Zelenskyy, European leaders to hold Ukraine online summit before Trump-Putin meet
They are then expected to talk to Trump and Vice President JD Vance in a second round of the conference call.
The Trump-Putin meeting on Friday is so far planned to go ahead without Zelenskyy. This has fuelled fears Kyiv could be forced into painful concessions, including over land.
EU leaders stressed on Tuesday "the inherent right of Ukraine to choose its own destiny", adding that "international borders must not be changed by force".
Zelenskyy, speaking to reporters Tuesday, ruled out withdrawing troops from the Donbas region which Moscow claims.
Merz's office said the conference call would discuss "further options to exert pressure on Russia" and "preparation of possible peace negotiations and related issues of territorial claims and security".
The talks would include leaders from "Finland, France, the UK, Italy, Poland, Ukraine, the heads of the European Commission and Council, the secretary general of NATO, as well as the US president and his deputy", Berlin said on Monday.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and Merz are then also set to hold a round of talks of the so-called coalition of the willing of Ukraine's military backers.
'Difficult' battles
"This is really a feel-out meeting a little bit," Trump said at the White House, but he also added that eventually "there'll be some swapping, there'll be some changes in land".
Russia, as a prerequisite to a peace settlement, has demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of several regions claimed by Moscow, commit to being a neutral state, shun US and EU military support and be excluded from joining NATO.
Ukraine has said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.
Ukraine said Tuesday it was engaged in "difficult" battles with Russian forces after Moscow had made rapid advances in a narrow but important section of the front line in the country's east.
Zelenskyy said on social media that "we see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations."
Trump, Putin peace talks in Alaska spark EU fears of a 'one-sided' land swap
'The Russian position is framed as a territorial swap', says one official
(vib)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
The threat is coordinated, our response is not
Chris Kremidas-Courtney is a senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre, associate fellow at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, and author of 'The Rest of Your Life: Five Stories of Your Future.' Russia and China are actively engaging in a new kind of conflict, one that targets infrastructure, information, and influence rather than just territory. Yet most democracies remain caught in outdated frameworks, still approaching security through the Cold War lens of deterrence, and tidy distinctions between war and peace. This battle is for influence and control across every key domain: information, infrastructure, supply chains, cyberspace, and even the human mind. And right now, the West is losing not because our adversaries are stronger, but because we're uncoordinated, reactive, and politically fragile. While Russia's military is bogged down in Ukraine, Moscow has quietly expanded its use of cognitive warfare, now powered by AI and producing a flood of false content. By manipulating narratives, distorting facts, and fueling polarisation, Russia seeks to weaken Western resolve before a shot is even fired. China's strategy is more patient, but no less potent. Through its dominance of global supply chains, Beijing has gained immense economic leverage . Chinese actors have also been caught prepositioning inside Western power grids, probing vulnerabilities to exploit later. We're not only trading with China, we're also entrusting it with the keys to our critical infrastructure. Meanwhile, China and Russia are deepening their military-technical ties, including joint submarine development, heavy-lift helicopters, and the construction of a missile attack warning system. These developments show a deepening of China and Russia's defence and security partnership . Economic sanctions are increasingly ineffective, largely because democracies can't stomach the political costs. As one recent analysis put it, 'The West can't survive the sanctions it needs to deter China.' When gas prices spike or critical imports dry up, public support crumbles and so does our deterrence. China continues supplying Russia with dual-use items like semiconductors and ball bearings, helping Moscow replace components lost to sanctions. This exchange not only fuels Russia's war against Ukraine, it actively undermines the effectiveness of the West's economic levers of power . Beijing and Moscow are playing the long game. They're sanction-proofing their economies while weaponising our openness and indecision. They're also betting on us being too slow, divided, or distracted to respond. Unfortunately, they're often right. Take the current situation in Libya. Italy and Greece have been sounding the alarm about Turkey and Russian-backed destabilisation in North Africa, along with weaponised migration flows and Russian navy repositioning in the Mediterranean. Yet their calls for help have been ignored by their allies. In Europe, we tend to think of Poland and the Baltic regions as frontline states. But Italy, Greece, and others on NATO's southern flank are also frontline states of hybrid warfare, weaponised migration, and maritime competition. When the security concerns of frontline states are not taken seriously, everyone becomes more vulnerable. We can also look at the EU's China strategy. While Brussels may have labelled Beijing a 'systemic rival,' most member states still treat China's expertise as an afterthought. Unlike the US, which created a 'China House' for cross-agency coordination, Europe has no comparable structure – leaving it flat-footed when decisions need to be made fast. By contrast, China and Russia conduct annual strategic security consultations and coordinate via institutionalised five-year military cooperation plans. Though not a formal alliance, their sustained coordination outpaces the ad hoc responses of Western democracies . What should we do? First, we need to stop pretending these are disconnected problems. They are expressions of the same campaign to reshape the global order in favour of authoritarian power. Europe and its allies must build permanent strategic capacities to respond and shape outcomes before crises escalate. Second, we must strengthen our 'asymmetric resilience'. That means diversifying supply chains, investing in local production, and scrubbing our infrastructure for vulnerabilities. Finally, we must prepare for hybrid threats the way we once prepared for nuclear ones: with scenario planning, joint exercises, and rapid-response mechanisms that include both civil and military sectors. From power grids to migration routes, the frontline of conflict has changed. Our defence posture must change with it. There is good news: When democracies act together, they are formidable. We've outmatched authoritarian powers before and not through force alone. We did so by staying flexible, principled, and united. But coordination begins with clarity. We must recognise that these are not isolated incidents but interconnected elements of a deliberate strategy to reshape the global balance of power. Effective response requires more than awareness. It demands institutional reform, strategic foresight, and the political will to act before the next crisis breaks.
