US Stock Futures Up After Federal Court Strikes Down Trump's Tariffs
U.S. stock futures surged in early trading on Thursday after a federal trade court struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs and declared the president exceeded his authority by imposing them.
President Donald Trump during his "Liberation Day" trade announcement event at the White House on ... More April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by)
A three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade ruled Trump's tariffs imposed on April 2 should be 'set aside,' siding with business groups and Democratic-led states that asked the court to strike the tariffs down as unlawful.
The judges agreed with plaintiffs' claims that Trump doesn't have authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives presidents the power to impose some sanctions during national emergencies.
IEEPA does not explicitly mention anything about tariffs, which plaintiffs argued means that Trump doesn't have authority to impose them under the law, and the trade court agreed, writing, 'Any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.'
The ruling halts Trump's tariffs on nearly every country - minus the tariffs on Mexico, China and Canada that were imposed prior to April 2 - but the White House is likely to appeal the decision, and either an appeals court or the Supreme Court could quickly put the tariffs back in effect.
U.S. stock futures surged in early trading on Thursday, with the benchmark S&P 500 Futures rising 1.5% to 5,991.50 points, while Dow Futures climbed to 42,630.00 points—up 1.1% since Wednesday's close. The tech-centric Nasdaq Futures had the biggest bump as it rose 1.9% to 21,785.25 points. Key Asian markets responded positively to the court ruling, with China's Shanghai Composite Index and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index rising 0.7% and 1.35% respectively. Japan's Nikkei 225 index and South Korea's KOSPI index both surged by nearly 1.9%.
The president has not directly commented on the ruling yet, but White House spokesperson Kush Desai told various outlets that trade deficits amount to a national emergency 'that has decimated American communities, left our workers behind, and weakened our defense industrial base — facts that the court did not dispute.' He then criticized the ruling saying: 'It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,' and the administration is prepared to use 'every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American Greatness.'
Trump's executive orders covering his 'Liberation Day' tariffs 'exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,' the three-judge panel wrote in their ruling.
Trump is all but certain to appeal the court's ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. That court could put the tariffs back into effect, as Bloomberg noted in April that court has historically been deferential to presidents when it comes to tariffs. It's likely the dispute will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court, though it's unclear how and when justices could rule on the issue. Trump could also try to impose his tariffs though other laws, but legal experts told Forbes prior to Wednesday's ruling that other laws would require Trump to go through a lengthier process to impose any tariffs.
Last month, at a White House event he deemed 'Liberation Day,' the president announced a series of sweeping levies that he described as 'reciprocal tariffs' against nearly every country, ranging from 10% to 50%. Trump argued that these tariffs were a result of the U.S.'s trade deficits with each of these countries and the purported barriers they have placed on American goods. A few days after the announcement majorly shook the stock and bond market, the president made his first of many backpedals on the matter by pausing the tariffs on every country for 90 days except China, which announced retaliatory measures, while maintaining a baseline rate of 10%. A few days later, the administration announced that some key electronic items, including smartphones and computers, would be excluded from the tariffs. While tariffs on most other nations remained paused, Washington and Beijing engaged in an escalatory tit-for-tat tariff battle, which saw a 145% tariff rate on Chinese goods entering the U.S. and China hit U.S. goods with a 125% levy. After talks in Geneva earlier this month, both countries agreed to roll back most new tariffs on each other for 90 days to allow for negotiations.
