logo
Mint Explainer: Online gaming's future—and its past taxes—hinge on this Supreme Court battle

Mint Explainer: Online gaming's future—and its past taxes—hinge on this Supreme Court battle

Mint08-05-2025

India's Supreme Court is hearing a pivotal case that could dramatically reshape how online gaming platforms are taxed.
The tax tug-of-war traces back to the introduction of the GST in July 2017. Since then, online gaming platforms had been paying 18% GST on gross gaming revenue (GGR)—that is, the commission or platform fee they charged for hosting games.
But in 2023, the government threw a curveball. An amendment reclassified online gaming, along with casinos and horse racing, as 'actionable claims"—a term in Indian law that refers to claims on debts or beneficial interests that can be enforced through legal action. This classification puts such games in the same tax category as lotteries and betting.
As a result, from 1 October 2023, a new rule kicked in: a flat 28% GST on the entire entry fee or deposit, not just on the platform's commission. However, the government maintains that this tax treatment should apply retrospectively—i.e., from 2017 onward—arguing that the platforms were always liable to pay GST on the full bet amount, not just their cut.
At the heart of the matter: should the government's 2023 decision to treat all real-money online games as gambling for GST purposes be applied retrospectively—triggering years of back taxes and penalties?
The stakes are colossal, with tax authorities demanding a staggering ₹1.12 trillion from online gaming platforms and casinos, alleging wrongful classification under GST law. These demands, previously put on hold by the court, are now front and centre of this month's final hearings.
Also read: Games24x7 lays off staff as Supreme Court hears 28% GST case
This move ignited a firestorm of over 50 legal challenges from gaming companies, vehemently arguing that only their service fee should be taxed. The Karnataka High Court had even quashed a ₹21,000 crore GST demand against Gameskraft, declaring online rummy a game of skill, not chance.
Now, this contentious ruling has been clubbed with 27 writ petitions transferred from various High Courts, along with related appeals by platforms like the E-Gaming Federation and Play Games24x7. All eyes are on the Supreme Court's final, potentially game-changing verdict—one that could define the future of India's online gaming industry.
Mint explains what's at stake for India's gaming industry.
What are gaming companies saying?
Online gaming companies have strongly opposed the government's move to apply a 28% GST retrospectively on player deposits, calling it disruptive and financially crippling.
While firms have accepted the higher tax rate on the full entry amount—such as deposits or entry fees—they insist it should apply only going forward, from the date the rule was officially enforced.
Their main contention lies with the retrospective application of the tax, which seeks to levy 28% GST on past transactions that occurred before the new rule or clarification was issued.
'The retrospective nature of this tax is a body blow to the industry. It not only disrupts ongoing operations but also renders many business models unviable," said an executive with an online gaming company, requesting anonymity.
'We are not contesting regulation or taxation per se — but applying a 28% GST on deposits retrospectively, in some cases going back several years, creates an impossible financial burden. Companies had operated under a different legal understanding for years, often backed by court rulings distinguishing games of skill from gambling. To now be asked to pay massive sums retrospectively — with interest and penalties — destabilises the entire ecosystem," the executive added.
According to Ranjeet Mahtani, partner at Dhruva Advisors — a tax advisory firm, companies have adjusted to the new tax regime post-October 2023, even though it has shifted the tax base from GGR to the entire bet amount.
'To maintain viability, gaming companies may increase charges, offer innovative schemes and, ultimately, this (tax) burden will be passed on to the consumer. That's how they're probably managing, to some extent, to balance things out and stay afloat," he said.
Also read: Online gaming: One nation, one law may blaze a way out of the maze
Smita Singh, partner at S&A Law Office, said the online gaming industry believes only the entry fee paid by players, and not prize money or discounts, should be taxed. She added that applying a higher taxable value from the start of GST is unreasonable and poses a serious threat to the sector's survival.
Moreover, industry stakeholders continue to argue that many of these games are skill-based—a classification upheld by the Supreme Court in previous rulings—and therefore should not be subjected to the same tax slab as games of chance.
What is the government's stance?
Representing the Centre, Additional Solicitor General N. Venkataraman stated that the GST is aimed at the 'speculative outcome' tied to these games, rather than the games themselves—positioning such activities within the scope of gambling.
During the May 5 hearing, he added that the distinction between games of skill and games of chance is immaterial when money is at stake.
Quoting past Supreme Court rulings, he emphasised that any game played for stakes qualified as gambling. The government maintains that gaming platforms were liable to pay 28% GST on the full entry amount right from the beginning, and not just on the commission or GGR they earned.
'Whether you call it a game of skill, a game of chance, or something in between—if money is involved and users are putting in stakes, it falls under taxable gaming activity. The GST Council has made it clear that the tax applies uniformly," said a Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) official, requesting anonymity.
Why it matters
This case has massive implications for the future of India's online gaming industry, which has seen explosive growth.
If the Supreme Court rules in favour of the government and maintains the 28% tax rate on the total bet amount, the industry will face a higher operational cost, which could affect smaller platforms more severely. However, the larger companies might be able to absorb the tax burden by passing it on to consumers.
Also read: Amid lack of regulation, online gaming in limbo, failing to attract investment
If imposed retrospectively, the 28% GST could saddle companies with massive back tax liabilities amounting to tens of thousands of crores. The long-standing legal ambiguity over whether games are based on skill or chance has also resulted in uneven taxation and regulation—something a definitive Supreme Court verdict could help resolve.
Among the companies in spotlight, Gameskraft is facing a ₹21,000 crore tax demand, while Paytm's First Games has been served a ₹5,712 crore notice.
In total, 71 firms across the industry are staring at retrospective GST demands exceeding ₹1.12 trillion, with penalties potentially pushing that figure beyond ₹2.3 trillion, according to media reports.
What's next?
Penalties from 2017 onward are expected to be pursued by the DGGI, but the penalties may be softened due to the legal ambiguity around the interpretation of the laws, including amendments, especially if the court rules on the basis of such legal complexities, rather than concludes that these cases involved fraudulent tax evasion, explained Mahtani.
In the interim, the stay on DGGI notices protects gaming firms from immediate action. Regardless of the outcome, the ruling will sculpt not just taxation but the broader legitimacy and growth prospects of India's gaming sector.
Also read: Don't believe doomsday predictions—PC gaming is alive and kicking

