National Science Foundation staff decry Trump's deep cuts
The three-page dissent states the actions of the administration 'collectively amount to the systemic dismantling of a world-renowned scientific agency' and that they have been compelled to act because 'NSF employees are bound by their oath to uphold the Constitution.'
The document condemns the decision as 'illegally' withholding $2.2bn of the $9bn budget appropriated by Congress for 2025 and the 'unlawful termination and threatened mass reductions' in the workforce, which has already seen more than 10% of the agency's staff dismissed.
They also point to the termination of more than 1,600 active NSF grants 'using undisclosed criteria devised by the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge)' – the quasi-government agency set up by Trump's billionaire donor Elon Musk.
Earlier this month, the Guardian reported on the unprecedented political interference being wielded by Doge which, together with the chaotic cuts, has already undermined the gold standard review process used by the NSF to support cutting-edge science, and was jeopardizing the future of US industries and economic growth.
'A covert and ideologically driven secondary review process by unqualified political appointees is now interfering with the scientific merit-based review system,' the letter states.
The NSF was created 75 years ago and until Trump took office for his second term had enjoyed bipartisan support. It is the only federal agency that funds fundamental research across all fields of science and engineering, and which over the years has contributed to major breakthroughs in organ transplants, gene technology, AI, smartphones, extreme weather warning systems, American sign language, cybersecurity and even the language app Duolingo.
Trump's budget proposal calls for a 56% cut to the NSF budget for 2026, which if enacted 'would undermine US leadership in science, eliminate funding for over 250,000 researchers and students, and break bipartisan commitments made under the CHIPS and Science Act,' the letter states.
The NSF statement follows similar unprecedented dissent by hundreds of scientists and other staff at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and most recently the Voyager Declaration from almost 300 current and former Nasa scientists including four astronauts.
All have warned about the devastating impact of the administration's arbitrary and chaotic cuts to staff and research funds on the lives of Americans – now and in the future – in order to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy including Trump's billionaire donors.
The NSF dissent is addressed to California member of Congress Zoe Lofgren, the top Democrat on the House science committee, who has repeatedly condemned Trump's assault on science.
Only one employee, Jesus Soriano, president of the local chapter of the American Federation of Government Employees which represents two thirds of the NSF's unionized bargaining unit, included his name; 148 of the 149 signatories are anonymous due to fear of reprisals.
The fear is well founded given that around 140 named signatories of the EPA 'declaration of dissent' were put on administrative leave, and Lee Zeldin, the climate change denier and EPA secretary, warned that there was a 'zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging, and undercutting' the current administration.
It ends with a stark warning: 'NSF employees are committed to serving the American people through research, education, and innovation. But they cannot do so under fear, censorship, and institutional sabotage. Without immediate oversight and corrective action from Congress, one of our nation's greatest engines for scientific and technological advancement faces irreversible long-term damage. Put simply, America will forfeit its scientific leadership position to China and other rival nations.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
5 minutes ago
- Spectator
France is turning against the EU
When Donald Trump won a second term in the White House last November the response in Europe was one of barely disguised horror. 'The European Union must stand close together and act in a united manner,' declared Germany's Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Emmanuel Macron posted a message on X: 'The question we, as Europeans, must ask ourselves is, are we ready to defend the interests of Europeans?' The president of France got his answer on Sunday evening. No. The trade deal agreed between Ursula von der Leyen, the EU Commission president, and Donald Trump has not gone down well in much of Europe. Scholz's successor, Friedrich Merz forecast that Germany's economy would suffer 'significant' damage because of the deal. EU exports will have a tariff of 15 per cent, which is superior to the customs duties before Trump's re-election, but much lower than his threatened 30 per cent tariff. Additionally, von der Leyen has promised the bloc will purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments. According to Hungary's Viktor Orban: This is not an agreement… Donald Trump ate von der Leyen for breakfast.' The most strident criticism of the deal came from France, where in a rare display of unity the terms of the agreement were savaged across the political spectrum. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said that 'it is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to assert their values and defend their interests, resigns itself to submission.' Trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin described the deal as unbalanced and said the government should not accept 'what happened yesterday because that would be accepting that Europe is not an economic power.' It was telling that Saint-Martin said 'Europe' and not 'France'. For centrists like Saint-Martin – he was one of the first to join Macron's fledging En Marcheparty in 2016 – France and the EU are indistinguishable. Macron's predecessor (and mentor), Francois Hollande once accused him of 'believing in nothing and having no conviction'. That is not true. Macron has one unshakeable conviction and that is the EU. It is why he won't let Brexit go, taking every opportunity to savage Britain's decision to leave the bloc. Twice during his recent state visit he went on the attack. Britons were 'sold a lie' over Brexit he said at one point, adding on another occasion that the country 'was stronger when part of the EU.' As yet there has been no response the Elysee to von der Leyen's trade deal. Perhaps Macron is still working out how best to spin the fact that Britain's tariff rate with the USA is 10 per cent. Marine Le Pen lost little time in pointing this out, posting on X that the EU 'has obtained worse conditions than the United Kingdom.' The leader of the National Rally described the deal as 'a political, economic and moral fiasco' and said that that 'this form of globalisation, which denies and destroys sovereignty, has been outdated for many years.' The majority of the French agree with her. In an interview with the BBC in 2018, Macron admitted that if given the choice his people would probably follow Britain out of the EU. This is one reason why he has been so determined to make life difficult for post-Brexit Britain: pour encourager les autres. Macron's strategy has been partially successful. A poll last year revealed that 62 per cent of the French are opposed to Frexit. The bad news for the president is that 69 per cent of them have a bad opinion of the EU. The poll was conducted a month before the European elections, which resulted in a resounding victory for Le Pen's Eurosceptic party and a humiliating defeat for Macron's Europhile movement. When Le Pen reached the second round of the 2017 presidential election it was with a promise to quit the EU. Two years later she abandoned that position and vowed to reform the bloc from within. Her party won't return to Frexit but it will increase its Euroscepticism between now and the 2027 election. The same goes for the hard-left's Jean-Luc Melenchon, who loathes Brussels as much as Le Pen. Bruno Retailleau, the leader of the centre-right Republicans, is also a long-standing critic of the EU's ambition and voted against the EU Constitution in France's 2005 referendum. That result, he said in a 2020 interview, along with Brexit, 'have shown one and the same thing: Europeans do not want a federal Europe.' Across France enmity towards the EU has strengthened in the last year. The Mercosur trade deal agreed with South America in December is widely unpopular and France's failure to control its borders is blamed on Brussels. The French are demoralised and angrier than ever with their ruling elite. A citizens' collective called 'Bloquons tout!' (Block everything) is using social media to mobilise people for a day of protest on September 10. 'Boycott, disobedience, and solidarity' is their rallying cry and they are urging people to take to the streets across France. Will it achieve anything? Probably not. After all, what's the point of protesting in Paris when all the big decisions about France's future are made in Brussels.