Trump Defends Tariff Flip-Flops As 'Negotiations'—Here Are The 21 Times He's Changed His Mind (Forbes)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump scrambles to claim credit for Israel's Iran attack he publicly opposed
Donald Trump is walking a tightrope as he claims that he was fully aware of Israel's plans to launch massive airstrikes against Iran while continuing to distance the US from those strikes and deny Washington took any active role in the preparations. The White House's messaging has shifted quickly from Marco Rubio's arms-length description of the Israeli attack as a 'unilateral action', to Trump claiming on Friday morning that he was fully in the loop on the operation and that it came at the end of a 60-day ultimatum he had given Iran to 'make a deal' on its nuclear programme. 'Today is day 61,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'I told [Iran] what to do, but they just couldn't get there.' Trump's framing presents a good cop-bad cop dynamic of his approach with Benjamin Netanyahu, the embattled Israeli leader with whom he has a notoriously combative relationship. The US president has scrambled to now present the Israeli strikes, which he publicly claimed he did not want on Thursday, as a means of continuing his efforts to convince Iran to negotiate. 'They should now come to the table to make a deal before it's too late,' he said. Related: UK government says it gave no military support for Israel's attack on Iran But the discordant US response to the strikes, including Rubio's Thursday evening statement, a hasty evacuation of some US personnel from the region and ambiguity over whether the US provided intelligence or would actively take part in Israel's defence from a likely counterattack, has raised questions over whether Israel may have moved ahead of the Trump administration as a way to present Washington with a fait accompli. 'They made a bet on President Trump,' said Elliott Abrams, a former diplomat and senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, suggesting that Israel had pushed harder for strikes while the Trump administration had sought to maintain a diplomatic route. 'The Israelis struck and then today Trump called it 'excellent'.' While Israel had clearly given the United States advanced warning of the strike, claims that it was fully coordinated in Israeli state media have been subject to speculation: was Trump actually on board or was he repositioning himself on Friday in order to present the strikes as part of a coherent strategy. On Thursday, in remarks from the White House's East Room, Trump said that strikes on Israel could 'blow up' his diplomatic efforts to negotiate with the Iranian leadership and said he 'didn't want them going in'. He defended his decision to begin evacuating personnel because a strike 'could well happen'. 'The US started evacuating voluntarily non-essential personnel on Wednesday, barely 24 hours ahead of time, not enough time to really get people out of harm's way,' said Rosemary Kelanic, the Middle East director for Defense Priorities, a thinktank that pushes for a more restrained US foreign policy. 'So the question for me is what did the president know and when did he know it?' On Friday, Trump told the Wall Street Journal that he was not caught unaware by the strike: 'Heads-up? It wasn't a heads-up. It was, we know what's going on.' And he indicated that he had been apprised of future Israeli plans, writing that the 'next already planned attacks' would be 'even more brutal'. Senior Israeli officials also began to brief media that Trump had only pretended to oppose an Israeli attack and that they in fact had a 'green light' for the attack. But Kelanic and others noted that Israel may be seeking a means to 'entrap' the US into a war. In either case, it is doubtful that Israel could have prepared the attack in the past week without US knowledge. Officials at the Defense Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies would have seen the preparations for the airstrike – involving more than 200 Israeli fighter jets striking more than 100 targets across Iran – and probably understood that Israel was planning a major attack against Tehran. Late on Thursday, administration officials told Fox News that the US had replenished missiles for Israel's Iron Dome anti-air batteries in recent weeks in preparation for an expected counterattack. Related: Leaders at G7 summit need to challenge Trump without ganging up on him And the US in recent weeks had deployed B-52 bombers to its airbase on the remote Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, where multiple B-2 bombers have also been stationed since late March. B-2s stationed at the base took part in airstrikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen earlier this year, but the base would also serve as a launching point for airstrikes against Iran if the US were to join the conflict. But there are other explanations for the resupply of anti-air missiles to Iron Dome, particularly following the unprecedented barrage of ballistic missiles launched by Iran against Israel last year. And the US could have employed those B-2s and B-52s to strike the Fordow uranium enrichment centre, which is located deep underground and was not apparently struck in Friday morning's strikes. Still intact, it represents an important element in Iran's nuclear program that was not eliminated – at least in the first round of the Israeli attacks.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia vs Palantir: Wall Street Says Buy Only 1 of These 2 Soaring Stocks
