Liberal senator claims PM to get super tax carve out
The man vying for treasurer in Sussan Ley's shadow cabinet has accused Jim Chalmers of plotting a super tax carve out for Anthony Albanese without offering any evidence.
It was revealed last week a handful of judges and former state-level officials would be exempt from Labor's proposal to roll back concessions on ultra-high super balances.
But the exemptions would be restricted to 'those earnings in superannuation funds that the constitution prevents being taxed by the government will be excluded', according to a government summary document.
Even though the Prime Minister did not fall into the category, Liberal senator Andrew Bragg on Sunday claimed the Treasurer was planning 'a tax on everyone except for Mr Albanese, where he will set special arrangements for the Prime Minister'.
'He has given himself a regulation making power where he will set the Prime Minister's tax and pension arrangements after the bill has passed the Senate,' Senator Bragg told Sky News.
'Now, if he's serious about applying it to the Prime Minister, he will put the parliamentary scheme into the Bill.'
He could not provide evidence when pressed, only repeating that Mr Chalmers had 'given himself a regulation making power, so the regulations will be made after the Bill is passed'.
'This is a massive integrity issue,' Senator Bragg said.
Only half a per cent Australians — some 80,000 — have super balances north of $3m.
Under the changes, they would pay an addition 15 per cent on yields.
It would pump about $2.7bn into Commonwealth coffers, according to Treasury estimates.
The plan, which Labor took to the federal election, has drawn ire, with some critics decrying it a tax on unrealised gains and others warning it could penalise younger generations down the track.
Teal independent Monique Ryan has called on the Albanese government to index the tax to make sure it rose with inflation.
She warned it 'could affect all Gen Z Australians by the time they turn 60' if changes were not made.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
20 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Most generous assessment of the year': AFL's call on Hawk's hit that left Pie concussed
Hawthorn ruck Lloyd Meek has escaped suspension for his late collision with Collingwood's Pat Lipinski on Friday night, which left the winger with a concussion that was expected to be harshly scrutinised under the AFL's controversial MRO guidelines. Despite large concerns that the 27-year-old would be sentenced with a three-game ban, the AFL explained their decision to not suspend Meek. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer. 'Lipinski was the target of a kick inside forward 50 with Meek approaching from behind to contest the mark. With his eyes on the ball, Meek attempts to spoil with a straight arm that does not deviate from the line of the ball, and in doing so makes primarily body contact with Lipinski in the marking contest,' the league's statement read. 'It was the view of the MRO that Meek made a genuine attempt to spoil the ball, that his actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances and that he took reasonable care to avoid making forceful high contact to Lipinski in the marking contest. 'Furthermore, it could not have been reasonably foreseen that Lipinski's head would make forceful contact with the ground as a result of Meek's conduct. No further action was taken.' Gerard Whateley, who was calling the game for Fox Footy on Friday night, predicted on SEN that Meek 'won't be suspended (and) I think it'll be the most generous assessment of the year'. 14 minutes before three-quarter time, a piercing kick inside 50 from five-goal hero Jamie Elliott looked to have laced out teammate Lipinski with the Magpies up and about by 38 points on Friday night. But a last-minute decision from Meek to enter the contest from behind — with the star big man only leaving the ground as Lipinski got both hands on the ball. Tempers flared as Lipinski's head hit the turf, with the in-play umpire awarding a 50 metre penalty to the former Bulldog. The 26-year-old wandered into an open goal to kick his second major for the night, before quickly running from the field for a Head Injury Assessment (HIA) test; one that he later failed as his side wen on to beat Hawthorn by 51 points. Speaking on Fox Footy at three-quarter time, reporter Jon Ralph was understandably at the time adamant that Meek will be dealt a punishment worth multiple weeks by the Match Review Officer (MRO) come Saturday evening. 'I think it's a three-week ban for Lloyd Meek, I don't think there's any way where he gets off this one,' Ralph said. 'He hits Lipinski high, he's responsible for that contact — even if he hits his head on the ground there. I just don't think that he actually tried to contest that football.' 'I don't think there's any chance he gets off it unfortunately for the Hawthorn fans and the Hawthorn coach in Sam Mitchell.' "I don't think there's any way he gets off this one" @RalphyHeraldSun discusses a potential suspension for Lloyd Meek. ðŸ'° Watch #AFLPiesHawks LIVE on ch.504 or stream on @kayosports: âœ�ï¸� BLOG ðŸ'¢ MATCH CENTRE — Fox Footy (@FOXFOOTY) May 30, 2025 Ralph elaborated on the incident after the match. 'The problem is ... it was late, and it was high. It doesn't really matter whether it was caused by the late fist to the head, or it was caused by Lipinski's head hitting the ground. He is responsible for all that contact,' he continued. 'I do think it's late enough for a 'rough conduct' (charge). So the concussion means it has to be three weeks, it has to be severe impact. 'If Lipinski gets up, that's probably a low level, $1,500 fine. I think all of us understand that's a real flaw in the system, but that is the system that Michael Christian (MRO) has to operate under. 'I think he's in strife there.' Fox Footy's Friday Night Footy panel dissected Meek's actions further after Ralph's insight, with a unanimous agreement that the act shouldn't see the ruck sidelined until Round 17 after three games and a mid-season bye. 