Euractiv
11 hours ago
- Euractiv
OpenAI wants US-wide AI rules with an eye on Europe's rulebook
The company says it wants federal AI rules to avoid 'a patchwork of state rules' Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maximilian Henning Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 15:00 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. OpenAI is urging California, a trendsetter in US regulation, to align its AI rules with existing national or international frameworks, including the EU's, to avoid conflicting regulations across the country. The EU passed its AI Act last year and introduced a voluntary Code of Practice for providers of large AI models, a non-binding framework signed by almost all major US and European companies, including OpenAI. In a letter to California Governor Gavin Newsom, OpenAI said the state should treat AI companies as compliant with its own rules if they have signed up to the EU's code, or if they work with the US's federal AI Centre. In the letter, OpenAI's chief lobbyist Christopher Lehane recommended policies 'that avoid duplication and inconsistencies' with those of similar democratic regimes. In a blog post accompanying the letter, the company warned the US must choose between setting clear national standards for AI and 'a patchwork of state rules', adding: 'Imagine how hard it would have been to win the Space Race if California's aerospace and tech industries had been tangled in state-by-state regulations'. At a US Senate hearing in May, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said having 50 different regulatory regimes would be 'quite bad' and warned that adopting the EU's approach to AI regulation would be 'disastrous', instead calling for a 'light touch' federal approach. California, the most populous and wealthiest US state, often seeks to set an example for others through its regulation. But tensions over AI rules between Washington and state capitals have been brewing for some time. At the start of July, the US Senate scrapped a decade-long ban on state-level AI laws from President Donald Trump's broad budget bill. Weeks later, the Trump administration published an AI Action Plan seeking to block federal funding for AI in states with 'burdensome AI regulations'. (de)
Euractiv
12 hours ago
- Euractiv
Ukraine willing to discuss territorial issues with Russia, German chancellor says
BERLIN – Kyiv is willing to discuss territorial issues with Russia, amid new 'hope for movement" towards peace in Ukraine, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Wednesday. The comments came after a digital summit of European leaders with Donald Trump, during which they discussed the US president's controversial meeting with Vladimir Putin on Russia's war in Ukraine, set to take place in Alaska on Friday. Merz said that Europeans used the call with Trump on Wednesday to underline that "fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests must be maintained in Alaska.' 'There is hope for movement. There is hope for peace in Ukraine,' Merz said during a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin. Merz outlined the joint European position on the talks, consisting of five points, including – notably – that Kyiv 'is prepared to negotiate on territorial issues." A legal recognition of Russian occupations was "not up for discussion,' he added, however. 'The principle that border must not be changed by force must be upheld," he stressed. The American president had raised eyebrows in Europe when he suggested that Moscow and Kyiv could discuss swapping Ukrainian-held territory against Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine, sparking fears that America and Russia could try and engineer a ceasefire deal in Ukraine's absence. Trump later said, however, that it was not up to him to make a deal and that he would try to get territory back for Ukraine. Zelenskyy previously said that he was not prepared to concede territory to Russia. In Berlin, he stressed that his overall position 'hasn't changed' and that any deal would need to be compliant with Ukraine's constitution. Aligned 'to very large extent' Other joint priorities listed by Merz included that Ukraine would need a seat at the table in future peace negotiations, that a ceasefire would need to precede peace talks, and that 'solid' security guarantees would need to be negotiated. Merz also called for a joint transatlantic approach, that would entail jointly "increasing the pressure... if there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska." Trump shared this position "to a very large extent,' Merz said. Other European leaders shared the optimistic outlook after the call, that included the heads of state and government of Finland, France, Britain, Italy, Poland, as well as the presidents of the European Commission and European Council, and NATO chief Mark Rutte. French President Emmanuel Macron noted that Trump had agreed during the call that Ukraine must be involved in territorial talks in any ceasefire deal with Russia. Meanwhile, Rutte wrote on X that European and America were 'united in pushing to end to this terrible war." 'The ball is now in Putin's court,' he added. *Magnus Lund Nielsen contributed reporting. (mm)