Nvidia and Palantir, both major AI players, have soared in recent times. These companies have delivered strong earnings growth, and the future looks bright for them, too. But Wall Street predicts one of these players may see its shares decline in the coming months. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) have been two of the stock market's biggest winners over the past couple of years -- they even delivered the best performances in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500, respectively, in 2024. Investors love these stocks for their positions in the high-growth artificial intelligence (AI) market. Nvidia is the world's leading AI chip designer, and Palantir sells a popular AI-driven software platform that helps customers make better use of their data. Both of these companies have reported soaring revenue and demand, and long-term prospects look bright as well. But Wall Street only recommends buying one of these players. According to Wall Street's average price forecast, one of these stocks is expected to climb nearly 20% in the next 12 months, while the other is expected to decline by 25%. Let's take a closer look at each and then find out which one Wall Street favors right now. Nvidia is the world's AI chip leader, offering graphics processing units (GPUs) that outperform all others on the market. They're pricier than rivals, but the company says that over time, gains in efficiency result in lower total cost of ownership. So, Nvidia GPUs may actually be the least expensive option for customers if they commit to them over the long run. Nvidia hasn't had to worry about attracting customers, though. Demand for its latest architecture and chip, Blackwell, surpassed supply as the platform launched a few months ago. Blackwell delivered $11 billion in revenue during its first quarter on the market. And Nvidia's pledge to update its chips on an annual basis should keep this growth going. Of course, the AI giant faces rivals, such as Advanced Micro Devices, and even Nvidia's own customers, in some cases, have become rivals as they make their own chips. (They haven't abandoned Nvidia but are using their own chips in addition to Nvidia GPUs.) Still, there's enough demand in the growing AI market to allow Nvidia to remain on top and for others to succeed as well. Palantir's business may not seem too exciting at first: The company offers software, driven by AI, that aggregates a customer's disparate data and puts it to work. But what sounds simple or mundane is actually driving some pretty exciting results. For example, on a battlefield, it's helping the military make faster and better decisions. As for commercial use, customer Rio Tinto says Palantir's software, by accessing unstructured data, is helping it tackle problems it never thought possible. In Palantir's early days, governments were its biggest customers, but in recent times, commercial growth has taken off. Companies across sectors are rushing to Palantir's Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) to help them solve problems or implement new processes and strategies. In the latest quarter, Palantir's commercial business delivered double-digit revenue growth, and the government business has continued to do the same. So, Palantir has two high-growth businesses, and considering the company's comments about recent demand, there's reason to be optimistic about the future. The one problem with investing in Palantir is the stock's valuation. It trades for a lofty 232 times forward earnings estimates. But it's important to remember that this only considers earnings expected next year and doesn't account for the company's prospects over the long run. Now, which of these two does Wall Street recommend buying? About 30 Wall Street firms have a positive recommendation, such as buy or outperform, on Nvidia, and the average 12-month price forecast indicates a gain of 19% from the closing price on June 12. As for Palantir, nine Wall Street analysts have a neutral or negative rating on the stock, and only two -- Wedbush and Bank of America Securities -- have positive recommendations on the shares. The average price forecast implies a 25% decline for the stock over the next 12 months. So, Wall Street clearly recommends buying Nvidia over Palantir, and much of this is linked to Palantir's steep valuation. Considering all the points above, Nvidia does stand out as the better buy right now for most AI investors, especially if you're cautious or focus on value. Aggressive investors, though, may still want to add some Palantir to their holdings. The company's earnings continue to march higher, demand is strong, and the AI market is booming -- and all this may create the recipe for a long-term win for Palantir shareholders, even those who buy at today's price. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Adria Cimino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia vs Palantir: Wall Street Says Buy Only 1 of These 2 Soaring Stocks was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Made His Supporters Endure Misery To Attend His Military Parade
WASHINGTON ― It didn't rain on President Donald Trump's parade on Saturday, which his critics were hoping for. But it was still rather miserable. We were made for this moment. HuffPost will aggressively, fairly and honestly cover the Trump administration. But we need your help. . Trump threw this military parade for himself. He turned 79 on Saturday, and his gift to himself was to spend tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer money to roll tanks through the streets of D.C. It's been his unfulfilled dream since his first term, and since the Army was already planning a celebration of its 250th anniversary, Trump big-footed their plans and ordered the Pentagon to tie the Army's event to an authoritarian-style showcase of America's soldiers and weapons of war. It was a very long and uncomfortable day. The Army festival started at 11 a.m., and the parade didn't begin until 6:30 p.m. Thousands of people and families of all ages stood in long, slow-moving lines on the National Mall to get through security for the festival in oppressively humid heat. And then did it again for the parade, except this time the line went on for blocks. The result? While Trump and other VIPs sat in relative comfort, the parade attendees ― whether MAGA faithful or just military aficionados ― were thrown into an environment seemingly designed to drain their energy before the headlining events. And as the day wore on, they were increasingly surrounded by boisterous anti-Trump protesters. People could get water once inside the festival, but food was scant, save a couple of ice cream vendors and some free lollipops tossed on a table. There was barely any shade. Children still had