Texas adds transgender bathroom bill to agenda for special legislative session to deal with deadly flooding
The 30-day session was called by Governor Greg Abbott in June to deal with six bills he had vetoed. But when flash flooding in Central Texas devastated communities along the Guadalupe River earlier this month, disaster preparedness became a focal point of the session.
More than 130 people have died, and just under 100 remain missing, Abbott said Monday. Following the disaster, questions have been raised over whether more could have been done to prevent at least some of the deaths.
Last week, Abbott released an 18-point agenda for the special session, which included four points related to the flooding or natural disasters in general.
Lawmakers will discuss legislation to 'improve early warning systems' and 'strengthen emergency communications' in flood-prone areas. Legislation to 'provide relief funding for response to and recovery from' the early July storms will also be discussed.
There is also a more general agenda point to 'evaluate and streamline rules and regulations to speed preparedness for and recovery from natural disasters.'
Besides the agenda points related to the flood disaster, Abbott included a point to discuss 'legislation protecting women's privacy in sex-segregated spaces' among other points, such as making it a crime to provide hemp-derived products to those under 21 years old and anti-abortion legislation.
Monday was the first day lawmakers could file bills for the special session, and of the 82 bills filed, none were related to the deadly floods, NBC News reported, citing its Austin affiliate, KXAN-TV.
Among the measures was a Republican -led bill, known as the Texas Women's Privacy Act, which requires transgender people to use bathrooms that align with their sex assigned at birth in public schools, government buildings and correctional facilities, per NBC News.
Under the bill, these public entities could face financial penalties and be sued if they violate the bathroom rules.
The regular legislative session, which ended in early June, saw 88 anti-LGBTQ bill proposals, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. Only four were signed into law.
There are currently 19 states that have some sort of ban on transgender people using public bathrooms consistent with their gender identity, according to the think tank Movement Advancement Project.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Court makes crucial decision on Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship
A federal appeals court delivered a blow to Donald Trump 's executive order ending birthright citizenship, deeming it unconstitutional. It's the latest step in an ongoing battle between Trump and various judges in states far over his plan to deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of illegal migrants. The ruling from a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals comes after Trump´s plan was also blocked by a federal judge in New Hampshire. It brings the issue one step closer to coming back quickly before the Supreme Court. The 9th Circuit decision keeps a block on the Trump administration enforcing the order that would deny citizenship to children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily. 'The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order´s proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree,' the majority wrote. The 2-1 ruling keeps in place a decision from U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour in Seattle, who blocked Trump´s effort to end birthright citizenship and decried what he described as the administration´s attempt to ignore the Constitution for political gain. The White House and Justice Department did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The Supreme Court has since restricted the power of lower court judges to issue orders that affect the whole country, known as nationwide injunctions. But the 9th Circuit majority found that the case fell under one of the exceptions left open by the justices. The case was filed by a group of states who argued that they need a nationwide order to prevent the problems that would be caused by birthright citizenship only being the law in half of the country. 'We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a universal injunction in order to give the States complete relief,' Judge Michael Hawkins and Ronald Gould, both appointed by President Bill Clinton, wrote. Judge Patrick Bumatay, who was appointed by Trump, dissented. He found that the states don't have the legal right, or standing, to sue. 'We should approach any request for universal relief with good faith skepticism, mindful that the invocation of `complete relief´ isn´t a backdoor to universal injunctions,' he wrote. Bumatay did not weigh in on whether ending birthright citizenship would be constitutional. The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment says that all people born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to U.S. jurisdiction, are citizens. Justice Department attorneys argue that the phrase 'subject to United States jurisdiction' in the amendment means that citizenship isn´t automatically conferred to children based on their birth location alone. The states - Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon - argue that ignores the plain language of the Citizenship Clause as well as a landmark birthright citizenship case in 1898 where the Supreme Court found a child born in San Francisco to Chinese parents was a citizen by virtue of his birth on American soil. Trump´s order asserts that a child born in the U.S. is not a citizen if the mother does not have legal immigration status or is in the country legally but temporarily, and the father is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. At least nine lawsuits challenging the order have been filed around the U.S. After the recent Supreme Court ruling that blocked federal judges from stopping Trump though 'nationwide injunctions,' a class-action lawsuit was deemed the only option to stop the president. The high court had allowed Trump's executive order halting birthright citizenship to take effect handing him a major victory. The court ruled 6-3 in favor of Trump, with all six conservative justices - including the three he appointed - siding with the president. Speaking at the White House, Trump reacted at the time: 'This was a big one. Amazing decision, one we're very happy about. This really brings back the Constitution. This is what it's all about.'
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: White House taps mining expert to head national security office, sources say
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) - The White House has tapped a former mining executive to head an office at the National Security Council focused on strengthening supply chains, three sources said, as a pared-down NSC zeroes in on a few of President Donald Trump's most oft-stated priorities. David Copley, who was chosen earlier in the year to serve as the top mining official at the U.S. National Energy Dominance Council, or NEDC, an interagency body chaired by the interior secretary, is now a senior director at the NSC, said the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss non-public personnel moves. The shift in roles reflects the White House ramping up its efforts to gain ground against China in a critical minerals arms race that touches a broad swath of global industries. China recently demonstrated its leverage by withholding exports of rare earth magnets, upending global markets and forcing U.S. officials back to the negotiating table, before reversing course. At the NSC, Copley will focus on strengthening U.S. supply chains and boosting U.S. access to the critical minerals that are often vital components of advanced military technology, two of the sources said. A White House official said Copley, who did not respond to a request for comment, will be overseeing the NSC's "international economics" component. Copley's precise title was not immediately clear, nor was it clear if he has formally left the NEDC. The decision to tap a mining expert for a top NSC position offers a window into how national security priorities have shifted under U.S. President Donald Trump. The NSC has been sharply downsized in recent months. Offices overseeing Africa and international organizations have been among those shuttered or downgraded, in line with the administration's skepticism of multilateral institutions. A special forces veteran was recently tapped to head the Latin America office, a move that comes as Trump has openly considered unilateral action against Mexican drug cartels. But Trump's focus on obtaining critical minerals like cobalt and nickel has never waned, and China's near-total control of the critical minerals industry has long rankled the president. In May, Reuters reported that Copley was among a clutch of officials who had been working on plans to pull Greenland deeper into America's sphere of influence, in part to ensure access to the island's vast deposits of rare earths. One of the sources said Copley's remit is, broadly speaking, "geostrategic affairs." Geostrategy is a field of international relations that focuses in part on the interplay of resource wealth and security, a matter of particular relevance for an administration that has made securing access to foreign resources a central element of its foreign policy. In April, the U.S. and Ukraine signed a sprawling deal to give the United States preferential access to Ukrainian minerals. An economist by training, Copley is an intelligence officer with the U.S. Navy Reserve, and he worked on Iraq-related issues for the State Department during Trump's first term. He previously held roles at minerals producer U.S. Silica. Copley consulted for Boston Consulting Group earlier in his career and served as an intelligence officer with the Defense Intelligence Agency, a component of the U.S. Department of Defense. Copley until recently had worked in a strategic development role for Denver-based Newmont (NEM.N), opens new tab, the world's largest gold miner by production with a market value of $54 billion.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration opens inquiry into universities over Daca scholarships
The Trump administration's Department of Education announced on Wednesday that it has opened national-origin discrimination investigations into five US universities over what it described as 'alleged exclusionary scholarships referencing foreign-born students'. According to the announcement, the department's office for civil rights has opened investigations into the University of Louisville, the University of Nebraska Omaha, the University of Miami, the University of Michigan and Western Michigan University. The department said that the investigations will determine whether these universities are granting scholarships exclusively to students who are recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) program, who came to the US as children, or who are undocumented 'in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964's (Title VI) prohibition against national origin discrimination'. The investigation stems from complaints submitted by the Legal Insurrection Foundation's Equal Protection Project, a conservative legal group. The group alleges in the complaints that certain scholarships at these schools are limited to students with Daca status or who are undocumented, which they argue is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 'and its implementing regulations by illegally discriminating against students based on their national origin'. In a post on X announcing the investigations on Wednesday, the education secretary, Linda McMahon, said that 'non-citizens should not be given special preference over American citizens for scholarships at American universities'. In addition to those scholarships, the education department's office for civil rights said on Wednesday that the investigations would also 'examine additional scholarships that appear to exclude students based on other aspects of Title VI, including race and color'. The education department's announcement on Wednesday came shortly after the US state department said it had launched a new investigation into Harvard University's 'continued eligibility' as a sponsor in a government-run visa program for international students and professors. In the announcement, the statement department wrote: 'To maintain their privilege to sponsor exchange visitors, sponsors must comply with all regulations, including conducting their programs in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.' 'The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests,' the announcement added. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Earlier this week, lawyers representing Harvard University and the Trump administration appeared in federal court for a hearing over the administration's decision to cut billions in federal funding to the university – an action that Harvard has argued is unlawful. The Trump administration has taken various steps to restrict the entry of foreign students to the US. It has attempted to ban Harvard from enrolling them at all in a move blocked last month by the same federal judge overseeing the case over funding cuts to the university, and announced new rules scrutinizing the social media presence of international students applying for US visas.
