
US Stock Futures Up After Federal Court Strikes Down Trump's Tariffs
President Donald Trump during his "Liberation Day" trade announcement event at the White House on ... More April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by)
A three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade ruled Trump's tariffs imposed on April 2 should be 'set aside,' siding with business groups and Democratic-led states that asked the court to strike the tariffs down as unlawful.
The judges agreed with plaintiffs' claims that Trump doesn't have authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives presidents the power to impose some sanctions during national emergencies.
IEEPA does not explicitly mention anything about tariffs, which plaintiffs argued means that Trump doesn't have authority to impose them under the law, and the trade court agreed, writing, 'Any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.'
The ruling halts Trump's tariffs on nearly every country - minus the tariffs on Mexico, China and Canada that were imposed prior to April 2 - but the White House is likely to appeal the decision, and either an appeals court or the Supreme Court could quickly put the tariffs back in effect.
U.S. stock futures surged in early trading on Thursday, with the benchmark S&P 500 Futures rising 1.5% to 5,991.50 points, while Dow Futures climbed to 42,630.00 points—up 1.1% since Wednesday's close. The tech-centric Nasdaq Futures had the biggest bump as it rose 1.9% to 21,785.25 points. Key Asian markets responded positively to the court ruling, with China's Shanghai Composite Index and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index rising 0.7% and 1.35% respectively. Japan's Nikkei 225 index and South Korea's KOSPI index both surged by nearly 1.9%.
The president has not directly commented on the ruling yet, but White House spokesperson Kush Desai told various outlets that trade deficits amount to a national emergency 'that has decimated American communities, left our workers behind, and weakened our defense industrial base — facts that the court did not dispute.' He then criticized the ruling saying: 'It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,' and the administration is prepared to use 'every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American Greatness.'
Trump's executive orders covering his 'Liberation Day' tariffs 'exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,' the three-judge panel wrote in their ruling.
Trump is all but certain to appeal the court's ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. That court could put the tariffs back into effect, as Bloomberg noted in April that court has historically been deferential to presidents when it comes to tariffs. It's likely the dispute will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court, though it's unclear how and when justices could rule on the issue. Trump could also try to impose his tariffs though other laws, but legal experts told Forbes prior to Wednesday's ruling that other laws would require Trump to go through a lengthier process to impose any tariffs.
Last month, at a White House event he deemed 'Liberation Day,' the president announced a series of sweeping levies that he described as 'reciprocal tariffs' against nearly every country, ranging from 10% to 50%. Trump argued that these tariffs were a result of the U.S.'s trade deficits with each of these countries and the purported barriers they have placed on American goods. A few days after the announcement majorly shook the stock and bond market, the president made his first of many backpedals on the matter by pausing the tariffs on every country for 90 days except China, which announced retaliatory measures, while maintaining a baseline rate of 10%. A few days later, the administration announced that some key electronic items, including smartphones and computers, would be excluded from the tariffs. While tariffs on most other nations remained paused, Washington and Beijing engaged in an escalatory tit-for-tat tariff battle, which saw a 145% tariff rate on Chinese goods entering the U.S. and China hit U.S. goods with a 125% levy. After talks in Geneva earlier this month, both countries agreed to roll back most new tariffs on each other for 90 days to allow for negotiations.
Trump Defends Tariff Flip-Flops As 'Negotiations'—Here Are The 21 Times He's Changed His Mind (Forbes)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
More Americans are driving to Canada than Canadians to the U.S., report finds
More American travellers drove to Canada in July than Canadians did to the United States, according to a new report by Statistics Canada. This is the first time such a reversal has taken place since before the COVID-19 pandemic. The dramatic decline of Canadians travelling to the U.S. was sparked last year, with U.S. President Donald Trump's heated rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state that led to an ongoing trade war and lingering tension between the two countries. The data for last month shows that 1.8 million American residents drove to Canada, compared to the 1.7 million Canadian residents who made a return trip from the U.S. by car. Canadian road trips to U.S. plunge for seventh month as boycott continues Both countries saw a decline at land border crossings last month. For Americans driving to Canada, there was a slight dip of 7.4 per cent compared to the same month last year. It was also the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year declines. However, the decline was much steeper for Canadians returning from the U.S. this July compared to the previous year, at nearly 37 per cent. Last month marked the seventh consecutive month of year-over-year declines, StatCan said. 'In 2024, Canadian-resident trips to the United States totalled 39 million, representing 75 per cent of all Canadian-resident travel abroad,' according to another StatCan report published earlier this summer about travel to the U.S. 'However, recent data on foreign travel suggest that Canadians' travel sentiment toward their southern neighbour has been shifting in early 2025.' Although the data reflects a 'notable change in travel patterns,' StatCan said it is 'unclear whether the change is temporary or part of a more permanent shift.' As for air travel, the number of non-resident visitors who flew to Canada increased in July. There were 1.4 million of them — up by just over 3 per cent since the same time last year. While the bump was largely due to residents who came from overseas (up 5.6 per cent this year), American travellers were also up by just under 1 per cent. The highest number of U.S.-resident arrivals by air was 31,600 Americans on July 3, before the Independence Day long weekend in the U.S. Meanwhile, the number of Canadians returning home from abroad by air last month was down by 5.3 per cent compared to the previous year. In particular, Canadians flying back from the U.S. also decreased by nearly 26 per cent since the same time last year. Canadian permanent residents will now have to pay 'visa integrity fee' to enter U.S. Here's what it is An American sent to Canada was shocked by how furious Canadians are at the U.S. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tim Walz Just Said What We're All Thinking About Trump's Smithsonian Plan
ABC News reports that Donald Trump is conducting a review of the Smithsonian Museum to make sure it aligns with his views of American History. Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said, "The Smithsonian is supposed to be a global symbol of American strength, culture and prestige. A place for families and children to celebrate American history and greatness. Instead, the exhibits have clearly been taken over by leftwing activists who have used the Smithsonian as yet one platform to endlessly bash America and rewrite / erase our magnificent story. These activists have obscenely defaced this beloved institution. The Trump Administration will proudly and diligently restore the patriotic glory of America and ensure the Smithsonian is a place that once more inspires love and devotion to this nation, especially among our youngest citizens." Related: Needless to say, people aren't comfortable with this audit! And now, Tim Walz's response to the news is going viral: "If you're trying to erase history, you're on the wrong side of it." Related: The comment section on his Facebook post is actually very funny... "Is he going to add planes to the revolutionary war section?" one person asked. Related: "…later this week he plans on personally surveying the museum and will be placing a McDonald's golden arches 'M' sticker of approval on every piece and or exhibit he approves of…" another person joked. And this is my personal favorite: "I'm excited for the interactive drinking bleach exhibit." Related: As this person said, "He must have read 1984 and got inspired." I guess we'll have to see what passes the Trump American history test. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court allows enforcement of Mississippi social media age verification law
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to block enforcement of a Mississippi law aimed at regulating the use of social media by children, an issue of growing national concern. The justices rejected an emergency appeal from a tech industry group that is challenging laws passed in Mississippi and other states that require social media users to verify their ages. NetChoice, which brought the lawsuit, argues the Mississippi law threatens privacy rights and unconstitutionally restricts the free expression of users of all ages. Mark Sherman, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio