
Tariffs may push California car insurance costs higher by year's end
Why it matters: The analysis shows one more way that Americans pay for higher tariffs.
Driving the news: Car insurance rates in California remained "relatively flat" in the first half of 2025, but the average annual cost of full coverage in California could rise to nearly 7.4% between June and December if tariffs stay in effect, per a new report from insurance-comparison platform Insurify.
That's compared to a roughly 4.4% increase without tariffs.
The figures are based on the tariff picture as of Aug. 1, reflecting the Trump administration's recently lowered rates on cars and auto parts from Japan, South Korea and Europe.
Between the lines: Tariffs affect insurance rates by increasing the costs of imported parts needed for repairs.
Inflation, accident frequency and claims due to extreme weather also impact rates, among other factors.
Caveat: Premiums may fluctuate as the fast-changing tariff landscape continues shifting, or if tariffs prove "less burdensome than expected," Insurify notes.
Claims volume could also fall, and insurance regulators could fight price hikes.
How it works: Insurify's projections are based on over 97 million rates from the insurance companies it works with, and reflect median costs for drivers age 20-70 with clean records and at least average credit.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Intel CEO appears to win over Trump
Just four days after demanding Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign, President Trump has described a meeting with Tan as "a very interesting one." Why it matters: The president's resignation call over Tan's alleged Chinese ties had threatened to waylay the chip maker's turnaround effort. What they're saying: After a meeting Monday at the White House with Tan, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump posted on Truth Social that Tan's "success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week." The context: Trump called for Tan's resignation last week after Sen. Tom Cotton (R.-Ark) said that he had written to Intel's board expressing concerns about what he said were "Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army." Tan had previously served as CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which in July reached a plea agreement with the government over claims of illegal exports to China. Intel's board has supported its CEO. "We are engaging with the administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts," Tan wrote to Intel employees on Thursday. "I fully share the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security, I appreciate his leadership to advance these priorities, and I'm proud to lead a company that is so central to these goals." The bottom line: By moving quickly to engage the White House and to endorse its priorities, Tan has taken a page from Apple CEO Tim Cook and other corporate chieftains on how to best navigate being caught in the Trump spotlight.


Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Update: Warning Issued Over Trump's New Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Institute for College Access and Success (TICAS), a student loan borrower advocacy organization, is warning against a new repayment plan that the Trump administration is introducing within the next few months. The Department of Education (ED), headed by Education Secretary Linda McMahon, has unveiled a new repayment plan option, called Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), to replace older plans that allowed borrowers to repay based on their specific income and eventually gain student loan forgiveness. Newsweek has reached out to TICAS and the ED for comment via email. Why It Matters RAP was introduced under the "Big Beautiful Bill" that President Donald Trump signed into law last month. Under the new regulations, three other income-driven repayment (IDR) plans: Income-Contingent Repayment (CIR), Pay As You Earn (PAYE), and Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) are being phased out by 2028. Enrolling in RAP will be a new option, but student loan borrower advocates warn there could be long term negative consequences to signing up for the plan. What To Know Beginning July 1, 2026, all borrowers who consolidate their student loans through the federal direct loan program will have to choose between RAP and the standard plan, which does not depend on a borrower's income. Under RAP, your monthly payments for each year are determined based on your income, and after a fixed term, you would qualify for student loan forgiveness. However, it differs from other IDR plans because it has higher monthly payments and uses a different formula where the percentage of income that is counted toward your monthly payment increases for every $10,000 in additional income earned by the borrower with a cap of $100,000. Other IDR plans use a fixed repayment formula and factor in inflation. RAP plan enrollees will also be subject to a minimum required monthly payment even if they bring in no income, unlike ICR, PAYE, SAVE and Income-Based Repayment (IBR). Additionally, while the other options factored in all the other people the borrower lived with in their home, RAP only adjusts a $50 monthly payment reduction for a dependent child. RAP also mandates a longer repayment period of 30 years before borrowers can qualify for student loan forgiveness, unlike older plans which allowed for this after 20 or 25 years. The Institute for College Access and Success warned that this new plan means many borrowers will likely find themselves in default on their loans compared to prior options. "The plan departs radically from the core design tenets of all previous income-based repayment plans," TICAS wrote in a recent blog post. "One stark difference is that it removes the 'income protection' that all prior plans have, which is meant to 'protect' a certain amount of a borrower's income so they can stay current on their loan payment while still having enough funds to cover their basic needs." It added: "RAP scraps this approach and instead bases a borrower's payment on their gross income, rather than their discretionary income. Unlike all existing income-based plans—which require monthly payments only once a borrower's income is a certain amount above the federal poverty threshold—RAP will require payments from even those earning far below the poverty level." As the cost-of-living increases, TICAS said RAP will likely "push more borrowers than ever into the nightmarish world of loan default." "All told, the RAP proposal is not much of a safety net," TICAS wrote. "When it's the only thing standing between borrowers and loan default, we can expect many more borrowers to enter the draconian student loan collections system, in which many will be trapped." President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters in the Oval Office on August 7 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters in the Oval Office on August 7 in Washington, People Are Saying Education and Workforce Committee chairman Tim Walberg, a Michigan Republican, said in a previous statement: "The student loan repayment process has become bloated and too complex. The plan simplifies the loan repayment system to help troubled borrowers repay loans without saddling taxpayers with the burden of paying back the loans of wealthy borrowers." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The warning is valid. The setup looks eerily similar to prior plans like IBR and PAYE, but with a few important twists. The structure feels familiar, yet as the saying goes, 'all that glitters isn't gold.'" He continued: "Calling it a debt trap is putting it mildly. This design pushes people to stay in the workforce longer, keeping them tied to repayment well into their lives. From a business perspective, it's a tool to keep labor in the system. On the 'bright' side, more companies are offering loan repayment perks—but those are just retention levers to keep people tied to the company." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "While the new Repayment Assistance Plan beginning next year may appear similar to other recently introduced programs designed to lessen monthly payment amounts for some borrowers, the reality is there are some stark differences that could have negative effects on those carrying substantial student debt. The new plan will still require a monthly payment regardless of whether the borrower has a job or not, differing from plans like SAVE which could lower the amount to $0 if the loan holder is out of work." What Happens Next? Once ICR, PAYE and SAVE are phased out, borrowers will be forced to choose a different repayment plan by July 2028. RAP will likely be more affordable than IBR for many borrowers, despite TICAS's warned risks. "These are the kinds of pro-business policies you get when the people crafting the legislation have a business mindset," Thompson said. "They see people as one thing and one thing only: inputs to the labor force."


Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Who's Got The Cards?
A D.C. crime crackdown, trade deals, peace summits, and redistricting battles headline American politics this week, as President Trump capitalizes on his current momentum to manage the moment. Founder of the bipartisan government relations firm Mehlman Consulting and author of The Age of Distribution Substack, Bruce Mehlman, explains why artificial intelligence wouldn't necessarily make redistricting any easier. He also discusses how companies and foreign countries are handling President Trump's second term. I Wish Someone Had Told Me: Bruce describes why it is not too soon to discuss the 2028 Presidential Election. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit