logo
Legendary car brand pulls out of country forever as it shuts massive engine factory in move to rival Tesla

Legendary car brand pulls out of country forever as it shuts massive engine factory in move to rival Tesla

The Sun2 days ago
A LEGENDARY car brand has called it quits in one of the world's biggest automotive markets, shutting down a major factory and ending local production for good.
The firm has officially pulled out of China after decades of operations, closing its joint engine venture and handing over its factory to a domestic rival as it pivots towards electric vehicles.
SAME, which began producing engines in 1998, supplied not only Mitsubishi vehicles but also powertrains for a host of Chinese automakers.
It will now operate under a new name: Shenyang Guoqing Power Technology Co., Ltd.
Mitsubishi said it has: "terminated its engine business operation at Shenyang Aerospace Mitsubishi Motors Engine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, SAME) in China and has terminated the joint venture partnership.
"Established in August 1997, SAME began engine production in 1998 and has played a key role in China's expanding automotive market by supplying engines not only to Mitsubishi-branded vehicle manufacturers, but also to numerous Chinese automakers. "
However, in response to the rapid transformation of China's automotive industry, Mitsubishi Motors has reassessed its strategy in the region and has decided to terminate its participation in the joint venture."
Mitsubishi's relationship with China stretches back to 1973, when it began shipping mid-sized vehicles to the market.
At one point in the early 2000s, its engines powered nearly 30 per cent of cars built in the country.
But as China's car industry turned sharply toward new energy vehicles (NEVs), demand for traditional engines plummeted.
In 2012, Mitsubishi joined forces with Guangzhou Automobile Group (GAC) and Mitsubishi Corporation to launch GAC Mitsubishi.
The joint venture saw strong early success, especially with the Outlander SUV, which pushed sales to 144,000 units in 2018.
But it didn't last - sales crashed to just 33,600 vehicles by 2022.
By the following year, Mitsubishi shut down local production and, in 2024, exited the market entirely. GAC has since taken over the plant and turned it into a production base for its EV brand, Aion.
Industry analysts say Mitsubishi's retreat is just the latest in a broader trend.
Foreign carmakers are losing ground in China as homegrown brands surge ahead in the electric vehicle market. GAC-FCA, a joint venture with Fiat Chrysler, also folded under similar pressures.
Mitsubishi says the decision is part of a strategic shift as it focuses on electrification and more competitive global markets.
But in China, the brand that once powered nearly a third of the country's cars is now just a memory.
The collapse of its Chinese business is a blow for the brand, which had hoped to hold on in the world's biggest car market.
But with EV start-ups popping up at lightning speed and government backing for green tech, Mitsubishi simply couldn't keep up.
The factory closure also means job losses for hundreds of local workers, with some fearing they'll struggle to find work in an industry moving away from fossil fuels.
One former worker said: 'We saw the writing on the wall last year. EVs are the future, and we weren't part of that plan anymore.'
It's a bitter end for a brand once considered a key player in Chinese motoring.
Now, it's packing up — leaving behind empty factories, lost jobs and a name that once meant something on Chinese roads.
The Sun has approached Mitsubishi for comment.
Iconic car brand 'on brink of collapse' as 'bosses warn company has just 12 months to survive'
ONE of the world's largest car manufacturers reportedly could go under within 12 months if it doesn't receive support.
The firm is looking to sure up its future by growing a partnership with its former rival after the reported collapse of a three-way alliance.
Nissan was one-third of a strategic deal with Mitsubishi and Renault to share financial backing and expand all their markets in Europe, Japan and the US.
The agreement dates back to 1999 but now could be on the brink of collapse.
A report from the Financial Times cites two anonymous "senior officials" at the firm suggesting that Renault is looking to reduce its financial stake in the Japanese carmaker.
The withdrawal of funding means, according to the same sources, that Nissan could require support from the Japanese or US governments within the next year just in order to stay afloat.
One of the officials said: "We have 12 or 14 months to survive.
"This is going to be tough.
"And in the end, we need Japan and the US to be generating cash."
Nissan has already cut 9,000 jobs across its global operation, while its CEO Makoto Uchida took a 50% pay cut in an economy drive.
The business is working through an emergency recovery plan, which will see it cut output by 20% and slash around £2bn in costs.
Its struggles have partly been blamed on the lack of a strong hybrid lineup, which has helped rivals like Toyota and Honda through the global collapse in EV sales.
In a press conference earlier this month, Mr Uchida said: "This has been a lesson learned and we have not been able to keep up with the times.
"We weren't able to foresee that hybrid electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids would be so popular."
2
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India signals it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trump tariff threat
India signals it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trump tariff threat

The Independent

time9 minutes ago

  • The Independent

India signals it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trump tariff threat

India has suggested it will continue purchasing oil from Russia despite US president Donald Trump 's threats to hit Delhi with new tariffs over the imports. Foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters on Friday that India 's energy decisions were based on market availability and global conditions, adding that ties with Moscow were 'steady and time-tested' and should not be seen through the prism of a third country. Mr Trump said earlier this week that he plans to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods along with an additional import tax in response to Delhi 's continued buying of Russian crude. The US president has stepped up warnings against nations doing business with Moscow as Washington seeks leverage over Russia 's war in Ukraine. India bought about 68,000 barrels of crude oil a day from Russia in January 2022, but this rose to 1.12 million barrels per day by June that year, peaking at 2.15 million barrels a day in May 2023, according to data from analytics firm Kpler cited by Press Trust of India. Russian supplies at one point made up nearly 40 per cent of India's total oil imports, making Moscow its biggest crude supplier. While the Indian government may not be deterred by Mr Trump's threats, Reuters news agency earlier reported that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Reacting to the reports, Mr Trump told reporters: 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I have heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens.' He added that despite his tariff announcement, trade deal talks with India were progressing. India consumes around 5.5 million barrels of oil a day, importing roughly 88 per cent of its needs. The world's third-largest crude buyer after China and the US shifted sharply towards Russian supplies after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, taking advantage of steep discounts as Western nations turned away from Moscow's energy exports.

