243m (£180m) to victims of a 2019 fatal crash of an autopilot-equipped Model S. Jurors in the Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, $129m in compensatory damages plus $200m in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla has said it will appeal the decision, which could encourage more legal action against the company.