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US and China hold trade talks after Donald Trump eyes ‘world tariff'
Update: Date: 2025-07-29T06:58:13.000Z Title: US-China talks extension 'likely' as Trump targets 'world tariff' Content: Good morning, and welcome to our live coverage of business, economics and financial markets. After the US and EU announced the outline of a trade deal that would limit tariffs to 15%, it looks like talks with China could be the next on the agenda, with an extension of a truce in the trade war 'likely', according to a top official in the Trump administration. US Treasury chief Scott Bessent arrived yesterday in Sweden, alongside China's vice premier He Lifeng, according to Reuters. Back in the US, Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary told Fox News that a delay to a higher tariff deadline was probable: Is that a likely outcome? Sure, it seems that way, but let's leave it to President Trump to decide. Donald Trump triggered financial market chaos after slapping tariffs at 145% on China. However, in May he announced a 90-day pause, lowering tariffs to (a still significant) 30%. That left a deadline of 12 August for the talks, but it is US trade representative Jamieson Greer told the CNBC news channel he did not expect 'some kind of enormous breakthrough today' at the talks in Stockholm, although he flagged that a deal last month to speed up rare earth metal imports from China to the US would be on the agenda. He said: What I expect is continued monitoring and checking in on the implementation of our agreement thus far, making sure that key critical minerals are flowing between the parties and setting the groundwork for enhanced trade and balanced trade going forward. It came after the US and EU announced a deal to limit tariffs to 15%. The end of market uncertainty appeared to be welcomed at first by markets on Monday – only for the mood to sour somewhat later in the day. The French prime minister, François Bayrou, said the EU had capitulated to Donald Trump, and said it was a 'dark day' for the EU. Trump on Monday suggested that he could impose a 'world tariff' on all of the countries that have not agreed a trade deal. That tariff could be 15% or 20% – meaning that, after all the negotiating effort, the EU could be left with similar terms to the rest of the world. At his golf course in Scotland yesterday, while visiting UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump said: I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15 to 20% range. Probably one of those two numbers. On the prospects of Chinese talks, Trump said: I'd love to see China open up their country. Back in May, Trump had said that China had already 'agreed to open up' – but it appears there may be more work to be done. 9:30am BST: Bank of England mortgage approvals (June; previous: 63,032; consensus: 63,000) 9:30am BST: Bank of England consumer credit (June; previous: £859m; consensus: £1.2bn)
The Herald Scotland
20 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Security breach on Trump's Scotland visit sparks probe
President Trump departed Joint Base Andrews for Scotland on board Air Force One on Friday of last week. The Secret Service confirmed that it is investigating the incident. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi said: 'The U.S. Secret Service is conducting a personnel investigation after an employee attempted to invite his spouse – a member of the United States Air Force – aboard a mission support flight. READ MORE Bagpipes, ballrooms and bluster: the day Trump came to Turnberry Donald Trump says he has 'alternative' plans for Gaza during visit to Scotland 'Scotland is a part of the world I want to thrive', says Donald Trump "The aircraft, operated by the U.S. Air Force, was being used by the Secret Service to transport personnel and equipment. 'Prior to the overseas departure, the employee was advised by supervisors that such action was prohibited, and the spouse was subsequently prevented from taking the flight. No Secret Service protectees were aboard and there was no impact to our overseas protective operation.' On the final day of his visit to Scotland on Tuesday, Trump will officially open his new golf course in Aberdeenshire. The US president's fifth day in Scotland follows a meeting and press conference with Sir Keir Starmer on Monday. Mr Trump will cut the ribbon on a second 18-hole course at his resort in Menie, Aberdeenshire before he flies back to the US on Air Force One. As they met at Turnberry for bilateral talks on trade and the situation in Gaza, Mr Trump and Sir Keir took part in what proved to be a lengthy press conference, with the president discussing a number of topics. The Republican Party leader spoke of his 'great love' for Scotland and said he wanted to see the nation 'thrive'. He returned to his long-running objections to wind turbines, branding them 'ugly monsters' and speaking of his admiration for North Sea oil and gas.