fun, climbing inside helicopters cockpits and atop tanks where parents posed for photos with their toddlers aiming massive guns. It was crowded, but certainly not at max capacity. For all the lines to get in, it was easy to walk around. Up front, rows of chairs set up by the main stage sat empty. When it got closer to the time to head over to the parade, it wasn't clear where to go. There weren't many signs. Hours in the sun, kids were starting to melt down, and streets barricaded off to traffic were filled with thousands of out-of-towners wandering around, asking police officers for directions to a security checkpoint that was blocks away. Then the protesters showed up. They were a sharp contrast to this sluggish scene: energized, singing, dancing, blasting anti-war songs from speakers while holding up signs calling Trump a fascist. Dozens of them gathered next to a long line of people waiting to get into the parade, so attendees had to stand there as protesters shouted at them how dangerous and awful Trump was. 'TRAITOR!!!!' one demonstrator repeatedly screamed in a demonic voice through a megaphone, just feet away from parade-goers nowhere near the security checkpoint yet. If people still had stamina by this point in the evening, the sight of the blocks-long lines to get through security for the parade was enough to make some of them throw in the towel. HuffPost watched as various people and families wandered up to assess the line, talked among themselves and then walked away. 'I'm old and tired,' one middle-aged woman remarked to HuffPost, from outside the security perimeter. She said she had a ticket for the parade but was ditching it to go home. Some attendees weren't exactly there to celebrate Trump, either. They had their own reasons for coming. George Washington himself was among them. He was lying under a tree near the Army festival, in head-to-toe 18th century attire. He said he was there to celebrate Flag Day. 'Americans have regained their pride and hope in America,' said Washington, who also goes by the name James Manship. 'I love to be among patriots. It's like a family gathering.' Asked for his take on the massive 'No Kings' protests taking place nationwide that day, in defiance against Trump's authoritarian efforts, Manship said 'part of our system' is that people have a right to express themselves. But things took a turn when he compared anti-Trump protesters to British loyalists in the Revolutionary War, and then falsely claimed pro-Trump rioters were simply expressing themselves when they stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. He shared a photo of himself waving a pro-Trump flag and a U.S. flag outside of the Capitol that day. 'I saw that it was a set-up,' Manship claimed of the clash between rioters and police. 'So I said the best thing for me to do is get out of here. I said a prayer, turned and marched away.' Matthew Puit was sitting nearby on a barrier with his wife, Eliana, who was taking photos of the Capitol in the distance. They came to D.C. from Mays Landing, New Jersey, but not for the parade ― for a Washington Nationals baseball game, so they figured they'd visit the Army festival, too. 'It's part of history,' said Eliana, who requested using only her first name. 'I like guns and tanks and so, I was able to get pictures,' said Puit. Neither said they had strong opinions about the protests against Trump because they consider themselves 'politics-naive.' But Eliana said she recently read about what the 'No Kings' protests were about, and said she could relate to their anti-authoritation message. 'I just don't want authoritarian. I don't want another Fidel Castro type of thing,' said Eliana, who is originally from Miami. Asked how they feel about Trump's harsh immigration enforcement, both said they work with people who are immigrants and who are scared. Eliana said she provides health care to indigent populations, and many of her patients have stopped coming in for appointments. 'I have people with testicular cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer who are not coming in for their follow-ups,' she said. 'They're afraid we're going to report them to ICE.' Dressed in red, white and blue overalls, and a cowboy hat, Christopher Quaglin of New Jersey stood next to a massive flag that read, 'January 6 was an inside job.' He was a Jan. 6 defendant who spent two years in prison, though, prior to Trump releasing him, he was sentenced to 12 years for repeatedly attacking police officers, spraying them with chemical irritants and stealing police officers' riot shields. Quaglin said he 'lost everything' after going to prison, and the reason he was attending the day's events was 'out of desperation for money.' He wants to go on a tour of colleges to talk to students about how hard it was for him in prison and to advocate for prison reform. He said he felt mixed about Trump going after undocumented immigrants who aren't violent criminals. But moments later, he said he was fine with it and blamed former President Joe Biden for having 'left the border open for four years.' 'It sucks, but you have to fight fire with fire,' Quaglin said of arresting and deporting immigrants who aren't violent criminals. 'They forced [Trump's] hand.' By the end of the day, the only people visibly energized and happy, at least among the throngs of people milling about after the parade ended, were the protesters. Even some Secret Service agents seemed over it. One agent passed by HuffPost muttering about how to get the crowd dispersed after the parade and seemed reluctant to get aggressive about it, 'just for some fucking propaganda.' Protesters had grown by the dozens as people trickled out of the parade. They gathered on a street corner by one of the parade exits to greet people with jeers and signs like 'All Hail Commander Bone Spurs' and 'Stop Fascism Now.' 'Fuck Trump!' they shouted in unison at parade attendees filtering out of the event. 'Shame! Shame! Shame!' So after a painfully long day of lines and sweltering heat, many of the people who showed up to honor Trump in MAGA gear ended their day by being publicly shamed. But Trump still got his birthday parade.