'If the outcome in terms of a concussion is reached, and that becomes a three-week penalty, then that should trigger the AFL to come out and make a change to the way that they legislate against these actions. There should be something in between nothing and three, and it should be done now … they can do it anytime,' Collingwood legend Nathan Buckley said. '(This is a one-week suspension) if anything … it's zero, or one.' Three-time Brisbane premiership player Jonathan Brown added: 'The players should be allowed every right to try to make an attempt on the spoil. I think it's unfair to be expecting players to be absolute, perfect decision (makers). 'I'm happy enough for him to have a sanction, but it shouldn't be three, because that is a player just genuinely doing his best for the team to get there and make a spoil. 'I'm concerned that we will lose a player in the first or second week of a final (for) a grand final — when the whole footy world is going: 'That is unfair'. 'Andrew Dillon has showed tremendous leadership during the week; continue on with that leadership. 'Bang!' Captain's call, this is what we're doing, the whole footy world agrees with it.' Collingwood coach Craig McRae provies injury updates on Lachie Schultz and Pat Lipinksi. ðŸ'° Watch #AFLPiesHawks on ch.504 or stream on @kayosports: âœ�ï¸� WRAP — Fox Footy (@FOXFOOTY) May 30, 2025 Four-time premiership Hawk Jordan Lewis ended by saying: 'I don't think anyone would argue the point if it was one week, because there's a level of responsibility. But three weeks is just ridiculous.' 'Andrew Dillon has showed tremendous leadership during the week; continue on with that leadership. 'Bang!' Captain's call, this is what we're doing, the whole footy world agrees with it.' Collingwood coach Craig McRae was also asked on the incident post-game, but noted that he'd need to see the vision again before commenting too much on the matter. 'I'll have to watch it (and) see it. Obviously there's a remonstration for the contest… and there's a concussion there now,' McRae told Fox Footy commentator Gerard Whateley. Only on Tuesday evening did Fremantle captain Alex Pearce have a three-week ban overturned at the Tribunal, after his mid-air collision with Port Adelaide's Darcy Byrne-Jones that was a crucial test case for players contesting the ball in incidents which cause a concussion. Lipinski now won't return until at least Round 15, as the league's concussion protocols prevent him from returning for the King's Birthday clash with Melbourne in Round 13, before their club bye the week after.

News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Psychopathic' killer who killed elderly woman, strangled fellow inmate has parole term set aside by court
A 'psychopathic' killer convicted for murdering an elderly woman and setting fire to her home, before strangling an inmate to death, has successfully appealed terms of an order preventing him from applying for parole. Rodney George Anderson was serving a life sentence for the 1995 murder of 77-year-old Ethel Adamson in her Moorooka – setting fire to her home in the process – when he murdered a fellow inmate five years later by strangling him with a TV aerial cord. He became eligible for parole in November 2020. But the Parole Board of Queensland (PBQ) in 2023 made a declaration naming him as a restricted prisoner – effectively barring Anderson from applying for parole for eight-and-a-half years. The order meant Anderson was prohibited from applying for parole until December 2031 – by which time he will be 78. In an appeal of the order to the Supreme Court, Anderson challenged the length of the term while citing his declining health conditions in custody. They include chronic kidney disease, type-2 diabetes, epilepsy, hypertension, and poor mobility requiring the use of a wheelchair. 'None of his conditions are immediately life threatening, however, he is at risk of acute deterioration due to his underlying health issues,' Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Treston said in her judgment. 'His mobility is very poor and he is experiencing regular falls.' A letter from a medical officer stated Anderson's needs were being met in custody but this would change as his condition declined. The decision to make a restricted prisoner declaration was outlined in a letter from President of the PBQ, which detailed the serious nature of offences that landed Anderson a life-imprisonment conviction, the harm he may pose to the public if granted parole and the effect the release on parole may have on the Anderson or another victim. Anderson had a 'psychopathic' personality, 'poor impulse control and demonstrated high levels of aggression' and was at risk of 'engaging in fire-setting behaviours', according to a psychiatric report and a letter from the PQB president. 'I have been informed that the prisoner presents as requiring a high level of support if he were to be released, the kind which is most likely to be facilitated in a nursing home,' the president's letter stated. 'However, given his particular risk towards vulnerable persons, it is unlikely this plan would be feasible. 'Given the above and considering all information and material before me, I am satisfied that there is a risk the prisoner may pose to the public if he is granted parole, particularly as the prisoner is a psychopath and a pyromaniac who continues to pose a moderately high risk of violent recidivism despite his advancing age and noted health issues.' In her decision, Justice Treston found the term of the restricted prisoner declaration failed to adequately consider the human rights consequences for Anderson, particularly in light of his numerous serious and worsening medical conditions. Justice Treston declared that the period imposed under the Restricted Prisoner Declaration — the term of eight-and-a-half years — was invalid and must be set aside. The court found that the 'public interest' consideration for deciding the term of the declaration must be broader than just the risk factors, such as nature of the offence, risk to public and the effect on victims. The parties will discuss the specific court order needed to implement this decision.

ABC News
23 minutes ago
- ABC News
Analyst says Liberals can learn from Goldstein victory
A political analyst believes the Liberals can take lessons from the party's narrow victory in the Melbourne electorate of Goldstein after Tim Wilson won back the seat from Independent Zoe Daniel by 175 votes.