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India's hospitality sector expected to clock 8 pc growth in FY26: Report
India's hospitality sector expected to clock 8 pc growth in FY26: Report

Hans India

time24 minutes ago

  • Hans India

India's hospitality sector expected to clock 8 pc growth in FY26: Report

India's hospitality sector is expected to post a revenue growth of 6-8 per cent in FY2026 on the high base recorded after three years of double-digit revenue expansion seen by the industry over FY2023 to FY2025, according to an ICRA report released on Monday. ICRA estimates pan-India premium hotel occupancy to hold at 72-74 per cent in FY2026, slightly higher than the 70-72 per cent levels witnessed in FY2024 and FY2025. The average room rates (ARRs) for premium hotels are projected to rise to Rs 8,200-8,500 in FY2026, after a healthy Rs 8,000-8,200 in FY2025 amid lagging supply additions and several hotels undergoing renovation, refurbishment, and upgradation. Jitin Makkar, Senior Vice President ICRA Limited, said: "After three years of strong demand, driven by favourable domestic leisure travel, demand from meetings, incentives, conferences and exhibitions (MICE), including weddings, and business travel, the growth in the Indian hospitality sector is forecast to normalise at 6-8 per cent year-on-year in FY2026." "While the terror attacks in April 2025 and consequent heightened uncertainties in North and West India in May 2025 had led to a surge in cancellation of travel/MICE, the impact has been largely temporary and localised. In recent weeks, there has been a healthy recovery in sentiments following the abatement of the conflict," he added. Foreign tourist arrivals (FTAs) to India are expected to remain muted in the next few months in the aftermath of the terror attacks, but are estimated to witness a gradual recovery thereafter. However, domestic tourism has been the prime demand driver so far and is likely to remain so in the near term, the report states. Factors like improvement in infrastructure and air connectivity, favourable demographics, and anticipated growth in large-scale MICE events, with the opening of multiple new convention centres in the last few years, among others, shall support the growth over the medium term, according to the report. ICRA's sample set, comprising 13 large hotel companies, is likely to report range-bound operating margins of 34-36 per cent for FY2026, despite a lower revenue growth. The margins will remain supported by factors like cost rationalisation measures and asset-light expansions in recent periods. However, within the sample, it is likely to be a mixed bag, depending on renovations and an increase in employee expenses amidst growing demand. De-leveraging of balance sheets has led to lower interest costs and is likely to support net margins, as well as improvement in credit metrics, the report observes. 'The demand uptick over recent years led to an increase in supply announcements and resumption of deferred projects in the past 24-30 months. However, supply growth is expected to lag demand over the next 12-18 months." "ICRA's premium room inventory database (12 key cities) across the country indicates a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5-5 per cent in room inventory addition during FY2023-FY2026. A large part of the new supply is through management contracts and operating leases. Land availability issues currently constrain supply addition in the premium micro-markets in metros and larger cities. The addition to premium hotel supply in these areas is largely on account of rebranding or property degradation, and the greenfield projects are largely being initiated in the suburbs," Makkar added.