Sky-high energy prices destroying European industry, warns metal giant
Sky-high energy prices destroying European industry, warns metal giant

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Sky-high energy prices destroying European industry, warns metal giant

Soaring energy prices will destroy what little heavy industry Britain and the EU have left, the boss of a metals giant has warned ahead of its London listing on Monday. Evangelos Mytilineos, the chief executive of Metlen, a Greek energy and metals company, has marked his company's new FTSE 100 listing with a dire warning about the disastrous impact of high energy costs. 'The UK and Europe have entered a period of high energy prices compared with our competitors,' he said. 'Countries like China, the US and others have maybe half or a third of the cost of power than we have, and this is the biggest problem for UK and European productivity going forward. 'A lot of [UK and European] companies are moving their plants to other parts of the world.' Mr Mytilineos cited German chemical giant BASF's 2024 decision to shut down 11 chemical plants in Germany and spend €10bn (£8.7bn) on a new mega-plant in southern China – partly linked to energy costs and green regulations. The Greek executive, who is also president of the European Metals Association, said the UK and Europe were fighting to retain the factories they had. 'A decade ago Europe had maybe 15 aluminium plants but now there are just four left so we are buying it from countries like China and Indonesia which make it by burning coal,' he said. That decline is partly down to the cost of renewables, the rollout of which is typically funded by subsidies that add levies to energy bills. Surging gas price followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine have also fuelled the problem. 'As long as Russian gas was around, we could be globally competitive,' Mr Mytilineos said. 'Now this is gone. This is geopolitics, and Europe is paying the price.' Addressing Ed Miliband and Sir Keir Starmer's race to decarbonise Britain's economy, Mr Mytilineos warned that green energy policies can come with a heavy price. 'If they want to take these decisions, they must also consider industry. You have to support your industries. Otherwise industries have to find new ways to survive. They have to move.' Metlen's core business is metal refining. It produces bauxite ore from its own mines in Greece where it also has a refinery and smelter. They annually produce 190,000 tonnes of aluminium and 860,000 tonnes of alumina, a vital ingredient in advanced ceramics. From the same ore it is now also extracting gallium, a strategically vital metal where China has long dominated global markets. Metlen is also increasingly involved in metal recycling, melting down scrap and targeting valuable metals like zinc and lead. The company has managed to avoid energy-induced shutdowns because its other key business is energy production: it owns around 14 wind farms, three solar farms and four hydroelectric plants, mostly in Greece, plus several gas fired power stations. It uses those generators to power its metal refining, giving it a near-unique level of immunity from the high energy prices that are wiping out energy-intensive industries across the UK and Europe. The comments come as Mr Mytilineos prepares to ring the London Stock Exchange opening bell at 8am on Monday as Metlen joins the market. The company, valued at close to £6bn, is set for inclusion in the FTSE 100 later this year when the index is re-evaluated. Metlen's move is a vote of confidence in London's beleaguered stock market, which has suffered from a dearth of new listings in the years following Brexit. Mr Mytilineos said: 'My shareholders ask me this – why London? We consider that despite London going through difficult times after Brexit, Amsterdam, Frankfurt or Paris have not managed to overtake the City as a financial hub. 'I think that having gone through this difficult period, the City will make a big comeback, and London Stock Exchange with it. So when choosing a European exchange with the biggest profile for our company, London was the obvious place.'

The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing
The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing

Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing

When the Government signed a deal on net-zero co-operation with Canada, the text of the memorandum was published. So too were the texts of deals with Ireland, Norway, South Korea and Chile. Five months after the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband signed a similar memorandum with the Chinese government, however, we are still in the dark as to precisely what was agreed. Chinese media have asserted that the Energy Secretary agreed to co-operation on power grids, battery storage, offshore wind power and carbon capture, among other areas; it is understood that Chinese investment in the UK was not discussed by Mr Miliband. The role of the Chinese state in Britain's net-zero ambitions may well be an uncomfortable issue for the Labour Government to discuss. While the Defence Secretary is insisting that Britain is 'ready to fight' over the future of Taiwan and the Foreign Secretary is explicitly referring to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' that requires hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding for the intelligence services, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been courting Chinese investment, and Mr Miliband's drive to meet his net-zero targets is heavily dependent on Chinese industry. Both the switch to electric vehicles and the decarbonisation of the energy grid will make heavy use of Chinese products. One study commissioned by the German defence ministry recently warned that this position at the heart of Western energy systems could result in Beijing enjoying the power to trigger remote shut-downs as 'an instrument of economic warfare'. Such concerns are less hypothetical than we might wish. Earlier this year, undocumented communication devices were located in Chinese-made power inverters exported to the United States, triggering fears that Beijing could use compromised equipment to 'physically destroy the grid'. This would be fully in line with the current approach of the People's Liberation Army to warfare as a clash between systems, and the extensive Volt Typhoon operation carried out by Chinese state-sponsored actors. Even given the understandable desire to avoid a sudden break with China, the delicacy of the balance between trade and reliance is such that the British public deserves to know what Mr Miliband has discussed with Beijing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store