‘Rachel from accounts' nickname gives us a bad rap, say accountants
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has earned herself the nickname 'Rachel from accounts' following claims she overstated her economist experience on her CV.
But now accountants say the nickname is giving the profession a bad name after the Chancellor's controversial high-tax Budget triggered uproar and economic decline.
The Chancellor has never been a qualified accountant, but has claimed to have spent 10 years working at the Bank of England 'as an economist', when in reality she spent less than six years on Threadneedle Street.
Accountant Rachel Harris, who runs her own business, said: 'I feel called out. I am Rachel from accounts, so I feel like my full-time job is to actually be the Rachel from accounts and make sure that Rachel Reeves doesn't leave a permanent mark on all Rachel from the accounts.'
Ms Harris, who also creates online content about accountancy, said: 'I was initially really excited to have a female chancellor, I think it's a great step for women everywhere to explore careers in politics and especially maths.
'She has had a very difficult job and, as a business owner, I have been underwhelmed and a bit disappointed. Business owners everywhere are underwhelmed and female business owners everywhere are particularly underwhelmed.
'For small business owners everywhere, this being the first big, heavy Labour Budget, it's been really disappointing. But it is important to separate that from the fact that she's a woman, because I think any Labour government would have hit in the same way.'
After promising not to increase taxes for 'working people' ahead of the election, Ms Reeves hit businesses with a £25bn National Insurance rise, which critics said would lead to job cuts and cuts to pay.
One practitioner, who works at a top 10 accountancy firm, said the nickname was 'unfair' to accountants.
He said: 'An accountant would see past the 'girl maths' of the Budget being 'free' because you tax businesses instead of people.'
The Chancellor has always rejected allegations that she had embellished her CV. In January, when asked if the nickname upset her, she told Sky News that she had 'been called worse things ... in the end, people are going to judge me on the job that I'm doing now, that I'm doing as Chancellor of the Exchequer'.
She added: 'Some people don't want me to succeed. I spend my life proving people wrong, proving that I can do stuff, that I've been underestimated.'
Rebecca Beeby, the founder of accountancy firm Altho Dai, said: 'It's definitely misogynistic, the stereotype around accountants is women will have the more junior jobs and we have to push harder for our voices to be heard.
'As a profession, calling us 'accounts' is pretty old-fashioned, modern accountants and finance teams lead business decision-making and drive them forward, we're so much more than the bean counters we used to be seen as.'
In 2021, Ms Reeves said in a magazine interview that she had spent a decade working at the Bank of England. She reiterated the claims in a speech at the Labour Party business conference in 2024, saying: 'I spent the best part of a decade as an economist at the Bank of England.'
An online profile on career website LinkedIn said that Ms Reeves worked at the Bank of England as an economist between September 2000 and December 2006, across three divisions. She also spent almost a year studying for a Master's degree at the London School of Economics.
It also stated that she had worked at Halifax between December 2006 and December 2009.
But she actually began working at Halifax in the spring of 2006, the BBC has reported, meaning that the time spent at the Bank of England amounted to less than six years.
Ms Reeves's team has previously said that the dates on her LinkedIn profile were wrong, and that the Chancellor had not seen the profile before it was published.
In 2024, following criticism of the profile's description of her role at Halifax as an 'economist', it was updated to read 'Retail Banking'.
A spokesman for the Chancellor said: 'She worked as an economist at the Bank of England between 2000 and 2006, including over a year at the British Embassy in Washington working in the economics section, and then she worked at HBOS from 2006 to 2009.
'She's proud of the jobs she did and experience she gained before becoming a Member of Parliament.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Home secretary yet to agree deal three days before spending review
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is the last minister yet to agree a funding deal with the Treasury ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review, BBC News understands. Ministers have been locked in talks with Chancellor Rachel Reeves and her team ahead of the major financial statement, which sets budgets for government departments covering the next few years. Housing and Communities Secretary Angela Rayner reached a settlement with the Treasury on Sunday evening, the BBC has learned, but Cooper is holding out, with police funding one of the contentious issues. Earlier on Sunday, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said police needed to "do their bit" towards reforming public services. Kyle told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that "every part of society was struggling" and that the chancellor was facing pressure from all departments for additional funding. He said the review would boost spending for schools and scientific research but declined to rule out a squeeze on policing. Earlier on Sunday, BBC News was told that Home Office ministers do not believe there is enough money to recruit the additional 13,000 new police and community support officers Labour promised in its manifesto. Kyle said the government had already provided an extra £1bn to the police, adding: "We are delivering investment in the police. "We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do to do their bit for change as well." Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Kyle also declined to guarantee that Rayner's housing department would be protected from budget cuts when asked about the government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the parliament. But he added: "We made a manifesto commitment. We are absolutely laser-focused on delivering that." The last-minute talks come ahead of what is set to be a highly significant week for every part of government. It is expected there will be extra money for the NHS, with reports the Department for Health will receive increased funding. But other parts of government will see their budgets squeezed as the chancellor seeks to meet her own fiscal rules, which are not to borrow to fund day-to-day spending, and for debt to be falling as a share of national income by 2029/30. Some elements of what will be included in the statement have emerged in recent days. Earlier on Sunday, the government announced an £86bn package for science and technology to help fund drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries. And on Wednesday, the chancellor unveiled a £15.6bn package to fund extensions to trams, trains and buses in Greater Manchester, the Midlands and the North East. Reeves has previously confirmed the government will revise its controversial decision to limit Winter Fuel Payments to those in receipt of means-tested benefits. While the government is expected to share some information about who will receive the payment as part of the Spending Review, full details will not be released until the Budget later in the year. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has said "relatively modest" growth rates mean "sharp trade-offs are unavoidable". Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Labour tiptoed cautiously through its first year - will it now decide to escape its own shadow?
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Time to face the harsh realities of spending orthodoxy
Labour came to power fatuously parroting the word 'change' and yet has shown itself to be the same old tax and spending party it has always been. What it meant was a change of party in office not a change of direction. Not only have taxes gone up but so-called protected spending is set to rise despite record debt levels. Yet if ever a public policy has been tested to destruction surely it is the notion that the NHS will improve if only more money is thrown at it. Even Sir Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, are on record as saying that higher health spending is not the answer to the endemic flaws in the health service and yet another £30 billion is to be announced for the next three years on top of the £22 billion handed over after last year's general election, much of which went on pay and showed nothing in the way of productivity improvement. No mainstream politician is prepared to acknowledge that the problem with the NHS is the fact it is a nationalised industry with all the inherent inefficiencies associated with such. Most other advanced economies in Europe and elsewhere have social insurance systems which work better. But the insistence in Britain of cleaving to the 1948 'founding principle' that treatment should be free at the point of delivery has become a quasi-religious doctrine that few dare challenge. Only Nigel Farage has questioned the wisdom of continuing with a system that patently fails to achieve what others manage to do but has been noticeably quiet on the subject recently because Labour will exploit it mercilessly to see off the Reform people that they will have to pay for something they have always had for free is even more difficult when political parties are prepared to see the health system get worse rather than reform it. The same is true of welfare. Taking benefits from people, even when they are payments introduced just a few years ago like the winter fuel allowance, is hard if the reasons are not explained and the issue is 'weaponised' by opponents. Yet unless the welfare budget is brought under control it will bankrupt the country. If change is to mean anything then we need politicians finally to understand the extent of the country's difficulties and make decisions accordingly. Will we see that from the Chancellor on Wednesday? Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
LONDON (Reuters) -British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These (security) issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday. Sign in to access your portfolio