Collegium system imperfect but preserves ‘judiciary's autonomy', says Supreme Court judge
Collegium system imperfect but preserves ‘judiciary's autonomy', says Supreme Court judge

Scroll.in

time25 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Collegium system imperfect but preserves ‘judiciary's autonomy', says Supreme Court judge

The Supreme Court's Justice Surya Kant has said that the collegium system of appointing judges, despite its imperfections, serves as a 'crucial institutional safeguard' and preserves the judiciary's autonomy, The Indian Express reported on Sunday. Kant, who is slated to become the next chief justice of India, said that the collegium system 'significantly limits interference by the Executive and Legislature, thereby preserving the Judiciary's autonomy and insulating judges from extraneous pressures that could otherwise compromise their impartiality,' the newspaper reported. Under the collegium system, the five most senior judges of the Supreme Court, including the chief justice, decide on the appointments and transfers of judges to the top court and the High Courts. Speaking at Seattle University in the United States on June 4, Kant acknowledged that the system has faced criticism, especially on the lack of publicly articulated criteria for selecting judges. However, he said that 'recent efforts by the Supreme Court signal a growing commitment to enhancing transparency and public confidence in it'. In 2022, the Supreme Court Collegium had published detailed documentation of its deliberations on selecting five judges. Since October 2017, the Collegium has also been publishing its resolution on the court's official website. Kant also said that the 'the judiciary's evolving relationship with its own independence, lies at the very heart of how India's vast, pluralistic democracy continues to function with remarkable cohesion'. He also said that some phases of institutional strain 'particularly during the Emergency' eventually 'gave way to renewed judicial consciousness'. In recent years, the Bharatiya Janata Party government at the Centre has been selectively appointing judges recommended for elevation to the bench by the Supreme Court collegium, which has allowed the Union government to exercise a veto over judicial appointments. The executive and the judiciary have been in a tug-of-war regarding appointments to higher judiciary in recent years. Former Law Minister Kiren Rijiju and Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar have repeatedly criticised the collegium system of appointing judges, contending that it is opaque. In 2014, the BJP-led government had introduced the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act with the objective of making appointments to the Supreme Court and High Courts 'more broad-based, transparent, accountable and bringing objectivity in the system'. The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act had proposed to make judicial appointments through a body consisting of the chief justice, two senior Supreme Court judges, the Union law minister and two other eminent persons nominated by the chief justice, the prime minister and the Leader of the Opposition. In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down the Act, ruling that it was unconstitutional.

Goyal begins visit to Switzerland and Sweden to deepen trade ties, focus on India-EFTA pact
Goyal begins visit to Switzerland and Sweden to deepen trade ties, focus on India-EFTA pact

Mint

time27 minutes ago

  • Mint

Goyal begins visit to Switzerland and Sweden to deepen trade ties, focus on India-EFTA pact

New Delhi: Amid ongoing negotiations for the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) with the US, commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal on Monday began a five-day official visit to Switzerland and Sweden, aimed at strengthening India's economic and trade ties with key European partners. The visit, which runs from 9 to 13 June, is expected to advance negotiations on the India-EFTA trade agreement and explore new avenues for investment in sectors such as precision engineering, pharmaceuticals, and sustainable technologies, as per a commerce ministry statement. However, the official release does not mention the inclusion of a business delegation with the minister, despite an earlier announcement by Goyal during his address at the CII Business Summit in New Delhi on 29 May, where he had indicated that a delegation of Indian industry leaders would travel with him to explore partnership opportunities. In Switzerland, Goyal will hold sector-specific meetings with global CEOs and senior officials from industries including life sciences and high-tech manufacturing. He is also scheduled to meet federal councillor Guy Parmelin, Swiss companies, and Indian industry representatives to push forward discussions on the India-EFTA Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (Tepa), which is seen as a critical pillar of India's strategy to diversify trade partnerships and reduce reliance on traditional markets, the statement said. The minister's itinerary includes participation in the Swissmem Industry Day and a roundtable with the Swiss mechanical and electrical industries—sectors in which Switzerland has deep expertise and where India is seeking greater technology partnerships. The visit comes at a time when India is seeking to push forward stalled trade negotiations with several partners, including those under EFTA, amid a broader geopolitical push to deepen ties with Western democracies and reduce China-dependency in global supply chains. Switzerland, which has a major share of EFTA's total trade with India, is seen as a key player in finalising a balanced and forward-looking Tepa deal. After concluding engagements in Switzerland, Goyal will travel to Sweden, where he will co-chair the 21st session of the Indo-Swedish Joint Commission for Economic, Industrial and Scientific Cooperation (JCEISC) alongside Swedish minister for international development cooperation and foreign trade, Benjamin Dousa, the ministry said in the statement. The commission meeting will serve as a platform to review the current economic cooperation and identify new areas of collaboration, the ministry said. In Sweden, bilateral meetings are also lined up with Håkan Jevrell, state secretary to the minister of development cooperation and foreign trade, as well as CEOs of major Swedish firms, including Volvo Group, Ericsson, IKEA, Sandvik, Alfa Laval, and SAAB, the ministry said. Discussions are likely to focus on green technologies, advanced manufacturing, and innovation—areas where Sweden has global leadership and where India is aiming to accelerate its industrial transition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store